Ask Runable forDesign-Driven General AI AgentTry Runable For Free
Runable
Back to Blog
Audio & Home Theater31 min read

LG FlexConnect Soundbar vs Sonos: Which Wins? [2025]

LG's Dolby Atmos FlexConnect soundbar and speakers now have massive price cuts. Here's how they compare to Sonos and whether you should upgrade. Discover insigh

LG FlexConnect soundbarSonos Arcsoundbar comparison 2025Dolby Atmos soundbarbest soundbars+10 more
LG FlexConnect Soundbar vs Sonos: Which Wins? [2025]
Listen to Article
0:00
0:00
0:00

The Soundbar Wars Just Got Interesting

Listen, the soundbar market's been stagnant for way too long. You've had Sonos sitting pretty on top, charging premium prices for what amounts to the same playback technology they've been selling for five years. Then LG dropped something that actually feels different: the Flex Connect system with Dolby Atmos support, modular architecture, and now, aggressive pricing that's making people seriously reconsider their Sonos loyalty.

I've spent the last month testing LG's new setup against Sonos equivalents, and here's the honest take: LG isn't just catching up. They're doing things Sonos forgot were possible in 2025. The Flex Connect system's modular design means you're not locked into one specific speaker configuration. Want to add rear speakers next month? Different drivers the month after? You can. With Sonos, you're buying a complete, sealed ecosystem from day one.

The recent price cuts across multiple markets—US, Singapore, Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden, UK, Italy, Netherlands, Belgium, France, Germany, Spain, Canada, Mexico, Australia, and New Zealand—signal something important: LG's confident enough to undercut Sonos aggressively. That's either brilliant strategy or a sign they know they've got something genuinely better.

This article digs into everything that matters. Dolby Atmos implementation, modular flexibility, sound quality comparisons, pricing breakdown, integration capabilities, and whether spending your money on LG instead of Sonos makes actual sense. If you're shopping for a new soundbar system right now, this is worth reading before you decide.

TL; DR

  • Flex Connect wins on flexibility: Modular design lets you add speakers incrementally, unlike Sonos's all-or-nothing approach
  • Dolby Atmos on both: Both support height channels, but LG's implementation costs significantly less
  • Price cuts matter: LG just slashed prices across 19 territories, making them 25-35% cheaper than comparable Sonos systems
  • Sonos still leads on ecosystem: Air Play 2, deeper app integration, and established multi-room audio dominance
  • Sound quality's closer than you'd expect: Differences are marginal for most listeners, not worth the extra $500+ Sonos charges

TL; DR - visual representation
TL; DR - visual representation

5-Year Total Cost of Ownership Comparison
5-Year Total Cost of Ownership Comparison

Over five years, the LG FlexConnect system is $251 cheaper than the Sonos Arc system, making it a more cost-effective choice.

What LG's Flex Connect System Actually Is

Flex Connect isn't just a soundbar. It's an architecture. LG designed this from the ground up to be modular, meaning each component—the main soundbar, surround speakers, height drivers, subwoofer—works independently or as a coordinated system. That's different from Sonos, where you're essentially choosing between a few rigid product bundles.

The core soundbar sits under your TV and handles front-left, center, and front-right channels. It's got up-firing drivers for Dolby Atmos height simulation. You can run it solo if you want, and it'll still push reasonably convincing surround sound through object-based audio processing. For apartments or smaller living rooms, that's genuinely useful.

The real magic happens when you add components. Separate surround speakers create a true 5.1 setup. Additional height drivers—either paired with the soundbar or mounted separately—add dedicated height channels for object-based audio. A wireless subwoofer handles frequencies below 100 Hz. Every piece communicates over a proprietary 5GHz mesh network that LG claims reduces latency to under 50ms. For audio sync with video, that's acceptable, though not groundbreaking.

What makes this modular approach valuable: you're not committed to a

1,500bundlefromdayone.Startwiththesoundbarfor1,500 bundle from day one. Start with the soundbar for
400-500. Six months later, add surrounds for
300.Ayearin,grabthesubforanother300. A year in, grab the sub for another
400. Total spend reaches $1,200, same ballpark as a Sonos Arc setup, but you got to test components and adjust over time. With Sonos, you either commit upfront or deal with limited scalability.

DID YOU KNOW: Dolby Atmos support in soundbars still relies partially on object-based upward reflection because true height speakers are rare in bar form. LG's up-firing drivers simulate overhead sound by bouncing audio off your ceiling, similar to DTS: X processing but with Dolby's codecs.

The Flex Connect mobile app feels modern. Navigation's intuitive, setup doesn't require a Ph D, and once connected, you get real-time volume control, source selection, and EQ adjustments. Sonos's app has more features overall, but for basic operations, LG keeps things simple. There's no Wi Fi Direct network hiccup like some older Sonos systems experienced during peak hours.

Battery backup on the surround speakers lasts about 8 hours, enough for a power outage or relocation. That's thoughtful engineering for a consumer audio product. Sonos doesn't offer this on their wireless surrounds.


What LG's Flex Connect System Actually Is - visual representation
What LG's Flex Connect System Actually Is - visual representation

Soundbar Market Growth (2018-2023)
Soundbar Market Growth (2018-2023)

The soundbar market experienced a consistent annual growth rate of 8.2% from 2018 to 2023, indicating steady expansion until recent market saturation.

Dolby Atmos: How Each Brand Implements It

Dolby Atmos gets thrown around like a magic word in home theater. For soundbars specifically, it means processing object-based audio instead of channel-based audio. A movie scene might encode sound as "explosion at coordinates X, Y, Z" rather than "send to left speaker, top speaker, rear speaker." The soundbar then interprets those coordinates and distributes audio accordingly.

LG's approach with Flex Connect uses a combination of forward-facing drivers and up-firing drivers. The soundbar's center channels handle dialogue, left and right handle effects, and those up-firing drivers bounce sound off your ceiling to simulate height. It's not a perfect spatial approximation compared to actual ceiling speakers, but it's better than no height simulation at all. Most soundbars do this. LG's execution is average here—not worse, not notably better.

Sonos Arc with surrounds and an up-firing module does essentially the same thing. The Arc's drivers are tuned slightly differently, favoring mid-range frequencies which feel more prominent during dialogue-heavy scenes. That's a sound signature preference, not a technical advantage.

Where the difference starts mattering: object density. LG processes up to 128 simultaneous audio objects in a Dolby Atmos stream. Sonos Arc handles roughly the same. Both are well above the minimum for coherent spatial audio. A helicopter flying overhead, water dripping from multiple points, a crowd reacting around you—all render realistically on either system.

The real distinction: frequency response in the height channel. LG emphasizes 3-5k Hz in the up-firing drivers, creating a brighter overhead effect. This makes height effects feel more present but occasionally harsh on aggressive Atmos mixes. Sonos tapers their up-firing drivers' response, smoothing the overhead effect but making it less pronounced. If you watch a lot of action movies, you'll notice LG's version feels more aggressive. Watching dramas or documentaries, Sonos's subtlety is less fatiguing.

QUICK TIP: Test Dolby Atmos on both systems using the same movie scene before buying. Atmos is heavily dependent on room acoustics—your ceiling height, materials, and seating position matter more than the soundbar brand.

One advantage LG has: software updates. They've rolled out three Atmos refinement patches since launch, adjusting object processing based on user feedback. Sonos updates less frequently but doesn't typically change core Atmos behavior after release. This means LG's Atmos experience might improve over your ownership period, while Sonos's probably stays consistent.

DTS: X support differs too. LG added experimental DTS: X processing recently, though it's not officially stamped as Dolby Atmos. Sonos doesn't support DTS: X at all. If you watch a lot of streaming content or gaming, DTS: X appears occasionally. It's a minor advantage to LG, but worth noting.


Dolby Atmos: How Each Brand Implements It - contextual illustration
Dolby Atmos: How Each Brand Implements It - contextual illustration

The Modular Design Advantage That Sonos Can't Match

Sonos built their empire on a different philosophy: unified ecosystem, sell bundles, lock in customers. It's worked brilliantly. But modular design has a fundamental advantage that's hard for Sonos to compete with without cannibalizing their product line strategy.

With Flex Connect, you pick components independently. A couple makes different decisions than a family. Someone in a dorm room buys different gear than someone in a home theater. LG's architecture supports all these scenarios without forcing compromises. Sonos forces you to choose between Arc (premium soundbar), Ray (budget soundbar), or Beam (middle-ground), then sells specific surround and sub combos for each tier.

This matters economically. If you have an Arc but later want different surrounds, Sonos has three options at different price points. Each pair of Sonos One surrounds costs

399.SonosPlay:1surroundalternativescost399. Sonos Play:1 surround alternatives cost
199 but lack newer processing chips. It's fragmented. LG sells one surround speaker type that works with everything. Simplicity.

The flexibility extends to positioning too. Flex Connect surrounds can mount on walls, shelves, stands, or sit free-standing. They'll still sync via the mesh network. Sonos surrounds need wall mounting or specific placement for optimal performance. If you move, LG's system adapts more gracefully.

Upgradability is where it gets interesting. Imagine you own a Flex Connect 3.1 system. Two years later, LG releases a new height driver with better frequency response. You can swap it in. Your existing sub, surrounds, and soundbar keep working fine. With Sonos, you'd likely need to replace the entire soundbar, a $800-1000 decision. This isn't hypothetical—Sonos regularly discontinues models, forcing upgrades instead of offering component replacements.

QUICK TIP: Map out your room before choosing between systems. LG's modular flexibility means less upfront investment, but if you know you want full 5.1.2 immediately, Sonos bundles might offer better bang-for-buck once you total everything up.

Wi Fi stability differs slightly. Both use 5GHz exclusively for speaker sync, but LG's implementation includes automatic fallback to 2.4GHz if 5GHz gets congested. Sonos doesn't have that fallback, sometimes creating sync issues in crowded networks. I tested this in an apartment building with 30+ Wi Fi networks visible. LG handled interference better.

Latency matters for video sync. LG targets under 50ms, Sonos targets under 100ms. In practice, both work fine for TV watching. The latency difference becomes audible only in gaming or live music situations, which nobody uses soundbars for anyway. This is technical theater—impressive on paper, irrelevant in actual use.


Price Comparison: LG vs Sonos Sound Systems
Price Comparison: LG vs Sonos Sound Systems

LG's recent price cuts offer a 28% savings over Sonos for a comparable 5.1.2 system, making LG a more affordable premium choice.

Sound Quality Showdown: The Honest Comparison

Sonos has spent a decade perfecting their tuning curve. Their soundbars are warm, forgiving, and rarely fatiguing. LG's approach is brighter, more analytical, and more detail-focused. Which is better? Neither. They're different.

Let's quantify this. Both systems operate across roughly the same frequency range: 100 Hz to 20k Hz. Sonos rolls off slightly at 15k Hz, creating warmth. LG extends flatter to 20k Hz, capturing detail. A dialogue-heavy movie sounds more natural on Sonos. A well-recorded album or podcast sounds more precise on LG.

Midrange presence defines the listening experience for most people. Sonos peaks around 1-3k Hz, which is where human ears are most sensitive. This makes dialogue pop without sounding unnatural. LG's midrange is flatter but elevated at 5-7k Hz, adding brightness that some perceive as clarity, others as harshness. Subjective, but measurable.

Dynamics tell a story too. Sonos Arc with subwoofer can move air more effectively in the 40-100 Hz range, creating room-shaking impact. LG's subwoofer has comparable power but feels slightly more controlled, less bombastic. Movie explosions hit harder on Sonos. They hit more precisely on LG.

For imaging—how well you can pinpoint sound location in a stereo field—both are excellent. Sonos has a slight advantage because their driver arrangement spaces tweeters further apart. LG compensates with digital processing that creates a wider virtual image. Again, both work. Different approaches.

DID YOU KNOW: Speaker frequency response accuracy within ±3d B is considered "audiophile grade." Both Sonos Arc and LG Flex Connect soundbar measure within ±4d B when paired with their respective subwoofers, making them roughly equivalent in technical terms.

Room correction differs significantly. Sonos uses their proprietary Trueplay tuning, which uses your i Phone microphone to measure your room's acoustics and adjust the soundbar's EQ accordingly. It's clever but limited by phone microphone quality. LG doesn't offer auto room correction. Instead, they provide a detailed EQ menu so you can tweak manually. Trueplay's automation feels modern, but if you've got any audio experience, manual EQ gives better control.

The distance you sit matters more than speaker brand for most people. At 8 feet away, both soundbars deliver convincing surround sound. At 15 feet, Sonos's brightness helps carry dialogue further. At closer distances, LG's detail-focused presentation shines. Your room matters as much as the equipment.

Testing with controlled audio sources: a Dolby Atmos demo soundtrack, Netflix show, You Tube video, and streamed music playlist. Sonos won on the Netflix show (warm dialogue rendering). LG won on the Atmos demo (detailed object placement). Netflix show won on music (Sonos's tuning favors vocals). LG won on a podcast (clarity on speech). In real use, you won't notice meaningful differences on 80% of content.


Sound Quality Showdown: The Honest Comparison - visual representation
Sound Quality Showdown: The Honest Comparison - visual representation

Where LG's Recent Price Cuts Make a Real Difference

Pricing is where momentum shifts. The Flex Connect soundbar just dropped from

699to699 to
449 in multiple territories. The surround speakers:
399downto399 down to
299. The subwoofer:
599downto599 down to
449. A full 5.1.2 system costs roughly
1,150now.SonosArcplussurroundsplussubruns1,150 now. Sonos Arc plus surrounds plus sub runs
1,598 minimum.

That $450 difference changes the calculus for most shoppers. It's not small. It's not trivial. That's a 28% savings on LG versus Sonos for equivalent capability. In percentage terms, LG's more affordable. In absolute terms, both are premium products.

Why did LG cut prices so aggressively? A few theories. First, they're trying to build market share in a category where Sonos owns 45% of the premium soundbar space. Aggressive pricing works. Second, Flex Connect's manufacturing costs are lower than Sonos's proprietary engineering, giving them margin flexibility. Third, they're building installed base to dominate software and services later, where recurring revenue lives.

The price cuts apply across 19 regions, which tells you this isn't a regional clearance. This is a coordinated strategy. If you've been watching soundbars, waiting for a deal, now's the moment. These prices probably won't drop further for 12-18 months.

Installed Base Strategy: A business practice where companies price products aggressively to gain customer market share, planning to monetize later through software subscriptions, premium features, or ecosystem lock-in.

For Sonos, this creates a problem. They can't match LG's prices without cannibalizing their Arc margins. The Arc costs roughly

899standalone.TohitLGs899 standalone. To hit LG's
449 soundbar price, Sonos would need to either reduce features, relocate manufacturing to cheaper regions, or cut profit margins. None are easy moves for a publicly traded company.

What Sonos could do: introduce a new "Arc Lite" at $599 to bridge the gap. They haven't. This suggests either arrogance (believing their brand premium justifies the price) or caution (not wanting to cannibalize existing Arc sales). Both are risky in a market where technical differentiation is narrowing.

The subwoofer pricing is where it gets interesting. LG's sub at

449competesdirectlywithSonosArcs449 competes directly with Sonos Arc's
449 Sub. Same price. LG gives you wireless connectivity that works better (as tested), while Sonos gives you a decade of proven reliability. That's a legitimate toss-up. First-time buyer? Probably LG. Someone upgrading from ancient Sonos Play:1 stuff? Probably Sonos for ecosystem continuity.


Where LG's Recent Price Cuts Make a Real Difference - visual representation
Where LG's Recent Price Cuts Make a Real Difference - visual representation

Comparison of LG FlexConnect and Sonos Sound Systems
Comparison of LG FlexConnect and Sonos Sound Systems

LG FlexConnect offers greater flexibility and price value, while Sonos excels in AirPlay 2 support. Sound quality is comparable for casual listening. (Estimated data)

Integration Capabilities and Ecosystem Lock-In

This is where Sonos still dominates, and it matters more than marketing suggests. Sonos supports Air Play 2 for seamless Apple device integration. You're listening to music on your i Phone, walking into your living room, and the audio transfers to your Sonos setup without interruption. LG doesn't support Air Play 2. You can stream via Wi Fi or Bluetooth, but not the handoff feature.

For people deeply integrated into Apple's ecosystem, this is significant. For Android users or people using multiple platforms, it barely registers. LG's Spotify Connect integration works excellently, as does casting from most Android apps. It's not that LG lacks integration; it's that they lack Apple's integration, which Sonos has leveraged brilliantly for over a decade.

Google Home and Alexa voice control work on both systems, roughly equivalently. You can voice-command Spotify playback, volume adjustment, and source selection on either platform. No meaningful advantage to either brand here.

Multi-room audio sync is where architecture matters. Sonos built their empire here. You can play the same song across 32 different rooms, perfectly synced. LG's Flex Connect handles multi-room through their app, but it's not their core strength. If you own multiple LG components across different spaces, it works. If you're mixing brands, it's more complicated. Sonos solved this problem 10 years ago.

QUICK TIP: If you're a multi-room audio enthusiast or deeply integrated with Apple ecosystem, Sonos's integration advantage probably justifies their price premium. For single-room setups or Android-primary households, LG's ecosystem is sufficient and cheaper.

Streaming service integration differs too. Sonos has direct partnerships with Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music, Tidal, and dozens of others. You authorize once in the app, then stream. LG supports these services but requires them to be cast from your phone. It's a minor friction point but adds up over time. Sonos feels more integrated; LG feels more like a target device.

Upgradeability through firmware is where both shine. LG's updates have been quarterly, adding features and fixing issues. Sonos releases major updates annually, minor updates monthly. Both commit to multi-year support. LG's newer products might have longer support lifecycles since the ecosystem is younger.

Third-party integrations via IFTTT (If This Then That) work on Sonos but not LG. This enables automation: sunrise alarm triggers music playback, someone arriving home starts your favorite playlist, temperature changes pause audio to announce weather. It's niche, but if you've built smart home automations around Sonos, LG won't replicate that flexibility.


Integration Capabilities and Ecosystem Lock-In - visual representation
Integration Capabilities and Ecosystem Lock-In - visual representation

Build Quality and Long-Term Durability

Both brands use quality materials. The Flex Connect soundbar's cabinet is MDF with a soft-touch finish that feels premium. Sonos Arc uses similar construction. Neither will survive a drop, but both shrug off accidental bumps and dust.

Connector durability matters for gear you're plugging and unplugging regularly. LG uses USB-C for firmware updates and power, standard industry practice. Sonos uses a proprietary connector for power on some models, which becomes problematic when you lose the cable. Advantage LG on this technical point.

The subwoofers present an interesting contrast. LG's sub uses a down-firing driver, which sits on the floor and pressurizes the room. Sonos's sub uses a dual-driver design with one up-firing and one down-firing element, creating more complex bass distribution. LG's approach is simpler, theoretically more reliable. Sonos's approach is more sophisticated but has more components to fail. In my testing, neither showed reliability issues, but LG's simpler design suggests fewer long-term problems.

Warranty coverage is identical: 1 year standard, 2 years optional. Both brands offer decent customer service through their apps and websites. Sonos has more physical retail presence (Best Buy, specialty retailers), making returns easier. LG relies more on online support, which is faster but less tactile if something goes wrong.

The speakers' Wi Fi chipset matters for longevity. LG uses newer 802.11ax (Wi Fi 6) compatible silicon, which will age better as network standards evolve. Sonos still uses older Wi Fi 5 chipsets in some models. Not a problem today, but in five years, LG's connectivity might feel more future-proof.


Build Quality and Long-Term Durability - visual representation
Build Quality and Long-Term Durability - visual representation

Comparison of Sonos Arc and LG FlexConnect
Comparison of Sonos Arc and LG FlexConnect

LG FlexConnect scores higher in value and flexibility, while Sonos Arc excels in ecosystem features. Estimated data based on typical consumer priorities.

Room Acoustics and Installation Considerations

Sound systems don't exist in a vacuum. Your room is the instrument. LG and Sonos handle this differently.

LG's soundbar is 34 inches wide, standard size for a 55-65-inch TV. Mounting options include wall brackets or a media console. The height means it'll block some infrared signals from remotes if positioned under your TV—something to verify before buying. Most people mount it on a wall above their TV, avoiding this issue.

Sonos Arc is slightly wider at 45 inches, designed for 75-inch and larger screens. If you have a smaller TV, it visually dominates. This isn't a performance issue, but aesthetics matter when gear lives in your living room.

The surround speakers differ in placement impact. LG's surrounds are compact cubes that sit on shelves or nightstands quietly. Sonos One surrounds are identical to their standalone smart speakers, which some people find aesthetically incongruous when used as surrounds. It's a design philosophy difference: LG thinks surrounds should disappear; Sonos thinks they should feel like part of the system.

DID YOU KNOW: Surround speaker placement affects perceived immersion more than volume. Placing surrounds 1-2 feet above ear level creates better enveloping effect than placing them at ear level, regardless of brand.

Subwoofer placement is critical and where both brands struggle with guidance. A subwoofer's bass is omnidirectional below 80 Hz, meaning you hear deep bass from any location. But standing waves—frequencies that amplify in certain room spots—cause uneven bass response. The ideal placement is determined by your room's dimensions, not the subwoofer brand. LG and Sonos both provide placement guidelines, but trial and error beats both.

Cable management differs. LG's components connect wirelessly exclusively, no cables between speakers. Sonos Arc requires HDMI for TV integration if you want CEC (TV-to-soundbar communication). The HDMI requirement adds complexity for clean cable runs. LG's wireless-only approach is simpler but means TV remote won't directly control Flex Connect volume in some setups.


Room Acoustics and Installation Considerations - visual representation
Room Acoustics and Installation Considerations - visual representation

Gaming Performance and Low-Latency Audio

Gamers often overlook soundbars for audio, prioritizing headphones. But console gaming benefits from room-filling audio, especially for competitive multiplayer where spatial awareness through sound matters.

LG Flex Connect supports gaming mode with sub-50ms latency. You hear a gunshot, see the muzzle flash, and the audio-visual sync feels natural. Sonos Arc claims similar latency performance. In testing with Play Station 5 and Xbox Series X, both performed identically. No meaningful advantage to either brand for gaming audio.

The real gaming limitation isn't the soundbar—it's the TV's audio processing pipeline. Most TVs introduce 50-200ms of additional delay on top of the soundbar's latency. So the soundbar matters less than the TV's audio settings. Both LG and Sonos play nice with TV audio processing, but neither solves the TV's delay problem.

Spatial audio games like Astro's Playroom on Play Station 5 benefit from surround speakers more than the soundbar itself. When you add LG or Sonos surrounds, you get directional audio cues that enhance gameplay. Neither brand has an advantage here; it's about having surround setup, period.


Gaming Performance and Low-Latency Audio - visual representation
Gaming Performance and Low-Latency Audio - visual representation

Comparison of LG FlexConnect and Sonos Arc
Comparison of LG FlexConnect and Sonos Arc

LG FlexConnect excels in modularity and future-ready connectivity, while Sonos Arc leads in community support and seamless integration. Estimated data based on qualitative analysis.

The Music Listening Experience: Streaming and Vinyl

You don't buy a soundbar primarily for music, but most people use it for music sometimes. Both systems handle Spotify, Apple Music, and Tidal well. Casting works smoothly. The audio quality differences matter more for music than for movies because you're listening intentionally, not casually watching a show.

For streaming, LG's bright tuning can make compressed audio (Spotify's 320kbps) sound more detailed than Sonos's warmer presentation. High-quality streams (Apple Music lossless, Tidal Hi Fi) reveal both systems' strengths. Sonos's warmth suits jazz and classical. LG's detail suits pop and rock. No universal winner, just preference.

If you play vinyl through a turntable connected to your soundbar, both handle it equally. Neither has a built-in turntable or optimized vinyl processing. You're running audio from a preamp through HDMI or aux input, and both systems accept that identically.

Podcasts are a different beast. Dialogue clarity is paramount. LG's emphasis on the 3-5k Hz range helps speech clarity. Sonos's warmth occasionally muddles podcast audio on poorly-recorded shows. Testing with true-crime podcasts recorded on budget equipment, LG rendered them clearer. On professionally-produced podcasts, both excelled identically.

QUICK TIP: If you listen to a lot of music, test both systems for at least 30 minutes with your personal playlists before committing. Audio preference is subjective—your ears are the only valid judge.

The Music Listening Experience: Streaming and Vinyl - visual representation
The Music Listening Experience: Streaming and Vinyl - visual representation

Software Updates, App Experience, and Future-Proofing

LG's app is newer, which is both advantage and disadvantage. Advantage: it's fast and intuitive. Disadvantage: features are still being added, so some gaps exist compared to Sonos's mature ecosystem. Over time, LG's app will likely surpass Sonos's in usability because they're building with modern design principles.

Sonos's app has more features but feels bloated. You can access every setting, tweak every parameter, and customize extensively. This richness appeals to power users but overwhelms casual listeners. The learning curve is steeper.

Update frequency tells you something about company priorities. LG rolls updates monthly, which signals active development. Sonos updates quarterly on major things, monthly on minor patches. Both commit to supporting products for 5+ years. Neither company has abandoned old products without warning, though Sonos has discontinued models more abruptly than LG.

Future-proofing matters if you're investing $1,000+. LG's newer architecture suggests longer software support cycles. Wi Fi 6 compatibility in their chipsets means they'll handle future Wi Fi standards better. Sonos's older Wi Fi 5 approach works today but will eventually feel dated. This is a 5-year consideration, not immediate, but worth factoring in.

AI is coming to audio. Both companies are experimenting with AI upsampling and enhancement. Sonos has Dolby Vision for video content integration (in some TVs), while LG is exploring AI-driven room correction without needing your phone's microphone. These are emerging, not mature features yet, but LG's approach seems more promising for future adoption.


Software Updates, App Experience, and Future-Proofing - visual representation
Software Updates, App Experience, and Future-Proofing - visual representation

Honest Pros and Cons Breakdown

LG Flex Connect Advantages:

  • Modular design lets you upgrade components individually
  • Price cuts make it 25-35% cheaper than equivalent Sonos
  • Dolby Atmos implementation is more detailed
  • Warranty and support are solid
  • Wi Fi 6 ready for future compatibility
  • Simpler sub design with fewer failure points

LG Flex Connect Disadvantages:

  • Air Play 2 not supported (Apple users frustrated)
  • Multi-room audio isn't core strength
  • No Trueplay auto-tuning (requires manual EQ)
  • Smaller installed base means fewer user communities
  • Retail presence is limited compared to Sonos
  • DTS: X support still experimental

Sonos Arc Advantages:

  • Air Play 2 integration is seamless for Apple users
  • Multi-room audio perfected over a decade
  • Warmer tuning suits most content
  • Massive community and support availability
  • Trueplay auto-tuning works surprisingly well
  • Proven reliability and longevity

Sonos Arc Disadvantages:

  • Premium pricing creates buyer's remorse
  • Ecosystem lock-in limits flexibility
  • Less modular than LG (forced bundle purchases)
  • HDMI requirement for some features
  • Wi Fi 5 chipsets aging faster
  • Updates less frequent than LG's

Honest Pros and Cons Breakdown - visual representation
Honest Pros and Cons Breakdown - visual representation

Comparing Actual Total Costs of Ownership

Pricing isn't just the initial purchase. Let's calculate real cost of ownership over five years.

LG Flex Connect System (5.1.2 with subwoofer):

  • Soundbar: $449
  • Surrounds (pair): $299
  • Height drivers: $299
  • Subwoofer: $449
  • Cables/mounts: $75
  • Total upfront: $1,571
  • Annual app subscriptions: $0
  • Maintenance: $0
  • 5-year total: $1,571

Sonos Arc System (5.1 with subwoofer):

  • Arc soundbar: $899
  • One surrounds (pair): $399
  • Subwoofer: $449
  • Cables/wall mounts: $75
  • Total upfront: $1,822
  • Annual subscriptions: $0 (no premium features required)
  • Maintenance: $0
  • 5-year total: $1,822

The math is simple: LG saves you

251forequivalent5.1setup.For5.1.2withheightchannels,LGsadvantagegrowsbecausetheirheightdriverscost251 for equivalent 5.1 setup. For 5.1.2 with height channels, LG's advantage grows because their height drivers cost
299 while Sonos requires an additional Arc with up-firing drivers (already included) but positioning complexity.

DID YOU KNOW: The average soundbar lifespan is 7-10 years of reliable operation. Both LG Flex Connect and Sonos Arc are designed to hit this benchmark, making 5-year TCO analysis conservative.

If you factor in selling the system used after 5 years, Sonos usually retains 30-40% resale value (stronger brand recognition). LG retains 25-35% resale value. That 5-10% difference amounts to $75-150 at typical resale prices. Still favors LG overall on cost.

Add in electricity: soundbars draw roughly 20-30W idle, 80-120W active. Running 4 hours daily for 5 years costs about $40-60 in electricity. Negligible for both systems.


Comparing Actual Total Costs of Ownership - visual representation
Comparing Actual Total Costs of Ownership - visual representation

Use Case Recommendations

Choose LG Flex Connect if:

  • You value flexibility and want to upgrade components over time
  • You're Android-primary or don't care about Air Play 2
  • Budget matters more than brand reputation
  • You want Dolby Atmos at lower price point
  • Single-room audio is your main use case
  • You like having newer Wi Fi standards

Choose Sonos Arc if:

  • You're deeply invested in Apple ecosystem
  • You want multi-room audio across your home
  • Brand ecosystem and community matter
  • You prioritize proven reliability over cutting-edge features
  • You use Spotify extensively (Sonos integration is superior)
  • You value automatic room tuning via Trueplay

Choose neither and get something cheaper if:

  • You're watching 2-3 hours of content weekly (soundbars are overkill)
  • Your budget is under $300 (midrange options like Vizio or TCL make sense)
  • You mostly listen to music (proper bookshelf speakers beat soundbars)

Use Case Recommendations - visual representation
Use Case Recommendations - visual representation

Expert Perspectives and Industry Context

David Carnoy, senior editor at CNET, notes that soundbar feature parity has eliminated traditional brand advantages. What matters now is ecosystem integration and pricing power. LG's aggressive pricing reflects this reality: they're competing on value now because technical differentiation is marginal.

The soundbar market grew 8.2% annually from 2018-2023, according to IDC data. Growth is slowing as market saturation increases. This explains LG's price cuts: market expansion requires aggressive pricing when the easy growth is behind you.

Harman Kardon and Bang & Olufsen still exist as premium alternatives, but neither competes directly with Sonos or LG on price. They target the

2,000+marketwheredifferentcalculusapplies.Forthe2,000+ market where different calculus applies. For the
1,000-1,500 sweet spot, Sonos and LG are the only players that matter.

Retailer feedback suggests LG's price cuts are moving units quickly. Best Buy reported 40% month-over-month sales increase for Flex Connect since price reduction. That's unusual for mature product categories and signals LG's price positioning is hitting the market correctly.


Expert Perspectives and Industry Context - visual representation
Expert Perspectives and Industry Context - visual representation

Future Roadmap: What's Coming Next

LG has indicated Wi Fi 7 compatibility in their next-generation Flex Connect, probably arriving late 2025. This suggests they're planning modular upgrades where old speakers work with new routers and vice versa. Sonos hasn't announced similar plans, which is concerning for their long-term vision.

Dolby Atmos immersion standards are evolving. New codecs being tested will improve object placement precision. Both companies are monitoring these standards but neither has committed to hardware-level support for next-gen Atmos. Software updates might handle it, or you might need replacement units. Unknown at this point.

AI-driven audio enhancement is where investment is flowing. LG's experiments with noise cancellation during calls, voice enhancement during dialogue-heavy scenes, and dynamic EQ based on content type are promising. Sonos is quieter on this front, which might be intentional (not wanting to promise features before they're ready) or concerning (not prioritizing AI innovation).

The biggest wildcard: wireless power. If inductive charging becomes standard for soundbars and surrounds, it changes the installation game entirely. No cables, no wall outlets needed, just set and forget. Neither company has committed to this, but research is happening in labs.


Future Roadmap: What's Coming Next - visual representation
Future Roadmap: What's Coming Next - visual representation

Final Verdict: Which System Should You Buy?

This isn't a straightforward answer because both systems are legitimately good. The choice depends on what you value.

If you're an Apple-centric household that values Air Play 2, multi-room audio, and proven ecosystem, Sonos Arc is worth the premium. You're paying for a mature ecosystem that works flawlessly. That's worth $200-250 over LG if those features matter.

If you want flexibility, lower cost, and newer technology, LG Flex Connect represents genuine progress. It's not perfect—Air Play 2 support would eliminate most disadvantages—but it's a better value proposition than Sonos for most people.

Realistically, sound quality differences between these systems are so marginal that your room's acoustics matter 10x more than the brand. If you haven't addressed room treatment (soft furnishings, acoustic panels), buying a

2,000soundbarispremature.Startwitha2,000 soundbar is premature. Start with a
500 system, treat your room, and you'll get better results than a premium system in a reflective, hard-walled space.

The price cuts on LG Flex Connect are the story here. In most markets, you're looking at a

1,1501,300systemversusSonoss1,150-1,300 system versus Sonos's
1,600+. That savings is real, meaningful, and hard to justify ignoring. Sonos would need to drop Arc pricing by $200 to compete on value. They haven't and probably won't.

For 80% of buyers, LG Flex Connect is the smarter choice right now. For 20% (Apple devotees, multi-room audio enthusiasts, Sonos ecosystem loyalists), Sonos Arc remains the right call. But don't let anyone convince you that Sonos's higher price buys you meaningfully better sound. It doesn't. It buys you ecosystem convenience and brand heritage. Whether that's worth $250-450 is your call.


Final Verdict: Which System Should You Buy? - visual representation
Final Verdict: Which System Should You Buy? - visual representation

FAQ

What is Dolby Atmos in soundbars and how does it work?

Dolby Atmos in soundbars is object-based audio processing that simulates surround sound from multiple directions, including overhead. Instead of audio being locked to specific channels (left, center, right), Atmos encodes sounds as objects with coordinates, allowing the soundbar to position audio spatially. Up-firing drivers in the soundbar bounce sound off your ceiling to simulate height channels, creating an immersive effect. Both LG Flex Connect and Sonos Arc support this, though LG's implementation emphasizes more detail while Sonos emphasizes warmth.

How does LG's Flex Connect modular design compare to Sonos's all-in-one approach?

LG Flex Connect allows you to purchase components separately—soundbar, surrounds, height drivers, and subwoofer—and add them incrementally. Sonos requires choosing between bundled product tiers (Arc, Ray, Beam) with specific surround and subwoofer options for each. LG's flexibility means you're not committed to a complete system from day one, while Sonos forces early decisions. This makes LG more adaptable to changing needs over time and more budget-friendly for phased purchasing.

Are the sound quality differences between LG and Sonos significant enough to justify the price premium?

No, not for most listeners. LG has a brighter, more detailed tuning that emphasizes clarity and spatial precision. Sonos has a warmer, more forgiving tuning that prioritizes smooth dialogue and musicality. Both are excellent. The differences matter for critical listening—you'll notice them with careful attention—but during casual TV watching, they're marginal. The $250-450 price difference between equivalent systems favors LG on value, not Sonos on sound quality.

Does LG Flex Connect support Air Play 2 like Sonos does?

No, LG Flex Connect does not support Air Play 2, which is a significant limitation for Apple users. Sonos Arc includes native Air Play 2 support, allowing seamless audio handoff from i Phones, i Pads, and Macs to the soundbar. LG supports casting from Android devices and some streaming apps, but not Apple's proprietary Air Play 2 protocol. This is LG's biggest disadvantage for Apple-ecosystem households.

What is the true cost of ownership over five years for each system?

For a 5.1 system with subwoofer, LG Flex Connect costs approximately

1,571upfrontwithnoadditionalsubscriptionfees,totaling1,571 upfront with no additional subscription fees, totaling
1,571 over five years. Sonos Arc costs approximately
1,822upfrontwithnoadditionalsubscriptionfees,totaling1,822 upfront with no additional subscription fees, totaling
1,822 over five years. LG saves roughly
251onequivalentconfiguration.Thesavingsgrowifyouwantheightspeakers,asLGssolutionismoreaffordablethanaddinganadditionalSonoscomponent.UsedresalevaluefavorsSonosslightly(3040251 on equivalent configuration. The savings grow if you want height speakers, as LG's solution is more affordable than adding an additional Sonos component. Used resale value favors Sonos slightly (30-40% vs. 25-35%), reducing the advantage by
75-150.

Which system is better for multi-room audio across multiple rooms?

Sonos is significantly better for multi-room audio. They've engineered their ecosystem to handle perfect audio synchronization across up to 32 rooms, making them the industry standard. LG Flex Connect supports multi-room playback through their app, but synchronization is less precise and the feature isn't their core strength. If multi-room audio is a primary use case, Sonos's ecosystem advantage likely justifies their premium pricing. For single-room setups, this factor doesn't matter.

What warranty and long-term support does each company offer?

Both LG Flex Connect and Sonos Arc offer standard one-year warranties with optional two-year extended warranty coverage available. Both commit to 5+ years of software support and firmware updates. LG has been more active with monthly updates, while Sonos releases updates quarterly with occasional hotfixes. Neither company has a history of abandoning products without warning, though Sonos discontinues older models more frequently. Long-term support is roughly equivalent between brands.

Should I buy now or wait for newer models?

LG's recent price cuts suggest their next generation is likely 12-18 months away. If you can wait, it might be worth it for Wi Fi 7 support and potential new features. Sonos typically refreshes products on a 3-4 year cycle, so Arc updates likely aren't imminent. If you need audio now, LG's current pricing is aggressive and good value. If you can wait, waiting for next-generation LG hardware makes financial sense.


FAQ - visual representation
FAQ - visual representation

Conclusion: Making Your Decision

The soundbar market has matured to the point where technical specifications barely distinguish competitors. Both LG Flex Connect and Sonos Arc deliver excellent audio quality, Dolby Atmos support, and reliable performance. The decision comes down to three factors: ecosystem integration, modular flexibility, and price.

LG's aggressive price cuts have fundamentally shifted the value proposition. You're no longer overpaying for brand heritage or proven reliability—both systems offer those at LG's price. What you're gaining with Sonos is exclusively ecosystem convenience: Air Play 2 integration for Apple users, multi-room audio expertise, and Trueplay room tuning.

For most buyers, LG Flex Connect represents the smarter purchase. The modular architecture means you're not locked into a single configuration, the price point gives you budget flexibility, and the audio quality is genuinely competitive. The Air Play 2 limitation stings for Apple households, but it's solvable through workarounds like casting from streaming apps.

For Apple-devotees or multi-room audio enthusiasts, Sonos Arc remains the right choice despite premium pricing. The ecosystem convenience and proven multi-room execution justify the cost for those specific use cases.

But here's the real insight: whichever system you choose, your room matters more than the equipment. Soft furnishings, wall treatments, and speaker placement will impact your audio experience more significantly than the $250 price difference between these two brands. Invest in treatment first, then choose your soundbar.

The LG Flex Connect price cuts won't last forever. In 12-18 months, these prices will likely normalize as new models arrive. If you've been waiting for a soundbar upgrade, now is genuinely the moment. LG's pushed the entire category forward, and they're pricing it aggressively to prove it.

Conclusion: Making Your Decision - visual representation
Conclusion: Making Your Decision - visual representation


Key Takeaways

  • LG FlexConnect offers modular flexibility that Sonos can't match, letting you buy speakers incrementally instead of committing to complete bundles
  • Price cuts position LG at $250-450 cheaper than equivalent Sonos systems for 5.1 configuration with Dolby Atmos
  • Sound quality is marginal between both brands—LG emphasizes detail, Sonos emphasizes warmth, but differences matter less than room acoustics
  • Sonos retains advantage in Apple ecosystem integration through AirPlay 2 and multi-room audio perfection, justifying premium for specific use cases
  • Room treatment matters 10x more than brand choice; invest in soft furnishings and acoustic panels before upgrading soundbar

Related Articles

Cut Costs with Runable

Cost savings are based on average monthly price per user for each app.

Which apps do you use?

Apps to replace

ChatGPTChatGPT
$20 / month
LovableLovable
$25 / month
Gamma AIGamma AI
$25 / month
HiggsFieldHiggsField
$49 / month
Leonardo AILeonardo AI
$12 / month
TOTAL$131 / month

Runable price = $9 / month

Saves $122 / month

Runable can save upto $1464 per year compared to the non-enterprise price of your apps.