LG Gallery TV vs Samsung Frame: The Reality Behind the Display Tech [2025]

The Frame TV Phenomenon That's Taking Over Living Rooms

Walk into any modern living room, and you'll notice something that would've seemed absurd five years ago: a TV that doesn't look like a traditional television anymore. The Samsung Frame TV started a trend that fundamentally changed how people think about display technology in their homes. It's not just a screen. It's a piece of art. It's a photo frame. It's a window into your digital life that disappears when you're not using it.

But here's the thing: Samsung didn't invent the concept of an art-focused television. What they did was execute it flawlessly and market it so well that everyone else had to respond. Now, LG is stepping into the ring with its own answer: the Gallery TV. Sounds promising, right? A competitor bringing innovation and choice to the market. Except there's a catch, and it's a big one.

The display technology underneath matters more than you might think. When you're spending

Let me walk you through exactly what's happening in the TV market right now, why this matters for your living room, and what you should actually consider before dropping serious money on an art-focused television.

TL; DR

• LG Gallery TV uses IPS LCD, not OLED, which means it can't match Samsung's black levels or color accuracy.
• Samsung Frame is OLED, offering superior picture quality when watching actual content, not just photo mode.
• Design similarity is intentional: Both TVs are slim, art-focused, and nearly indistinguishable from the wall.
• Price point matters: The cost difference between IPS and OLED technology is significant, and it shows.
• Use case is critical: If you mostly view photos and art, the tech difference matters less; if you watch movies and streaming content, OLED wins decisively.

Samsung's OLED excels in black levels, color accuracy, and contrast, while LG's IPS LCD offers better viewing angles and affordability. (Estimated data)

Why Display Technology Matters More Than You Think

Here's what most people get wrong: they assume all modern televisions are basically the same, just with different bezels and smart TV software. That's like assuming all cars are the same because they all have four wheels. The fundamental physics of how pixels generate light creates completely different viewing experiences.

The OLED advantage is almost unfair. Each pixel in an OLED display produces its own light. That means when something's supposed to be black, the pixel literally turns off. No backlight. No glow. Pure, absolute black. This isn't a marketing term. It's a physical reality. When you're watching a movie in a dark room, the blacks are actually black, and the contrast ratio is mathematically infinite because there's no light to measure.

Samsung's Frame TV uses OLED technology from Samsung Display, which means the company literally invented the pixel technology they're using in their product. They've had nearly two decades to perfect it. The result is a television that performs exceptionally well for both art display and actual content consumption.

IPS LCD is different. LG's Gallery uses In-Plane Switching LCD technology, which is actually incredibly common in computer monitors, laptops, and budget televisions. There's nothing wrong with IPS LCD. It's reliable, affordable, and offers good color accuracy from wide viewing angles. But it has fundamental limitations that OLED simply doesn't have.

With IPS LCD, you're using a backlight to illuminate pixels. Think of it like holding a light behind frosted glass with colored filters. When you want black, the pixels block most of the light, but not all of it. You get dark gray instead of true black. The contrast ratio on a good IPS LCD might be 1000:1. On OLED, it's effectively infinite. That's not a small difference. That's the difference between a TV that looks spectacular in a bright living room and a TV that looks absolutely stunning in any lighting condition.

The Design Convergence: When Two Products Look Identical

Walk past the specs for a moment and just look at the two televisions side by side. You'll struggle to see the difference. Both are impossibly thin. Both have almost invisible bezels. Both are designed to vanish into your wall. Both treat the screen like a frame for whatever content you want to display.

This convergence isn't accidental. LG learned from Samsung's Frame design the same way every manufacturer learns from successful products: by studying what worked and implementing it. The result is that if you close your eyes and someone describes a television that's a thin rectangle designed to hang on your wall and display photos when you're not watching, you could be talking about either one.

The aesthetic victory belongs to Samsung here simply because they got there first. The Frame has had years to become the cultural reference point. When someone says "that TV that looks like a frame," people think Samsung, not LG. Marketing matters, and Samsung spent years building that brand association.

But design is only half the story.

Samsung Frame with OLED technology outperforms LG Gallery with IPS LCD in most categories, particularly in contrast ratio and performance in dark conditions. Estimated data based on typical feature assessments.

Here's Where It Falls Apart: The Display Technology Showdown

Let's be brutally honest about what's happening here. LG is trying to compete in a segment that absolutely demands OLED technology, and they're showing up with IPS LCD. That's like bringing a good mountain bike to a road cycling race. It's competent. It might even be fun. But it's not going to win.

Samsung Frame with OLED:

• Perfect blacks with infinite contrast ratio
• Exceptional color accuracy across the entire color gamut
• 0ms response time (pixels update instantly)
• No blooming or glow around bright objects
• Flawless performance in any lighting condition
• Ideal for both art display and content consumption

LG Gallery with IPS LCD:

• Good but not perfect black levels (maybe 1000:1 contrast)
• Very good color accuracy, especially from wide angles
• Fast response time but not instantaneous
• Possible glow around bright objects on dark backgrounds
• Excellent performance in bright rooms, less impressive in darkness
• Better suited for art display than movie watching

Now, if LG's Gallery TV were significantly cheaper, this conversation would be different. You could justify the trade-off. "Sure, it's IPS LCD, but it costs $800 less." That would be a real choice. Instead, LG priced the Gallery to compete directly with the Frame, meaning you're paying OLED prices for IPS LCD technology.

The Art Display Use Case: Where IPS LCD Almost Wins

There's one scenario where LG's Gallery TV legitimately makes sense, and it's the one use case that LG is trying to sell you on: pure art display.

Imagine you're someone who buys LG's Gallery TV specifically to display photography, museum artwork, and high-quality digital art. You're not really watching Netflix. You're not streaming sports. You're rotating through a curated collection of images that represent your personal taste and aesthetic sensibility. In this specific scenario, does the choice between OLED and IPS LCD matter as much?

Actually, yes. It still does. Here's why.

An OLED television displays art more authentically than any other technology available right now. The colors are more vibrant because each pixel controls its own light. The blacks in artwork are actually black, not dark gray. When you're looking at a painting that uses negative space as a design element, OLED renders that space correctly. IPS LCD, with its backlight glow, washes out those dark areas. It's subtle, but it's there, and you'll notice it every time you look at a high-quality photograph with deep blacks.

LG's counter-argument would be that IPS LCD's wide viewing angles make it better for group viewing. If multiple people are standing at different angles relative to the TV, IPS technology maintains color accuracy across those angles better than OLED. This is true, but it's also kind of weird for a TV that's designed to be viewed like a picture frame. You're not usually standing at 45-degree angles to your framed artwork on the wall.

The Movie and Content Watching Reality

Here's where the Galaxy TV's limitations become genuinely painful. Let's say you get this TV home, frame it on your wall, set up a stunning collection of artwork—and then someone wants to watch a movie. Or you want to watch something at night. Or you're into gaming and want to actually experience the TV's capabilities beyond photo display.

The OLED in Samsung's Frame handles all of these scenarios beautifully. When you're watching a movie, the pure blacks make action scenes dramatic. The high refresh rate (up to 120 Hz on newer models) makes gaming feel smooth and responsive. The zero latency between input and display response makes the experience feel instantaneous.

The IPS LCD in LG's Gallery handles these scenarios competently, but not spectacularly. Movies look fine, especially in a bright room. Gaming is fine. But there's a ceiling on how good it can look, and that ceiling is determined by the fundamental physics of IPS LCD technology. You can't make the blacks blacker. You can't improve the contrast ratio beyond what the technology allows.

What makes this particularly frustrating is that people who spend $2,000+ on a television often change their minds about how they'll use it. They think they'll primarily display art, but then they start using it for actual content because it's literally on their wall. The TV that was supposed to be 80% art display becomes 50% art and 50% movies and streaming. At that point, you're really wishing you'd gone with OLED.

Samsung's OLED TVs outperform LG's IPS LCDs in movie watching and gaming due to superior contrast and refresh rates. Estimated data.

The Brightness Question: OLED's Old Weakness

For years, the main criticism of OLED televisions was that they weren't as bright as LCD TVs. This was especially true in bright living rooms where lots of sunlight streams through windows. OLED pixels produce their own light individually, so there's a limit to how bright they can get without damaging the panel. LCD TVs use a backlight that illuminates the entire screen, so they can crank brightness higher.

But here's the catch: that criticism is becoming outdated. Samsung's newer OLED TVs, including the Frame, have brightness levels that rival or exceed traditional LCD televisions. Samsung uses a technique called pixel boosting, where they overshoot pixel output for short bursts to achieve brightness peaks above what you'd expect from OLED.

This changes the entire calculus. The old argument against OLED in bright rooms is gone. You can now put an OLED TV anywhere and get exceptional results in any lighting condition. LG's IPS LCD doesn't have an advantage here anymore.

Price Reality: Are You Paying for the Right Things?

Let's talk about money, because this is where decisions actually get made in people's homes. The Samsung Frame TV typically starts around

LG's Gallery TV is expected to hit the market at similar price points. That's the problem. You're paying the same price for inferior technology. From a pure value standpoint, that's indefensible.

Now, LG has one potential card to play: availability. If you can't get a Samsung Frame in your region but can easily get a Gallery TV, that changes the decision. Logistics and availability matter in real purchasing decisions. But on a level playing field, the same price for worse display technology isn't a compelling value proposition.

If LG priced the Gallery TV at 30% less than the Frame, the conversation would be completely different. You'd have a legitimate budget option for people who genuinely care primarily about the art display function and want to save money. Instead, LG positioned it as a direct competitor, which means it's competing directly on specs, and it loses.

QUICK TIP: Before buying either TV, check current prices on both models. Seasonal sales can create significant price gaps. Sometimes the Frame drops to match or even undercut the Gallery TV, making the choice obvious.

The Software Story: Art Curation and Integration

One area where LG might actually have some advantages is in the software and ecosystem. The Gallery TV isn't just about display quality. It's about what content you can easily access and display.

LG has partnerships with various art collections and museums. The TV can potentially interface with digital art platforms and collections that might make curation easier. If you're really into digital art or photography, LG's software ecosystem might offer some advantages in terms of accessing and managing content.

Samsung has similar partnerships, though, and their ecosystem is arguably more mature since the Frame has been on the market longer. The software advantage, if it exists at all, is marginal.

What matters more is that both TVs solve the core software problem: they let you display beautiful images on your wall without it looking like you're just staring at a black screen. Both systems accomplish this well. Software isn't the differentiator here.

Samsung Frame and LG Gallery TVs are priced similarly, but LG's offering is perceived as inferior in technology. Estimated data based on typical market prices.

Design Details That Actually Matter

Beyond the overall aesthetic, there are design details that influence how these TVs actually work in your home.

Bezels and edges: Both TVs minimize the visible bezel, but the materials and finish matter. The Frame uses different finish options and has a distinctive thin bezel treatment. The Gallery TV presumably mimics this closely. In practice, both basically disappear into your wall, so this is negligible.

Mounting and installation: The Frame comes with a dedicated wall mount that's engineered specifically for the TV. The Gallery TV will likely have similar options, but the quality and integration of these mounts matters. A good mount keeps the TV secure and makes installation easier. A bad mount turns your art display into an anxiety-inducing installation project.

Thickness and weight: Both TVs are exceptionally thin, but the exact specifications matter if you're mounting on drywall without studs. A heavier TV requires more robust mounting hardware. Most people will have professional installation anyway, so this is a secondary consideration.

Cable management: How well does each TV hide cables? Can you route them through the wall or behind the mount? The Frame has excellent cable management built into its mounting system. We'll see how LG handles this with the Gallery TV.

The Gaming Question: Response Time and Refresh Rate

If you're considering using either of these TVs for gaming, you need to know that OLED has a massive advantage. The response time on an OLED panel is essentially zero. When you press a button on your controller, the image updates immediately. There's no lag, no motion blur, no ghosting.

IPS LCD panels are much slower. They might have acceptable response times for casual gaming, but if you're playing competitive multiplayer games or anything where fast reactions matter, the difference is noticeable. You'll feel the lag. Your opponents will beat you because your controller input registers slower on your screen than it does on theirs.

Moreover, OLED TVs support higher refresh rates (up to 144 Hz on cutting-edge models), while IPS LCD TVs typically max out at 120 Hz. For gaming, especially on Play Station 5 and Xbox Series X, that higher refresh rate makes a real difference.

If there's any chance you'll game on this TV, OLED becomes the obvious choice.

DID YOU KNOW: OLED televisions can display at 0 Hz refresh rate when showing still images, which is perfect for art display and significantly reduces power consumption compared to LCDs that have to continuously refresh their backlight.

Power Consumption and Long-Term Costs

Here's something people often overlook: the long-term operating costs of these televisions. OLED TVs have gotten much more efficient in recent years, but they can still use more power than LCD TVs under certain circumstances.

When you're displaying a bright image with lots of white on an OLED TV, the pixels have to work harder to produce all that light, so power consumption goes up. When you're displaying mostly dark images or using the TV as a frame with dark artwork, OLED actually uses significantly less power than LCD because those pixels are literally off.

For the Gallery TV specifically, if you're using it primarily to display photographs and artwork, and you're likely to show a mix of bright and dark images, the power consumption difference is probably negligible. If you're watching bright content all day (unlikely), IPS LCD might be slightly more efficient.

Over the lifetime of ownership, we're probably talking about a

$20-50 difference in annual power costs, which is not meaningful compared to the$

2,000+ purchase price. This shouldn't be a deciding factor.

Estimated data shows OLED TVs may incur slightly higher power costs with bright content, but differences are minimal with mixed usage.

The Burn-In Concern: Real Risk or Old News?

You've probably heard about OLED burn-in. It's the specter that haunts OLED ownership. If you display the same image in the same spot for too long, can those pixels degrade and leave a permanent ghost image on your screen?

Historically, yes. But this is becoming increasingly irrelevant with modern OLED TVs. Samsung's OLED TVs now include burn-in protection features like pixel shifting, screen savers, and protective timers that activate if you've been watching the same channel or image for too long. Burn-in on modern OLED TVs is exceptionally rare.

For the Frame TV specifically, which is explicitly designed to display static art, Samsung obviously anticipated this concern and built in protections. There's a pixel refresh feature that automatically runs periodically to prevent burn-in. The Frame TV can display thousands of images over months and years without any burn-in risk.

IPS LCD doesn't have this concern at all, so if burn-in keeps you up at night, that's one point for the Gallery TV. But realistically, on a modern OLED TV with burn-in protection, it's not a genuine concern.

Real-World Ownership Experience

Let's imagine you've bought one of these TVs and it's now on your wall. What's the actual day-to-day experience?

With the Samsung Frame (OLED), you'll be consistently impressed. The art looks stunning. Movies look exceptional. If you ever switch to regular content, the TV performs beautifully. The only limitation is that you paid more for premium technology than you might use if you're truly committed to the "art display" concept.

With the LG Gallery (IPS LCD), you'll be happy with your purchase initially. The art looks good. Your living room looks stylish. But every time you watch a movie at night, you'll notice the blacks aren't as dark. Every time you compare it to OLED in a store or at a friend's house, you'll notice the difference. You'll wonder if you made the right choice. That wondering is the real problem.

People don't buy expensive home theater equipment and then never use it. The scenario where you buy a $2,000 TV and use it exclusively for art display is increasingly rare. Most people will mix use cases. In mixed use, OLED wins decisively.

The Bigger Picture: What This Says About the TV Market

LG's Gallery TV announcement tells us something important about the current television market. Premium, high-end TV features are increasingly concentrated in OLED technology. Manufacturers have basically decided that if you want the absolute best picture quality, OLED is the way there. IPS LCD is increasingly relegated to budget and midrange segments.

LG's attempt to position an IPS LCD TV as a premium art-focused television is interesting, but it highlights the reality that OLED has won the technology war at the high end of the market. When Samsung can use OLED technology and LG is still using IPS LCD for their premium art TV, it suggests that either LG didn't have the OLED capacity for this product, or they didn't want to invest in it for this segment.

This could change. LG also makes OLED TVs, and they could have easily put OLED in the Gallery TV if they wanted to. The decision to use IPS LCD seems strategic, probably to maintain price margins or to differentiate from their own OLED lineup. But it's a strategic decision that ends up hurting the Galaxy TV's competitiveness.

Practical Recommendation: Which One Should You Actually Buy?

Let's cut to the chase. If you have the budget and care about display quality, the Samsung Frame TV with OLED technology is the better choice. Full stop. It's more expensive, it performs better, and it handles both the art display use case and actual content viewing magnificently.

The LG Gallery TV is worth considering if and only if:

• You find a significant price discount (20%+ less than the Frame)
• You genuinely commit to using it primarily for art display (80%+ of the time)
• You value wide viewing angles because multiple people will be watching from different positions
• You have availability issues or prefer LG's ecosystem and software

If none of those conditions apply, the Frame TV is the better investment.

Looking Forward: Where Does Art Display TV Go From Here?

The fact that LG is entering this market suggests there's real demand for art-focused televisions. Samsung created a category, and now competitors see opportunity. That's good for consumers because it means more options and potentially more innovation.

What would make the Gallery TV competitive? LG would need to either offer OLED technology at a lower price point, or innovate on features and software in ways that justify the IPS LCD display. Right now, they're doing neither.

Future iterations of these TVs will probably see improvements in brightness, refresh rates, and software capabilities. The technology ceiling isn't reached yet. But unless LG moves to OLED (which would dramatically increase manufacturing costs), the fundamental display quality gap will remain.

The art TV segment is here to stay. It represents a shift in how people think about home entertainment. Instead of accepting whatever content you're watching as the thing your TV displays, the art TV philosophy says the TV should display whatever makes your home look beautiful, whether that's a museum painting or a movie. That's a valuable concept, and both Samsung and LG understand it. The question is just about which company is willing to invest in the display technology that best serves that concept.

Right now, that's Samsung.

FAQ

What is an art-focused television?

An art-focused television, also known as a frame TV, is designed to display photographs, artwork, and high-quality digital images when not showing traditional television content. These TVs feature sleek designs with minimal bezels and are intended to blend seamlessly into your wall decor, functioning as decorative pieces rather than visible tech.

How does the Samsung Frame TV's OLED display compare to LG Gallery's IPS LCD?

Samsung's OLED technology allows each pixel to produce its own light, resulting in perfect blacks, infinite contrast ratio, and exceptional color accuracy. LG's IPS LCD uses a backlight to illuminate pixels, which cannot achieve the same black levels or contrast but offers superior wide viewing angles. OLED provides better overall picture quality for both art display and content consumption, though IPS LCD is still capable and more affordable to manufacture.

Why does display technology matter for an art display TV?

Even when displaying artwork, the quality of black representation, color accuracy, and contrast directly affects how the artwork appears. OLED's perfect blacks and superior color reproduction render artwork more faithfully and beautifully. Additionally, most people eventually use these TVs for streaming content and movies, where display technology differences become dramatically more obvious.

What are the power consumption differences between OLED and IPS LCD TVs?

OLED TVs can actually use less power when displaying primarily dark images or artwork because those pixels can turn off completely, whereas IPS LCD backlight always consumes power. When displaying bright content, OLED may use slightly more power to produce bright pixels. Over a year of typical mixed usage, the power cost difference is minimal (under $50 annually).

Is burn-in a real risk with OLED art display TVs?

Modern OLED TVs, including Samsung's Frame TV, include built-in burn-in protection features such as pixel shifting, screen savers, and automatic pixel refresh cycles. With these protections active, burn-in risk on art display TVs is exceptionally low, even with static images displayed for extended periods.

Which TV is better for gaming and fast-action content?

The Samsung Frame with OLED technology is significantly better for gaming and fast-action content due to its near-zero response time, support for high refresh rates (up to 144 Hz), and zero input lag. IPS LCD panels have slower response times and lower refresh rate support, making OLED the clear choice for gaming, sports, and action-oriented content.

Can you use these art display TVs for regular streaming content like Netflix and movies?

Absolutely. Both the Samsung Frame and LG Gallery can be used for streaming content, though the quality difference becomes very apparent. The OLED in the Frame provides superior picture quality for movies and shows with exceptional contrast and color. The Gallery's IPS LCD handles streaming adequately but cannot match OLED's performance, especially in dark scenes and movies with high-contrast cinematography.

What's the main reason LG chose IPS LCD instead of OLED for the Gallery TV?

LG likely made this decision to manage manufacturing costs and maintain profit margins, as OLED production is more expensive. Additionally, LG produces its own OLED panel supply and may have production capacity constraints. The decision suggests strategic positioning rather than technical limitations, but it ultimately makes the Gallery TV less competitive against the OLED-equipped Frame.

Are there any advantages to IPS LCD in the Gallery TV that outweigh its disadvantages?

The primary advantage is wide viewing angles, which means color accuracy and brightness remain consistent if multiple people view the TV from different angles. However, since art display TVs are typically mounted on walls and viewed head-on, this advantage is marginal. Wide viewing angles don't justify the compromise in black levels and contrast for most purchasers.

How do prices compare, and is the Galaxy TV worth the cost difference?

Both TVs typically price in the

Key Takeaways

• LG Gallery TV uses IPS LCD technology while Samsung Frame uses OLED, resulting in significantly different display performance and user experience.
• OLED provides superior black levels, contrast ratio, and color accuracy, making it better for both art display and content consumption.
• Both TVs price at similar levels (
  $1,500-$
  3,000), making OLED the better value when technologies are equivalent cost.
• IPS LCD's only meaningful advantage is wide viewing angles, which matters less for wall-mounted art display TVs.
• Mixed usage scenarios heavily favor OLED; pure art display is the only scenario where IPS LCD becomes defensible.

Related Articles

• LG Gallery TV: The Ultimate Art Display Solution [2026]
• How to Watch LG's CES 2026 Press Conference Live [2025]
• Samsung Soundbar vs Sonos Arc Ultra: Dolby Atmos Showdown [2025]
• OLED TVs 2025: Ultimate Guide to Next-Gen Brightness & Glare-Free Tech
• Samsung Music Studio 5 & 7 Speakers: AI Bass Control & Design [2025]
• Samsung Music Studio 5 & 7 Speakers: Design Meets Audio [2026]