Ask Runable forDesign-Driven General AI AgentTry Runable For Free
Runable
Back to Blog
Technology6 min read

Forget big donors — Tor Project proved a crowd of small givers can bankroll internet freedom and raise over $200K | TechRadar

The Tor Project's first participatory funding round used a "quadratic" model to turn hundreds of small crypto donations into six-figure support for 10 privac...

TechnologyInnovationBest PracticesGuideTutorial
Forget big donors — Tor Project proved a crowd of small givers can bankroll internet freedom and raise over $200K | TechRadar
Listen to Article
0:00
0:00
0:00

Forget big donors — Tor Project proved a crowd of small givers can bankroll internet freedom and raise over $200K | Tech Radar

Overview

News, deals, reviews, guides and more on the newest computing gadgets

Start exploring exclusive deals, expert advice and more

Details

Unlock and manage exclusive Techradar member rewards.

Unlock instant access to exclusive member features.

Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.

Forget big donors — Tor Project proved a crowd of small givers can bankroll internet freedom and raise over $200K

The Tor Project's first participatory funding round used a "quadratic" model to turn hundreds of small crypto donations into six-figure support for 10 privacy tools

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.

The Tor Project's debut participatory funding raised more than $200,000

A "quadratic funding" model meant the number of backers mattered more than the size of any single donation

The experiment was a response to a 2025 collapse in traditional funding

Back in May, we covered the launch of an unusual fundraising experiment from the nonprofit behind the Tor Browser. The results are now in, and they give the team reason to be cautiously optimistic.

More than

200,000wasraisedintotal,with200,000 was raised in total, with
174,536 distributed to participating grantee projects. The campaign officially closed on June 19th, and the Tor Project has spent the weeks since reconciling a tangle of multi-currency, privacy-preserving donations before sharing the final numbers.

While most people rely on one of the best VPN services to keep their everyday browsing private, activists, whistleblowers, and journalists in heavily censored regions lean on a more specialized set of open-source tools. Those tools are exactly what this campaign set out to sustain.

Leave No Trace investigates the companies and governments putting our digital freedom at risk — and the people fighting back.

Meet Snowflake Volunteer: Tor's Android app that lets you help people bypass censorship

'A critical tool for fighting against an Orwellian future' — Why users of this encrypted messaging app are helping keep the project alive

'It’s time to punch more holes in the closed Internet' — This free VPN now promises to be even better at evading censorship

📩 Subscribe now to get every edition delivered to your inbox every Friday, launching this September.

The headline figure hides a more interesting story: 580 unique donors made 662 contributions, with an average donation size of just $41.

Direct community donations came to roughly $27,000, which was then added to an existing matching pool with funds provided by the following organizations: Cake Wallet, the Ethereum Foundation, Logos, Octant, Xeovo, and Zcash Community Grants.

The campaign used quadratic funding, a model that rewards the breadth of support rather than the depth of any single wallet. While the organizations donated the biggest portion of the cash, it was the community donations that decided where that cash went.

The results are in: Our first crowdfunding round in partnership with @Funding Commons has raised more than $200k for projects working across privacy, censorship circumvention, secure communications, and public-interest digital infrastructure. https://t.co/Cy 113f JHUy @web 3privacy…August 17, 2026

The results are in: Our first crowdfunding round in partnership with @Funding Commons has raised more than $200k for projects working across privacy, censorship circumvention, secure communications, and public-interest digital infrastructure. https://t.co/Cy 113f JHUy @web 3privacy…August 17, 2026

The timing was not accidental. US funding for global internet freedom was "effectively gutted" in 2025, with many programs cut permanently and the main granting office issuing no money that year.

Russia's censors want to block 92% of VPN apps by 2030

Nym VPN just had its biggest two-month update yet, and a fresh redesign is already on the way

10 million downloads but no website? New Tech Radar data reveals how Android VPNs are gaming the system to avoid supporting users effectively

Even the Open Technology Fund, a long-standing backer of tools like Tor and Signal, had its congressionally authorized grant terminated and went to court to try to save it.

The Tor Project frames this as a structural problem, not a one-off. When public-interest infrastructure leans too heavily on a single funder, one decision can put essential work at risk.

That fragility is sharpened by a worsening censorship climate: 2025 was the worst year on record for internet shutdowns, with censors also shifting toward more targeted blocks on apps and platforms.

Ten projects shared the pot, spanning censorship circumvention, secure messaging, and secure journalism.

Onion Browser, which brings Tor access to i OS, took the largest allocation at around

111,000,followedbyUnredactedthenonprofitbehindthefree,censorshipresistantFreeSocksVPNwithroughly111,000, followed by Unredacted — the non-profit behind the free, censorship-resistant Free Socks VPN —with roughly
41,000. Familiar names like Secure Drop, Onion Share, OONI, and Ricochet Refresh each received a guaranteed minimum.

The Tor Project is candid that the model is "promising, but operationally complex" (15% of the funds went to running the campaign), and that better-known projects had an advantage. Even so, smaller grantees reported a valuable side effect: new visibility, followers, and first-time discovery.

The round has now closed, but the team says it is already exploring what future matching pools could look like.

Follow Tech Radar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button!

Follow Tech Radar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button!

Monica is a tech journalist with over a decade of experience. She writes about the latest developments in computing, which means anything from computer chips made out of paper to cutting-edge desktop processors.

GPUs are her main area of interest, and nothing thrills her quite like that time every couple of years when new graphics cards hit the market.

She built her first PC nearly 20 years ago, and dozens of builds later, she’s always planning out her next build (or helping her friends with theirs). During her career, Monica has written for many tech-centric outlets, including Digital Trends, Slash Gear, We PC, and Tom’s Hardware.

You must confirm your public display name before commenting

New Peacock price hikes take effect ahead of the NFL season

Microsoft smothers malware by tracking behavior instead of blocking domains

Proton VPN usage spikes in Brazil amid Discord feature block

GTA 6 gets leaked again with new gameplay and the entire map revealed

Red Magic Astra 2 review: the fastest Android tablet I've ever tested

Tech Radar is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site.

© Future US, Inc. Full 7th Floor, 130 West 42nd Street, New York, NY 10036.

Key Takeaways

  • News, deals, reviews, guides and more on the newest computing gadgets
  • Start exploring exclusive deals, expert advice and more
  • Unlock and manage exclusive Techradar member rewards
  • Unlock instant access to exclusive member features
  • Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards

Cut Costs with Runable

Cost savings are based on average monthly price per user for each app.

Which apps do you use?

Apps to replace

ChatGPTChatGPT
$20 / month
LovableLovable
$25 / month
Gamma AIGamma AI
$25 / month
HiggsFieldHiggsField
$49 / month
Leonardo AILeonardo AI
$12 / month
TOTAL$131 / month

Runable price = $9 / month

Saves $122 / month

Runable can save upto $1464 per year compared to the non-enterprise price of your apps.