Ask Runable forDesign-Driven General AI AgentTry Runable For Free
Runable
Back to Blog
Technology6 min read

California canals could turn into massive solar power plants, saving water and energy while raising tough economic and environmental questions | TechRadar

The Canal Solar idea could generate gigawatts of power and save billions of gallons of water Discover insights about california canals could turn into massive s

TechnologyInnovationBest PracticesGuideTutorial
California canals could turn into massive solar power plants, saving water and energy while raising tough economic and environmental questions | TechRadar
Listen to Article
0:00
0:00
0:00

California canals could turn into massive solar power plants, saving water and energy while raising tough economic and environmental questions | Tech Radar

Overview

News, deals, reviews, guides and more on the newest computing gadgets

Start exploring exclusive deals, expert advice and more

Details

Unlock and manage exclusive Techradar member rewards.

Unlock instant access to exclusive member features.

Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.

A solution to our data center woes? Covering California’s canals with solar panels could generate a staggering 13GW of clean energy and save enough water for two million people — so why the opposition?

The Canal Solar idea could generate gigawatts of power and save billions of gallons of water

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.

Covering 4,000 kilometers of canals would save 63 billion gallons of water and generate 13GW of power annually

Pilot project shows significant drops in water loss and algae growth

Critics argue that the project is too expensive, and preventing canal evaporation can be counterproductive

California's extensive canal network could become a massive source of clean energy while saving billions of gallons of water each year.

A University of California study found covering roughly 4,000 kilometers of canals with solar panels would generate 13GW of power annually and save 63 billion gallons of water.

That amount of water is enough to meet the residential needs of more than two million people every single year.

Saltwater cooling system could turn data centers into clean water producers

Large solar farms in deserts may trigger rainfall, research suggests

How wave-powered ocean platforms could meet AI data center energy demands

A small-scale demonstration called the Nexus project was built to test whether this concept actually works in real-world conditions.

The 1.6-megawatt Nexus installation sits on canals operated by the Turlock Irrigation District, and after one full irrigation season, the covered canal sections showed evaporation reductions of 50 to 70% beneath the solar arrays.

Algae growth dropped by 85%, which significantly reduces the cost of maintaining the canals and cleaning water pumps.

The shade also keeps the solar panels cooler than ground-mounted alternatives, improving their electricity output by roughly 2.5 to 5%.

India has already built similar canal-top solar projects, proving the concept works across different climates and geographies.

Despite the clear benefits, this idea faces resistance, and the major obstacle is cost.

Canal top solar requires heavy steel support structures that must span the width of the water channel below, and these structures alone can account for up to 40% of the total project cost, significantly more than ground-mounted solar farms.

Meta to power data centers with space-based solar energy

Amazon, Microsoft, Google and more pressed on data center water and power use

Southwest data centers face power risks as Hoover Dam output declines

Critics argue that canals are designed for water delivery, not as foundations for industrial infrastructure.

Such designs will require regular access to the canals by maintenance crews for desilting and repairs, and overhead panels would complicate that work significantly.

Some also point out California has plenty of cheap desert land where traditional solar panels can be installed at much lower expense.

Though a solar farm on desert land costs less and avoids the engineering complications, it does nothing to save water, a long-standing Californian issue, as the state has already lost 40% of its Colorado River allocation this year, and every drop saved matters.

What would need to change for widespread deployment

The economic calculation of this idea shifts when water savings are given real monetary value.

Canal top solar prevents evaporation in a state that regularly faces severe drought conditions, and also generates electricity exactly where agricultural demand exists, reducing transmission losses from distant desert solar farms.

From another vantage point, canal top solar could ease data center power demand, which usually places enormous strain on local grids and water supplies.

It generates clean power exactly where it is needed, reducing transmission losses and avoiding the need for new transmission lines.

The water saved through evaporation reduction could be used to cool data centers instead of being lost to the atmosphere.

A single data center can use millions of gallons of water each year, and canal shading preserves that resource for productive use.

The 13GW of potential generation from California's canals could power hundreds of data centers without requiring additional land or stressing the state's overtaxed grid.

That said, preventing evaporation, which the canal top solar will do, is not a guaranteed win.

It will likely have minimal impact on the local humidity and can disrupt aquatic ecosystems by reducing dissolved oxygen, which is like solving one problem while creating another.

The Nexus pilot will continue collecting data to determine whether California scales the concept or decides the ecological and operational trade-offs aren't worth the energy gains.

Follow Tech Radar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds.

Efosa has been writing about technology for over 7 years, initially driven by curiosity but now fueled by a strong passion for the field. He holds both a Master's and a Ph D in sciences, which provided him with a solid foundation in analytical thinking.

You must confirm your public display name before commenting

1 The Dell Ultra Sharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub monitor is the kind of display I always wished was possible, and now it's in my office

2 Amazon is slashing prices of best-selling women's running shoes from Nike, Saucony, Brooks, Asics and more — here are 28 deals you should make a sprint for

3 The Netherlands' ambitious homegrown AI model enters the real world

4'From the inventors of origami': Japan joins Australia in building cardboard drones designed for one-way missions and swarming targets — and at just $2,000, they’re scarily cheap

5 Open AI has 3 new AI voice models that the Chat GPT maker says will ‘unlock a new class of voice apps for developers’

Tech Radar is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site.

© Future US, Inc. Full 7th Floor, 130 West 42nd Street, New York, NY 10036.

Key Takeaways

  • News, deals, reviews, guides and more on the newest computing gadgets
  • Start exploring exclusive deals, expert advice and more
  • Unlock and manage exclusive Techradar member rewards
  • Unlock instant access to exclusive member features
  • Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards

Cut Costs with Runable

Cost savings are based on average monthly price per user for each app.

Which apps do you use?

Apps to replace

ChatGPTChatGPT
$20 / month
LovableLovable
$25 / month
Gamma AIGamma AI
$25 / month
HiggsFieldHiggsField
$49 / month
Leonardo AILeonardo AI
$12 / month
TOTAL$131 / month

Runable price = $9 / month

Saves $122 / month

Runable can save upto $1464 per year compared to the non-enterprise price of your apps.