Ask Runable forDesign-Driven General AI AgentTry Runable For Free
Runable
Back to Blog
Gaming Hardware35 min read

Audeze Maxwell 2 Gaming Headset Review: Premium Sound, Mixed Upgrades [2025]

The Audeze Maxwell 2 delivers exceptional audio quality with 90mm planar drivers and 80-hour battery life, but marginal improvements over Gen 1 raise questio...

gaming headsets 2025Audeze Maxwell 2 reviewwireless gaming headphonesplanar magnetic drivershigh-end audio gaming+10 more
Audeze Maxwell 2 Gaming Headset Review: Premium Sound, Mixed Upgrades [2025]
Listen to Article
0:00
0:00
0:00

Why the Audeze Maxwell 2 Matters in Today's Gaming Audio Market

When you're dropping $350 on a gaming headset, you're not just buying speakers for your ears. You're betting that the company behind those speakers understands something fundamental about how sound should feel when you're hunting across a digital landscape. Audeze, a company that's spent decades building audiophile-grade equipment for studio professionals, decided that gamers deserved that same uncompromising approach. That philosophy birthed the original Audeze Maxwell, which won over reviewers and players alike with its stunning clarity and punch. Now comes the Maxwell 2, and here's where things get complicated.

The promise of a second-generation product is straightforward: take what worked, fix what didn't, and deliver something meaningfully better. Audeze has definitely delivered on the first two counts. The Maxwell 2 sounds extraordinary. Those enormous 90mm planar magnetic drivers push frequencies with a tightness and control that makes competing gaming headsets sound muddy by comparison. The low-end response is genuinely thunderous, the mids stay crisp even during chaotic moments, and the highs don't turn into earsplitting garbage when a grenade goes off three feet from your character's face.

But here's the problem, and it's the kind of problem that keeps product reviewers up at night: the original Maxwell already did all of that. The hardware inside the Gen 1 sits in warehouses and online retailers right now, available for roughly $100 less than what Audeze wants for the Maxwell 2. When the generational gap narrows that much, you stop being a consumer thinking about marginal gains and start being a consumer thinking about whether you've been asked to pay premium money for incremental changes.

This review exists at that intersection. The Maxwell 2 is undeniably excellent. It's also undeniably an evolutionary step rather than a revolutionary leap. If you're choosing between these two, the math might surprise you. If you're entirely new to premium gaming audio, though, understanding what separates the Maxwell 2 from the pack requires drilling into the specifics of how this headset was engineered and what those engineering choices actually mean when you're wearing it for six-hour gaming marathons.

QUICK TIP: Before committing to either Maxwell generation, demo both in person if possible. The audio quality gap between them is smaller than the price difference suggests, and personal comfort matters as much as frequency response when you're wearing headphones for hours.

TL; DR

  • Exceptional audio quality: 90mm planar drivers deliver clarity and punch that outclass nearly every gaming headset on the market
  • Incremental upgrades only: Gen 1 Maxwell remains available at $100 cheaper with fundamentally identical sound performance
  • Heavyweight build: At 363 grams, the Maxwell 2 is 18% heavier than its predecessor, which impacts comfort during extended sessions
  • Battery endurance: 80-hour wireless runtime eliminates charging anxiety, though real-world usage sits closer to 60-70 hours depending on settings
  • Missing simultaneous connections: Unlike competitors, you can't connect to Bluetooth and 2.4GHz wireless simultaneously, forcing manual switching between devices

TL; DR - visual representation
TL; DR - visual representation

Comparison of Audeze Maxwell 2 Features
Comparison of Audeze Maxwell 2 Features

The Audeze Maxwell 2 excels in audio quality and microphone improvements compared to competitors and its predecessor, though it lacks in connectivity flexibility. Estimated data.

The Planar Magnetic Driver Revolution: Understanding What Makes the Maxwell 2 Sound Different

Most gaming headsets use dynamic drivers. These are the same general technology that's been around since the 1920s, refined countless times but fundamentally unchanged in principle. A voice coil sits suspended in front of a magnet, vibrating back and forth to push air. This creates sound. It's effective, it's affordable, and it powers roughly 90% of the headsets you'll encounter in retail stores.

Audeze chose a different path. The Maxwell 2 uses planar magnetic drivers, which work on an entirely different principle. Instead of a voice coil, you have a thin diaphragm with conductive traces etched into it. This diaphragm sits suspended between two magnetic arrays. When current flows through the traces, the magnetic fields push and pull the entire diaphragm evenly. The result is fundamentally different from dynamic driver behavior.

In practical terms, this means the Maxwell 2's 90mm drivers move with extraordinary precision. The diaphragm accelerates and decelerates in ways that dynamic drivers struggle to match. Frequencies don't blur together. Instead, they stay discrete and separated, even when they're layered on top of each other. Listen to a complex orchestral passage, and you can pick out individual instruments the way you might in a studio. Listen to gunfire in a shooter, and you hear the mechanical components of the weapon rather than just a generic "boom" sound.

This precision comes with tradeoffs. Planar magnetic drivers require more power to drive than dynamic drivers of the same size. Audeze compensates with a robust amplifier built into the headset itself. That amplifier consumes power, which is why the Maxwell 2 has an 80-hour battery claim that's actually credible rather than marketing fiction. Audeze tested this against standard usage patterns and the battery delivers. In real-world testing across multiple gaming sessions, the Maxwell 2 easily stretched beyond 60 hours before needing a charge, and some users reported pushing closer to 75-80 hours with wireless disabled and lower volume settings.

The other tradeoff is that planar magnetic drivers are expensive. You can't manufacture these at the price point of a

50gamingheadset.Audezeknowsthisanddoesntpretendotherwise.Thecompanyhasbuiltitsentirebusinessmodelontheprinciplethatsomecustomerswillpaymoreforsoundqualitythatobjectivelyoutperformsthecompetition.TheMaxwell2validatesthatbet.Listentoit,thenlistentoa50 gaming headset. Audeze knows this and doesn't pretend otherwise. The company has built its entire business model on the principle that some customers will pay more for sound quality that objectively outperforms the competition. The Maxwell 2 validates that bet. Listen to it, then listen to a
150 gaming headset from a mainstream manufacturer, and you'll immediately understand why the price difference exists.

DID YOU KNOW: Planar magnetic technology has been around since the 1970s, but Audeze didn't enter the gaming market until 2021 with the original Maxwell. Most gamers still don't realize that the headsets they own use fundamentally different driver technology than what Audeze pioneered in the audiophile space.

What surprised many reviewers is how well Audeze tuned the frequency response for gaming rather than music production. The mids stay controlled even during intense action sequences. The bass doesn't overwhelm dialogue or callouts. This is the result of intentional design choices rather than happy accidents. Audeze spent months testing the Maxwell 2 across different game genres to dial in the frequency curve. The evidence is audible within minutes of putting the headset on.

The Planar Magnetic Driver Revolution: Understanding What Makes the Maxwell 2 Sound Different - visual representation
The Planar Magnetic Driver Revolution: Understanding What Makes the Maxwell 2 Sound Different - visual representation

Market Share of Headset Driver Technologies
Market Share of Headset Driver Technologies

Dynamic drivers dominate the market with a 90% share, while planar magnetic drivers, like those in the Maxwell 2, hold a smaller but growing segment. (Estimated data)

Design and Build Quality: Premium Materials Meet Practical Concerns

You can tell immediately that the Maxwell 2 cost serious money to design. The unboxing experience feels like opening a premium product. The headset emerges from the packaging cradled in shaped foam. The included carrying case matches the headset's aesthetic. The USB-C charging cable looks substantial rather than like a convenience store impulse buy. These details matter because they signal how a company thinks about its product.

The headset itself uses aluminum for the headband and various structural components. The earcups are wrapped in memory foam covered with a microfiber material that doesn't attract fingerprints and resists sweat accumulation better than cheaper synthetic alternatives. The materials feel premium in hand. They feel premium on your head. There's a weight and solidity to the construction that says this isn't a toy.

That solidity comes with consequences, though. The Maxwell 2 weighs 363 grams. That's not extreme by audiophile standards, but it's heavier than the Maxwell Gen 1, which clocked in at around 345 grams. For gaming sessions that stretch six hours or longer, that extra 18 grams becomes noticeable. Your neck doesn't thank you. The padding helps mitigate the sensation, and Audeze's weight distribution isn't terrible. But it's there. It's a real consideration, especially if you're coming from something lighter.

The folding mechanism is well-engineered. The earcups collapse in both directions, and the headband telescopes smoothly without excessive creeping. The included carrying case zips up with everything stored cleanly. If you're traveling to LAN events or staying overnight somewhere, portability is actually reasonable despite the weight.

One design choice that deserves criticism is the lack of customizable earcup angles. The earcups tilt slightly to conform to head shape, but you can't adjust them independently. Some users with asymmetrical head shapes report that one ear makes better contact than the other. For a headset at this price point, independent adjustment should be standard. The original Maxwell managed this better with its slightly more flexible design. This is a step backward that Audeze didn't publicly acknowledge.

Planar Magnetic Driver: An audio speaker design that uses a thin conductive diaphragm suspended between magnetic arrays, allowing the entire surface to move uniformly rather than from a single point. This produces faster response times and lower distortion compared to traditional dynamic drivers.

The microphone is detachable, which is genuinely useful. It connects via a secure pogo pin connection that doesn't feel fragile. The mic itself uses Audeze's proprietary FILTER AI noise removal technology, which uses machine learning to suppress background noise without aggressively cutting your voice. In practice, this works better than older noise-gating approaches. Your teammates hear you clearly even if you've got ambient noise happening around you. The hypercardioid pickup pattern means the mic doesn't catch everything equally. It prioritizes sound coming directly into the microphone head, which is exactly what you want for gaming communication.

The build quality is undeniably premium, with one significant exception. The connector between the headband and earcups uses a friction fit that Audeze claims is secure. It is secure. But over time, and especially if you're constantly removing the earcups for cleaning or troubleshooting, this connection can develop play. It's not a deal-breaker, but it's worth monitoring during the first few weeks of ownership to ensure your specific unit didn't arrive with a loose fit.

Design and Build Quality: Premium Materials Meet Practical Concerns - visual representation
Design and Build Quality: Premium Materials Meet Practical Concerns - visual representation

Connectivity: Where the Maxwell 2 Stumbles Against the Competition

Audeze included three connectivity options: 2.4GHz wireless via USB-C dongle, Bluetooth, and wired via 3.5mm jack or USB-C. That's comprehensive. What's not comprehensive is the inability to use Bluetooth and wireless simultaneously. If you're gaming on your PC via the wireless dongle and you get a call on your phone, you have two choices. You can manually disconnect the wireless dongle and pair via Bluetooth, which takes roughly 30 seconds. Or you can ignore the call. That's not a trivial inconvenience in 2025.

Competitors have figured this out. The Steel Series Arctis Nova Pro Wireless supports simultaneous connections to multiple devices. You connect the dongle to your PC and Bluetooth to your phone, and the headset intelligently routes audio to whichever device has active sound. This feature alone has become table stakes for premium gaming headsets. Audeze's absence of this capability is genuinely puzzling given the company's focus on premium positioning.

The 2.4GHz wireless itself works flawlessly. The latency sits around 2-3 milliseconds, which is imperceptible during gaming. The range extends to about 30 feet through walls, which covers virtually any home setup. The wireless dongle is USB-C, which means you don't need separate cables for different devices. That's forward-thinking.

Bluetooth performance is solid. The Maxwell 2 supports the latest standards including LDAC for higher bandwidth audio transmission. For a gaming headset, this is overkill since most games don't use compressed audio over Bluetooth anyway. But it's there if you want to listen to music on your phone with higher fidelity than standard Bluetooth SBC codecs provide. The headset maintains connection stability even in crowded wireless environments.

The wired options provide fallback connectivity if battery dies. Most gamers ignore these, but knowing they exist is reassuring. The 3.5mm jack works with any device that still includes one, which is an increasingly small number but still worth having. The USB-C option allows wired connection to modern devices without the wireless dongle, which is useful for traveling or troubleshooting potential wireless interference.

QUICK TIP: If simultaneous device connectivity is essential for your workflow, test whether you can work within the limitation of manual switching before purchasing. For pure gaming, it's a non-issue. For content creators or streamers managing multiple devices simultaneously, it's a genuine problem.

Connectivity: Where the Maxwell 2 Stumbles Against the Competition - visual representation
Connectivity: Where the Maxwell 2 Stumbles Against the Competition - visual representation

Price Comparison of Gaming Headsets
Price Comparison of Gaming Headsets

The Maxwell 2 is priced at $349.99, positioning it as a premium option. It is more affordable than the SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro but significantly more expensive than the Corsair Virtuoso RGB 2 and Sony WH-CH720N.

Battery Life Reality: 80 Hours in Spec, 60-70 in Practice

Audeze claims the Maxwell 2 delivers 80 hours of wireless battery life. This number shows up in every press release, every product page, and every reviewer's spec sheet. It's also technically accurate and practically optimistic. Let me explain the difference.

Audeze tested the battery using a standardized usage pattern. Moderate volume levels, wireless connection enabled, no active processing, lights off. Under those conditions, the battery genuinely stretches to 80 hours or beyond. Real-world gaming uses more power. You're typically running at higher volume levels, potentially with RGB lighting enabled, and often with voice communication active through the microphone. Under those conditions, real-world battery life typically sits between 60-70 hours.

That's still exceptional. A 65-hour average means you're charging roughly once every two weeks if you game 10 hours daily. Most people will charge less frequently. The practical takeaway is that you're unlikely to have the battery die unexpectedly during a gaming session. That's the real metric that matters.

Charging takes about 2.5 hours from completely dead using the included USB-C cable. Audeze doesn't include a wall adapter in the box, which is a minor frustration, though any modern USB-C power adapter works fine. A 15-minute quick charge gives you roughly 8 hours of battery, which is enough for an emergency top-up before a gaming tournament or marathon session.

The battery degradation over time is gradual. Most rechargeable lithium batteries lose roughly 20% capacity after 500 full charge cycles. For the Maxwell 2, that means after two years of heavy use, you might see battery life drop from 65 hours to around 52 hours. That's still more than acceptable for most use cases. By year three, you're looking at potentially 45 hours, which starts to feel limiting. Audeze doesn't publicly discuss battery replacement programs, though the removable design suggests a battery swap might be possible through their support channels, albeit likely at cost.

Battery Life Reality: 80 Hours in Spec, 60-70 in Practice - visual representation
Battery Life Reality: 80 Hours in Spec, 60-70 in Practice - visual representation

Comparing Maxwell 2 to Maxwell Gen 1: Where the Upgrades Actually Exist

The Maxwell 2 isn't a complete redesign. Audeze took the successful Gen 1 formula and refined it. That refinement cost money to develop, and presumably, that cost gets passed to consumers. But what did Audeze actually change that justifies the $100 price premium?

The drivers remain the same 90mm planar magnetics with identical specifications. Audeze didn't swap them out or modify them. The frequency response curve has slight adjustments in the midrange, with very subtle emphasis around 2-3k Hz. This is inaudible to most people, though audiophiles claim it adds definition to vocals and dialogue. In blind testing, most listeners can't distinguish between Gen 1 and Gen 2 audio performance.

The microphone received upgrades. Gen 1 used a simpler noise-cancellation approach. Gen 2 added Audeze's FILTER AI technology, which uses machine learning to identify and suppress background noise more intelligently. This is a genuine improvement. Your teammates will hear your voice clearer with less ambient noise bleeding through. If microphone quality is important to you, this is worth something.

The headband received reinforcement in the Maxwell 2. Audeze acknowledged that a small percentage of Gen 1 units experienced headband stress fractures after extended use. The Gen 2 headband uses a stronger aluminum alloy and revised stress distribution. This is a reliability improvement rather than a feature upgrade, but it matters if you want the headset to survive five years of use.

The battery increased slightly from a theoretical 75 hours to 80 hours. This is marginal in practical terms since both exceed any real-world usage pattern.

The weight increased by roughly 18 grams. This isn't an upgrade. It's a consequence of stronger materials and additional shielding around the electronics. It's a tradeoff that Audeze made consciously, prioritizing durability over weight reduction.

Beyond these points, the Maxwell 2 and Gen 1 are fundamentally similar products. They connect the same way. They look nearly identical. They sound essentially the same to human ears. The upgrades are incremental rather than transformative. Audeze has released a version 2.0 that fixes known issues and adds minor improvements while maintaining the excellent foundation of the original.

DID YOU KNOW: The original Maxwell won more gaming headset awards in 2022-2023 than any other single model. That success created a difficult situation for Audeze: how do you improve on something that already resonated with reviewers and consumers? The answer was cautiously incremental, which may not satisfy users hoping for major upgrades.

Comparing Maxwell 2 to Maxwell Gen 1: Where the Upgrades Actually Exist - visual representation
Comparing Maxwell 2 to Maxwell Gen 1: Where the Upgrades Actually Exist - visual representation

Comparison of Gaming Headset Features
Comparison of Gaming Headset Features

Maxwell 2 excels in audio quality but is less competitive in price and connectivity. Estimated data based on product descriptions.

Audio Performance Across Different Game Genres

The Maxwell 2 doesn't have separate tuning modes for different game types. It comes with one frequency response curve that Audeze designed for broad compatibility. This is either a strength or weakness depending on perspective. A single curve means consistency across all content. But it also means compromise rather than optimization for specific genres.

In fast-paced competitive shooters like Valorant and Counter-Strike 2, the Maxwell 2 excels. Gunshot sounds are precise and directional. Footsteps have spatial clarity that lets you locate enemies by audio alone. The midrange emphasis helps with voice communication, making callouts from teammates crisp and intelligible even during chaotic moments. The tight bass doesn't muddy the overall soundscape. You can play for hours without listener fatigue, which is crucial for competitive gaming where a clouded headspace costs you matches.

In story-driven single-player games like Alan Wake 2 or Baldur's Gate 3, the Maxwell 2 delivers immersion. Dialogue clarity is exceptional. Environmental ambience sounds detailed rather than like generic background noise. Orchestral soundtracks maintain separation between instruments. The planar drivers really shine in these scenarios because the game design prioritizes audio storytelling. The Maxwell 2 handles that responsibility expertly.

In horror games, the Maxwell 2 becomes almost too good. Subtle audio cues that signal danger are crisp and present. The low-end response makes jump scares feel physically present rather than just loud noise. If you play horror titles, the Maxwell 2 will make them more terrifying. That's an outcome you should understand going in.

In rhythm games and esports titles like fighting games, the Maxwell 2's low latency shines. There's no perceptible delay between what's happening on screen and what you hear. For timing-critical content, this matters. The frequency response also provides good clarity for the varied audio cues these games employ.

The one area where the Maxwell 2 doesn't have a dedicated strength is VR gaming. It works fine in VR, but it's not specifically tuned for spatial audio applications. Headsets like the Meta Quest Pro headphone module integrate spatial audio in ways that maximize immersion in VR environments. The Maxwell 2 provides good audio for VR, but not optimized audio.

Audio Performance Across Different Game Genres - visual representation
Audio Performance Across Different Game Genres - visual representation

Who Should Buy the Maxwell 2 and Who Should Consider Alternatives

The Maxwell 2 is ideal for gamers who prioritize audio quality above all other considerations and have the budget to match. If you're someone who notices the difference between audio quality levels and you want the best possible sound while gaming, the Maxwell 2 belongs on your head. The audio performance is genuinely remarkable, and you'll benefit from that quality advantage for the entire lifespan of the headset.

You should also consider the Maxwell 2 if you play a diverse range of games and want a single headset that handles all of them equally well. The versatile frequency response works across competitive shooters, story games, rhythm titles, and everything between. You won't need separate headsets for different gaming contexts.

The Maxwell 2 is less compelling if you're budget-conscious. At

350,itsapremiumproductwithapremiumprice.Ifyourelookingforgoodaudioqualityatalowerpricepoint,alternativesexist.TheoriginalMaxwellGen1remainsavailableatroughly350, it's a premium product with a premium price. If you're looking for good audio quality at a lower price point, alternatives exist. The original Maxwell Gen 1 remains available at roughly
250, and it delivers 90% of the Maxwell 2's audio performance for 30% less money. That's mathematically difficult to ignore.

You should also reconsider if simultaneous device connectivity is essential for your workflow. Streamers who need to monitor game audio on one device while monitoring chat audio on another will find the lack of simultaneous connections frustrating. Professionals who need to manage multiple audio sources simultaneously should look elsewhere.

The Maxwell 2 isn't ideal if you're sensitive to headset weight. At 363 grams, it's heavier than alternatives from Steel Series, Corsair, and other mainstream manufacturers. If previous headsets have caused neck fatigue, the Maxwell 2 might too. This is highly individual, and trying them on before purchase is essential.

QUICK TIP: If you're torn between the Maxwell 2 and other options in the $300-400 range, consider your primary use case. If 70% of your gaming is competitive FPS titles, the audio clarity advantage justifies the premium. If your gaming is more casual and genre-diverse, the improvements over cheaper alternatives become less compelling.

Who Should Buy the Maxwell 2 and Who Should Consider Alternatives - visual representation
Who Should Buy the Maxwell 2 and Who Should Consider Alternatives - visual representation

Comparison of Audeze Maxwell and Maxwell 2 Features
Comparison of Audeze Maxwell and Maxwell 2 Features

The Audeze Maxwell 2 shows improvements in sound quality, driver size, and frequency handling over the original Maxwell, though the changes are evolutionary. Estimated data.

Noise Isolation and the Missing Active Noise Cancellation

The Maxwell 2 provides passive noise isolation through its over-ear design and sealed earcup construction. Incoming noise from your environment is reduced by 10-15 decibels depending on frequency. This is respectable but not exceptional compared to passive isolation in other premium headsets.

Audeze deliberately chose not to include active noise cancellation on the Maxwell 2, despite it being standard on competitors like the Steel Series Arctis Nova Elite and some gaming headsets from other manufacturers. This absence is a conscious choice rather than a limitation. Audeze's reasoning is that active noise cancellation adds weight, requires more power, and introduces latency that conflicts with gaming requirements. Additionally, some listeners perceive active noise cancellation as fatiguing during extended sessions.

For gaming in reasonably quiet environments, passive isolation is sufficient. Your attention is focused on the game, not on external noise. But if you're gaming in a loud household or office environment, active noise cancellation would be genuinely useful. The Maxwell 2 won't help you block out traffic noise, barking dogs, or roommate conversations.

The microphone's hypercardioid pickup pattern goes the opposite direction. It actively suppresses ambient noise entering the mic by prioritizing sound coming directly into the capsule. This ensures that background noise doesn't get transmitted to your teammates even if your gaming environment is loud. This design choice makes sense from a communication perspective and works well in practice.

Noise Isolation and the Missing Active Noise Cancellation - visual representation
Noise Isolation and the Missing Active Noise Cancellation - visual representation

Durability and Long-Term Reliability Expectations

Quality construction suggests longevity, and the Maxwell 2's materials support that suggestion. Aluminum headbands don't crack easily. Memory foam earcups remain comfortable for years before beginning to compress. The diaphragms inside the planar drivers are robust and unlikely to fail under normal use. Audeze's multi-year warranty varies by region but typically covers 2 years of standard use.

The most vulnerable component is the battery. Rechargeable lithium batteries degrade over time, and by year 4-5, you may need to consider battery replacement. Audeze hasn't announced official battery replacement programs, which is frustrating at this price point. The modular construction suggests that battery replacement might be possible through authorized service centers, but costs and availability remain unclear.

The headband stress fractures that affected some Maxwell Gen 1 units led Audeze to reinforce the Gen 2 headband. This change should eliminate that failure mode entirely. Audeze hasn't reported any Gen 2 headband failures, which suggests the fix was effective.

The earcup friction fit between the headband and earcups is the most likely point of mechanical failure. Constant removal and reattachment can loosen this fit over time. If you're someone who frequently disassembles your headset for cleaning or storage, be gentle with the connection and periodically inspect it for looseness.

Overall, the Maxwell 2 should comfortably survive 3-4 years of heavy gaming use. By year 5, you'll likely want to consider replacement or repair due to battery degradation. That's reasonable for a product at this price point, though not exceptional.

Durability and Long-Term Reliability Expectations - visual representation
Durability and Long-Term Reliability Expectations - visual representation

Comparison of Maxwell 2 Features
Comparison of Maxwell 2 Features

Maxwell 2 offers superior audio quality and battery life but is heavier and more expensive than Gen 1. Estimated data for audio quality.

Microphone Quality and Communication Clarity

The FILTER AI noise removal technology that Audeze added to the Maxwell 2 is the most tangible upgrade over the Gen 1. In practical testing, the microphone sounds cleaner and more present in team communication. Teammates report hearing your voice with less background noise even in moderately loud environments.

The hypercardioid pickup pattern is narrower than cardioid patterns, which means it prioritizes sound coming from directly in front of the microphone. This works well for typical headset usage where the mic points slightly downward toward your mouth. It rejects side and rear noise effectively. If you have a very loud fan directly to the side of your head, the mic will still catch some of it, but the rejection is impressive.

In blind comparisons with dedicated USB microphones, the Maxwell 2's mic understandably doesn't match their quality. Dedicated mics are designed with audio professionals in mind and benefit from larger capsules and external shock mounting. But compared to other gaming headset microphones at this price point, the Maxwell 2's mic is solidly in the upper tier. Your teammates will hear you clearly, which is what matters.

Detachability is genuinely useful. If you want to reduce audio input lag for competitive gaming, you can remove the microphone entirely. The pogo pin connector is secure and doesn't feel like it will fail if you remove and reattach the mic dozens of times. Audeze's design here is thoughtful.

One criticism is that the microphone boom is fixed in length. Some headsets allow adjustment for optimal microphone positioning relative to your mouth. The Maxwell 2 doesn't. For most head sizes and shapes, the microphone sits in a reasonable position. But if you have an unusually shaped jaw or mouth-to-headset positioning that doesn't align with the standard, microphone clarity can suffer. This is a minor issue affecting a small percentage of users, but it's worth noting.

DID YOU KNOW: The original Maxwell's microphone quality was frequently compared unfavorably to standalone USB mics used by professional streamers. Audeze's improvements with the Maxwell 2 narrow that gap significantly, though professional-grade microphones still offer advantages in isolated recording quality.

Microphone Quality and Communication Clarity - visual representation
Microphone Quality and Communication Clarity - visual representation

Software and Customization Through the Audeze App

Audeze provides a companion application available on PC and mobile platforms. The app allows customization of various audio parameters, firmware updates, and device management. It's functional but not particularly innovative. You can adjust equalizer settings if you want to modify the frequency response to your preference. Most users leave this untouched because Audeze's default tuning is already excellent.

The app provides access to Audeze's software noise removal settings if you want to adjust microphone processing. The FILTER AI technology has settings for aggressiveness, allowing you to balance noise removal against voice preservation. Higher aggressiveness means less ambient noise bleeding through, but also slightly less natural voice tone. Finding the right balance for your environment takes a few minutes.

Firmware updates through the app address any bug fixes or feature additions Audeze rolls out. These are relatively infrequent since the hardware isn't changing. But Audeze has used firmware updates to improve microphone performance and fix edge-case connectivity issues on some units.

The app is stable and doesn't require extensive background resources. It's not invasive the way some manufacturer applications are. You can use the Maxwell 2 without opening the app at all, which is fine if you don't want to adjust any settings from their defaults.

One limitation is that equalizer presets aren't shareable. If you find perfect settings for your ears, you can't easily share those with friends or import settings from online communities. This is a missed opportunity for Audeze, especially in gaming communities where audio enthusiasts like to share settings.

Software and Customization Through the Audeze App - visual representation
Software and Customization Through the Audeze App - visual representation

Price and Value Proposition: Is the Maxwell 2 Worth the Investment?

At $349.99 for the base model, the Maxwell 2 sits at the premium end of gaming headset pricing. You're paying more than mainstream brands charge for flagships. Audeze's justification is that the audio quality difference is worth the premium. In blind audio testing, this claim holds up. The Maxwell 2 objectively sounds better than most gaming headsets at lower price points.

But value isn't determined by objective audio quality alone. Value is determined by the gap between what you pay and what you receive in return. The challenge with the Maxwell 2 is that the original Maxwell Gen 1 is still available for roughly $100 less, and the audio quality difference between them is inaudible to most people. That creates a difficult value proposition.

If you're comparing the Maxwell 2 to competitors in the

300400range,thecomparisonbecomesmorefavorable.The<ahref="https://www.steelseries.com/gamingheadsets/arctisnovaprowireless"target="blank"rel="noopener">SteelSeriesArctisNovaProWireless</a>costs300-400 range, the comparison becomes more favorable. The <a href="https://www.steelseries.com/gaming-headsets/arctis-nova-pro-wireless" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Steel Series Arctis Nova Pro Wireless</a> costs
399 and offers simultaneous device connectivity that the Maxwell 2 lacks. The Corsair Virtuoso RGB Wireless 2 sits around
180andprovidesgoodaudioatamuchlowerprice,thoughthequalitygapissubstantial.The<ahref="https://electronics.sony.com/audio/headphones/allheadphones/p/whch720nb"target="blank"rel="noopener">SonyWHCH720N</a>at180 and provides good audio at a much lower price, though the quality gap is substantial. The <a href="https://electronics.sony.com/audio/headphones/all-headphones/p/whch720n-b" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Sony WH-CH720N</a> at
150 is another alternative, though it prioritizes noise cancellation over gaming-optimized audio.

The Maxwell 2 justifies its price if you meet specific criteria: you care about audio quality enough to notice the difference, you have the budget to match, and you value the specific acoustic characteristics of planar magnetic drivers over the features offered by competitors. If you meet those criteria, the Maxwell 2 is an excellent investment. If you don't meet all three criteria, consider whether the Gen 1 Maxwell or a competitor offering different strengths might serve you better.

QUICK TIP: Calculate the cost per year of use before purchasing. If you plan to use the Maxwell 2 for five years, the annual cost is roughly $70. For a premium audio tool you'll use thousands of hours per year, that's reasonable. If you'll replace it in two years, the annual cost jumps to $175, which is harder to justify.

Price and Value Proposition: Is the Maxwell 2 Worth the Investment? - visual representation
Price and Value Proposition: Is the Maxwell 2 Worth the Investment? - visual representation

Common Issues and Troubleshooting Guide

Despite solid engineering, some Maxwell 2 users have reported specific issues worth knowing about. The most commonly reported problem is intermittent wireless disconnection, typically manifesting as brief audio dropouts lasting a fraction of a second. This affects roughly 5% of units. The solution is usually updating firmware or moving the USB receiver farther from potential sources of interference like wireless routers or USB 3.0 devices.

Some users report that the microphone boom is too rigid for their preference. If you prefer the microphone positioned differently than the default orientation, adjustment options are limited. Gentle bending with careful pressure can modify the boom position slightly, but Audeze doesn't warranty this modification. It's a workaround rather than an elegant solution.

The earcup fit varies slightly from unit to unit due to normal manufacturing tolerances. Most people receive units that fit comfortably. Some report that one earcup makes tighter contact than the other. Audeze's support channel can sometimes address this through replacement if the issue is severe.

Battery life lower than expected usually comes from suboptimal settings. Running RGB lighting, high volume, and with noise cancellation enabled drains the battery faster than Audeze's standard test scenario. Disabling these features extends battery life closer to the claimed 80 hours.

Wireless latency issues are extremely rare. If you experience noticeable lag, the solution is usually moving the USB receiver, ensuring firmware is current, and checking for interference sources. This resolves the issue in virtually every reported case.

Headphone pad degradation is a non-issue for the Maxwell 2 because the pads are covered in microfiber rather than traditional leather or pleather. This material resists sweat damage better than alternatives. Regular cleaning extends pad lifespan significantly.

Common Issues and Troubleshooting Guide - visual representation
Common Issues and Troubleshooting Guide - visual representation

Future Considerations and the Headset Upgrade Cycle

If you purchase the Maxwell 2 today, what should you expect from a potential Maxwell 3 in 2-3 years? Based on Audeze's approach with the Maxwell 2, the Maxwell 3 will likely be another incremental refinement. Audeze doesn't radically redesign its gaming products. Instead, the company makes targeted improvements addressing specific limitations or adding features that have become table stakes elsewhere in the market.

The most likely additions would be simultaneous device connectivity, since this has become standard across premium headsets. Active noise cancellation might be reconsidered if Audeze can implement it without adding excessive weight or power drain. A lighter construction would address user feedback about the Maxwell 2's weight, though this might compromise the headband durability improvements.

The core technology—planar magnetic drivers—will likely remain unchanged. These drivers are a competitive advantage for Audeze, and the company has invested heavily in manufacturing capability. Swapping to different driver technology would require rethinking the entire acoustic design.

The software side will probably receive more attention. Better equalizer presets, sharing capabilities, and integration with gaming platforms are possibilities. These improvements don't drive hardware sales but do enhance the ownership experience.

One consideration if you're purchasing now: is the $100 price difference between Maxwell 2 and a hypothetical Maxwell 3 worth waiting for? If you game heavily and would benefit from the Maxwell 2 immediately, the benefit of using it now probably outweighs the cost of upgrading in a few years. If you can wait and flexibility on features matters to you, holding off might make sense.

Future Considerations and the Headset Upgrade Cycle - visual representation
Future Considerations and the Headset Upgrade Cycle - visual representation

Maintenance and Care for Long-Term Ownership

Keeping the Maxwell 2 in excellent condition requires minimal effort but consistent attention. The microfiber earcup covering should be cleaned regularly with a slightly damp cloth. This prevents sweat and dust accumulation. The microphone detaches for easier cleaning of areas where the mic connects to the headset.

The aluminum headband can be gently wiped with a dry cloth. Avoid excessive moisture contact with the mechanical components. The headband is robust enough for normal use, but like any aluminum product, it benefits from not being exposed to harsh conditions.

The battery doesn't require special maintenance, but fully discharging and recharging the battery once per month helps maintain long-term health. Modern lithium batteries don't have memory effects like older battery technology, so regular usage patterns are fine. Avoid leaving the headset uncharged for months at a time, as this can degrade battery performance.

The USB-C charging port should be kept free of debris and moisture. A quick inspection before charging ensures nothing is lodged in the connector. If the headset will sit unused for extended periods, charge it to about 50% before storage. This is optimal for lithium battery longevity.

The earcup foam is durable for years of use before compression becomes noticeable. If you find yourself replacing earcups or repair pads, Audeze sells these as accessories. Planning for eventual pad replacement 3-4 years down the line is reasonable.


Maintenance and Care for Long-Term Ownership - visual representation
Maintenance and Care for Long-Term Ownership - visual representation

FAQ

What makes the Audeze Maxwell 2 different from other gaming headsets?

The Maxwell 2 uses 90mm planar magnetic drivers instead of the traditional dynamic drivers found in most gaming headsets. This driver technology allows the entire diaphragm to move uniformly, producing clearer frequencies and faster response times. The result is audio quality that objectively outperforms nearly every competitor, with particular strength in frequency separation and detail clarity that becomes apparent within minutes of use.

Is the Maxwell 2 worth upgrading from the Maxwell Gen 1?

The audio quality difference between Maxwell 2 and Gen 1 is minimal and inaudible to most people in blind testing. The Maxwell 2 adds microphone improvements through FILTER AI noise removal and a reinforced headband addressing some Gen 1 durability concerns. However, the original Maxwell remains available for roughly $100 less. Unless you specifically value the improved microphone or want the durability assurance of the reinforced headband, the Gen 1 offers comparable performance at better value.

How does battery life compare to claimed specifications?

Audeze claims 80 hours of wireless battery life, which is technically accurate under standard test conditions with moderate volume and wireless-only usage. Real-world gaming with higher volume levels, RGB lighting enabled, and voice communication active typically yields 60-70 hours. Even at 65 hours average, you're looking at charging roughly every two weeks during heavy gaming, which is practical and convenient for most users.

Can the Maxwell 2 connect to multiple devices simultaneously?

Unlike some competitors, the Maxwell 2 does not support simultaneous Bluetooth and wireless 2.4GHz connections. You can use one connection method at a time, and switching between them requires manual disconnection and reconnection through the Audeze App. This takes about 30 seconds. For most gaming scenarios this is fine, but streamers or professionals managing multiple audio sources simultaneously may find this limitation frustrating.

What is the microphone quality like for team communication?

The microphone on the Maxwell 2 uses Audeze's FILTER AI noise removal technology to suppress background noise intelligently. Your teammates will hear your voice clearly with minimal ambient noise bleeding through, even in moderately loud environments. The hypercardioid pickup pattern prioritizes sound directly in front of the microphone. Compared to other gaming headset microphones, it's solidly competitive, though dedicated USB microphones still offer advantages for professional recording.

Does the Maxwell 2 support active noise cancellation?

Audeze deliberately omitted active noise cancellation from the Maxwell 2, prioritizing weight reduction and gaming-appropriate latency over ambient noise suppression. The headset does provide passive noise isolation through its sealed over-ear design, which reduces environmental noise by 10-15 decibels depending on frequency. For gaming in reasonably quiet environments, this is sufficient. However, in loud households or offices, active noise cancellation would provide additional benefit.

How does the Maxwell 2 perform in different game genres?

The single frequency response curve works excellently across competitive shooters, story-driven games, rhythm games, and esports titles. Competitive shooters benefit from precise gunshot and footstep localization. Story games gain from excellent dialogue clarity and detailed environmental ambience. Horror games become more immersive with excellent low-end response. The versatile design means you won't need separate headsets for different gaming contexts, though no single curve is optimized for every possible genre.

What is the expected lifespan of the Maxwell 2?

With proper care, the Maxwell 2 should comfortably survive 3-4 years of heavy gaming use. The aluminum construction, robust drivers, and quality materials support longevity. The most likely wear component is the rechargeable battery, which degrades gradually over time. By year 4-5, battery capacity may drop to 50% of original capacity. Audeze doesn't currently offer official battery replacement programs, which is a limitation at this price point. The overall durability is solid but not exceptional compared to some industrial-grade audio equipment.

How does the Maxwell 2 compare to Steel Series Arctis Nova Pro Wireless?

The Maxwell 2 offers superior audio quality with planar magnetic drivers, while the Arctis Nova Pro Wireless offers simultaneous device connectivity, slightly lighter weight, and different features. The Maxwell 2 costs

349,theArctisNovaProWirelesscosts349, the Arctis Nova Pro Wireless costs
399. The choice depends on priorities: if audio quality is paramount, the Maxwell 2 wins. If device connectivity and different feature priorities matter more, the Steel Series option is worth considering. Audio quality differences are noticeable but not necessarily worth the extra cost to every user.

What are the weight and comfort considerations for extended gaming sessions?

At 363 grams, the Maxwell 2 is heavier than many gaming headsets from mainstream manufacturers. During extended 6+ hour gaming sessions, this weight becomes noticeable. The memory foam padding and weight distribution help mitigate discomfort, but users sensitive to headset weight should try them on before purchasing. The weight isn't extreme by professional audio standards, but it's worth considering if previous headsets have caused neck fatigue.


FAQ - visual representation
FAQ - visual representation

Final Verdict: Excellence With Compromises

The Audeze Maxwell 2 represents the pinnacle of gaming headset audio quality. The planar magnetic drivers deliver frequency response and detail that standard gaming headsets simply cannot match. If you care about hearing every nuance in your games and you have the budget to match that priority, the Maxwell 2 is an outstanding choice. The build quality feels premium. The microphone communicates clearly. The battery lasts practically forever. The overall ownership experience is excellent.

But the Maxwell 2 exists in an awkward position. The original Maxwell remains available for $100 less, and the audio quality difference between them is inaudible to most people. Competitors offer different feature priorities, including simultaneous device connectivity that Audeze omitted. The headset is heavier than alternatives, which matters for some users. None of these issues are deal-breakers individually, but collectively they make the Maxwell 2 a harder recommendation than a true generational leap would provide.

Your decision should hinge on specific criteria. If audio quality is your primary driver and cost is secondary, the Maxwell 2 is an investment that will reward you for years. If you're budget-conscious or you prioritize features beyond audio quality, the original Maxwell or a competitor might better serve your needs. If you're torn between the two Maxwells, spend an extra 30 seconds trying them on in person before deciding. The difference in sound is subtle, and personal comfort matters as much as frequency response when you're wearing headphones for hours.

The Maxwell 2 is an excellent headset that achieves what Audeze set out to accomplish: bringing audiophile-grade sound to gaming. It doesn't revolutionize the category, and it doesn't offer compelling reasons to abandon the already-excellent Maxwell Gen 1. But if you're making a fresh purchase and audio quality matters to you, the Maxwell 2 is the best gaming headset money can buy in its category. That accomplishment alone makes it worthy of serious consideration.

Final Verdict: Excellence With Compromises - visual representation
Final Verdict: Excellence With Compromises - visual representation


Key Takeaways

  • Planar magnetic drivers deliver objectively superior audio quality compared to standard gaming headsets, with 90mm drivers providing exceptional frequency separation and detail clarity
  • Maxwell Gen 1 remains available at roughly $100 less with nearly identical audio performance, creating a challenging value justification for the Maxwell 2 despite its engineering improvements
  • The 80-hour battery claim is technically accurate but represents optimistic real-world performance, with actual gaming usage typically yielding 60-70 hours before requiring a charge
  • Lack of simultaneous Bluetooth and wireless connectivity is a notable limitation compared to competitors, requiring manual switching between devices rather than seamless transitions
  • Weight increase to 363 grams impacts comfort during extended gaming sessions, particularly compared to lighter alternatives from mainstream manufacturers like SteelSeries and Corsair

Related Articles

Cut Costs with Runable

Cost savings are based on average monthly price per user for each app.

Which apps do you use?

Apps to replace

ChatGPTChatGPT
$20 / month
LovableLovable
$25 / month
Gamma AIGamma AI
$25 / month
HiggsFieldHiggsField
$49 / month
Leonardo AILeonardo AI
$12 / month
TOTAL$131 / month

Runable price = $9 / month

Saves $122 / month

Runable can save upto $1464 per year compared to the non-enterprise price of your apps.