Ask Runable forDesign-Driven General AI AgentTry Runable For Free
Runable
Back to Blog
Technology7 min read

Elon Musk appeared more petty than prepared | The Verge

In his opening testimony against Sam Altman, Musk wasn’t his own best witness. Instead, we got unfocused testimony about Musk’s other companies. Discover insigh

TechnologyInnovationBest PracticesGuideTutorial
Elon Musk appeared more petty than prepared | The Verge
Listen to Article
0:00
0:00
0:00

Elon Musk appeared more petty than prepared | The Verge

Overview

Tech Expand Amazon Apple Facebook Google Microsoft Samsung Business See all tech

Reviews Expand Smart Home Reviews Phone Reviews Tablet Reviews Headphone Reviews See all reviews

Details

Science Expand Space Energy Environment Health See all science

Entertainment Expand TV Shows Movies Audio See all entertainment

Policy Expand Antitrust Politics Law Security See all policy

Gadgets Expand Laptops Phones TVs Headphones Speakers Wearables See all gadgets

Verge Shopping Expand Buying Guides Deals Gift Guides See all shopping

Streaming Expand Disney HBONetflix You Tube Creators See all streaming

Transportation Expand Electric Cars Autonomous Cars Ride-sharing Scooters See all transportation

AIClose AIPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All AI

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Open AIClose Open AIPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All Open AI

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

In his opening testimony against Sam Altman, Musk was unfocused and uncharming.

Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

AIClose AIPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All AI

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Open AIClose Open AIPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All Open AI

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

In his opening testimony against Sam Altman, Musk was unfocused and uncharming.

Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Today the first witness was sworn in in Musk v. Altman: Elon Musk. I was surprised by how flat he seemed.

This is not the first time I’ve seen Musk in court. During his defamation suit, he turned on the charm and the jury responded by finding him not guilty. Today he looked adrift and unprepared. The only times he showed real animation were when he was bragging about how much he’d done for Open AI.

The direct examination is a way of telling a story through questions; it’s important to make the narrative clear. For a suit that accuses Sam Altman of straying from Open AI’s mission, Musk spent a weird amount of time talking about himself, recounting his biography, and hyping up the various ventures he’s undertaken that have nothing to do with Open AI.

“I came up with the idea, the name, recruited the key people. taught them everything I know, provided all the initial funding. Besides that, nothing.”

For instance, he told jurors that he worked between “80 to 100 hours a week,” which was how he got so much done. It is unclear to me whether his prolific posting habits count as part of the workweek. I hope the defense asks.

We did eventually get around to Open AI, where Musk portrayed himself as the driving force. He’d been worried about AI since childhood, and who had finally felt that someone needed to prevent Google from developing it. He testified that he became involved in AI safety because he had a conversation with Google’s own Larry Page and asked, “What if AI wipes out all the humans?” Page essentially shrugged — as far as he was concerned, as long as the AI didn’t also go extinct, things were all right. “I said, ‘That’s insane,’ and he called me a species-ist for being pro-human.” So Open AI, for Musk, was born specifically to keep Google from having too much power in AI. Petty! Musk also said that after he recruited Ilya Sutskever, then a research scientist at Google, to Open AI that “Larry Page refused to speak to me ever again.”

What did Musk do at Open AI? “I came up with the idea, the name, recruited the key people. taught them everything I know, provided all the initial funding. Besides that, nothing.” He paused for laughter, and one or two people obligingly chuckled. But most of the courtroom was silent. I thought he sounded petulant. “I could have started it as a for-profit and I chose not to,” Musk said.

It’s hard to preempt the argument you are expecting without making it yourself

I do wonder how much of this the jury is following. We went very quickly through a lot of ideas, including “artificial general intelligence,” an imaginary thing that many AI researchers are nonetheless afraid of. Musk defined this as being when a computer “becomes as smart as any human, arguably smarter than any human.” (Large language models are not the same as intelligence, and AGI has been defined downward for quite some time. But whatever! This case is not about that!)

At another point, Musk was asked to explain who former Open AI board member Shivon Zilis was. “Shivon was the, um, my chief of staff and, uh, you know,” Musk said. One person in the gallery — presumably familiar with the fact that Zilis is the mother of a few of Musk’s kids — burst out in loud laughter. But the jury looked puzzled.

During discussions of how best to get Open AI the vast amounts of funding it would need for compute, there was indeed discussion of a for-profit arm of Open AI with Musk. The strategy here, I think, was to make clear that Musk’s intentions were very different than the for-profit that came to pass. (That’s true! He did not get 55 percent equity in it, as one possible cap table suggested he should.) This all seemed pretty mushy, and we got bogged down in a discussion of what, in Musk’s opinion, a reasonable equity split between founders and funders would be; it’s hard to preempt the argument you are expecting without making it yourself.

This is also kind of a distraction from the core point of the trial: Did Open AI betray its mission statement and fool Musk into making a charitable donation? I agreed to a for-profit model but not THAT for-profit model isn’t a strong argument.

We’ll be back with more Musk testimony and presumably his cross-examination. If there’s a clearer story from the defense, this trial is effectively all over but the shouting. I’ve seen a strong performance from Musk on the stand before. Today he just didn’t seem dialed in. Maybe he’s grumpy about this trial because he knows he’s wasting his own time.

Elizabeth Lopatto Close Elizabeth Lopatto Senior Reporter Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All by Elizabeth Lopatto

Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

AIClose AIPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All AI

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Open AIClose Open AIPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All Open AI

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

More in: Live updates from Elon Musk and Sam Altman’s court battle over the future of Open AI

Jury selection in Musk v. Altman: ‘People don’t like him’

Valve launches the Steam Controller without the Steam Machine

It’s a busy time for sci-fi, but don’t miss Aphelion

Elon Musk and Sam Altman’s court battle over the future of Open AI

Key Takeaways

  • Tech Expand Amazon Apple Facebook Google Microsoft Samsung Business See all tech
  • Reviews Expand Smart Home Reviews Phone Reviews Tablet Reviews Headphone Reviews See all reviews
  • Science Expand Space Energy Environment Health See all science
  • Entertainment Expand TV Shows Movies Audio See all entertainment
  • Policy Expand Antitrust Politics Law Security See all policy

Cut Costs with Runable

Cost savings are based on average monthly price per user for each app.

Which apps do you use?

Apps to replace

ChatGPTChatGPT
$20 / month
LovableLovable
$25 / month
Gamma AIGamma AI
$25 / month
HiggsFieldHiggsField
$49 / month
Leonardo AILeonardo AI
$12 / month
TOTAL$131 / month

Runable price = $9 / month

Saves $122 / month

Runable can save upto $1464 per year compared to the non-enterprise price of your apps.