Boomerang: Why We Transfer's Co-Founder Built a Better File Transfer Service

Sometimes the best products get ruined by the people who buy them. And sometimes the person who created the original masterpiece decides to build it again.

That's exactly what happened with Boomerang, a new file transfer service launched by Nalden, who co-founded We Transfer back in 2009. And his frustration isn't just personal—it's a masterclass in why product philosophy matters more than market share.

Here's the thing: We Transfer was legendary. For over a decade, it was the gold standard for sending files. No nonsense, no sign-ups required, just drag, drop, and share. But then Bending Spoons acquired it, and things went sideways. Fast.

The company made bewildering design decisions. It laid off 75% of its staff. It got caught trying to use user content to train AI models. And worst of all, it abandoned the core principle that made We Transfer great in the first place: simplicity for the user.

Nalden watched this happen from the outside. Creatives and designers started reaching out to him, frustrated with what We Transfer had become. They missed the old days. They wanted their tool back.

So he built it again. Boomerang is the antidote to We Transfer's slow decline. And it's raising some genuinely interesting questions about what happens when founders reclaim their vision after a company gets corrupted by acquisition.

The Rise and Fall of We Transfer: A Cautionary Tale

We Transfer wasn't just successful—it was iconic. When Nalden, Rinke Visser, and Bas Beerens launched it in 2009, they solved a real problem that had been ignored by every major tech company. You needed to send files to someone. You didn't want to create an account. You didn't want ads. You didn't want complexity. You wanted to send a file.

We Transfer nailed it. The interface was clean. The process was frictionless. You could transfer files up to 2GB without even creating an account. For creatives—designers, photographers, video producers—it became indispensable.

By 2020, We Transfer had processed billions of file transfers. It had a valuation in the hundreds of millions. The company had built something genuinely valuable, not through dark patterns or manipulation, but through ruthless focus on user experience.

Then, in 2023, Bending Spoons acquired We Transfer. Bending Spoons is an Italian software acquisition company that specializes in buying established products and monetizing them aggressively. Their strategy is straightforward: extract maximum revenue, cut costs, and optimize for different KPIs than the original creators intended.

Almost immediately, things changed. We Transfer started emphasizing features nobody asked for. The free tier became more restricted. Updates felt less about improving the product and more about pushing users toward paid plans. The company even got caught in a controversy around its terms of service, which appeared to give We Transfer rights to use customer content for AI training.

Users noticed. The product that had been built on the principle of "just works" started feeling like it didn't work for anyone—at least not in the way they wanted.

This is the classic acquisition playbook, and it almost never ends well for the user. The acquirer inherits a beloved product and a user base. Then they systematically trade long-term goodwill for short-term revenue extraction. They get two to three years of growth from the existing user base, then watch as users gradually migrate to alternatives.

We Transfer's trajectory is a textbook example. The company that was built on simplicity started adding features, complexity, and friction. It's the product equivalent of a Michelin-starred restaurant getting bought by a fast-casual chain and slowly destroying what made it special.

Boomerang excels in ease of use, pricing transparency, and user privacy compared to WeTransfer, which focuses more on a broader feature set. (Estimated data)

Nalden's Frustration: Why Founders Don't Stay

Nalden left We Transfer in 2019, about four years before the Bending Spoons acquisition. He watched what happened next from a distance, and honestly, he wasn't happy about it.

"Bending Spoons doesn't really care about people," he told Tech Crunch. "Even though I get that it is their private equity strategy, I notice that since I left, there were a lot of updates that were basically killing the product."

This is worth unpacking. Nalden isn't being emotional here—he's making a strategic observation. Private equity firms like Bending Spoons have a different objective function than founders. Founders optimize for product-market fit, user happiness, and long-term brand value. Private equity optimizes for cash flow, margin expansion, and exit value.

These are fundamentally misaligned. A founder might say, "Let's keep the free tier generous to build loyalty." A PE firm says, "Restrict the free tier and push users toward the $10/month plan." The founder thinks in decades. The PE firm thinks in quarters.

Nalden experienced this tension firsthand. He built a product that was beloved but not aggressively monetized. When he sold (or stepped back), the new operators took that same product and started optimizing for extraction. It worked for a while. But it also started eroding the thing that made We Transfer special.

What really triggered Nalden's decision to build Boomerang wasn't just frustration with his old company. It was creatives reaching out to him, asking if there was an alternative. Designers, photographers, and video producers were looking for what they'd lost. They missed the simplicity. They missed the no-nonsense approach. They wanted their tool back.

Nalden realized something important: the market was fragmented. We Transfer still existed, but it wasn't what users wanted anymore. Competitors like Dropbox, Box, and Tresorit had filled some of the gap, but none of them captured the original vision: a file transfer tool that just worked, required no account, and got out of your way.

So instead of complaining about We Transfer, Nalden decided to rebuild what he'd created.

Boomerang offers a highly usable free tier compared to typical SaaS products, which often have limited functionality. (Estimated data)

Boomerang: The Spiritual Successor

Boomerang is what happens when a founder gets to rebuild their original idea without compromise. It's stripped down. It's intentional. It's the opposite of feature bloat.

Here's what Boomerang does: you go to the website, drag a file onto the browser window, and share a link. That's it. No login. No account creation. No sign-up flow. No onboarding. No permissions screen. No "verify your email." Just upload and share.

The free tier lets you transfer files without any restrictions on account creation. You get a permanent link to your files. You can access your transfers anytime.

If you want more, there's a €6.99/month paid tier. You get 200GB per "space" (which is basically a folder), 500GB total storage, and a 5GB file upload limit. You also get password protection, custom covers, up to 90 days of expiry settings, and the ability to invite unlimited users to access files.

But here's what's important: the paid tier is optional. The free tier is genuinely useful. You're not being nagged to upgrade every thirty seconds. The product isn't designed to make your life miserable until you pay.

Nalden was explicit about his philosophy: "I just want to offer a tool that works for users. It's like buying a hammer. You possibly don't want to buy a fancy hammer, but a hammer that just works."

This is such a refreshing perspective. The entire SaaS industry is obsessed with adding features, gamifying onboarding, and building "delightful" experiences that are actually just manipulative. Nalden looked at that and said no.

Boomerang's website is intentionally barebones. The design is minimal. The interface doesn't try to impress you. It just works. And Nalden has been explicit that a lot of design choices in modern products are made to please investors and impress venture capitalists, not to serve users.

The Simplicity Philosophy: Why Less Is More

Modern software design has become incredibly complex. Every app is trying to be everything. They're adding AI features whether they make sense or not. They're loading interfaces with options, settings, and preferences. They're gamifying everything.

Boomerang is a rejection of that entire paradigm.

Nalden noted that he's using AI to build Boomerang—to optimize the backend, improve performance, and solve infrastructure problems. But he explicitly doesn't want user-facing AI features. No "AI-powered file suggestions." No "AI-enhanced sharing recommendations." No Chat GPT integration just to have one.

This is the opposite of every tech company right now. Everyone is racing to add generative AI features to everything, whether it makes sense or not. Some of it's marketing. Some of it's genuine innovation. Most of it is companies panicking that they're falling behind and bolting AI onto products where it doesn't belong.

Nalden's approach is different. Use AI internally to build a better product. But keep the user-facing experience simple.

This philosophy extends to monetization. Nalden doesn't want to run ads. He doesn't want to collect user data. He doesn't want to play the data harvesting game. He wants to charge a reasonable price and let users own their experience.

There's something almost radical about this in 2025. Most SaaS companies are optimizing for three things: ads, data collection, and engagement metrics. Boomerang is optimizing for one thing: user happiness.

What's fascinating is that this isn't just ideological. It's also a better business model. Simple products have lower support costs. They have fewer bugs. They're easier to maintain. They don't require massive engineering teams to add features nobody wants.

Boomerang's barebones approach might seem like weakness. It's actually strength. When you strip away everything but the core function, you end up with something that's more reliable, more usable, and more maintainable than bloated competitors.

Modern cloud storage platforms require an average of 4.5 clicks for a simple file transfer, whereas WeTransfer's original interface required only 1 click. Boomerang, focusing on simplicity, is estimated to require about 1.5 clicks.

The Platform Wars: File Transfer in 2025

Boomerang isn't entering an empty market. The file transfer space is crowded, and there are several established players with significant advantages.

We Transfer still exists, even if it's diminished. Dropbox dominates the productivity space with 700+ million registered users. Box owns the enterprise segment. Sync.com focuses on privacy. Tresorit emphasizes security.

So what's Boomerang's advantage? It's not better technology than Dropbox. It's not more secure than Tresorit. It's not a sophisticated collaboration platform like Box.

Boomerang's advantage is user experience. It solves the problem of "I need to send a file to someone" in the fastest, simplest way possible. It doesn't pretend to be a collaboration platform. It doesn't try to be a productivity suite. It's a file transfer tool that actually works.

This is a real gap in the market. Millions of users still need to send files on a regular basis. Most of them don't need a 500-feature collaboration platform. They need to send a file.

Dropbox added collaboration features, which made it bloated for simple use cases. We Transfer added monetization tactics, which made it frustrating for users. The competitors focused on security or enterprise features, which are great but not what most users need.

Boomerang is attacking from the simplicity angle—the one position that's been abandoned by everyone else.

Nalden also has a credibility advantage that's hard to overstate. He literally invented the category. His name is synonymous with simple, reliable file transfer. When he says "we're going back to basics," users listen.

This is the founder's moat. It's not network effects. It's not technology. It's reputation and authenticity. Nalden built We Transfer with a philosophy, watched that philosophy get destroyed, and is rebuilding it. That's a story that resonates.

Monetization Without Manipulation

Here's something interesting about Boomerang's pricing: it's not trying to trick you.

The free tier is genuinely useful. You can send unlimited files, create permanent links, and share with anyone. The paid tier (€6.99/month) adds storage, larger file sizes, and organizational features. It's a fair trade.

Compare this to most SaaS companies. They offer a "free tier" that's so limited it's practically unusable. You hit the limit in about 30 seconds. Then you get nagged with a popup offering a paid plan. The psychological manipulation is constant.

Boomerang's approach is different. The free tier is good. The paid tier is better. If you want to upgrade, it's because you actually need the features, not because you're being coerced.

This matters for several reasons. First, it builds trust. Users know they're not being manipulated. Second, it improves the product's reputation through word of mouth. People actually recommend it. Third, it creates genuine paying customers who want to be there, not resentful users forced into paid tiers by artificial restrictions.

Long-term, this is a better business. Short-term, it might generate less revenue than a predatory freemium model. But it also has better retention, lower churn, and more sustainable growth.

The pricing is also refreshingly transparent. €6.99/month. That's it. No tiered pricing. No "contact us for enterprise." No hidden fees. You know exactly what you're getting and what it costs.

This is radical in an industry where pricing pages have become deliberately confusing. SaaS companies intentionally create three or four tiers with overlapping features so users can't figure out which one they need. Then they add annual discounts, introductory pricing, and volume discounts to make comparison shopping impossible.

Nalden rejected all of this. Simple price, simple value prop, simple decision.

Boomerang excels in user experience with a rating of 9, focusing on simplicity, while Tresorit leads in security with a perfect score. Estimated data.

The No-Account Philosophy: Why Friction Matters

One of Boomerang's most striking features is that you don't need an account to send files. You just upload and share.

This seems like a small thing, but it's actually fundamental to the product's philosophy.

Every account requirement is friction. Every login page is a barrier to use. Every "verify your email" notification is friction. Every password reset flow is friction. These seem minor individually, but they compound.

A user who needs to send a file quickly doesn't want to create an account. They don't want to remember a password. They don't want to deal with two-factor authentication. They just want to send the file.

We Transfer originally understood this. That's why it was so popular. You could send files without an account. It was gloriously frictionless.

When We Transfer started requiring accounts (or at least pushing toward them heavily), it lost something essential. The friction increased. The utility decreased.

Boomerang brings back the no-account experience. This is a feature that seems simple but is incredibly powerful.

The no-account approach also has privacy implications. When you don't have an account, the company collects less data about you. There's no profile. There's no account history. There's no data to breach or monetize.

This is actually a business advantage disguised as a limitation. Nalden has explicitly said he wants to collect as little user data as possible. This isn't just ideological—it's also safer. Less data means fewer data breaches. Fewer breaches mean better reputation. Better reputation means more users.

Technical Architecture: Building for Simplicity

Building a simple interface is easy. Building a simple system that scales is hard.

Boomerang needs to handle billions of file transfers. It needs to store files reliably. It needs to serve downloads quickly. It needs to handle concurrent uploads. It needs to remain available 99.9% of the time.

All of this while keeping the interface minimal and the business model simple.

This is where engineering excellence actually matters. You can't build a reliable global file transfer system with cheap shortcuts. You need proper infrastructure, redundancy, caching, and monitoring.

Nalden has mentioned that he's using AI to optimize the backend—not for marketing purposes, but for actual infrastructure improvements. This is the right use of AI technology. Not user-facing features that impress investors, but internal optimization that makes the product better.

The technical challenge of Boomerang is invisible to users, which is exactly how it should be. You upload a file and it works. The fact that it's working on a sophisticated distributed system with proper redundancy and optimization is hidden.

This is the opposite of companies that over-engineer simple features and then feel the need to highlight the complexity. "Look at our advanced machine learning algorithms!" Meanwhile, the core product barely works.

Boomerang's approach is to engineer well invisibly. Do the hard work behind the scenes so the user doesn't have to think about it.

Boomerang collects significantly fewer data points compared to WeTransfer and Dropbox, emphasizing its privacy-first approach. (Estimated data)

Privacy and Data: The Boomerang Approach

In an era where every company is harvesting user data, Boomerang's explicit commitment to minimal data collection stands out.

Nalden has been clear: Boomerang doesn't collect unnecessary data. There are no ads. There's no tracking. There's no profile building. You send a file, it gets transferred, and that's it.

This is functionally different from We Transfer under Bending Spoons, which started expanding what data it collected and how it used that data. It's also different from companies like Dropbox, which use file metadata to build user profiles and provide recommendations.

None of that with Boomerang. The service is designed to respect user privacy as a core principle, not as a marketing angle.

The privacy-first approach also has practical benefits. It simplifies the product. It reduces liability. It makes the service compliant with privacy regulations like GDPR without needing a massive compliance team.

There's also something psychologically important about knowing a company isn't harvesting your data. You trust the product more. You use it more freely. You recommend it to others.

Privacy as a feature is becoming increasingly valuable as users wake up to the extent of data collection happening across the web. Boomerang's commitment to minimal data isn't a liability—it's an asset.

The Macbook App Strategy: Building for Native Platforms

Boomerang is launching on the web, but Nalden has explicitly said a dedicated macOS app is coming.

This is interesting because it shows a deliberate platform strategy. The web version handles the basic case: anyone with a browser can use it. But power users on macOS get something better.

A native macOS app would be faster, more integrated, and more capable than a web version. You could drag files directly from Finder. You could integrate with macOS's file system. You could use system-level APIs for faster uploads.

Most companies skip native apps these days. They say "just use the web version, it's responsive." But there's a reason native apps still matter: they're better.

A native app for macOS signals that Boomerang cares about the user experience, not just about keeping development costs low. It's a feature that matters to power users and creatives, which are exactly Boomerang's target audience.

Windows and Linux support will probably follow, but the macOS focus first makes sense. Designers, photographers, and video producers—the people frustrated with We Transfer—disproportionately use Macs.

The app strategy also creates a moat. It's harder for competitors to replicate a well-designed native app than a web service. It's easier to defend against Dropbox or Microsoft if you have better integration with the platform.

This timeline illustrates the decline of WeTransfer's market position from 2018 to 2023 and the corresponding rise of Boomerang. Estimated data shows Boomerang's strategic entry as WeTransfer's influence waned.

The Competitive Response: How We Transfer and Others React

Boomerang's launch is a direct challenge to the entire file transfer industry. But the biggest pressure is on We Transfer.

We Transfer will almost certainly respond. They might simplify their interface. They might roll back some of the monetization changes. They might try to win back power users. They might all point at Boomerang and say "see, we've learned our lesson."

But once a product has been corrupted by PE optimization, it's hard to uncorrupt it. The incentive structure is misaligned. Every manager in the company is evaluated on revenue growth, not user satisfaction. Rolling back monetization tactics means fewer short-term profits, which looks bad on the quarterly report.

This is why Boomerang will probably succeed. Not because it's better technology. Not because it has more features. But because We Transfer can't go back to being simple without destroying the financial model that Bending Spoons bought it for.

The other competitors—Dropbox, Box, etc.—aren't really competitors. They're solving different problems. Dropbox is for collaboration and storage. Box is for enterprise content management. Boomerang is just for file transfer.

Specialization is an advantage here. When you do one thing, you can do it really well. Dropbox can't compete on simplicity because it's built a complex system with thousands of features. Box can't compete on price because it's targeting enterprises.

Boomerang's strategy is to own the simple file transfer niche completely.

Market Opportunity: How Big Is This?

It's easy to dismiss file transfer as a solved problem. But it's not.

Billions of file transfers happen every day. Billions. Not millions. Billions.

Most of them happen through suboptimal channels. People email files. They use WhatsApp or Telegram. They use Google Drive or Dropbox when they don't need a full storage system. They use USB drives.

The reason is that the current options are either too complex or don't exist. There's no dominant simple file transfer tool anymore, because We Transfer abandoned simplicity.

Boomerang is targeting that gap.

The market is also stratified. Individual users need simple transfer. Small teams need something slightly more sophisticated. Enterprises need security, compliance, and integration.

Boomerang's paid tier targets small teams without overcomplicating the interface. The free tier targets individuals and casual users.

If Boomerang captures even 5% of the file transfer market, it's a valuable business. At 10%, it's probably worth a few hundred million dollars. Not Unicorn territory, but real sustainable revenue.

The key is growth. Boomerang needs to reach critical mass where word-of-mouth takes over. If creatives, designers, and knowledge workers start recommending it, growth becomes easier.

Lessons for Founders and Builders

Boomerang teaches several important lessons for anyone building products.

First: Simplicity is a competitive advantage. The entire industry is moving toward complexity. Adding features is easier than cutting them. So simplicity is rare and valuable.

Second: User-first thinking still works. Most companies optimize for investor vanity metrics or engagement metrics that don't correlate with user happiness. When you optimize for actual user happiness, good things happen.

Third: Monetization doesn't have to be exploitative. You can build a sustainable business without dark patterns, manipulation, or data harvesting. It requires discipline and a different definition of success, but it's possible.

Fourth: Founder credibility matters. Nalden's reputation from building We Transfer is his biggest asset. It's worth more than any marketing budget.

Fifth: Timing can work in your favor. We Transfer's decline created an opportunity. When an incumbent abandons a market position, someone will eventually fill the gap. Being first-to-fill with better execution is powerful.

These aren't revolutionary insights, but they're insights the industry has collectively forgotten in pursuit of growth at all costs.

Future Possibilities: Where Boomerang Goes From Here

If Boomerang succeeds, what comes next?

The obvious path is geographic expansion. Launch in more countries, in more languages, with local payment options.

The next step might be enterprise features. Right now, Boomerang is personal and small team focused. There's a market for an enterprise file transfer solution that hasn't been corrupted by bloat and complexity.

There might also be collaboration features. Not a full collaboration platform like Box, but the ability to share files with a team and control access. This would be a natural extension of the current product.

Integrations are another possibility. Zapier integration, API access, things like that. But only if they're genuinely useful, not just to check off a feature list.

The key is maintaining the philosophy. Every feature should make the core experience simpler or better, not more complex. If it doesn't, it shouldn't be built.

The hardest test will come if Boomerang becomes successful and valuable. At that point, venture capitalists will probably want to invest. They'll push for faster growth, more features, more monetization.

Nalden will have to decide whether to stay independent or raise money. If he raises money, he'll need to stay disciplined about maintaining the product philosophy. Most founders fail at this test. They get seduced by growth-at-all-costs and watch their product slowly become what they started out to fix.

The Bigger Story: When Acquisition Destroys Value

Boomerang is ultimately a story about what happens when acquisition prioritizes extraction over cultivation.

We Transfer was a valuable asset. Not just in terms of revenue, but in terms of cultural value. It represented a specific vision: technology that respects the user, solves a real problem, and doesn't try to be everything.

When Bending Spoons acquired it, they saw We Transfer as a cash cow to be optimized for short-term profit. They weren't wrong from a financial perspective. They probably made money.

But they destroyed the product in the process. And more importantly, they created an opportunity for someone else to reclaim the vision.

This is a pattern in tech. The acquirer inherits an asset and slowly corrupts it in service of different incentives. Users notice. Some of them leave. Eventually someone rebuilds what was lost, and the incumbent loses market share.

It's not inevitable. Companies that acquire products can maintain the original philosophy and culture. But it requires discipline. It requires having incentives aligned with long-term value creation, not quarterly profit extraction.

Most companies fail at this. Boomerang is essentially betting that they will continue to fail.

Boomerang's Role in a Broader Shift

Boomerang isn't the only company rejecting the bloat-and-complexity trend. There's a broader movement toward minimal, focused tools.

Companies like Linear are proving that project management doesn't need to be complicated. Notion started simple and maintained it (mostly). Slack succeeded by focusing on one problem: team communication.

There's a market for focused, simple tools that do one thing well. The industry has become so obsessed with feature parity and platform expansion that it forgot about specialization.

Boomerang is riding this wave. Not creating it, but riding it.

The question is whether this movement can persist at scale. Once companies get big, the pressure to expand increases. Investors want faster growth. Teams want to explore new markets. Product managers want to build new features.

Staying focused is hard. Boomerang will face these pressures if it succeeds. Whether Nalden can resist them is the real test.

Why This Matters More Than You Think

On the surface, Boomerang is just another file transfer tool. Who cares?

But it's actually a referendum on a much bigger question: Is simplicity and user focus viable in modern SaaS, or has the industry permanently shifted to bloat and manipulation?

If Boomerang succeeds, it proves that there's a market for honest, simple products that respect the user. It proves that you don't need dark patterns to build a successful business. It proves that simplicity is a competitive advantage.

If Boomerang fails, it might suggest that the industry has fully optimized toward extraction and manipulation. That users have accepted bloat as the price of digital services.

That's probably too dramatic. Boomerang will probably do fine. But its success or failure will send a signal about what's possible in modern software.

For now, Boomerang represents something rare: a founder rebuilding their vision because they believe in it more than they believe in accepting the corruption of what they built.

That's worth paying attention to.

TL; DR

• Boomerang is We Transfer reimagined: The co-founder of We Transfer rebuilt the service after Bending Spoons acquisition corrupted it with bloat, monetization manipulation, and data harvesting practices

• Simplicity is the competitive advantage: No login required, minimal interface, focused features, and honest pricing—everything modern SaaS abandoned

• The market gap is real: Billions of daily file transfers currently happen through suboptimal channels because there's no simple dominant tool anymore

• Founder credibility matters: Nalden's reputation as We Transfer's creator gives Boomerang authenticity and trust that no competitor can easily replicate

• Privacy-first and no ads: Boomerang explicitly rejects data harvesting, ad networks, and manipulation tactics that have become standard in the industry

FAQ

What is Boomerang?

Boomerang is a file transfer service launched by Nalden, the co-founder of We Transfer. It allows users to upload and share files without creating an account, with a free tier for basic transfers and a paid tier (€6.99/month) for enhanced features like storage expansion, larger file sizes, password protection, and team access management.

How does Boomerang work?

Boomerang simplifies file transfer to its core function. Users navigate to the website, drag files into the upload area, and instantly receive a shareable link. There's no login process, no account verification, and no unnecessary steps between uploading and sharing. The service handles the storage and delivery while keeping the user interface minimal and focused.

What are the benefits of Boomerang?

Boomerang offers several competitive advantages including frictionless no-login file sharing, transparent and fair pricing without manipulation tactics, minimal data collection for user privacy, a clean interface designed for speed rather than feature proliferation, and the founder's credibility from creating the original We Transfer. These benefits appeal particularly to creatives, designers, and professionals frustrated with We Transfer's post-acquisition decline and competitors' bloat.

Why did Nalden build Boomerang?

After We Transfer was acquired by Bending Spoons in 2023, the company shifted toward aggressive monetization, layoffs (75% of staff), complex interface changes, and even attempted to use user content for AI training. Nalden watched his original vision get corrupted and began receiving messages from frustrated users seeking alternatives, which motivated him to rebuild We Transfer with its original ethos of simplicity and user-first design.

How is Boomerang different from We Transfer now?

Modern We Transfer emphasizes paid tier features, more complex interface design, aggressive monetization tactics, and less respect for user privacy. Boomerang explicitly rejects these approaches with no required login, simpler interface, transparent pricing, no ads, minimal data collection, and a commitment to building features only when they genuinely improve the core function of file transfer.

Does Boomerang have privacy protections?

Yes, Boomerang is built with privacy as a core principle rather than an afterthought. The service collects minimal user data, contains no ad network or tracking, and doesn't use user content for AI training or any other purpose. Users can transfer files without creating an account or providing unnecessary personal information, making it fundamentally more privacy-respecting than competitors.

When will the macOS app launch?

Nalden has announced that a dedicated macOS application is in development, though no specific launch date has been provided. The web version is currently the primary interface, with the native app promised as a future release to provide better integration with macOS file system and enhanced performance for power users on the platform.

How much does Boomerang cost?

Boomerang is free for basic file transfers without storage limits or account creation. The paid tier costs €6.99 per month and includes 200GB storage per space, 500GB total storage, 5GB maximum file size, password protection, custom covers, 90-day file expiry control, and the ability to invite unlimited users to collaborate on files.

What makes Boomerang's philosophy different?

Boomerang embraces radical simplicity by explicitly rejecting feature bloat, AI marketing gimmicks, dark pattern monetization, and unnecessary user-facing complexity. The founder uses AI internally to optimize infrastructure and performance, but consciously avoids adding user-facing AI features just for trend-following, focusing instead on solving the core problem of file transfer better than anyone else.

Is Boomerang secure?

While detailed security specifications haven't been publicly disclosed, Boomerang's architecture emphasizes reliability and proper infrastructure design with distributed systems, redundancy, and monitoring. The privacy-first approach means user files aren't harvested for training data or sold to third parties, and users maintain control over file access through password protection and expiry settings.

How does Boomerang compete with Dropbox?

Dropbox is a comprehensive productivity platform with 700+ million users, but this complexity is Boomerang's advantage. For users who only need to send a file, Boomerang is dramatically simpler and faster. Dropbox optimizes for collaboration and storage; Boomerang optimizes for the single task of file transfer, allowing it to be better at that specific function while remaining more affordable and less invasive.

Key Takeaways

• Boomerang represents a founder's attempt to reclaim product vision after private equity acquisition corrupted WeTransfer with bloat and manipulation
• Market gap exists for simple, no-login file transfer tools as competitors optimized for features and monetization rather than core user needs
• Nalden's reputation and credibility as WeTransfer's original creator provides authentic differentiation that competitors cannot easily replicate
• Simplicity, privacy-first design, and honest pricing create genuine competitive advantage in industry obsessed with feature expansion
• Product acquisition and value destruction pattern repeats across SaaS industry when PE firms optimize for extraction over cultivation of original vision

Related Articles

• The Complete Guide to Breaking Free From Big Tech in 2026