Ask Runable forDesign-Driven General AI AgentTry Runable For Free
Runable
Back to Blog
Technology6 min read

Meta misled users about its products’ safety, jury decides | The Verge

A New Mexico jury determined that Meta had willfully violated state law by engaging in an unconscionable trade practice. Discover insights about meta misled use

TechnologyInnovationBest PracticesGuideTutorial
Meta misled users about its products’ safety, jury decides | The Verge
Listen to Article
0:00
0:00
0:00

Meta misled users about its products’ safety, jury decides | The Verge

Overview

Tech Expand Amazon Apple Facebook Google Microsoft Samsung Business See all tech

Reviews Expand Smart Home Reviews Phone Reviews Tablet Reviews Headphone Reviews See all reviews

Details

Science Expand Space Energy Environment Health See all science

Entertainment Expand TV Shows Movies Audio See all entertainment

Policy Expand Antitrust Politics Law Security See all policy

Gadgets Expand Laptops Phones TVs Headphones Speakers Wearables See all gadgets

Verge Shopping Expand Buying Guides Deals Gift Guides See all shopping

Streaming Expand Disney HBONetflix You Tube Creators See all streaming

Transportation Expand Electric Cars Autonomous Cars Ride-sharing Scooters See all transportation

Policy Close Policy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All Policy

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

News Close News Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All News

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Tech Close Tech Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All Tech

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Meta misled users about its products’ safety, jury decides

New Mexico got a historic $375 million jury verdict in the first of several cases nationwide against Meta.

New Mexico got a historic $375 million jury verdict in the first of several cases nationwide against Meta.

Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Meta willfully violated New Mexico law by misleading users about the safety of its products and engaging in an unconscionable trade practice, a jury found. The company will face a

375millionpenaltyfortheviolations,awardingthemaximumpenaltyof375 million penalty for the violations, awarding the maximum penalty of
5,000 per violation for 37,500 violations across two counts. The jury decided against Meta on every count, though it declined to award a penalty as high as the state sought, which would have been closer to $2 billion.

It’s a landmark verdict delivered just one day after closing arguments. New Mexico argued that Meta had flouted state law by misleading consumers and facilitating child predators on its platform. The state set up decoy accounts on Facebook to lure suspected predators to profiles that appeared to belong to minors, and said they found they were flooded with requests and messages from adults. Meta vehemently denied the allegations, saying the states’ investigation was flawed and that it has been truthful about the safety of its products.

Another verdict in a case involving Meta’s product safety is expected soon in Los Angeles, where the jury has been deliberating for over a week in a case that also targets Google’s You Tube. Several more cases are waiting in the wings to go to trial. The New Mexico verdict is a historic win for a unique legal strategy pursued by Attorney General Raúl Torrez, focused on the tech platform’s own design, in an attempt to overcome the defense that online content is protected.

“New Mexico is proud to be the first state to hold Meta accountable in court for misleading parents, enabling child exploitation, and harming kids,” Torrez said in a statement. “In the next phase of this legal proceeding, we will seek additional financial penalties and court-mandated changes to Meta’s platforms that offer stronger protections for children.”

“We respectfully disagree with the verdict and will appeal,” Meta spokesperson Francis Brennan said in a statement. “We work hard to keep people safe on our platforms and are clear about the challenges of identifying and removing bad actors or harmful content. We will continue to defend ourselves vigorously, and we remain confident in our record of protecting teens online.”

Lauren Feiner Close Lauren Feiner Senior Policy Reporter Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All by Lauren Feiner

Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Law Close Law Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All Law

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Meta Close Meta Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All Meta

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

News Close News Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All News

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Policy Close Policy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All Policy

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Speech Close Speech Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All Speech

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

Tech Close Tech Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. Follow Follow See All Tech

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

More in: Social media on trial: tech giants face lawsuits over addiction, safety, and mental health

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang says ‘I think we’ve achieved AGI’

The US government just banned consumer routers made outside the US

Donut Lab’s solid-state battery could barely hold a charge after getting damaged

Confronting the CEO of the AI company that impersonated me Video

Ayaneo says selling its Windows gaming handheld ‘is no longer sustainable’

Key Takeaways

  • Tech Expand Amazon Apple Facebook Google Microsoft Samsung Business See all tech
  • Reviews Expand Smart Home Reviews Phone Reviews Tablet Reviews Headphone Reviews See all reviews
  • Science Expand Space Energy Environment Health See all science
  • Entertainment Expand TV Shows Movies Audio See all entertainment
  • Policy Expand Antitrust Politics Law Security See all policy

Cut Costs with Runable

Cost savings are based on average monthly price per user for each app.

Which apps do you use?

Apps to replace

ChatGPTChatGPT
$20 / month
LovableLovable
$25 / month
Gamma AIGamma AI
$25 / month
HiggsFieldHiggsField
$49 / month
Leonardo AILeonardo AI
$12 / month
TOTAL$131 / month

Runable price = $9 / month

Saves $122 / month

Runable can save upto $1464 per year compared to the non-enterprise price of your apps.