Ask Runable forDesign-Driven General AI AgentTry Runable For Free
Runable
Back to Blog
Technology7 min read

Ire identifies another LOTUSLITE specimen - Microsoft Research

Project Ire examined a timely malware sample and determined its intent through reverse engineering—identifying LOTUSLITE characteristics even as most major E...

TechnologyInnovationBest PracticesGuideTutorial
Ire identifies another LOTUSLITE specimen - Microsoft Research
Listen to Article
0:00
0:00
0:00

Ire identifies another LOTUSLITE specimen - Microsoft Research

Overview

By

								Brian Caswell								
						
					
												,
						
						Principal Security Engineer

Bob Fleck

												,
						
						Senior Security Engineer

Details

Mike Walker

												,
						
						Research Manager

Project Ire identifies a LOTUSLITE variant that shares TTPs (tools, tactics, procedures) with the public family but none of its indicators of compromise (IOC).

The LLM-driven agent produces a function-by-function behavioral report on the sample without any user interaction to determine whether it is malicious.

The binary names a threat actor in cleartext; the agent declines to attribute and instead focuses on statically analyzing the behaviors.

We pointed Project Ire, Microsoft’s autonomous malware-classification agent, at a malware sample—blind—and asked for a verdict. The sample is a variant of LOTUSLITE, a Windows DLL backdoor recently documented by Acronis. Our copy’s hash isn’t in their IOC list, and as of June 4, most major EDRs (Crowd Strike Falcon, Sentinel One, Sophos, Trellix, Palo Alto, ESET) still don’t flag it as malware. Ire produced a function-by-function behavioral report—install routine, C2 packet layout, command IDs, persistence mechanism, obfuscation—that lines up with Acronis’s published analysis. One decompiler-based run, no human priors.

This is what behavioral, agentic reverse engineering can achieve when signature matching and manual inspections fall short. Variants that share TTPs but not indicators of compromise (IOC) get caught instead of slipping past signature lists. Novel malware classification is a domain with no automatic validator, requiring in-depth investigation and holistic understanding of the software’s behaviors to surface and determine intent. Ire operates without context: no origin metadata, no telemetry, no analyst prompt. It invokes decompilers and binary-analysis tools, builds an auditable chain of evidence, and reaches a malicious-or-benign verdict.

Acronis’s Threat Research Unit (TRU) published a writeup (opens in new tab) on LOTUSLITE, a DLL backdoor delivered through a politically themed ZIP, sideloaded through a renamed Tencent Ku Gou launcher. They attribute it to Mustang Panda at moderate confidence based on infrastructure overlap and the loader/DLL split. Hunting on Virus Total for samples whose behavior matched the report, we surfaced one whose SHA-256 doesn’t appear in Acronis’s IOC list.

The sample: 47e 51e 82229e 80a 387c 3cb 100d 39d 3705e 6360bbf 9bfa 1601dbc 484e 8d 02e 653 (opens in new tab). When we picked it up on May 28, Virus Total showed 1 of 72 vendors flagging it.

Figure 1. File Sample 47e 51e 82229e 80a 387c 3cb 100d 39d 3705e 6360bbf 9bfa 1601dbc 484e 8d 02e 653 detection state on Virus Total on May 28, 2026.

A week later, that rose to 7 of 70. The cluster: Microsoft Trojan: Win 32/Malgent! MSR, Kaspersky HEUR: Trojan-Dropper. Win 32. Dorifel.gen, Rising Dropper. Dorifel!8.31E (CLOUD), Cynet (score 100), Elastic (moderate confidence), Kingsoft, Trend Micro-House Call. With Microsoft now flagging, VT’s popular threat label has shifted to dropper.dorifel / malgent. Crowd Strike Falcon, Sentinel One, Sophos, Trellix, Palo Alto, and ESET still miss it. VT lists the file type as pedll (PE DLL) and the filename as Smart Print Screen. Print.

Figure 2. File Sample 47e 51e 82229e 80a 387c 3cb 100d 39d 3705e 6360bbf 9bfa 1601dbc 484e 8d 02e 653 detection state on Virus Total on June 4, 2026.

We analyzed the sample with Ire, using only its decompiler-based tools through a single tool call. Ire’s verdict was “malicious”; you can review the complete report on Github (opens in new tab).

One noteworthy observation in Ire’s report (opens in new tab) is worth highlighting first. Ire flagged the nfapi:: nf_un Register Driver and Net Filter naming as suspicious but explicitly did not claim active packet interception. The function in question writes the Run key; it does not install a driver. This is where LLM-driven analysis can go wrong: suggestive strings can steer the verdict. A function called nf_un Register Driver sounds like it does kernel-level work, and a less thorough agent would write that into the report. Downstream defenders would then chase a phantom, building detection rules for behavior that may or may not be there. Ire flagged the misleading name and considered the behavior as one piece of the evidence during its final adjudication of malice.

infra and TTP overlap, moderate confidence (Acronis’s call)

not independently assessed; binary contains the literal string Believeme Iam Mustang-Panda

Comparing Ire’s output with Acronis’ report, the sample we analyzed matches the behavioral profile of the LOTUSLITE family of malware. Both show a loader/DLL split, HTTPS C2 carrying a custom binary protocol with a magic DWORD, interactive shell over pipes, directory enumeration, file primitives, chunked upload, HKCU persistence, and traffic camouflaged as Google and Microsoft services. The surface details differ—filenames, paths, magic value—but the underlying behaviors align. Ire correctly identified this sample as part of the same family of malware because of the behaviors it was able to identify through decompilation and reverse engineering, not on string match alone.

Because the sample is a DLL (pedll per VT), the sample’s install routine reads differently than it might look at first. The DLL copies two files into C:\Program Data\Smart Print: the loader EXE that sideloaded it (its host process, obtained via Get Module File Name(NULL), written as Smart Print Screen.exe) and itself (AMPV.dll, the analyzed sample). The Run key points at the loader with –Da Da Bar. On the next logon, the loader runs and sideloads AMPV.dll from the install path. This is the same Acronis-identified pattern but with different filenames.

This also explains the binary’s strange export surface. The DLL exports a long list of banking and QR-themed names (Query_Bank, Bank Sepah_Iran, Bank Toman_BMI, Bankof China, qr Bank Init, Jpg Symbol To BMP, and others), most of which resolve to a message box or Exit Process. The shape suggests a hijacked banking/QR SDK shell, repurposed so the host EXE can call any one of those exports via Get Proc Address and reach the LOTUSLITE entry point. Acronis names theirs Data Importer Main. The Ire report does not surface a matching entry-point name, but it identifies that the behavioral shape is the same.

Acronis attributes the malware family to Mustang Panda at moderate confidence based on infrastructure and TTPs we don’t have access to, while our sample directly contains a literal actor-name string “Believeme Iam Mustang-Panda” with no obfuscation. A string isn’t direct proof of authorship; it could be a developer artifact, a trophy, or a deliberate plant. While we are not making an attribution call, we note that the binary names the same actor that Acronis named through other means, and we leave the question open. Another consideration to make for this finding: a string like this can function as adversarial input to LLM-driven analysis, biasing the verdict.

Join us for a continuous exchange of ideas about research in the era of general AI. Watch the latest episodes on demand.

Ire statically reverse-engineers binaries and identifies the behavior from the function to the system level to describe what the software does and determine a verdict. The verdict of this sample came from a single Ire run because of the specific detail Ire was able to surface: function roles, packet layout, command IDs, persistence registry keys, and decoy strings. Ire never named LOTUSLITE in its report or chain of evidence. The family mapping is ours, after the fact, comparing Ire’s report against Acronis report. Ire described the behavior precisely enough to make the mapping straightforward of this sample to LOTUSLITE.

Stay up to date on the latest findings and other interesting sample detections from Project Ire by following along on our project page.

Key Takeaways

  • By

      							Brian Caswell								
      					
      				
      											,
      					
      					Principal Security Engineer
    
  • Bob Fleck

      											,
      					
      					Senior Security Engineer
    
  • Mike Walker

      											,
      					
      					Research Manager
    
  • Project Ire identifies a LOTUSLITE variant that shares TTPs (tools, tactics, procedures) with the public family but none of its indicators of compromise (IOC)

  • The LLM-driven agent produces a function-by-function behavioral report on the sample without any user interaction to determine whether it is malicious

Cut Costs with Runable

Cost savings are based on average monthly price per user for each app.

Which apps do you use?

Apps to replace

ChatGPTChatGPT
$20 / month
LovableLovable
$25 / month
Gamma AIGamma AI
$25 / month
HiggsFieldHiggsField
$49 / month
Leonardo AILeonardo AI
$12 / month
TOTAL$131 / month

Runable price = $9 / month

Saves $122 / month

Runable can save upto $1464 per year compared to the non-enterprise price of your apps.