![Borderlands 4 Nintendo Switch 2 Port Paused: What It Means [2025]](https://tryrunable.com/blog/borderlands-4-nintendo-switch-2-port-paused-what-it-means-20/image-1-1770156394704.jpg)
Borderlands 4 Nintendo Switch 2 Port Paused: What Just Happened and Why It Matters [2025]
Last week, Variety broke the news that Take-Two Interactive, the publisher behind Gearbox Software's Borderlands 4, has put the Nintendo Switch 2 version of the game on "pause." If you were one of the people who watched Nintendo's big Switch 2 Direct presentation last April and got excited about playing Borderlands 4 on a portable console, this news probably stung a bit.
Here's the core situation: the Switch 2 version of Borderlands 4 was supposed to launch on October 3rd, 2025, but Take-Two delayed it just days before that release date. Now, the company is officially hitting pause on development altogether. In a statement to Variety, Take-Two spokesperson Alan Lewis said, "We made the difficult decision to pause development on that SKU. Our focus continues to be delivering quality post-launch content for players on the ongoing improvements to optimize the game."
What does this actually mean? It means you're not getting Borderlands 4 on Switch 2 anytime soon. Maybe ever. And the ripple effects of this decision extend way beyond just one game on one platform.
The gaming industry has been watching the Switch 2's launch closely. The hybrid console concept proved incredibly successful with the original Switch, which became one of Nintendo's best-selling consoles of all time. Publishers have been cautiously optimistic about bringing AAA games to the Switch 2, betting that the improved hardware would finally let them port more demanding titles without destroying performance or requiring massive compromises.
Borderlands 4 was supposed to be proof of concept. The game already shipped on PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X|S, and PC. It's a co-op shooter that demands solid performance, responsive controls, and stable framerates. If Take-Two could pull off a competent Switch 2 port, it would signal to other publishers that the hybrid console was worth investing in. Instead, we're getting the opposite signal entirely.
Take-Two didn't explain specifically why development is paused. The company just mentioned needing to focus on "ongoing improvements to optimize the game" on existing platforms. This is where things get interesting, because Borderlands 4 has had a rough launch. The game shipped with performance issues, bugs, and balancing problems that have required patches and fixes since day one. Maybe the Switch 2 port isn't paused because it's technically impossible. Maybe it's paused because the base game still needs work, and porting it to a new platform when the original version isn't even stable yet is a recipe for disaster.
The Borderlands 4 Launch Disaster Nobody's Talking About
When Borderlands 4 shipped in September 2024, it wasn't the triumphant return the franchise needed. The game had been delayed from earlier in the year, which should have been a red flag. But even with that extra development time, the game hit storefronts in rough shape.
On PC, performance was particularly problematic. Frame rates would tank in hectic combat scenarios. The game would stutter when loading new areas. On some systems, it straight-up crashed. Meanwhile, the console versions had their own issues: frame rate inconsistency, texture pop-in, and a save system that felt antiquated compared to games that shipped five years ago.
The game balance wasn't great either. Certain weapons and character builds were wildly overpowered compared to others. The endgame content felt thin. The storytelling, which has always been Borderlands' greatest strength, felt rushed in places. It wasn't a catastrophic launch like Cyberpunk 2077 or No Man's Sky, but it definitely wasn't the polished, ready-to-play game that a franchise like Borderlands should have delivered.
More importantly, the player community was frustrated. People bought the game expecting the Borderlands experience they'd gotten before: a chaotic, funny shooter with mountains of loot and genuinely entertaining characters. Instead, they got a game that felt like it needed another six months in the oven.
Take-Two's response has been to push out patches and balance updates. They've added new weapons, tweaked skill trees, fixed bugs, and generally worked to improve the core experience. But this is exactly the kind of post-launch work that takes developer resources and attention. When you're in damage control mode trying to fix a game that's already out in the world, adding a new platform port to your workload is the last thing you want to do.
This is where the Switch 2 port gets shelved. Not because it's technically impossible, but because it's strategically stupid to release another broken Borderlands 4 port when you're already dealing with the fallout from the broken original.
Why the Switch 2 Represents a Real Technical Challenge
Here's the thing about porting AAA games to Nintendo's hybrid console: it's genuinely hard. The Switch 2 is more powerful than the original Switch, obviously, but it's still dealing with fundamental hardware constraints that PC and current-gen consoles don't have to worry about.
The Switch 2 uses an NVIDIA processor based on the same Tegra architecture as the original Switch, but upgraded. We're talking roughly 2 to 3 times the performance compared to the first Switch. That sounds like a lot in theory, but in practice, it means you can't just recompile a PS5 version and ship it on Switch 2. Games need to be optimized for different power targets.
Borderlands 4 is built on Unreal Engine 5. The game uses high-resolution textures, complex lighting systems, and demanding visual effects. On PS5, the game runs at 1440p (or 4K in some modes) at 60 frames per second. On Switch 2, you'd be looking at dropping down to 720p or 900p in handheld mode, with significant visual compromises. In docked mode, maybe you push for 1080p at a lower frame rate.
But here's where it gets messy: porting Unreal Engine 5 games to the Switch is notoriously difficult. The engine is designed for high-powered hardware. Scaling it down requires specialized knowledge. Epic Games has released tools to help, but they're still not foolproof.
Take a game like Doom Eternal, which shipped on the original Switch. Panic Button, the porting studio that handled it, had to make massive visual compromises. The game looks significantly worse on Switch than it does on console. Not just a little worse. Noticeably, obviously worse. That's the kind of thing that makes players unhappy. They see footage of the PS5 version, then buy it on Switch expecting something similar, and instead get something that looks like a game from 2015.
For a franchise like Borderlands, which is known for its distinctive visual style and bright, expressive art direction, those compromises become obvious. The cel-shaded aesthetic that makes Borderlands look like a comic book is actually somewhat forgiving on lower-end hardware, but you still need solid performance to maintain that visual identity. A stuttering, 30 FPS version of Borderlands 4 would feel sluggish and unsatisfying, especially in the fast-paced multiplayer sections.
The technical challenge, then, isn't impossible. Other developers have proven that AAA games can ship on Switch 2 with acceptable quality. But it takes time, effort, and specialized expertise. When you're already stretched thin optimizing the base game, adding that workload becomes unjustifiable.
The October Delay Nobody Saw Coming
Let's rewind to early October 2025. Borderlands 4 is scheduled to ship on Switch 2 in exactly a few days. Marketing materials are out. Retailers are stocking copies. Players are counting down the hours. Then, with almost no warning, Take-Two announces a delay.
This wasn't a vague delay either. There was no "we'll let you know more soon" messaging. The company just went silent on the Switch 2 version. No new release date. No explanation. Just radio silence.
When companies do that, it usually means one of two things: either the situation is so fluid that they genuinely don't know when they'll be able to ship, or they're trying to figure out whether they should ship at all. Given the state of Borderlands 4 at launch, the decision to eventually pause development entirely makes sense in retrospect. The company was probably hoping that with another month or two, they could get the game in acceptable shape. But as they tested it on Switch 2, they realized the compromises were too significant, or the bugs were too numerous, or the resources required were too massive.
The pause announcement came alongside Take-Two's Q3 FY 2026 earnings report. This is the moment companies use to make difficult announcements about their product roadmap. It's almost like they wanted to bury the news in financial minutiae. Tell investors first, then let the news trickle out to players through gaming outlets. Less dramatic that way.
But for players who had been waiting for the Switch 2 version, it stung. The original Nintendo Switch got its version of Borderlands: The Pre-Sequel, though it was a compromise. But players were hoping that the more powerful Switch 2 would finally let them experience Borderlands 4 properly on a portable device.
What This Means for Nintendo Switch 2 as a Gaming Platform
Here's the bigger picture issue: if major publishers can't or won't commit to bringing their latest, most important games to the Switch 2, then the console has a serious problem.
The original Switch succeeded largely because Nintendo was willing to publish tons of exclusive games, and because indie developers found the portable format to be ideally suited to their development constraints and audience preferences. But the Switch 2 needs AAA third-party support to be a credible home console. It can't survive on first-party Nintendo titles alone, though those are undoubtedly excellent.
When Electronic Arts, Rockstar Games, Activision, and Take-Two all decide that bringing AAA games to Switch 2 is too much effort for too little return, you end up with a console that feels increasingly like a Nintendo exclusive machine. That's great if you love Nintendo franchises. It's less great if you want variety.
The economics are brutal. Porting a complex game to a new platform requires a dedicated team of engineers, months of work, and millions of dollars in development costs. For that investment to make sense, the sales potential has to justify it. Publishers need to believe that enough Switch 2 owners will buy their game to recoup that cost and turn a profit.
But here's the problem: fewer people will own a Switch 2 than will own a PlayStation 5 or Xbox Series X. That's just the nature of Nintendo's market position. So the addressable audience is smaller. That means the sales potential is lower. That means publishers are less likely to invest in ports. It becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy: if publishers don't bring games to Switch 2, it becomes less attractive to buy a Switch 2, which means fewer people own one, which means publishers are even less likely to bring games to it.
Borderlands 4 was supposed to be the game that proved publishers could make this work. It was supposed to be the Fortnite moment, where a major AAA title showed up on the new Nintendo hardware and just worked well enough that other publishers would follow. Instead, Take-Two punted. They're focusing on bringing smaller games to Switch 2, like PGA Tour 2K25 and WWE 2K26. Those are fine games, but they're not the franchise tentpoles that really move hardware.
Take-Two's Own Problems Beyond Borderlands 4
Take-Two Interactive is in the middle of navigating some genuinely tough territory right now. Grand Theft Auto VI, the company's biggest franchise and arguably the most anticipated game in the industry, is scheduled for November 2025. That game's success will define Take-Two's financial performance for the next several years.
But GTA VI has already had its own development challenges. The game was announced with a reveal trailer that generated some criticism for its graphics. The company had to fight off speculation that the game had been delayed multiple times. Meanwhile, development of GTA VI has been hampered by the same kind of third-party contractor management issues that affected Rockstar's Red Dead Redemption 2 development.
Add to that the troubled state of some of Take-Two's other major franchises. Judas, the mysterious new game announced back in 2022, still has no release date. The next iteration of the BioShock series has had a legendarily troubled development, with multiple reboots and direction changes over the years. NBA 2K series is under fire for aggressive monetization that's turning players away. And Grand Theft Auto V, which came out in 2013, has somehow sold more than 225 million copies and is still generating revenue at scales that would make most AAA games jealous, but it's also become a cash cow that's overshadowing new releases.
In this context, deciding to pause the Borderlands 4 Switch 2 port makes strategic sense. It's not a high priority. It's not going to make or break the company's financial year. It's better to redirect those resources toward ensuring that GTA VI ships in November in polished condition, and that other upcoming titles get the attention they need.
The Broader Industry Trend: Quality Over Platforms
This pause isn't necessarily bad news for gamers, even though it feels that way in the moment. What it actually represents is a shift in how publishers are thinking about porting games. For years, the assumption was that more platforms equals more sales, and therefore every game should ship everywhere possible. That led to some notoriously bad ports, where games were rushed onto new hardware and shipped broken.
But the industry is gradually learning that a bad port actually damages your franchise more than skipping the platform entirely. Players who buy a terrible version of your game tell their friends not to bother. They leave negative reviews. They lose faith in your ability to deliver quality experiences. That's damaging in the long term.
So what we're seeing from Take-Two with Borderlands 4 is actually a more mature approach: admit that you can't do the work required to make a high-quality port, and pause rather than shipping garbage. It's not fun for Switch 2 owners, but it's arguably the right call.
This is similar to what happened with some other major ports. When Bethesda ports Elder Scrolls Online to new platforms, the company doesn't rush it. When Call of Duty gets ported to lower-end hardware, it gets careful optimization. These are the lessons the industry learned from years of shipping broken ports.
Borderlands 4 being paused, then, is actually an example of the industry getting smarter, even if it doesn't feel that way if you wanted to play it on Switch 2.
What Games Are Actually Coming to Nintendo Switch 2
If Borderlands 4 is paused, what AAA games are actually going to be available on the Switch 2? This is where things get interesting, because Nintendo is being very careful about which games it highlights.
Take-Two mentioned PGA Tour 2K25 and WWE 2K26 for Switch 2. Those are sports games, which are generally easier to port than action-heavy shooters because they have lower graphical requirements and simpler physics. You can maintain 60 FPS on less powerful hardware when you're managing a golf swing or a wrestling match than when you're managing 100 enemies on screen with explosions and particle effects.
Then there's the question of what other publishers will bring. 2K Sports, the division of Take-Two that makes those sports games, has a much easier time with Switch 2 ports than the entertainment division does. Activision has been quiet about Switch 2 support beyond confirming they'll bring games, but no details. EA has been similarly vague. Microsoft, which owns Xbox, has been making the case that Game Pass on Switch 2 (if that happens) would be the real play rather than individual AAA ports.
The most likely scenario is that the Switch 2 ends up looking like a platform for Nintendo first-party games, some sports titles, indie games, and older AAA games that have already been successfully ported to switch. New AAA games like Borderlands 4 will probably remain exclusive to the more powerful platforms, at least at launch.
This is actually how the original Switch evolved. Despite everyone assuming it would get day-one ports of every major release, it actually became a platform primarily defined by Nintendo games, indie games, and selective third-party support. By the end of the original Switch's lifecycle, that was fine. The console was wildly successful anyway. But it does represent a ceiling on what kind of gaming experiences the Switch 2 can offer.
The State of AAA Game Porting in 2025
Borderlands 4's pause is also a window into the current state of AAA game porting technology and philosophy. We're at a point where it's theoretically possible to port almost any game to almost any platform, given enough time and money. But "possible" and "practical" are two different things.
The cost-benefit analysis of porting has gotten more sophisticated. Publishers now have better data about expected sales on different platforms. They know roughly how many copies of a PS5 game will sell compared to how many copies of a Switch version will sell. They can calculate the exact ROI of a porting effort. If the math doesn't work, they don't do it.
This is actually good for consumers in some ways. It means publishers are being more strategic about where they invest. It means fewer broken games shipping on platforms they weren't properly optimized for. But it also means more consolidation around the most popular platforms, which is bad for consumer choice and diversity.
Ultra Engine optimization tools have gotten better. Unreal Engine has tools specifically for scaling down to mobile and handheld platforms. Unity has similar capabilities. But those tools only do so much. They automate some of the scaling, but a human expert still needs to do the hard work of making artistic compromises, rewriting shaders, and optimizing critical systems.
Meanwhile, the games themselves are getting more complex. The expectation for visual quality in AAA games has risen dramatically in the last few years. Players expect photorealistic graphics, complex lighting systems, detailed environments, and smooth 60 FPS performance. Delivering that across multiple platforms with vastly different hardware capabilities is genuinely challenging work.
Borderlands 4, with its vibrant cel-shaded style, is actually one of the more port-friendly AAA games from a visual perspective. Games with more realistic graphics have an even harder time scaling down. The fact that Take-Two couldn't make Borderlands 4 work on Switch 2 in a way that satisfied them suggests that truly current-gen AAA games are increasingly becoming exclusive to high-end platforms.
How Borderlands Has Always Struggled on Nintendo Hardware
It's worth noting that this isn't the first time a Borderlands game has had issues coming to Nintendo hardware. The original Borderlands never shipped on Switch. Borderlands 2, despite being over a decade old, also never made it to the hybrid console. Borderlands: The Pre-Sequel eventually got a Switch port, but it was a pretty compromised version that required a lot of optimization to even be playable.
The Borderlands series, for all its popularity, has never been the easiest franchise to port to lower-power hardware. The games are built around chaotic combat scenes with tons of enemies on screen at once, particle effects everywhere, procedurally generated loot that displays massive amounts of text, and complex physics interactions. All of that is harder to run on portable hardware.
Meanwhile, games that do well on Switch tend to be either Nintendo exclusives, indie games built for lower-spec hardware from the ground up, or older AAA games that have been thoroughly optimized over years of patches. Doom Eternal works on Switch, but only because Panic Button spent an enormous amount of time making it work. The Witcher 3 exists on Switch, but it requires cloud streaming on some features to actually function.
So there's maybe a pattern here. Borderlands just doesn't play well with Nintendo hardware. The franchise is fundamentally built around high-performance systems. That's where Borderlands should stay.
The Future of Take-Two's Switch 2 Strategy
Take-Two said in its statement that it's "continuing to collaborate closely with our friends at Nintendo" and that the company is "incredibly excited about bringing more of our titles to that platform in the future." This is corporate speak for "we're not abandoning Switch 2 entirely."
But the company is clearly being selective. The sports games like PGA Tour 2K25 and WWE 2K26 are happening because those franchises have a large audience on Switch (people play sports games casually and don't necessarily need cutting-edge graphics) and because they're technically easier to port. But the big action franchises, the shooters, the complex open-world games? Those are probably staying on PlayStation, Xbox, and PC.
This actually makes sense for Take-Two's business model. The company makes more money from a single copy of Grand Theft Auto VI sold on PS5 than it does from three copies of a sports game sold on Switch 2. Prioritizing the platforms that generate the most revenue is just basic business strategy.
The question is whether this approach will eventually become a problem for Switch 2's market position. If enough major publishers decide that the effort-to-reward ratio isn't worth it, the Switch 2 could gradually become seen as a second-tier platform where you go to play Nintendo games and indie titles, but not for the latest blockbusters. That worked fine for the original Switch, but it was partly because the Switch was unique in offering console gaming on the go. The Switch 2 is supposed to be a more serious competitor to the PS5 and Xbox Series X, which means it needs the latest AAA games.
The pause on Borderlands 4 doesn't kill the Switch 2's potential. But it's a signal that the console might not be the platform where everyone wants to develop their most ambitious AAA titles.
Why the Pause Might Be Temporary (Or Permanent)
Here's the crucial thing: Take-Two said the port is on "pause," not "canceled." Pause is a weaker word than cancellation. It suggests the project might resume at some point. But in the history of video game development, "pause" often means "we're not working on this right now and have no plans to resume." It's a softer way of saying no.
For Borderlands 4 specifically, a pause could theoretically become a permanent pause after the game's post-launch content cycle ends. Once the team stops working on seasonal updates and balance patches, maybe the Switch 2 port becomes viable again. Maybe a year or two down the line, when the Switch 2 has matured and developers have figured out better optimization techniques, the port could resume.
But realistically? Once a project gets paused, it rarely restarts. Players move on to other games. The development team gets reassigned to new projects. The code base ages and becomes harder to work with. By the time a company might want to resume work on a paused port, it's often more efficient to just leave it paused.
So while Take-Two is technically leaving the door open, don't expect to see Borderlands 4 on Switch 2 anytime soon. The franchise will probably move on to Borderlands 5, and maybe that game will have a Switch 2 port at launch if the porting ecosystem has improved by then. But Borderlands 4 on Switch 2? That ship has sailed.
The Ripple Effects: What Other Publishers Are Watching
Other publishers are definitely paying attention to Take-Two's decision. This is exactly the kind of decision that ripples through the industry and affects future planning.
When a major publisher decides that they can't justify the effort of porting a AAA game to a new console, other publishers take notice. They look at the financials. They look at the technical challenges. They draw conclusions about whether their own games should make the jump.
Some publishers will probably look at the Borderlands 4 situation and think, "We're going to pass on Switch 2 ports of our biggest games." Others might think, "We can do better than Take-Two did. Let's try." But the baseline assumption will have shifted. Instead of assuming every new game will ship on Switch 2, publishers will now assume most won't, unless they're from Nintendo or specifically designed for that platform.
This could actually be healthy in some ways. It might push publishers to either invest seriously in Switch 2 ports and do them right, or not do them at all. The middle ground of rushed, compromised ports is bad for everyone. But it also means Switch 2 owners will have fewer options for AAA games, which is not great for the console's long-term market position.
What Players Should Actually Expect From Switch 2's Game Library
If you're considering buying a Switch 2, you should go in with realistic expectations about its game library. Based on everything we know about the platform and how publishers are reacting to it, here's what's likely:
You're definitely getting all the major Nintendo first-party games. Mario, Zelda, Pokémon, Splatoon, these franchises will all be on the console. Nintendo doesn't skip their own platforms.
You're probably getting most indie games, especially smaller indie games that are inherently suited to the Switch's processing power. The Switch became an indie haven, and that's not likely to change.
You're likely getting some sports games and FIFA-style annual franchises, because those are relatively easy to port and have consistent revenue on Nintendo platforms.
You might get some older AAA games that have already been successfully ported to the original Switch and just need updates for the new hardware.
You're probably not getting brand new AAA games at launch. Games like Borderlands 4, or the next Grand Theft Auto, or the next Call of Duty. These will launch on PS5, Xbox Series X, and PC. If they come to Switch 2, it'll be years later, if ever.
This isn't a disaster. The original Switch proved you can have a wildly successful console without being the platform for cutting-edge AAA games. But it's important to have realistic expectations going in.
The Bigger Context: How Post-Launch Support Breaks Games
One thing that's worth understanding about Borderlands 4's situation is that the pause likely reflects a broader truth about modern AAA game development: post-launch support is expensive and all-consuming.
Back in the 1990s and 2000s, when a game shipped, it shipped. Maybe it got one or two patches to fix game-breaking bugs, but then it was done. Developers moved on to the next project.
Now? Every major AAA game is expected to support post-launch updates indefinitely. Players expect seasonal content, balance changes, new weapons, new story content, and ongoing community engagement. This is what players want and what the industry has trained them to expect.
But this model has a cost. It ties up development resources for years after a game's initial release. The Borderlands 4 team can't just move on to the next game. They need to keep people assigned to supporting Borderlands 4's live service. That means fewer people are available for other projects, like porting the game to new platforms.
This is a fundamental problem with modern game development that the industry hasn't really solved yet. Games are expected to be live services and constantly updated experiences, but that creates a resource management nightmare for publishers. Something has to give, and what gives is usually platform ports and side projects like the Switch 2 version.
Eventually, this model might break. Publishers might realize they can't sustainably keep multiple AAA games in live service mode forever while also shipping new games. But for now, this is the reality: the post-launch support expectations for modern AAA games make it harder to justify porting those games to other platforms, because the resources are tied up in ongoing support.
Looking Forward: Will AAA Gaming Exclude Nintendo?
The biggest question hanging over the Borderlands 4 pause is whether it's an isolated incident or a sign of a larger trend. Are we entering an era where Nintendo consoles are gradually excluded from cutting-edge AAA gaming?
It's possible. The gap between the Switch 2's hardware power and the PS5/Xbox Series X is significant. It's not insurmountable, but it's noticeable. As games get more visually ambitious and technically complex, scaling them down to Switch 2 becomes proportionally harder.
At the same time, the market is fragmented in ways it never has been before. Subscription services like Game Pass are fundamentally changing how people think about game availability. Cloud gaming is becoming more viable. Free-to-play games are dominant. In this context, spending millions on a single port to a console that represents maybe 5% of your addressable market starts to look less and less attractive.
But Nintendo has historically found ways to remain relevant even when excluded from bleeding-edge AAA gaming. The original Switch succeeded despite not getting day-one ports of major titles. Nintendo's first-party development is strong enough and distinctive enough that people buy the console anyway.
The Switch 2 will probably follow a similar pattern. It'll be a great console for people who want Nintendo games and a portable gaming experience. It'll eventually get some third-party support, but probably not as much as people are hoping for right now. And that's okay. Nintendo doesn't need to be everything to everyone.
But for people who want the full breadth of modern AAA gaming on a portable device? The Switch 2 might not be the answer. Those people might need to stick with PS5, Xbox, and PC, and accept that portable AAA gaming at that level isn't really viable yet.
The Borderlands Franchise Needs to Figure Out Its Identity
Here's something worth considering that goes beyond just the Switch 2 issue: the Borderlands franchise itself is at a crossroads.
Borderlands 2, which came out in 2012, is arguably one of the best games of the last generation. It's got a huge, devoted fanbase. People still play it. Borderlands: The Pre-Sequel was less successful but still had its fans. Tales from the Borderlands was an episodic narrative game that won a ton of awards.
But then the main franchise stalled out. There was a gap of seven years between Pre-Sequel (2014) and Tales from the Borderlands (2014-2015) and the next major release. When Borderlands 3 finally shipped in 2019, it was commercially successful but not critically adored. It felt like a step backward in terms of storytelling compared to the series' best moments.
And now Borderlands 4, coming out after another long wait, has struggled out of the gate. It's not a bad game, but it's not inspiring the kind of passion that the franchise is known for.
Meanwhile, the New Tales from the Borderlands was a commercial disappointment. The Tiny Tina's Wonderlands spin-off had its fans but wasn't a blockbuster. The Borderlands movie starring Jack Black was, to put it charitably, not well-received by critics or audiences.
So the franchise is in a weird spot. It's still popular, it still sells, but it's not generating the cultural impact it once did. The Borderlands 4 pause on Switch 2, then, is just one symptom of a larger issue: the franchise's momentum is slowing.
Maybe a Switch 2 port would have helped. Maybe having a handheld Borderlands 4 would have introduced the game to new players and boosted sales. But at this point, the franchise probably needs to focus on getting the core experience right first, before worrying about bringing it to other platforms.
Conclusion: The Pause as a Symptom
The Borderlands 4 Nintendo Switch 2 port pause isn't really about the Switch 2. It's not even really about Borderlands 4, though both factors play a role. It's a symptom of something deeper in the gaming industry right now: the unsustainable cost of supporting AAA games across multiple platforms, the increasing complexity of modern game development, and the difficult calculus of porting to new hardware.
Take-Two made a pragmatic decision. The company weighed the costs and benefits of continuing the Switch 2 port and decided the costs were too high relative to the expected returns. That's actually a rational, business-sensible decision, even if it's disappointing for Switch 2 fans.
But this decision also signals something important to the industry: the era of expecting every major game to be available on every platform might be coming to an end. Publishers are becoming more selective about where they invest their resources. Some consoles and some platforms are getting the big franchises. Others aren't.
For the Switch 2, that means accepting that it will be a Nintendo-focused console with strong indie support and selected third-party games, but probably not the place where everyone gets to play the latest AAA blockbusters on day one. That's a reality that Nintendo fans might need to come to terms with.
As for Borderlands 4, maybe a future Switch port is possible. Maybe once post-launch support winds down and the game stabilizes, someone will revisit the Switch 2 port. But realistically, the game is probably staying on the high-end platforms where it was designed to run.
The pause is telling us something important about the future of gaming: not every game will be everywhere, and that's okay. The industry is maturing toward a model where platforms are more differentiated, and development resources are allocated more strategically. It's not the future everyone wanted, but it might be the one we're getting.
