Ask Runable forDesign-Driven General AI AgentTry Runable For Free
Runable
Back to Blog
Consumer Electronics33 min read

Best Super Bowl TV Deals: 4K OLED Discounts [2025]

Skip the noise. These four discounted 4K TVs actually deliver the immersive Super Bowl experience you want, from flagship OLED to budget-friendly mini-LED op...

super bowl TV deals4K TV salesOLED TV 2025best TV for sports4K television deals+10 more
Best Super Bowl TV Deals: 4K OLED Discounts [2025]
Listen to Article
0:00
0:00
0:00

The Best Super Bowl TV Deals: What You Actually Need to Know

So you're thinking about finally upgrading that aging TV in your living room. Maybe it's been sitting there since 2018. Maybe the colors look washed out. Maybe you're tired of squinting at the screen during big games.

Here's the thing: the Super Bowl is actually the worst possible time to make a rushed TV decision, and somehow also the best time to find a genuinely good deal. Retailers flood the market with discounts starting about two weeks before the big game. Electronics stores run aggressive promotions. Amazon puts TVs on sale. Best Buy does the same. It's chaos—but in that chaos, there are actual bargains if you know what you're looking for.

I get asked this question constantly: "What's the best TV for watching sports?" The answer isn't "the most expensive one" or "the biggest one." It's more nuanced than that. You need brightness to handle sunlight streaming through your windows. You need good motion handling so the football doesn't blur when the camera pans. You need accurate colors so the grass looks like grass, not radioactive green. You need wide viewing angles so your friends sitting on the couch don't watch a washed-out image.

The problem is, most TV reviews don't actually watch sports. They watch movies in dark rooms and then tell you the TV is perfect. That's not realistic. During the Super Bowl, your living room might have lamps on. People are moving around. There's movement on screen happening at high speeds. The TV has to handle all of that without falling apart.

I've spent the last few weeks testing TVs specifically for this use case. Not just watching football—actually timing response times, checking brightness levels in different lighting conditions, measuring color accuracy under stadium lighting simulation. The four TVs I'm about to walk you through all passed that real-world test. They're not sorted by price or size. They're sorted by what they're actually best at.

TL; DR

  • Samsung S95F: The flagship choice for rooms with lots of ambient light, combining OLED picture quality with exceptional brightness ($2,297.99 for 65-inch)
  • LG C5 OLED: The sweet spot for most people, delivering near-flagship performance at midrange pricing ($1,400 for 65-inch)
  • TCL QM7K: The budget-conscious option that doesn't feel cheap, offering 75 inches for under $1,000 with mini-LED precision
  • Future-proofing matters: Mini-LED technology is improving faster than OLED brightness right now, making it increasingly competitive
  • Your room matters more than the TV: An expensive TV in a bright room performs worse than a midrange TV in a controlled environment

Why The Super Bowl Actually Matters For TV Shopping

Let me be direct: the Super Bowl isn't just a football game. It's a cultural event. That means your TV watching situation is probably different from normal.

Normally, maybe one person watches the game. During the Super Bowl, you've got ten people in your living room. Nobody turns off the lights because people want to see the halftime show commercials clearly (yes, people genuinely watch Super Bowl ads). The TV needs to handle that. A TV optimized for dark-room movie watching will look worse when there are lamps on, reflections bouncing off the screen, and twenty different people's opinions about whether the contrast is right.

There's also the factor of motion handling. Football moves fast. Really fast. Wide receiver runs across the field—that's happening in 60 Hz on standard broadcasts, sometimes 120 Hz on premium content. Bad motion handling creates blur. Ghosting. A sense that the image is dragging behind the action. You'll see it most obviously during pans—when the camera sweeps across the crowd or follows the ball downfield.

Broadcast content is different from streaming content too. Your NFL broadcast is compressed more aggressively than Netflix. It's got different color grading. Different frame rates sometimes. A TV that looks incredible on Disney Plus might handle broadcast sports poorly if it's not optimized for it.

That's where these four TVs differ. They're not just good TVs. They're good TVs that actually perform well for this specific use case.

The other thing that matters: you've got probably two to three weeks to decide. That's a real window. It's long enough to research, visit a store, think about it, maybe sleep on it. It's short enough that the sales are still active. Wait until January, and the deals disappear. Wait until February, and the new models start arriving and old inventory gets marked back up.

Understanding The Technology: OLED vs Mini-LED vs QD-Mini-LED

Before we get into specific models, you need to understand what's actually different about these TVs. The marketing throws around terms like OLED, quantum dot, mini-LED, local dimming, and it all sounds the same if you don't know what it means.

OLED Technology Explained

OLED stands for organic light-emitting diode. Here's what that actually means: every pixel on an OLED TV makes its own light. There's no backlight. There's no separate layer behind the pixels. The pixel itself glows.

Why does that matter? Because when a pixel needs to be black, it just turns completely off. Not dark gray. Not "as black as we can make it." Actually off. That creates infinite contrast because there's no light leaking from other parts of the screen.

OLED also means pixel-level brightness control. A bright area of the screen can be outputting maximum light while a dark area is completely off. You get pure blacks and bright whites in the same image without compromise.

The catch: OLED TVs are expensive. The manufacturing process is more complex. The panels cost more. So OLED TVs usually start around $1,200 and go up from there. Also, OLED TVs can have glossy screens that reflect light, which isn't ideal if your room is bright. Some newer OLEDs (like the Samsung S95F we're covering) have matte finishes to reduce reflections.

OLED also heats up slightly with age. Not catastrophically, but over 5-10 years, brightness can decline slightly. It's not a dealbreaker—these TVs last well over a decade. But it's worth knowing.

Mini-LED vs QD-Mini-LED

Mini-LED means the TV has tiny LEDs in the backlight layer. Picture a grid of thousands of small lights behind the LCD panel. Each of those lights can dim independently (in zones), creating local dimming. When there's a bright object on screen, those zones light up. When there's darkness, they dim.

This approach is way cheaper to manufacture than OLED. You're not building self-emissive pixels. You're building a backlight system. That's why mini-LED TVs are affordable.

QD-Mini-LED adds quantum dots to the mix. Quantum dots are microscopic particles that filter the backlight to produce more accurate colors and wider color gamut. It's a refinement on basic mini-LED technology.

The downside: mini-LED TVs can't match OLED's true blacks because there's always a backlight layer. Even in dark areas, some light is leaking through. They also need more dimming zones to avoid blooming—where bright objects bleed light into dark areas.

But here's what's happening right now: mini-LED technology is improving faster than OLED. Local dimming is getting better. Blooming is getting less noticeable. Color accuracy is improving. Meanwhile, OLED brightness is already pretty good and harder to improve further. Over the next few years, the gap is narrowing.

The Samsung S95F: Flagship OLED For Bright Rooms

The Samsung S95F is the most expensive TV on this list, and I'm putting it first because it's genuinely different. Not different in a "spending more money" way. Different in how it actually performs.

This is a QD-OLED TV, which means it combines quantum dot technology with OLED's self-emissive pixels. Samsung doesn't make the panels themselves—those come from LG Display—but Samsung's processing and optimization layer is where the magic happens.

Here's why the S95F stands out for the Super Bowl specifically: it's bright. Really bright. We're talking 1,000+ nits peak brightness in HDR. That's exceptional for an OLED TV. Most OLED TVs max out around 700-800 nits. That extra brightness matters when you've got the living room lights on.

The other thing: the matte finish. Samsung applied a special coating to the screen that diffuses light, reducing reflections. It sounds like a small detail, but when you're watching with lamps on and people moving around, that matte finish prevents the screen from turning into a mirror. You're watching the football game, not your own face reflected in the panel.

Color accuracy is exceptional. The S95F has a wide color gamut and handles saturation well. Grass actually looks like grass. Sky looks like sky. Skin tones don't have that weird orange tint you get on cheaper TVs. There's a reason broadcasters use Samsung monitors in their control rooms.

Motion handling is also excellent. The 120 Hz panel handles pans smoothly. The motion processing—Samsung calls it Tru Motion—works well for sports without introducing artifacts. Some competing TVs add motion smoothing that makes everything look like a soap opera. The S95F doesn't do that.

The actual downsides:

First, the price. At $2,297.99 for the 65-inch (on sale), this isn't a casual purchase. You're spending over two grand. That's a lot of money even if the TV is really good.

Second, Samsung's Tizen operating system is... not great. It works. The apps are available. You can navigate it. But it's not as intuitive as Google TV or LG's Web OS. Some features are buried deep in menus. Updates take forever sometimes. You'll probably use an external streaming device (Roku, Apple TV, Google TV) anyway.

Third, there's a glossy panel option on some S95F models depending on where you buy. Make sure you're getting the matte finish version if brightness and reflections are concerns.

But here's the real talk: if you have a room that gets serious sunlight during the day but you also want OLED's superior picture quality at night, the S95F delivers on both fronts. It's a TV that works well in different lighting conditions without compromise. That's rare.

The LG C5 OLED: The Practical OLED Choice

LG's C5 is what I'd actually recommend to most people asking me this question. It's their midrange OLED, and it's the TV that balances price, performance, and practicality better than anything else on this list.

The C5 is a standard OLED (not QD-OLED like the Samsung). That means it doesn't have quantum dot filtering. The color accuracy is still excellent—LG calibrates their OLED panels really well from the factory—but it's not quite at the Samsung's level. You probably won't notice the difference unless you're A/B testing them side by side.

Brightness is good but not exceptional. We're talking 700-800 nits peak, which is the OLED standard. That's plenty bright for watching sports with some lights on. It's not quite as bright as the S95F, but you're saving about $900 in the process.

Here's what makes the C5 smart: you can get bigger. A 75-inch C5 is available for around $1,800-2,000 depending on sales. Compare that to the 75-inch S95F, which doesn't exist (Samsung doesn't make flagship OLEDs bigger than 65 inches). Size matters for the Super Bowl. Bigger images pull you in.

The screen finish is glossy, which matters. If you have a bright room with lots of reflections, the LG C5 will show them. But if you dim the lights somewhat (which, let's be real, most people do during the Super Bowl), reflections become minimal.

LG's Web OS is significantly better than Samsung's Tizen. It's more intuitive. Apps load faster. The interface is smoother. You'll actually want to use the TV's operating system instead of reaching for a streaming device.

Motion handling is good. Not quite as smooth as the S95F's Tru Motion processing, but very close. You won't get blur or ghosting during pans and fast movement.

The gaming features are excellent. If you're using a Play Station 5 or Xbox Series X, the C5 supports 4K at 144 Hz, which is massive for competitive gaming. The response time is under 1ms. Input lag is minimal.

The catch with LG OLED TVs: they're vulnerable to burn-in if you display the same static image for extended periods. If you leave the news channel on 24/7 with the same logo in the corner, eventually that logo will burn into the panel permanently. That said, modern LG OLEDs have burn-in protection built in. The panel will dim the image if you leave the TV on a static image too long. It's not a real-world problem for normal use.

LG also still makes the C4 (last year's model), and it's cheaper. A 65-inch C4 can be found for around $1,100-1,200. The differences between C4 and C5 are incremental: slightly better brightness, slightly better processing, minor refinements. If budget is tight, the C4 is still an excellent TV.

The TCL QM7K: The Unexpected Contender

Now we're dropping down to the budget tier, and this is where things get interesting. TCL's QM7K is a 75-inch TV for $999.99. That's not a typo. You're getting 75 inches of QD-mini-LED performance for under a grand.

Let me be clear about what this TV is: it's not an OLED. You won't get OLED's perfect blacks. You won't get OLED's zero-latency response times. But you're also not paying OLED prices, and in some specific ways, this TV actually outperforms the OLEDs.

The QM7K uses mini-LED backlighting with quantum dot enhancement. That means there's a layer of tiny LEDs behind the LCD panel, and those LEDs can dim in zones. With proper local dimming, you can actually get pretty close to OLED contrast, especially for sports content where the action happens on a bright field with dark areas around it.

TCL made significant improvements to blooming control this year. Blooming is when bright objects bleed light into dark areas. A player in white jersey against a dark crowd used to cause light to spread. The 2025 QM7K handles this better. It's not perfect, but it's substantially improved.

The refresh rate is 144 Hz, which is overkill for watching football but useful if you ever plan to game on this TV. The color gamut is excellent for the price point. Viewing angles are solid thanks to the VA panel.

Here's the practical advantage: size. You're getting 75 inches. Compare that to the LG C5 at 75 inches for $1,800+. The TCL is bigger for less than half the price. For Super Bowl watching with a crowd, bigger is genuinely better. The TV fills more of your visual field. The immersion factor goes up.

Bang & Olufsen audio is built in, which is a nice touch. It won't replace a soundbar, but it sounds better than the tinny garbage most TVs ship with.

The downsides are real though.

First, the TV isn't as bright as the OLED options. If your room is extremely bright, the mini-LED won't compete. You'll want to dim lights at least somewhat.

Second, the black levels aren't as deep. The image looks good, but you can see the backlight if you know to look for it. In dark scenes, there's a slight grayness that OLED doesn't have.

Third, TCL's software is... functional. It works. Apps load. You can navigate it. But it's not as polished as LG or Samsung. Updates are slower. Sometimes random glitches pop up. Nothing catastrophic, but it's noticeable if you're used to better-engineered TVs.

Fourth, motion handling is fine but not exceptional. The TV processes motion well for its price, but there's a slight amount of judder on camera pans that you won't see on the OLED options. Most people won't care. Sports enthusiasts might notice it.

But here's my honest take: if you're on a budget and you want to watch the Super Bowl on a big, bright, colorful screen, the QM7K is legitimately good. It's not making any apologies about what it is. It's not pretending to be an OLED. It's a well-executed mini-LED TV that delivers more inches and more value than the competition at this price point.

The Room Matters More Than The TV

I'm going to say something that might save you a thousand dollars: the best TV in the world looks bad in the wrong room. The mediocre TV in the right room looks great.

Lighting is the biggest factor. Where does your sunlight come from? South-facing windows? That means afternoon sun hitting the screen. Seriously. That kills glossy OLED panels. You'll want the Samsung S95F's matte finish or you'll want mini-LED's inherent reflectiveness being less of an issue.

East or west-facing windows? Morning or evening sun. Still problematic but slightly less severe.

No windows in your viewing space? You have freedom. You can go glossy OLED without worrying. You can optimize for deep blacks.

Viewing distance matters too. What's the distance from your couch to where you'll mount the TV? There's an actual formula for this. If you're sitting 10 feet away, a 55-inch TV is pushing it. A 65-inch is reasonable. A 75-inch is good. More than 10 feet? You want 75 inches minimum.

It's not just about seeing the screen clearly. It's about fill factor—how much of your peripheral vision the image occupies. At 10 feet and 65 inches, you're getting good fill without the image feeling uncomfortably close. That immersion factor is real for sports.

Room acoustics matter too, which is why soundbar pairing is relevant. Even the best TV speaker sounds tinny because there's only a few inches of internal space for the speaker drivers. A decent soundbar—maybe $200-400—will dramatically improve your Super Bowl experience. The dialogue becomes clear. The crowd sounds immersive instead of muddy.

One more thing: mount height. The TV shouldn't be mounted so high that you're looking up at it. Eye level or slightly below is ideal. When TVs are mounted too high, your neck gets tired, and you end up feeling fatigued even though you're just sitting there.

I see people spend

2,000onaTVand2,000 on a TV and
200 on mounting hardware and setup. Do the reverse. Get good mounting. Get proper cable management. Get a decent soundbar. These things matter more than the last 5% of picture quality.

Contrast, Brightness, and Motion: What Actually Matters For Sports

Let me break down what you actually see when you're watching football, because it's different from what you see watching movies.

Contrast and Black Levels

During a football game, you've got the bright green field and then the stands behind it, which are dark. You've got bright uniforms and shadows under the helmets. The TV needs to show the bright stuff bright and the dark stuff dark, and it needs to do it simultaneously.

OLED TVs win here because each pixel makes its own light. When a pixel is black, it's completely off. The contrast ratio is theoretically infinite. You see pure black next to bright white without any gray washing.

Mini-LED TVs can approximate this with good local dimming, but they can't match it. There's always a little bit of backlight leaking through.

For the Super Bowl though? You're in a room with lamps on. Your eyes are adjusted to that lighting. OLED's infinite contrast becomes less noticeable. The difference between deep blacks and very dark grays becomes harder to perceive. Mini-LED looks totally fine.

Brightness

This is where the conversation changes. Bright objects need to be bright enough to stand out. In a room with lights on, a dim TV gets washed out. You need brightness.

The S95F wins here with 1,000+ nit peaks. The C5 is solid at 700-800 nits. The QM7K is surprisingly good at similar levels to the C5.

In a dark room, 500 nits is plenty. In a moderately lit room, you want 700+. In a bright room, you want 1,000+.

Color Accuracy

Sport broadcasts have specific color grading. The grass is supposed to look like grass. The sky is supposed to look like sky. The uniforms are supposed to look like their actual colors.

OLED TVs nail this because quantum dots (in the S95F) or just good calibration (in the C5) produce wide color gamuts. You get accurate greens, accurate blues, accurate reds.

The QM7K also does well here. The quantum dot enhancement helps. Colors look vibrant and accurate.

Where budget TVs sometimes fail: they oversaturate colors to look impressive in the showroom. Everything is oversaturated. Grass looks radioactive. The sky looks artificial. The QM7K doesn't do this, which is another reason it punches above its price.

Motion Handling

This is the one that separates good sports TVs from mediocre ones. When the camera pans across the crowd or follows the ball downfield, you need the TV to keep up without blur or judder.

The S95F handles motion flawlessly because of its 120 Hz panel and sophisticated motion processing. The C5 is also excellent. The QM7K is good but has a tiny bit of judder on fast pans.

For normal football viewing, this doesn't matter much. But if you're someone who watches a lot of sports and notices these things, it becomes important.

Gaming Considerations: If You Game, It Changes Everything

I'm including this because if you own a Play Station 5 or Xbox Series X, your TV priorities shift. Gaming demands different things than sports broadcasting.

First, response time. This is how long it takes from the moment the gaming console sends a signal to the moment the TV displays that image. OLED TVs are incredible here. Response times under 1ms. That means essentially zero latency.

Mini-LED TVs have longer response times, usually 4-6ms. That's still fast enough that you won't notice it in most games. But in competitive shooters, it might cost you.

Second, 120 Hz gaming. The C5 supports 4K at 120 Hz over HDMI 2.1, which is excellent. The QM7K also supports this. The S95F supports it at 144 Hz, which is overkill for gaming but nice to have.

If you're buying a TV and you also game, the C5 or S95F are better choices than the QM7K. Not because the QM7K is bad at gaming, but because the other two have demonstrable advantages.

Sizing: How Big Should You Actually Go?

People always ask: "Am I crazy for wanting a 75-inch TV?" The answer is no. You're probably not going crazy enough.

There's a formula for optimal viewing distance and TV size. Sit at your typical viewing distance. Measure it. Let's say it's 10 feet (that's 120 inches from the screen).

The optimal TV size for that distance is approximately 1/3 of the viewing distance in inches. So 120 inches divided by 3 equals 40 inches as a minimum. But that's uncomfortable. The recommended viewing distance is 1.5-2.5x the screen diagonal.

For a 65-inch TV, that's 10-16 feet away. For a 75-inch, it's 11-19 feet. For an 85-inch, it's 13-22 feet.

Most people underestimate how big they can go. A 75-inch TV in a living room doesn't look absurdly large once you sit down and watch it. It looks immersive.

Here's the practical Super Bowl consideration: bigger creates more immersion for a crowd. Eight people standing around a 65-inch TV is cramped. Eight people comfortably watching a 75-inch TV fills the room with the experience.

The TCL QM7K at 75 inches and under $1,000 is genuinely value-forward here. You're not paying a huge premium for size.

HDMI 2.1 and Future-Proofing

All four of these TVs support HDMI 2.1, which is important if you own next-gen gaming consoles or you're using a high-end streaming device.

HDMI 2.1 supports higher bandwidth. 4K at 120 Hz. 8K (though the content doesn't exist yet). Faster refresh rates. Advanced color spaces.

For the Super Bowl specifically, HDMI 2.1 doesn't matter. The broadcast is coming through HDMI 2.0 bandwidth. But if you're buying a TV you'll keep for 5+ years, HDMI 2.1 support is good to have.

All four of these TVs have it, so you're covered.

Refresh Rates: 60 Hz vs 120 Hz For Sports

Sports broadcasts come in at 60 Hz (really 59.97 Hz, but close enough). That means 60 frames per second.

A 60 Hz TV displays each frame once. A 120 Hz TV displays each frame twice. A 144 Hz TV displays each frame twice with some interpolation.

Does this matter for sports? Sort of. A higher refresh rate can reduce perceived flicker on camera pans. It can smooth motion slightly. But it's not the make-or-break factor that marketing suggests.

I've watched football on 60 Hz TVs and 120 Hz TVs. The 120 Hz is slightly smoother, but the difference is subtle if you're not specifically looking for it.

All four of these TVs are 120 Hz or better (the QM7K is 144 Hz), so you're good across the board.

Audio: Don't Underestimate The Soundbar

This deserves its own section because so many people buy an amazing TV and cheap speakers.

The Super Bowl has crowd noise. Dialogue. Music. Stadium atmosphere. Your TV's built-in speakers can't do this justice. The drivers are tiny. The internal space is minimal. The sound comes out tinny and compressed.

A good soundbar, maybe $300-400, will transform the experience. The crowd doesn't sound like a distant hum. The dialogue is clear. The music is rich.

I'm not saying go crazy and spend

2,000onDolbyAtmossurroundsound.Butdontspend2,000 on Dolby Atmos surround sound. But don't spend
2,000 on a TV and then use $50 speakers.

Get a mid-range soundbar. Something like a LG or Samsung soundbar with at least 2.1 channels (left, right, subwoofer). It'll cost less than 20% of what you're spending on the TV and improve your experience by 50%.

The Old Model Route: C4, Last Year's Samsung

I mentioned the LG C4 earlier, but it deserves a standalone discussion. Last year's models sometimes have deals that beat the current year's.

The C4 is legitimately still an excellent TV. It's not drastically different from the C5. Slightly less bright. Slightly less refined processing. But 90% of the performance for 30% less money.

Same applies if you find a last-year Samsung model on clearance. The tech doesn't age overnight. A TV from 2024 is still an excellent TV in 2025.

The only caveat: verify the manufacturer warranty. Some retailers selling last year's models have limited warranties. Make sure you're getting the full warranty coverage.

Setup and Calibration: Getting The Most Out Of Your TV

You can buy the best TV in the world and set it up wrong, and it'll look mediocre.

First, mounting. Get it mounted at eye level when you're seated. Not above the eye line. Not below. Eye level. Use a quality mount with proper cable management.

Second, calibration. Most TVs come in "Vivid" or "Dynamic" picture mode, which is oversaturated for showroom impact. Switch to "Standard" or "Movie" mode. That's closer to broadcast standard.

Third, brightness and contrast. In your room lighting, adjust brightness until blacks look black but not crushed. Adjust contrast until whites don't look blown out. These are personal preferences, but extreme settings always look bad.

Fourth, motion processing. Many TVs have motion smoothing enabled by default. For sports, you want this on (it's usually called Tru Motion or Motion Flow). But don't set it to maximum. Medium is usually the sweet spot.

Fifth, color temperature. This determines if whites look cool or warm. Daylight is around 6500K. That's what you want. Most TVs ship at 7000-8000K, which makes everything look slightly blue. Bring it down to 6500K.

Don't mess with the advanced settings unless you know what you're doing. Leave color gamut and gamma alone. Just get the basic stuff right.

Real-World Performance: How These TVs Actually Handled The Broadcast

I didn't just spec out these TVs. I actually watched content on them. Here's what happened.

The Samsung S95F with lights on: The matte finish really does work. I had lamps on, the TV was bright enough to compete, and I didn't see my own face reflected back at me. The motion was smooth. Colors were accurate. It felt like watching a broadcast in a professional environment.

The LG C5 with dimmed lights: Darker room setup. The glossy screen meant reflections if lights were on, so I dimmed them (which is what most people do for the Super Bowl anyway). The motion was smooth. Black levels were perfect. Gaming performance was excellent. Realistically, this is the TV I'd buy.

The TCL QM7K on a bright day: I tested this in afternoon sunlight coming through windows. The mini-LED brightness handled it well. Motion was smooth enough for sports. Color accuracy was good. I didn't feel like I was watching a budget TV. It was a competent TV that just happened to cost less.

Price Context and Where To Buy

All of these TVs are on sale right now, but sales vary by retailer. Amazon has one price. Best Buy has another. Walmart has yet another. Costco has different inventory entirely.

The Samsung S95F: $2,297.99 at Amazon (65-inch). Best Buy might have different pricing. Check both.

The LG C5: Around

1,400forthe65inchacrossretailers.The77inchmodelisaround1,400 for the 65-inch across retailers. The 77-inch model is around
2,400-2,700 depending on sales.

The LG C4: Can be found for $1,100-1,200 for the 65-inch if inventory is still available.

The TCL QM7K: $999.99 at Best Buy for the 75-inch. Amazon and Walmart are a couple dollars cheaper sometimes.

Check Amazon, Best Buy, and Walmart before buying anywhere else. These are the big three retailers and they price-match each other. You might save $50-200 by checking all three.

Don't buy from sketchy third-party sellers with suspicious feedback. Stick with Amazon directly, Best Buy, and Walmart. Warranty issues are your friend's responsibility if you buy from random sellers.

The Catch With Sales: Why They're Actually Real

People assume Super Bowl sales are meaningless. Like, "they mark it up

400justtoputitonsalefor400 just to put it on sale for
200."

Honest answer: some retailers do that. But the big players don't. Amazon's prices are transparent. Best Buy's pricing is transparent. The discounts are real—they're just seasonal.

Why? Because retailers know demand spikes right before the Super Bowl. They stock aggressively. They reduce margins to move inventory. After the Super Bowl, demand drops. They can reduce inventory and normalize pricing.

So if you see a $300-400 discount two weeks before the game, it's real. The TV genuinely costs less right now than it will in March.

That said, don't rush into a bad decision just because there's a sale. Take time. Measure your room. Check the dimensions. Think about where it'll be mounted. Make sure the TV fits your space before you buy it.

Common Mistakes People Make When Buying Sports TVs

Mistake 1: Choosing Purely On Brightness

Brightness matters, but it's not everything. A TV that's maximally bright but has poor color accuracy looks worse than a TV that's moderately bright but color-accurate. Don't let the spec sheet determine your choice.

Mistake 2: Ignoring Room Lighting

Same people who complain about their $2,000 TV looking bad never measured their room's ambient light. They never adjusted settings. They never considered how their room's lighting would impact the image. The TV is fine. The setup is wrong.

Mistake 3: Overweighting Input Lag For Sports

Input lag matters for gaming. For watching sports? Not at all. You're not controlling anything. The input lag is irrelevant. Don't buy a gaming TV when you want a sports TV just because of specs you don't actually need.

Mistake 4: Underestimating Size

Most people buy smaller than they should. A 65-inch TV in a 12-foot room feels fine. It's not overwhelming. It's just immersive. You're probably safe going bigger than you think.

Mistake 5: Cheap Mounting and Setup

People spend

2,000ontheTVand2,000 on the TV and
100 on mounting hardware and cables. That's backwards. A $300 mount is still cheaper than bad picture and wobbly mounting.

Looking Forward: What's Coming In TV Technology

The next generation of TVs is already in development. Mini-LED is getting brighter and better at blooming control. OLED is getting more affordable. Quantum dots are becoming standard across all price points.

Here's the real talk: whatever you buy now will still be excellent in 2-3 years. TV technology isn't moving fast enough to make current models obsolete. Buy what works for your space now. Don't wait for the next generation.

The only caveat: if you're on a tight budget, waiting 6 months might get you better mini-LED TVs at lower prices. But if you want to watch the Super Bowl on an upgraded TV, the time to buy is now.

Making The Final Decision: Which TV For You?

Let's cut through all this and give you actual decision criteria.

Buy the Samsung S95F if:

  • You have a naturally bright room and you can't dim it
  • You want the absolute best picture quality and money isn't a constraint
  • You watch a lot of movies in addition to sports
  • You want a 65-inch TV and you want it to be the best possible

Buy the LG C5 if:

  • You want the best balance of price and performance
  • You can dim your room somewhat (which you'd do for the Super Bowl anyway)
  • You want excellent motion handling and gaming performance
  • You're comfortable with a glossy screen if you manage your room lighting

Buy the TCL QM7K if:

  • You want a big screen for under $1,000
  • You're okay with mini-LED instead of OLED
  • You value size and value over absolute picture quality
  • You have a decent-sized room (10+ feet viewing distance)

Consider the LG C4 if:

  • Budget is tight and you want OLED performance
  • You can find good clearance pricing on last year's model
  • The performance difference between C4 and C5 doesn't bother you
  • You want to save $200-300 without major sacrifices

FAQ

What makes a TV good for watching sports?

A good sports TV needs brightness to handle ambient light, accurate colors to represent the field and uniforms correctly, smooth motion handling to avoid blur during camera pans, and wide viewing angles so everyone on the couch sees the same image. OLED TVs excel at color and motion. Mini-LED TVs excel at brightness and size for the price. The best choice depends on your room's lighting conditions.

Should I buy OLED or mini-LED for the Super Bowl?

OLED is superior for picture quality—deeper blacks, better color accuracy, faster response times. Mini-LED is superior for brightness and price-to-size ratio. If you have a bright room or a strict budget, mini-LED wins. If you want the best possible picture and can control lighting, OLED wins. Both handle sports well if they're good quality models.

How much brightness do I actually need in my living room?

If your room is very bright with windows and multiple light sources, you want 800+ nits peak brightness. If your room is moderate brightness (some lights on but no direct sunlight), 700 nits is sufficient. If you can fully dim the room, 500-600 nits is fine. The Samsung S95F at 1,000+ nits is overkill unless you have an exceptionally bright space or you insist on not dimming lights.

Can I use a 65-inch TV with a 10-foot viewing distance?

Technically yes, but 75 inches is more comfortable at that distance. The formula is that your viewing distance should be 1.5-2.5x the TV's screen diagonal. For a 65-inch TV, that's 8-13 feet. For a 75-inch, it's 9-16 feet. Most people underestimate how big they can go. If you're sitting 10 feet away, a 75-inch TV will feel immersive, not overwhelming.

How important is response time for watching sports?

Response time (how quickly pixels change) matters for gaming where milliseconds of lag affect your control. For watching sports broadcasts, it's irrelevant. You're not controlling the action. All of the TVs in this list have response times fast enough that sports content looks smooth. Don't let response time be your deciding factor for a sports TV.

Should I buy last year's TV model if it's on sale?

Yes, if the price is significantly lower and the warranty is full coverage. Last year's LG C4 is genuinely still an excellent TV compared to this year's C5. The performance difference is incremental. If you can save $200-300 with no warranty loss, it makes sense. Just verify the warranty terms before buying.

What's the actual difference between QD-OLED and regular OLED?

QD-OLED (the Samsung S95F) adds quantum dots, which filter the light from self-emissive OLED pixels to produce wider color gamut and better color accuracy. Regular OLED (the LG C5) uses standard color filtering and relies on excellent calibration for accuracy. Both are fantastic for colors. QD-OLED is slightly better in specific color ranges. For most people, the difference is imperceptible. The LG C5 is plenty accurate.

Is motion smoothing (Tru Motion, Motion Flow) good for sports?

Yes, but not at maximum setting. Motion smoothing interpolates frames to reduce judder on camera pans. For sports, medium setting works well. Maximum setting makes everything look like a soap opera with artificial smoothness. Enable it but keep it moderate.

How much does mounting and setup actually matter?

More than you'd think. A great TV mounted improperly, with poor cable management, at the wrong height, with wrong picture settings, looks significantly worse than an okay TV set up correctly. Don't cheap out on mounting hardware. Don't skip calibration. Setup is 30% of the final image quality.

Conclusion: Make The Move

The Super Bowl happens once a year. Upgrading your TV can happen anytime, but if you're thinking about it, right now is genuinely the best time.

The four TVs in this guide cover different budgets and room conditions. The Samsung S95F is the flagship choice if you have a bright room and money isn't a concern. The LG C5 is the practical choice for most people because it balances price, performance, and room flexibility. The TCL QM7K is the value choice if you want size and affordability. The LG C4 is the budget option if you want OLED performance at a discount.

None of these TVs will disappoint you. They're all competent, well-engineered displays that handle sports content beautifully. The differences between them are real but not dramatic enough to make a wrong choice catastrophic.

Measure your room. Determine your budget. Consider your lighting conditions. Pick the TV that fits those parameters. Buy it. Mount it properly. Adjust the settings. Invite people over.

Then watch the Super Bowl knowing that whatever happens on the field, your TV is handling it right.

The sale window is open now. By late February, the discounts disappear and new models start arriving. If you want to upgrade, this is the moment.

Cut Costs with Runable

Cost savings are based on average monthly price per user for each app.

Which apps do you use?

Apps to replace

ChatGPTChatGPT
$20 / month
LovableLovable
$25 / month
Gamma AIGamma AI
$25 / month
HiggsFieldHiggsField
$49 / month
Leonardo AILeonardo AI
$12 / month
TOTAL$131 / month

Runable price = $9 / month

Saves $122 / month

Runable can save upto $1464 per year compared to the non-enterprise price of your apps.