Ask Runable forDesign-Driven General AI AgentTry Runable For Free
Runable
Back to Blog
Technology6 min read

BBC fights Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit over VPN jurisdiction limits | TechRadar

The British broadcaster warns that allowing unauthorized VPN streams to establish legal jurisdiction could upend international law for foreign media companies

TechnologyInnovationBest PracticesGuideTutorial
BBC fights Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit over VPN jurisdiction limits | TechRadar
Listen to Article
0:00
0:00
0:00

BBC fights Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit over VPN jurisdiction limits | Tech Radar

Overview

News, deals, reviews, guides and more on the newest computing gadgets

Start exploring exclusive deals, expert advice and more

Details

Unlock and manage exclusive Techradar member rewards.

Unlock instant access to exclusive member features.

Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.

BBC fights Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit over VPN jurisdiction limits

The British broadcaster warns that allowing unauthorized VPN streams to establish legal jurisdiction could upend international law for foreign media companies

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.

(Image credit: Photo by JIM WATSON/AFP via Getty Images)

The BBC is moving to dismiss Donald Trump's $10 billion defamation lawsuit over a 2024 documentary

Trump’s amended complaint relies on 34 unauthorized play-starts in Florida accessed via virtual private networks (VPNs)

The BBC argues that penalizing broadcasters for viewers bypassing geo-blocks could have "massive implications"

Donald Trump’s $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the BBC may ultimately hinge on how a federal judge views the legal mechanics of virtual private networks (VPNs).

On Monday, the British broadcaster filed a motion in a Florida federal court to dismiss Trump’s amended complaint regarding a 2024 documentary about his reelection campaign. The core of the BBC’s defense tackles a major streaming loophole: the UK broadcaster never broadcast or licensed the program in the United States.

Trump's legal team is arguing that the Florida court has jurisdiction because the documentary was played 34 times in the state. However, those 34 alleged play-starts were initiated by just 10 users employing a VPN to bypass the BBC’s strict geo-blocking measures.

For tech experts and everyday consumers who use the best VPN to protect their privacy or access overseas content, this lawsuit threatens to open a Pandora's box.

If the court sides with Trump, it could mean that any foreign streaming service, news outlet, or online company could be dragged into foreign courts simply because a handful of users spoofed their IP address to circumvent regional blocks.

EU study proposes 30-minute takedown of illegal streams, and your VPN is in the crosshairs

'VPNs are lawful technical tools,' says EU Court in landmark Anne Frank copyright ruling

Reality check: Could the UK's social media ban lead to VPN restrictions?

Leave No Trace investigates the companies and governments putting our digital freedom at risk — and the people fighting back.

📩 Subscribe now to get every edition delivered to your inbox every Friday, launching this September.

The dispute centers on a documentary that Trump alleges maliciously edited his January 6, 2021 speech to make it seem as though he was inciting violence, combining phrases spoken nearly 55 minutes apart.

While the BBC later apologized for the edit and pulled the documentary from its streaming platforms, it continues to aggressively fight the defamation claim and the massive $10 billion price tag.

From ISP to DNS and VPNs: Rightsholders must be liable for collateral damage in piracy blocking, European ISP group says

FIFA's Express VPN World Cup sponsorship sparks fury from Spain's La Liga and French broadcasters

The best BBC i Player VPNs: top choices based on expert testing for streaming East Enders, Dr Who, and more

In its motion to dismiss, the BBC took aim at the idea that unauthorized VPN streams represent the broadcaster conducting business in Florida.

The corporation argued that the 34 Florida streams represent just 0.006% of the 570,000 successful requests for the documentary, characterizing them as unconfirmed and completely unauthorized.

To enforce its UK-only streaming rule, the BBC uses third-party cybersecurity services like Geo Guard to perform technical checks and block viewers employing VPNs or proxy servers. The BBC also said it strictly prohibits circumvention in its Terms of Use.

"The unilateral activity of a third party . . . cannot satisfy the requirement of contact with the forum State," the BBC’s legal team noted in the court filing, quoting legal precedent. No court has ever established jurisdiction based on a user forcibly bypassing geographical restrictions with a VPN.

The broadcaster issued a stark warning to the federal judge, stating that validating this legal strategy would have "massive implications for foreign companies with online presences."

If a user bypassing a digital fence is enough to establish legal jurisdiction, the wider impact on the tech and streaming industries could be devastating.

Foreign media companies might be forced to cut off international access entirely or invest heavily in draconian geo-blocking tech to avoid the risk of multi-billion-dollar lawsuits in jurisdictions where their content was never officially offered.

Despite the BBC's warnings about the dangerous legal precedent this could set, Trump's team is pushing forward with the lawsuit. The president is seeking

5billionfordefamationandanother5 billion for defamation and another
5 billion under Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act — The Wrap reported.

The judge has yet to rule on the motion to dismiss. Unless the Florida court throws out the case based on the BBC's VPN arguments, the defamation suit is slated for a two-week trial in February 2027.

Follow Tech Radar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button!

Rene Millman is a seasoned technology journalist whose work has appeared in The Guardian, the Financial Times, Computer Weekly, and IT Pro. With over two decades of experience as a reporter and editor, he specializes in making complex topics like cybersecurity, VPNs, and enterprise software accessible and engaging.

You must confirm your public display name before commenting

BBC fights Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit over VPN jurisdiction limits

Gaming needs a ‘vinyl revival’ — I spoke with gaming and music experts to find out whether physical games could make a comeback

Play Station Blackout won't matter — and the reasons are as obvious as the physical media you never owned

'The version Microsoft will build should be known as Copilot OS': Windows built around AI may not be happening, but leaked concept remains a grim portent for desktops

The Apple Watch 12 is rumored to be released next month — get the Apple Watch 11 in stock and on sale for just $299 at Amazon

Tech Radar is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site.

© Future US, Inc. Full 7th Floor, 130 West 42nd Street, New York, NY 10036.

Key Takeaways

  • News, deals, reviews, guides and more on the newest computing gadgets
  • Start exploring exclusive deals, expert advice and more
  • Unlock and manage exclusive Techradar member rewards
  • Unlock instant access to exclusive member features
  • Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards

Cut Costs with Runable

Cost savings are based on average monthly price per user for each app.

Which apps do you use?

Apps to replace

ChatGPTChatGPT
$20 / month
LovableLovable
$25 / month
Gamma AIGamma AI
$25 / month
HiggsFieldHiggsField
$49 / month
Leonardo AILeonardo AI
$12 / month
TOTAL$131 / month

Runable price = $9 / month

Saves $122 / month

Runable can save upto $1464 per year compared to the non-enterprise price of your apps.