Elon Musk’s Last-Ditch Effort to Control Open AI: Recruit Sam Altman to Tesla | WIRED
Overview
Elon Musk’s Last-Ditch Effort to Control Open AI: Recruit Sam Altman to Tesla
A few months before Elon Musk left Open AI’s board of directors in February 2018, he tried to recruit Sam Altman to join a “world-class AI lab” within Tesla. Musk went as far as offering the Open AI CEO a Tesla board seat, according to emails and testimony presented in federal court on Wednesday during the Musk v. Altman trial. The emails were shown to a jury during the cross examination of Shivon Zilis, a former Open AI adviser and board member who is also the mother of four of Musk’s children.
Details
Musk’s core claim in this lawsuit is that Altman and Open AI president Greg Brockman effectively stole a nonprofit, using the
Open AI’s legal team has responded to Musk’s claims by questioning his true motives, arguing that the Tesla CEO has had “sour grapes” ever since he failed to assume control of Open AI in 2017. He has since started a rival, for-profit AI lab. Open AI’s lawyers used Zilis’ cross-examination on Wednesday to bring up evidence about Musk’s alleged plans to subvert Open AI, and tried to suggest Zilis was privy to those plans. As it pertains to this case, one of Zilis’ most important roles at Open AI was acting as a conduit between Musk and Altman.
In a text from February 2018 presented as evidence, Zilis—then an Open AI adviser, as well as a Neuralink and Tesla executive—asked Altman, “Did you think through a B Corp subsidiary of Tesla?”
“There was documentary evidence that, at several points, Mr. Musk had contemplated seeking to join Sam Altman to the board and offered that option,” said Open AI lawyer William Savitt outside the courthouse on Wednesday. “It was part of Mr. Musk’s effort to corrupt Open AI and absorb it into Tesla … he was trying to get Altman to abandon the mission and be part of Tesla.”
Are you a current or former Open AI or Tesla employee who wants to talk about what's happening? We'd like to hear from you. Using a nonwork phone or computer, contact the reporters securely on Signal at Mzeff.88 and Peard 33.24.
In an email to Tesla’s VP of communications, Sarah O'Brien, from November 2017, Zilis shared a draft of an FAQ page about an event Tesla was planning to hold at the Neur IPS AI conference. “The purpose of this event is to share that Tesla is building a world leading AI lab(?) which will rival the likes of Google / Deep Mind and Facebook AI Research,” the drafted FAQ read. The document continues, “One major issue for Tesla is when people think of Elon and AI, they think of Open AI.”
Another part of the FAQ labeled “Who?” lists several Tesla executives who were planned to lead the unit, including Musk and Andrej Karpathy, a former Open AI researcher. Altman’s name is listed next to Musk’s with two question marks beside it.
The FAQ is marked up with notes including that Altman could be a moderator for the Neur IPS event, which "could be a forcing function for Sam to commit to Tesla AI.” Another note reads that Tesla AI's "strategy had yet to be defined and some of it may be deeply proprietary.”
Zilis testified on Wednesday that Altman never ended up joining Tesla, and the AI lab and the Neur IPS launch event never came to fruition. She also testified that Musk reached out to Karpathy about recruiting him to Tesla. Savitt told reporters that Zilis’ testimony on Karpathy is “directly contrary to what Mr. Musk told the jury just a few days ago.” Earlier in this trial, Musk testified that Karpathy left Open AI of his own volition.
In text messages from June 2017, Zilis responded “Fuck yeahhhhhhh” when told by Tesla colleagues that Karpathy had signed an official offer. Another employee asked if Open AI would be mad about Karpathy’s hire, followed by a smiley face emoticon. Zilis said it was a good question, but said she had “talked to Greg [Brockman] today and he clearly had no idea …”
It was already known that Musk wanted Open AI to merge with Tesla, but evidence presented on Wednesday revealed new details about the plans. In an email to another Tesla employee from October 2017, Zilis said that Open AI’s cofounders had not “internalized the advantages of burying this in Tesla for stealth advantage.” When Open AI’s lawyers asked Zilis whether “burying” meant Tesla was planning to close-source its AI, she said no. “It’s just a small fish in a big pond,” said Zilis.
In another email from Zilis to Musk in February 2018, the same month Musk stepped down from Open AI’s board, Zilis shared several scenarios about how to create an effective counterbalance to Google Deep Mind, which Musk viewed as a major threat. One of the scenarios was having Altman run a Tesla AI lab. Another scenario read, “Find a way to get Demis. Seriously,” referring to the leader of Google Deep Mind, Demis Hassabis. “Maybe he comes to Tesla somehow or Deep Mind is spun out,” Zilis wrote.
Almost two years later, in January 2020, Zilis was appointed to Open AI’s board of directors. During her time as a board member, Zilis testified that she became pregnant with Musk’s children through IVF, but did not disclose this to the other board members due to a confidentiality agreement she had signed with Musk. When Business Insider reached out to her in 2022, informing Zilis it planned to break a story on the children later that day, Zilis said she called her father, and then Altman.
But Zilis continued to serve as an Open AI board member until February 2023, months before Musk announced the launch of his competing AI lab, x AI. Zilis testified that she resigned after learning about Musk’s effort, allegedly, via a call from Altman. However, texts revealed in the case suggest Zilis already knew about x AI before the call.
“Have to resign [from the] openai board btw. [Musk’s] effort has become well known,” Zilis told a friend the day of Altman’s call. “When the father of your babies starts a competitive effort and will recruit out of openai there is nothing to be done.”
On Thursday, lawyers for Musk are expected to call Rosie Campbell—a former Open AI employee and managing director at the AI consciousness nonprofit Eleos AI—as a witness. They’re also expected to call David Schizer, a former dean of Columbia Law School who specializes in nonprofit law.
In your inbox: Upgrade your life with WIRED-tested gear
In your inbox: Upgrade your life with WIRED-tested gear
Big Story: They built a legendary privacy tool—now they’re sworn enemies
Big Story: They built a legendary privacy tool—now they’re sworn enemies
These AI models tried to scam me—some of them were scary good
These AI models tried to scam me—some of them were scary good
Event: How to adapt, compete, and win in the next era of business
Event: How to adapt, compete, and win in the next era of business
Key Takeaways
-
Elon Musk’s Last-Ditch Effort to Control Open AI: Recruit Sam Altman to Tesla
-
A few months before Elon Musk left Open AI’s board of directors in February 2018, he tried to recruit Sam Altman to join a “world-class AI lab” within Tesla
-
Musk’s core claim in this lawsuit is that Altman and Open AI president Greg Brockman effectively stole a nonprofit, using the
800 billion today -
Open AI’s legal team has responded to Musk’s claims by questioning his true motives, arguing that the Tesla CEO has had “sour grapes” ever since he failed to assume control of Open AI in 2017
-
In a text from February 2018 presented as evidence, Zilis—then an Open AI adviser, as well as a Neuralink and Tesla executive—asked Altman, “Did you think through a B Corp subsidiary of Tesla
