Ask Runable forDesign-Driven General AI AgentTry Runable For Free
Runable
Back to Blog
Technology15 min read

Elon Musk and Sam Altman’s court showdown will dish the dirt | The Verge

On Monday, jury selection for Musk v. Altman begins. But the actual trial itself may not be as important as the evidence it makes public about Musk and OpenAI.

TechnologyInnovationBest PracticesGuideTutorial
Elon Musk and Sam Altman’s court showdown will dish the dirt | The Verge
Listen to Article
0:00
0:00
0:00

Elon Musk and Sam Altman’s court showdown will dish the dirt | The Verge

Overview

Tech Expand Amazon Apple Facebook Google Microsoft Samsung Business See all tech

Reviews Expand Smart Home Reviews Phone Reviews Tablet Reviews Headphone Reviews See all reviews

Details

Science Expand Space Energy Environment Health See all science

Entertainment Expand TV Shows Movies Audio See all entertainment

Policy Expand Antitrust Politics Law Security See all policy

Gadgets Expand Laptops Phones TVs Headphones Speakers Wearables See all gadgets

Verge Shopping Expand Buying Guides Deals Gift Guides See all shopping

Streaming Expand Disney HBONetflix You Tube Creators See all streaming

Transportation Expand Electric Cars Autonomous Cars Ride-sharing Scooters See all transportation

AIClose AIPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All AI

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Policy Close Policy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All Policy

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Report Close Report Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All Report

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Elon Musk and Sam Altman’s court showdown will dish the dirt

Forget the jury — Musk v. Altman is all about the court of public opinion.

Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Might as well jump, as the poet David Lee Roth once said.

AIClose AIPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All AI

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Policy Close Policy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All Policy

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Report Close Report Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All Report

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Elon Musk and Sam Altman’s court showdown will dish the dirt

Forget the jury — Musk v. Altman is all about the court of public opinion.

Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Elon Musk cofounded Open AI, and then flounced off in a huff when he wasn’t anointed CEO, leaving Sam Altman as the last power-hungry man standing. Now, Musk is back with a lawsuit, and a trial is scheduled to start in Oakland, California, on April 27th. Theoretically, it’s a legal case about whether Open AI defrauded Musk. But that’s not really what we’re all doing here. This is about mess.

Over the past couple of years, Musk’s legal theories for punishing Open AI have run the gamut from breach of contract to unfair business practices to false advertising. Now, he and Altman will be getting called to the stand at a particularly delicate time. Musk’s x AI, now a part of Space X, has filed for an initial public offering. Open AI is rumored to be considering an IPO itself. There are only billions of dollars at stake.

And so naturally, there’s a lot of internal tech gossip coming to light. Questions about Elon’s “rhino ket” use won’t make it into the trial… but it’s in news stories because it showed up in the docket. We got excerpts from Open AI President Greg “What will take me to $1B?” Brockman’s diary. Mark Zuckerberg, not involved in the litigation at all, has had several embarrassing texts made public, like allegedly telling Musk that he had Meta teams “on alert to take down content doxxing or threatening the people on your [DOGE] team,” weeks after claiming he refuses to moderate based on government requests. Also, Musk thinks Jeff Bezos “is a bit of a tool.”

Lawsuits appear to be Musk’s preferred alternative to therapy

The fact that the case got to trial at all is a win for Musk, who seems to be trying to damage Open AI’s reputation however he can — from lawsuits to general shit-talking to, apparently, a homophobic dossier on Sam Altman that’s getting passed around Silicon Valley by “Musk intermediaries.” Musk v. Altman “only ended up at trial because Elon Musk can pay his attorneys to argue a losing case,” said Sam Brunson, a professor of law at Loyola University of Chicago. “If I were doing this on contingency, I’d assume I wouldn’t be getting paid.”

Over the next few weeks, high-profile AI executives, such as Microsoft’s CEO Satya Nadella and CTO Kevin Scott, will likely testify. Former Open AI executives, such as cofounder Ilya Sutskever and Mira Murati, former CTO, may be called. The former board members involved in Altman’s temporary 2023 ouster from his CEO role may also testify.

Lawsuits appear to be Musk’s preferred alternative to therapy. Musk has sued perceived adversaries of his X social media platform, including a suit against a nonprofit that was dismissed as “baseless” and another against the firm that successfully made him follow through on his agreement to buy Twitter. Tesla and Space X are hotbeds of litigation. Let’s not go over the numerous family law matters that Musk is involved in due to his 14 known children.

Musk has actually filed four lawsuits against Open AI. The first — for a breach of the founding agreement — was in state court, in 2024; Musk withdrew it immediately before a major hearing. We then got the current lawsuit, also filed in 2024, in which Musk alleged “Shakespearean” deceit. Several of its claims, including a laughable invocation of racketeering law, have been dismissed. Another suit, filed a year later, this time by x AI, accused Apple and Open AI of engaging in anticompetitive behavior by making an agreement to exclusively put Chat GPT into i Phones. (The case is ongoing.) A fourth case accused Open AI of poaching x AI employees and stealing trade secrets. It was dismissed.

“Since launching a competing artificial intelligence company, x AI, Musk has been trying to leverage the judicial system for an edge.”

In court starting next week, Musk will be making three main claims: that Altman and Brockman, et al., breached Open AI’s charitable trust; that they participated in unjust enrichment (at Musk’s expense); and that they committed fraud. His lawyer will tell a jury that he was duped into giving Open AI money on terms that Altman and Brockman didn’t live up to. Among other things, he’s demanding that Altman and Brockman be removed from their company roles, that Open AI be required to award a certain amount of money to its nonprofit, and that it cease operating in its current structure as a public benefit corporation.

Open AI has countered that Musk failed to prove that Altman and Brockman ever made him a “cognizable promise” that could amount to unlawful activity, and that he lacks the standing for some claims, among other objections. It’s pointed out that Musk could have intervened in the company’s 2025 recapitalization in the time between Open AI filing and its review by two attorneys general, and he did not. “This suit is the latest move in Elon Musk’s increasingly blusterous campaign to harass Open AI for his own competitive advantage,” Open AI wrote in one filing. “Since launching a competing artificial intelligence company, x AI, Musk has been trying to leverage the judicial system for an edge. The effort should fail.”

In court, Open AI could argue that it engaged in self-help — such as starting its for-profit arm — because Musk left it in the lurch when he pulled promised funding from the nonprofit, says Peter Molk, a professor of law at the University of Florida. But that may not be enough to protect Open AI. “My walking away doesn’t mean you can break any agreement we have,” Molk says. Musk may argue that Open AI should have brought him to court and forced him to pay up. Of course, if Open AI had done that, it likely would have gone bankrupt.

The details that come out in the trial about Open AI “will absolutely change its reputation, if it’s still trying to claim it’s doing this in some high-minded, ‘we want to make AI safe for humanity’ way,” said Deven Desai, a professor of business law and ethics at the Georgia Institute of Technology. “The court documents and testimonies will make it harder and harder for Open AI to keep claiming that’s what it’s about.”

”I think at this point Open AI has the leverage to ask for a soft promise for new investors not to invest in competitors.”

Since this lawsuit was initially filed, Open AI’s reputation has cratered. Besides the assorted lawsuits from people who say Chat GPT encouraged loved ones’ suicides, constant exec reshuffling, and the dominance of Anthropic’s enterprise product have significantly cooled enthusiasm for the company. And there’s always the question of whether Open AI, one of the most expensive startups ever, will make a profit that meets investors’ expectations.

Already, we’ve found out that Sutskever and others were worried about the success of Stability AI, a then-competitor open-source lab. Sutskever also felt “betrayed” by Reid Hoffman, an early investor, founding his own AI lab; in response, Altman said, “I think at this point Open AI has the leverage to ask for a soft promise for new investors not to invest in competitors.” Altman also didn’t tell the board he was personally running an Open AI VC fund, according to a deposition of former board member Helen Toner.

Some of the damages Musk is calling for in his lawsuit — like the demands to unseat executives and change the company’s business structure — are likely unrealistic. State attorneys general from California and Delaware both blessed Open AI’s restructuring. But Georgia Tech’s Desai says that even if the federal court doesn’t move to act on such requests, Musk might still get what he wants. The suit could do real damage, especially ahead of Open AI’s impending IPO, and amid some shareholders reportedly questioning if Altman is the person to lead the company during that process — especially as allegations of his untrustworthiness and manipulative behavior resurface.

Musk’s strategy here is likely not just about angling to win in court, but also to “go after Open AI as it currently exists,” says Desai. “It’s to create enough issues around how it has evolved to cause trouble and possibly get to the point where even if Musk doesn’t win, he’ll have made it look like it’s not worth keeping Mr. Altman in his position.”

Any scandalous information about Open AI’s C-suite could derail the IPO

Musk has his own AI project with x AI and is nakedly trying to damage a competitor, says Molk. Much of the damage — bad PR, the cost of litigation, and distracting Altman and other executives as they begin to prepare for an initial public offering — occurs outside the purview of the courtroom, Molk says. “As long as there is some credibility [to Musk’s case], the motivation doesn’t matter,” he says.

The suit is part of a yearslong feud between Altman and Musk, ever since their personal and working relationships both soured in a public way. Musk’s x AI is aimed at the same government contracts and consumer chatbot users as Open AI. He also folded x AI into Space X, as he had planned to do with Open AI and Tesla.

Open AI has responded to Musk by blogging. According to Open AI, Musk himself wanted a for-profit arm of Open AI — and further, 50 to 60 percent of its equity, and to be its CEO. He also proposed merging Open AI with Tesla. Open AI’s lawyers, playing dirtier, asked in depositions about Musk’s purported escapades at Burning Man, including whether he’d ingested “rhino ketamine.” This fits with its legal tactics elsewhere — including subpoenaing nonprofits and requesting a full list of who attended a deceased 16-year-old’s memorial services.

Open AI is racing both Space X and Anthropic for an initial public offering. And there’s more investor pressure than ever to generate revenue, after companies like Open AI and Anthropic raised billions of dollars without generating profit. Reportedly, even Open AI’s CFO doesn’t believe the company is ready to go public in 2026 due to its sizable spending commitments. Other executives have nevertheless expressed a desire to beat Anthropic to the public market. Any scandalous information about Open AI’s C-suite could derail the IPO.

Zilis: “‘Relationship’ is a relative term. But there have been romantic moments.”

Musk is also potentially vulnerable to mud-slinging. Musk’s Space X has filed confidentially for an IPO, which may happen as soon as June. Anything revealed in the courtroom about x AI or Musk personally could potentially affect investor interest or confidence, particularly since the IPO may follow so quickly on the heels of the trial. We already know from texts surfaced in discovery that Musk was actively recruiting from Open AI.

There are other topics — such as Musk’s relationship with Shivon Zilis, the former board member of Open AI and mother of several of his children — that are particularly sensitive, too. Zilis, who was effectively Open AI’s “Elon whisperer,” has already questioned what the meaning of a “romantic relationship” is in her deposition. (Zilis: ‘Relationship’ is a relative term. But there have been romantic moments.”) And in a 2018 text message, Zilis asks Musk if she should stay “close and friendly” to Open AI to “keep info flowing.” She also told Musk that after he hung up on a call, Sutskever was “visibly devastated” and Musk could probably recruit him if he wanted to.

Another key witness on Open AI’s list is Jared Birchall, Musk’s fixer — who, among other things, runs Musk’s family office. Birchall is likely privy to a number of Musk’s secrets, and his testimony could be damaging.

On the other hand, “I’m not sure how much reputation Musk has left to lose,” says Brunson.

Elizabeth Lopatto Close Elizabeth Lopatto Senior Reporter Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All by Elizabeth Lopatto

Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Hayden Field Close Hayden Field Senior AI Reporter Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All by Hayden Field

Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

AIClose AIPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All AI

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Analysis Close Analysis Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All Analysis

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Elon Musk Close Elon Musk Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All Elon Musk

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Open AIClose Open AIPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All Open AI

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Policy Close Policy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All Policy

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Politics Close Politics Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All Politics

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Report Close Report Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All Report

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Tech Close Tech Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All Tech

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

x AIClosex AIPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All x AI

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Microsoft brings Xbox back, scraps Microsoft Gaming

Microsoft launches ‘vibe working’ in Word, Excel, and Power Point

Microsoft offers voluntary retirement to long-serving employees

Key Takeaways

  • Tech Expand Amazon Apple Facebook Google Microsoft Samsung Business See all tech
  • Reviews Expand Smart Home Reviews Phone Reviews Tablet Reviews Headphone Reviews See all reviews
  • Science Expand Space Energy Environment Health See all science
  • Entertainment Expand TV Shows Movies Audio See all entertainment
  • Policy Expand Antitrust Politics Law Security See all policy

Cut Costs with Runable

Cost savings are based on average monthly price per user for each app.

Which apps do you use?

Apps to replace

ChatGPTChatGPT
$20 / month
LovableLovable
$25 / month
Gamma AIGamma AI
$25 / month
HiggsFieldHiggsField
$49 / month
Leonardo AILeonardo AI
$12 / month
TOTAL$131 / month

Runable price = $9 / month

Saves $122 / month

Runable can save upto $1464 per year compared to the non-enterprise price of your apps.