Ask Runable forDesign-Driven General AI AgentTry Runable For Free
Runable
Back to Blog
Technology6 min read

Mitigating the risks of autonomous AI with agent-ready data | TechRadar

AI needs sufficient data context for success Discover insights about mitigating the risks of autonomous ai with agent-ready data | techradar..........

TechnologyInnovationBest PracticesGuideTutorial
Mitigating the risks of autonomous AI with agent-ready data | TechRadar
Listen to Article
0:00
0:00
0:00

Mitigating the risks of autonomous AI with agent-ready data | Tech Radar

Overview

Mitigating the risks of autonomous AI with agent-ready data

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.

Details

The rollout of autonomous AI agents poses major opportunities to organizations.

However, without the right foundations and approach, the risks are vast when there is no way to guarantee that agents will make correct, reliable decisions.

Agents do not perceive reality as we do. Instead, they act upon the snapshots of reality captured in the data they access.

Championing data leadership: how can data strategy shape AI success?

3 risks hindering enterprise-ready AI — and how low-code workflows help

Global AI Practice Leader at Informatica from Salesforce.

When data quality is poor, an agent will make bad decisions, and there is no human around to identify the mistake and correct it.

The good news is that there are data strategies that can mitigate the risks.

In a traditional Machine Learning (ML) system using automation, data problems can reduce accuracy. But in an agentic ecosystem, the actions of one agent can have catastrophic downstream impacts.

At worst, a rogue agent could cause a data cascade in which one error sparks a chain reaction of flawed outputs that get stored, treated as truth, and then reused.

In large organizations, these failures don’t look dramatic at first. Everything seems normal.

Until someone realizes the system has been acting on the wrong frame for weeks. By then, it’s too late and other agents are acting out based on the mistakes made upstream.

A lie whispered into the system becomes a command shouted out of the other side.

AI governance under strain: what modern platforms mean for data privacy

How businesses can stop their AI agents from running amok

Data quality is necessary, but not sufficient. Agents need decision quality data to mitigate the risk of poor outcomes

Given my role as an AI data leader working with global enterprises, I was reflecting on a key data problem during a recent trip to London. I stopped to eat a famous British dish and when I asked for some chips, I was confident I wouldn’t be served a plateful of silicon.

The data I had gathered about my own personal situation and the context - sitting in a restaurant in the UK capital - made me confident the waiter would bring me some cooked potatoes served alongside fish, not a handful of CPUs. Analysis of local data told me what kind of food I should expect. If I had made the wrong judgment and gathered or interpreted data incorrectly, it would have been a disappointing dinner.

A New Zealand supermarket recently provided another excellent - and hilarious - illustration of the challenge of interpreting data without all the right pieces in place. It created an AI recipe builder to help customers use up their leftovers, inviting people to type in the ingredients they have available and have the bot generate recipes.

Inevitably, people started asking it to make dishes with bleach, ant killer and other dangerous ingredients, so the AI began generating less-than-lovely-sounding suggestions like glue sandwiches and French toast flavored with a soupçon of methanol.

The ingredients were complete and the instructions were correct, but the AI only understood the structure of a recipe - not the purpose or intent of using ingredients to make nourishing, rather than noxious, food.

Now imagine if that AI had been agentic and tasked with, for example, instructing a food assembly plant to generate recipes and ingredient boxes to be sent to customers. The story above was funny - the nightmare scenario of poison being mailed to customers is anything but.

That tale is a clear lesson. If organizations haven’t established a trusted foundation for their data, the jump to agentic AI is extremely risky. This doesn’t magically appear when agents are deployed - it comes from governance, metadata, lineage and understanding not just what the data says, but where it came from and why it exists.

And what should that data look like? It needs to be authoritative and trustworthy, as well as comprehensive and up-to-date to inform timely, complete decisions. It must also be responsible - meaning agents can safely act on it - and secure to prevent misuse.

Finally, context must be considered at every stage. It is the secret sauce that ties all these aspects of good data management together.

As they roll out autonomous AI tools, organizations are discovering that accuracy alone is not enough. Agentic systems don’t just predict - they act - and those actions compound. That means missing context is far more dangerous than it was in earlier generations of AI.

The organizations that succeed will be those that treat governance, metadata, and lineage not as an annoying requirement from their compliance teams, but as a strong foundation for their agents. When data drifts away from the truth, that movement doesn’t stop - it gets worse. Building a solid “truth layer” will help to stop that and prevent systems from failing down the line.

Many IT management teams won’t know where this layer is. Maybe they will point vaguely to a warehouse. But they need to know where the truth their agents rely on can be found, because if it’s not in place upstream, then everything else is at risk.

Right now, this appears like a relatively small issue. But as agents take on more and more critical roles, it’s going to become a big one - so getting the basics right today is not just a prudent decision, but an unavoidable hedge against future chaos.

Global AI Practice Leader at Informatica from Salesforce.

You must confirm your public display name before commenting

1 Salesforce recuits team behind calendar app Clockwise into Agentforce

2 Stay safe this spring break with our exclusive Nord VPN deal (and get a free Amazon gift card)

3I spent 2 weeks testing the H2O Audio Sonar 2 Pro, and found them to be the perfect headphones for swimming

4 It's about time: Your Samsung Galaxy S26 can now Air Drop files to an i Phone

5 Did Kioxia just unveil the fastest SSD ever? GP series uses Storage Class Memory to feed the HBM GPU with millions of IOPS

Tech Radar is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site.

© Future US, Inc. Full 7th Floor, 130 West 42nd Street, New York, NY 10036.

Key Takeaways

  • Mitigating the risks of autonomous AI with agent-ready data

  • When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission

  • The rollout of autonomous AI agents poses major opportunities to organizations

  • However, without the right foundations and approach, the risks are vast when there is no way to guarantee that agents will make correct, reliable decisions

  • Agents do not perceive reality as we do

Cut Costs with Runable

Cost savings are based on average monthly price per user for each app.

Which apps do you use?

Apps to replace

ChatGPTChatGPT
$20 / month
LovableLovable
$25 / month
Gamma AIGamma AI
$25 / month
HiggsFieldHiggsField
$49 / month
Leonardo AILeonardo AI
$12 / month
TOTAL$131 / month

Runable price = $9 / month

Saves $122 / month

Runable can save upto $1464 per year compared to the non-enterprise price of your apps.