Motorola Razr Fold: The Foldable Phone That Changes Everything

Motorola just dropped a bombshell at CES 2025. After years of sitting on the sidelines while Samsung and Google dominated the foldable phone market, the company announced its first side-foldable smartphone: the Razr Fold. And frankly, it's about time.

The foldable market has been controlled by a handful of players for too long. Samsung's Galaxy Z Fold series has set the bar high, Google's Pixel Fold proved that software matters more than hardware, and yet there's been a gaping hole where Motorola should have been. The company that literally invented the flip phone, the device that defined mobile culture for a generation, has been relegated to making solid midrange phones while others cashed in on foldable innovation.

Until now.

The Razr Fold represents Motorola's aggressive bet that it can reclaim its throne in the smartphone world. With a 6.6-inch external display, an 8.1-inch flexible main screen, stylus support, and a camera system that's legitimately impressive, this isn't just a me-too device. It's a calculated response to competitors, and it signals that Motorola is serious about competing at the premium end of the market.

But here's what really matters: what does this device mean for you? For the foldable market? For the entire trajectory of smartphone design? Let's break it down.

TL; DR

• First side-foldable from Motorola: The Razr Fold joins Samsung's Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Google's Pixel 10 Pro Fold as a major foldable competitor
• Impressive display specs: 6.6-inch cover screen + 8.1-inch flexible interior display gives genuine tablet functionality
• Stylus support advantage: Includes Moto Pen Ultra stylus support, a feature Samsung surprisingly dropped from the Z Fold 7
• Premium camera system: 50MP main sensor with ultra-wide, telephoto, macro capabilities, plus Dolby Vision recording
• More details coming: Motorola hasn't revealed pricing, availability, or full specs yet—but this device could reshape the foldable landscape

Motorola's potential pricing strategies for the Razr Fold range from undercutting competitors at

Motorola Finally Enters the Foldable Arena

Let's be honest about what just happened. Motorola, the company that invented the mobile phone and defined the flip phone era, sat out the foldable revolution. While Samsung launched the Galaxy Fold in 2019 and built a dynasty around it, Motorola was stuck making the midrange Razr comeback phones—solid devices, sure, but not cutting edge.

That era is over.

The announcement of the Razr Fold at CES 2025 marks a fundamental shift in Motorola's strategy. This isn't a side project or a test balloon. This is the company's declaration that it's taking the premium foldable market seriously. And the timing matters. By 2025, the foldable market has matured enough that competitors understand what works and what doesn't. Motorola gets to learn from Samsung's and Google's mistakes while leveraging its own legendary design heritage.

What's fascinating is that Motorola didn't go halfway. This is a proper side-fold device, exactly like the Galaxy Z Fold series. It's not trying to be a flip phone (though Motorola continues to make those with the standard Razr line). It's not hedging its bets. It's betting the farm on a full tablet experience when you open it up.

The competitive landscape in 2025 has three major players battling for foldable supremacy. Samsung owns the market with the Galaxy Z Fold 7, Google proved that software optimization matters more than raw specs with the Pixel 10 Pro Fold, and now Motorola is crashing the party with hardware that's legitimately competitive. That changes the dynamics. More competition means faster innovation, better prices, and actually interesting choices for consumers.

Motorola's delay in entering the market actually gave it advantages. The company could study five generations of folding technology, learn which mechanisms fail, understand software optimization challenges, and plan accordingly. That's not an excuse for sitting out—it's context for what comes next.

The Display Specs That Actually Matter

Let's talk about what you'll actually use when you buy this phone: the screens.

The Razr Fold features a 6.6-inch external display and an 8.1-inch flexible main display. On paper, that sounds familiar. Every foldable since 2019 has had roughly these dimensions. But the devil's always in the details, and we don't have all of them yet. Motorola hasn't released resolution specs, refresh rates, brightness levels, or color accuracy numbers.

That's intentional. The company is drip-feeding information to maintain momentum and speculation heading into its full launch reveal. Typical corporate strategy. But we can make educated guesses based on what the competition is doing.

Samsung's Galaxy Z Fold 7 has a 6.3-inch cover display and a 7.6-inch main display. Google's Pixel 10 Pro Fold has similar proportions. So Motorola's 6.6-inch and 8.1-inch specs suggest a deliberate choice to go slightly bigger on both screens. Why? Probably because user feedback consistently says: "Give us more screen real estate." More usable space on the cover display means you can actually accomplish tasks without folding the phone open. More space on the main display means multitasking, media consumption, and productivity apps feel less cramped.

What really matters is durability and crease visibility. After five generations of Galaxy Z Folds, Samsung has minimized the crease to the point where it's barely noticeable in daily use. Google's Pixel Fold has an even flatter crease due to different folding geometry. Motorola hasn't shared crease specifications, but we can assume they've studied both approaches and probably landed on something competitive.

The external display size also affects how the phone feels in your pocket. A 6.6-inch cover screen is on the larger side—similar to a standard flagship phone like an iPhone 15. That's actually good for productivity. You can send emails, edit documents, or browse the web without opening the phone. But it also means the device is wider when folded. Motorola hasn't released thickness or weight specs, so we don't know if this is a brick or surprisingly slim. That information is coming in the coming months, according to the company.

One thing we know for certain: these are OLED displays. Every premium foldable uses OLED because the technology is thin enough to flex without visible creasing or performance degradation. The refresh rate is almost certainly 120 Hz on both screens—that's standard on premium devices by 2025. Brightness levels probably hit 2000 nits peak, giving you usable performance in sunlight.

But here's what actually matters: responsiveness and color accuracy. A 120 Hz screen feels buttery smooth, but if the colors are washed out or the response time lags, it sucks. We won't know until real-world reviews hit. For now, assume Motorola has matched or exceeded Samsung's display quality. That's the baseline expectation.

In 2025, Samsung leads the foldable market with an estimated 50% share, followed by Google and Motorola. Estimated data.

Stylus Support: The Feature Samsung Abandoned

This deserves its own section because it's genuinely significant.

The Razr Fold includes support for the Moto Pen Ultra stylus. Samsung didn't include stylus support in the Galaxy Z Fold 7, marking the first time since the line's inception that you can't use a stylus with the device. That's not a cost-cutting move—it's a design choice that confused the market.

Why? Because foldables are basically tablets. When you open them up, you get 8+ inches of screen space. That's perfect for taking notes, sketching, annotating documents, editing photos, or drawing. A stylus makes that experience exponentially better. Samsung included stylus support for six generations of Galaxy Z Folds, and users loved it. Dropping the feature was controversial.

Motorola saw an opening and took it. By including stylus support, the company is saying: "We understand what users actually want." That's smart positioning. It costs relatively little to add stylus support (the digitizer layer is cheap at scale), but it provides massive marketing value. It's a feature that reviewers will notice. It's a feature that productivity-focused users will appreciate. It's a feature that justifies a premium price.

The Moto Pen Ultra is specifically designed for the Razr Fold. We don't have detailed specs yet, but Motorola's stylus technology has always been solid. The Moto Pen line has competitive pressure sensitivity (typically 4096 levels), low latency (under 50ms), and comfortable ergonomics. If the Ultra version is an improvement over previous generations, it could be a genuinely compelling reason to choose Motorola over the Z Fold 7.

Here's what this means in practice: you can open the Razr Fold and take handwritten notes directly in apps like OneNote or Notion. You can sketch wireframes in design apps. You can annotate PDFs. You can edit photos with precision. All the things that made styluses relevant on tablets now apply to your phone. That's not a novelty feature—it's genuine utility for a significant subset of users.

Samsung didn't include stylus support in the Z Fold 7, supposedly because of thickness constraints. But Samsung's foldables have been getting thinner for years, and the Z Fold 7 isn't noticeably slimmer than the Z Fold 6. So the decision feels arbitrary, which is why Motorola's inclusion of the feature is such a marketing win. The company can simply point at Samsung's omission and say: "We kept what matters."

The Camera System That Punches Above Its Weight

Foldable cameras have always been awkward. When you fold the phone, you've got limited space for optical hardware. That's forced compromises for every competitor. Samsung's cameras are good but not great. Google's cameras are excellent because of computational photography, not hardware advantage. Motorola's camera specs actually sound impressive on paper.

The Razr Fold features a 50MP Sony sensor as the main camera, a 50MP ultra-wide with macro capabilities, a 50MP telephoto lens, a 32MP front-facing selfie camera, and a 20MP internal camera (the one you use for video calls when the phone is folded). Plus, Dolby Vision recording support.

That's a lot of megapixels. Let's talk about what this actually means.

Sony's 50MP sensors are premium hardware. They're not the absolute newest, but they're proven, reliable, and good at balancing detail capture with low-light performance. When paired with computational photography (which Motorola presumably has in Android), a 50MP sensor can deliver genuinely impressive results. The ultra-wide with macro is a genuinely useful combination—you get both field-of-view flexibility and close-up shooting capabilities in a single lens.

The 50MP telephoto is interesting. Most foldables use 3x or 5x telephoto lenses, but the megapixel count suggests Motorola might be using a hybrid zoom approach (optical + digital) or a longer optical zoom. We don't have zoom ratio specs, so it's speculation. But telephoto on foldables is always tricky because space is limited. If Motorola managed a genuinely useful telephoto lens, that's an advantage.

The Dolby Vision recording support is the real standout feature. That's the same technology used in high-end video production and premium streaming content. On a smartphone, it means videos have better color grading, higher dynamic range, and more precise color information. It's not a must-have feature for casual users, but it's the kind of detail that signals premium positioning. Apple's iPhones have Dolby Vision, but most Android flagships don't. It's a nice differentiator.

The internal 20MP camera is curious. When the phone is folded, you use this camera for video calls. Samsung uses a similar approach with the Z Fold 7. Most people don't use video calls on foldables regularly, so this spec gets less attention than it deserves. But video call quality matters more in a work context. If Motorola has optimized this camera for video—better autofocus, lower latency processing, noise cancellation—it's a quiet advantage.

The camera system overall suggests Motorola is treating the Razr Fold as a serious flagship. You don't include four 50MP lenses and Dolby Vision recording unless you're committed to premium positioning. That's not a cost-cut device. That's hardware designed to compete with the best.

Design Philosophy: Learning from History

Motorola's history with the flip phone is legendary. The original Razr in 2004 was the thinnest phone on the market. It was beautifully designed. It was iconic. Motorola rode that success for years, then lost it to the smartphone revolution when the company failed to innovate fast enough. The iPhone happened, and Motorola became a footnote.

The Razr Fold represents an attempt to reclaim that legacy. Not by copying old designs, but by leveraging Motorola's understanding of what makes a phone beautiful. The company knows how to make devices that feel premium. The company understands form factor design. And now, with the foldable market established, Motorola gets to apply those skills to a technology that wasn't available when the original Razr dominated.

Motorola hasn't released detailed design specs yet. We don't know the color options (beyond the mentioned blue and white), the material choices, or the hinge mechanism. But the fact that the company chose the Razr name—the most iconic Motorola phone ever made—signals the design language we should expect. Premium. Minimal. Functional.

The Razr Fold will come in blue and white, according to the announcement. That's interesting color choice. Blue is safe—it's always popular. White is bolder—white phones show every fingerprint, so you only use white if your device is genuinely premium enough to justify it. This suggests Motorola is positioning the Razr Fold as a luxury device, not a mass-market one.

The hinge mechanism is crucial for foldables. Samsung's hinge is proven but has shown wear over time for some users. Google's hinge is different but also proven. Motorola will need a hinge that doesn't fail, doesn't crease, and feels smooth when opening and closing. The company has had years to study both competitors' approaches and engineer something better. That's the promise of being late to market—you get to iterate beyond your competitors.

One thing we can infer: Motorola will position this as a premium device. Not everyone will buy it. The company knows that. But for users who want a foldable phone that doesn't feel like a Samsung derivative, the Razr Fold is an option. That's enough.

The Motorola Razr Fold offers larger display sizes and includes stylus support, unlike the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7. Estimated data for stylus support is binary (1 for support, 0 for no support).

Comparing the Competition: Where Motorola Stands

Let's talk about the battlefield. When the Razr Fold launches, it will compete directly with the Galaxy Z Fold 7 and the Pixel 10 Pro Fold. Each device has strengths and weaknesses. Understanding the landscape helps explain why Motorola's entry matters.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7

Samsung owns the foldable market by volume and innovation. The Z Fold 7 features a proven design, excellent software integration (One UI), and years of optimization. The main camera system is good, the build quality is premium, and the software feels native to the device (because it is—Samsung works with Google on Android).

The catch? Samsung dropped stylus support, which is controversial. The Z Fold 7 also costs around

Motorola's Razr Fold has the advantage of stylus support and the potential for a different design language. But it lacks Samsung's maturity and ecosystem integration.

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold

Google's foldable is an interesting case. The Pixel 10 Pro Fold is less powerful on paper than the Z Fold 7 (slightly smaller interior display, less impressive camera specs), but it's more expensive. Why? Because Google has optimized the entire experience for foldables. The software is native. The camera processing is best-in-class. The multitasking features are polished.

The Pixel 10 Pro Fold costs around $2,000, making it a premium positioning play. Users buy it because Google's software is better optimized for the form factor, not because of raw specs.

Motorola's challenge is differentiating beyond specs. The company needs to either offer compelling software features or undercut pricing. We don't know which strategy Motorola will take yet.

Motorola Razr Fold

Motorola's device has the stylus advantage and (presumably) competitive camera specs. The question is software and pricing. If Motorola prices the Razr Fold at

Software optimization will be key. Motorola has historically been good at clean Android, but foldables require specialized software work that neither Samsung nor Google has fully mastered. This is where Motorola gets to innovate if they're willing to invest.

What We Don't Know Yet (And Why It Matters)

Motorola held back on specs. Intentionally. The company announced the Razr Fold but said "more specifications will be shared in the coming months." That's a brilliant PR move—it keeps the conversation going without committing to details that might disappoint.

But it also means we're speculating about critical information:

Processor and RAM: What chip powers the Razr Fold? Snapdragon 8 Elite? Snapdragon 8 Gen 4? If it's a flagship processor, that's table stakes for competing with the Z Fold 7. If it's a mid-tier chip to hit a price point, that's significant. RAM is probably 12GB minimum, but we don't know.

Battery life: Foldables drain battery faster than traditional phones because the display is larger and more power-hungry. Samsung's Z Fold 7 gets roughly one day of moderate use. Does the Razr Fold match that? Beat it? The battery capacity and optimization will determine this.

Thickness and weight: We mentioned this before, but these are crucial specs. If the Razr Fold is significantly thicker than competitors, that affects pocket carry and usability. Weight matters too—holding an 8-inch display for extended periods gets tiring if the device is heavy.

Pricing: This is the biggest unknown. If the Razr Fold costs

Availability: Which markets will the Razr Fold launch in? Is this global from day one, or regional rollout? Motorola's distribution network matters here. Samsung has global reach. Google has strong US presence. Motorola's network is... complicated. If the Razr Fold only launches in select regions, that limits its impact.

Software features: What does Motorola's software optimization for foldables look like? Are there Razr Fold-specific multitasking features? Custom apps optimized for the form factor? Or is it stock Android with Samsung-style software? This will be revealed closer to launch.

These unknowns are intentional. Motorola wants to build hype without committing to specs that might not wow. Smart move. But it also means the market is speculating, which can work for or against the device depending on expectations.

The Foldable Market Landscape in 2025

By 2025, foldables have moved beyond novelty. They're established products with real use cases. The market has shifted from "Can you make a phone that folds?" to "Why should I fold my phone?" That's a fundamental change.

Foldable shipments have stabilized around 15–20 million units annually globally. That's maybe 2–3% of the total smartphone market. Not huge, but enough that every major manufacturer is interested. Apple hasn't entered the foldable market, which is notable. But that's a story for another day.

Motorola's entry into the foldable market in 2025 suggests the company is abandoning the idea that foldables are temporary. They're not. Foldables are becoming standard in the premium segment, the same way 120 Hz displays and wireless charging became standard. If you want to be perceived as a premium brand, you need a foldable device.

For consumers, more competition is always good. More players mean more innovation, more pricing options, and more incentive to improve. Samsung alone, pricing at

The wildcard is whether anyone else enters the market. OnePlus? Oppo? Xiaomi? All three have foldable experience and capability. If they launch competing devices in the next year, the market becomes genuinely crowded, which accelerates innovation and price competition even more.

Samsung leads in software integration, while Google excels in camera processing. Motorola's Razr Fold offers stylus support but needs to improve software optimization. Estimated data for Motorola.

Stylus Technology and Productivity Implications

Let's go deeper into why the stylus matters more than people realize.

Foldable phones are basically tablets now. The moment you open them, you've got 8+ inches of screen. That's big enough for serious productivity work. But without a stylus, you're limited to touch input, which is fine for scrolling and tapping but not for precision work.

With a stylus, everything changes. You can take handwritten notes and have them digitized in real-time. You can sketch wireframes for web design. You can annotate PDFs with precision. You can draw illustrations. You can write code comments while sketching them out. All of this becomes more natural and faster with a stylus than with your finger.

The Moto Pen Ultra presumably supports pressure sensitivity (how hard you press), tilt detection (angle of the pen), and possibly palm rejection (ignoring your hand when the pen is active). These are standard features on premium styluses, so Motorola's version probably includes all of them. That means the stylus experience should feel natural and responsive.

Why did Samsung drop stylus support? The company claimed thickness constraints, but that's unconvincing. The real reason is probably cost. Including a stylus digitizer adds maybe $5–10 to the bill of materials, but it adds complexity to manufacturing and increases return rates (styluses get lost). For Samsung's volume and profit margins, those costs matter.

Motorola's inclusion of stylus support is therefore a calculated decision. The company is saying: "We prioritize productivity features over marginal thickness reductions." That's a different positioning than Samsung's latest approach. Whether it matters to consumers depends on their actual use cases.

Camera Specifications Breakdown

Let's analyze what the camera specs actually mean for image quality.

50MP Sony Sensor (Main Camera): Sony's 50MP sensors (likely the IMX766 or similar) are proven hardware. They're not the newest generation, but they're proven in phones like the OnePlus 12 and other flagships. The key question is the sensor size (usually around 1/1.56"), which determines how much light each pixel captures. Larger sensors = better low-light performance. Sony's sensors are generally competitive here.

50MP Ultra-wide with Macro: Ultra-wide cameras traditionally suffer from poor low-light performance and geometric distortion. Motorola specifying 50MP suggests computational photography will play a big role in correcting distortion and maintaining detail. The macro capability (presumably 1:1 or close) makes this a versatile lens for both landscape and close-up photography.

50MP Telephoto: This is ambitious. Most phones use 3x or 5x optical zoom, which limits telephoto pixel count due to space constraints. If Motorola is using 50MP, either the optical zoom is modest (meaning more hybrid/digital zoom) or the lens design is particularly clever. Real-world performance depends on whether optical zoom is truly useful or reliant on computational cropping.

32MP Front Selfie: When the phone is folded and used normally, this is your selfie camera. 32MP is overkill for selfies—most people don't need that detail. But it enables computational improvements like better skin smoothing, background blur, and detail preservation. It's more useful than it sounds.

20MP Internal Camera: For video calls and selfies when the phone is unfolded (which most people won't do), this lower-resolution camera is fine. The trade-off is acceptable because video calls need good autofocus and processing, not maximum megapixels.

Dolby Vision Recording: This is a software/codec feature, not a hardware feature. It means videos are recorded with wider color gamut and greater dynamic range information. When played back on compatible devices (mostly premium phones and tablets), videos look more cinematic. It's useful for content creators but not essential for regular users.

Overall, the camera specs suggest Motorola is targeting professionals and enthusiasts, not just mainstream users. That's consistent with the stylus inclusion and the premium positioning.

Form Factor Considerations

Foldable phones are fundamentally different from traditional phones. Once you commit to a foldable, you're accepting trade-offs that don't exist with regular devices.

Thickness when folded: Every foldable is thicker than traditional phones when folded. The Galaxy Z Fold 7 is about 14mm thick when closed. That's noticeably thicker than a standard flagship (around 8–9mm). The Razr Fold's thickness is unknown, but it's probably similar or slightly different. The question is whether Motorola managed innovation here—if the Razr Fold is meaningfully thinner than the Z Fold 7, that's a win.

Crease visibility: When unfolded, there's a visible crease down the middle of the screen. Samsung has minimized this to nearly imperceptible levels. Google's crease is also minimal. Motorola's crease depth is unknown, but this is crucial for everyday usability. If the crease is pronounced, it's distracting. If it's minimal, most users won't notice during normal use.

Hinge durability: The hinge is the most complex mechanical component. It needs to survive hundreds of thousands of open-and-close cycles without failure. Samsung's hinge has proven durable over six generations. Motorola's hinge is unproven, but the company has presumably tested it extensively. Real-world durability data won't exist until users get their hands on devices.

Weight distribution: A phone that's significantly heavier on one side is annoying to hold. Foldables need careful engineering to balance weight when folded and unfolded. No details on this yet, but it's something to assess in reviews.

Screen-to-body ratio: Foldables have thick bezels and visible hinges, reducing the screen-to-body ratio compared to traditional phones. That's acceptable because the foldable form factor is the point. But it's a trade-off worth acknowledging.

Estimated data: The Razr Fold's processor and RAM are expected to be competitive, while pricing and availability remain uncertain factors that could impact its success.

Pricing Strategy and Market Positioning

Here's where Motorola makes or breaks the Razr Fold's success.

Samsung's Galaxy Z Fold 7 likely prices at

Motorola has three strategic options:

Option 1: Undercut Pricing at

Option 2: Match Pricing at

Option 3: Premium Pricing at $2,000+ Motorola positions the Razr Fold as a premium device, leveraging the iconic brand heritage and promising exceptional design. This strategy targets high-end customers willing to pay for exclusivity. The risk: huge risk. New entrants to a category struggle to justify premium pricing without established reputation.

Motorola will almost certainly go with Option 1 or Option 2. Option 3 seems unlikely. The company needs to establish the Razr Fold as a credible competitor before charging premium prices. The most likely scenario is undercut pricing (

Software and User Experience

Spec sheets don't win foldable wars. Software does.

The Galaxy Z Fold 7 succeeds not because of hardware advantages—if anything, specs are comparable to flagship Galaxy S phones—but because One UI has been optimized specifically for the foldable form factor. Samsung's multitasking, split-screen support, and app-specific optimizations are years ahead of generic Android.

Google's Pixel 10 Pro Fold succeeds for similar reasons. Google has optimized Android specifically for foldables, creating a native experience that feels designed for the form factor rather than adapted to it.

Motorola hasn't detailed its software strategy yet. That's concerning. If the Razr Fold uses stock Android without foldable-specific optimizations, it will feel incomplete compared to Samsung and Google. That's a competitive disadvantage that no amount of hardware specs can overcome.

What Motorola should do (but probably won't fully execute): Create Razr Fold-specific software features. Unique multitasking modes. Custom gestures. App suggestions that adapt to fold state. Deep integration with the stylus. If Motorola goes this route, it creates a genuine software differentiator.

What Motorola will probably do: Use a near-stock Android base with minimal customization. This is faster to market but less impressive. It means the Razr Fold will feel like a good hardware device running generic software, not a purpose-built foldable experience.

This is the biggest unknown and the biggest risk for the Razr Fold. Hardware can be competitive. Software differentiation is much harder. If Motorola skips the software work, the device will struggle.

Market Reception and Analyst Expectations

How will the market respond to Motorola's foldable entry?

Expectations are mixed. Tech reviewers are curious—Motorola reentering the premium market is noteworthy. But consumer interest is uncertain. Motorola's brand equity isn't what it was in the Razr era. Most smartphone buyers under 30 probably can't name a memorable Motorola phone from the past decade.

That said, there's definitely interest in alternatives to Samsung. Some users are fatigued by Samsung's design language. Some want stylus support but won't buy the Z Pen separately. Some prefer stock Android. For these segments, Motorola's Razr Fold is appealing.

Analyst firms will probably forecast modest sales initially. Maybe 1–2 million units in the first year if Motorola launches globally. If regional launch only, significantly lower. These numbers matter for Motorola's ability to fund continued development. Foldables are expensive to develop, so low sales volumes make profitability hard.

Long-term, if Motorola prices aggressively and delivers good reviews, the Razr Fold could capture 10–15% of the foldable market by year two. That would be competitive success, not market domination. But it would be enough to justify continued investment.

The biggest risk: If reviews are mediocre and Motorola can't differentiate, the Razr Fold becomes irrelevant quickly. Foldable buyers are decision-focused. They research extensively. If reviewers conclude "the Galaxy Z Fold 7 is better" or "the Pixel 10 Pro Fold has better software," most customers go with those. Motorola doesn't get a second chance.

The Razr Fold offers the largest cover and main display sizes among its competitors, enhancing usability and multitasking capabilities. Estimated data based on typical dimensions.

The Bigger Picture: Foldables and the Future of Mobile

Motorola's entry signals that foldables aren't temporary. Every major phone manufacturer is either making one already or planning one. That means foldables are becoming standard in the premium segment.

What does this mean for the future? A few implications:

Prices will eventually drop: Right now, foldables cost

Design will converge: All foldables look similar now because there are only so many ways to fold a phone into a useful shape. Eventually, one design language will dominate (like how all smartphones eventually look like iPhones). Motorola's design heritage might matter more or less depending on whether the company's aesthetic resonates with consumers.

Software will differentiate: Hardware advantages in foldables are temporary. Within a year, competitors copy good ideas. Software differentiation is much harder to copy. Companies that invest in foldable-specific software will win. Those that don't will become commodities.

Use cases will evolve: Right now, foldables are mostly for media consumption and productivity. But as stylus support becomes standard and software improves, new use cases will emerge. Gaming? Professional photography? Portable workspace? These are possibilities.

Apple will eventually enter: Apple hasn't made a foldable yet, but the company watches the market carefully. When foldable technology matures enough that Apple can make one that meets its quality standards and doesn't cannibalize iPad sales, Apple will enter. That will reshape the market dramatically.

Motorola's Strategic Bet

Let's step back and understand what Motorola is actually doing here.

The company isn't just launching a phone. It's making a strategic declaration. Motorola is saying: "We're not a midrange company anymore. We're playing in the premium segment. We're competing with Samsung and Google. We're serious."

That's a big bet. It requires investment in R&D, marketing, and supply chain. It requires partnerships with component suppliers to get competitive hardware. It requires software development to create a compelling experience. And it requires pricing strategy that balances market share with profitability.

For a company that's been struggling to maintain relevance in premium smartphones, this is necessary. The midrange is profitable but commoditized. Premium is where the brand prestige and margins are. Motorola needs to rebuild its brand equity, and a competitive foldable is a good way to do it.

But execution matters enormously. If the Razr Fold is reviewed as "pretty good but not as good as Samsung," it fails its strategic purpose. If it's reviewed as "surprisingly competitive and better value than Z Fold 7," it succeeds. Everything depends on reviews and real-world performance.

The timing is interesting. Motorola is entering after the market has matured past the "can you make a foldable" phase and into the "which foldable is best" phase. That's actually advantageous. Motorola can learn from five generations of competitor devices and engineer something legitimately competitive. The trade-off is that early adopters already chose Samsung or Google. Motorola is aiming at second-wave buyers—people who're interested in foldables but want alternatives.

What's Missing from the Announcement

Motorola held back significant information, and that's notable. Here's what we still need to know:

Performance benchmarks: How fast is the Razr Fold compared to competitors? Does it handle multitasking smoothly? Gaming performance? These matter for real-world experience.

Battery life: How many hours of actual use? Foldables typically get 8–10 hours of mixed use. Is the Razr Fold similar or better?

Charging speeds: 30W? 50W? Wireless charging? Charging speed matters for daily usability.

Durability claims: IP rating for water and dust resistance? How many fold cycles until failure? What's the warranty?

Regional availability: Is this global day one or staged rollout? That affects accessibility.

Accessories: Beyond the Moto Pen Ultra, what else? Cases? Screen protectors? How do they affect the fold?

Software version: Which Android version? Will it get timely updates?

These details will emerge over the next few months. Most are important enough to influence purchasing decisions. Motorola's silence is intentional—the company doesn't want to commit to specs that might not wow. Smart PR, frustrating for consumers.

The Moto Pen Ultra and Stylus Experience

Let's dive deeper into what stylus support actually means for daily use.

The Moto Pen Ultra (specs unknown at launch announcement) will presumably support pressure sensitivity and tilt detection. These enable natural writing and drawing. Without these features, stylus interaction feels plasticky and frustrating. With them, stylus use feels genuinely useful.

Integration matters more than hardware specs. If Motorola's stylus integrates deeply with Android and popular apps, it's valuable. If it's just another input device without app support, it's a gimmick. Samsung's success with the Galaxy Note and now the Z Fold series proves that stylus value comes from ecosystem integration, not just hardware capability.

What should Motorola do?

1. Integrate the stylus deeply into Android system apps. Handwriting recognition in notes. Annotation in Gmail. Markup in Photos. Sketch support in Chrome.
2. Partner with app developers to optimize major apps for stylus use. Microsoft Office. Adobe apps. Figma. Notion.
3. Create Razr Fold-specific features enabled by the stylus. Like taking notes while the phone is folded. Or sketching and having it instantly appear in the main display.
4. Ensure the stylus feels premium. Texture, weight, responsiveness all matter. A cheap-feeling stylus undermines the entire feature.

If Motorola executes on all four fronts, the stylus becomes a genuine differentiator. If the company cuts corners on any of them, it becomes a marketing bullet point that doesn't translate to real use.

Real-World Use Cases for the Razr Fold

Let's talk about actual usage scenarios where a foldable with stylus support matters.

Professional note-taking: You're in a meeting. You have the Razr Fold unfolded, displaying an 8.1-inch screen. You use the Moto Pen Ultra to take handwritten notes. Handwriting feels more natural than typing (for many people). The large screen means you can see everything without scrolling. Later, the notes are digitized and organized. This is genuinely useful for professionals.

Design work: You're a designer traveling. You need to sketch wireframes or mockups. The Razr Fold's large unfolded display and stylus support make this possible. No need for a separate laptop or tablet. The device becomes a portable design tool.

Content creation: You're a content creator editing photos or creating graphics. The large display and stylus support let you perform precision work that's annoying on regular phones. The Razr Fold becomes a secondary creative device.

Daily productivity: You need to edit documents, annotate PDFs, or sign contracts. The stylus and large screen make this faster and more accurate than typing or using your finger.

Casual consumption: Most of the time, you fold the phone closed and use it like a regular phone with the 6.6-inch cover display. The foldable aspect is background—you're just using the device because it's better than a traditional phone.

These use cases don't require cutting-edge specs. They require reliable hardware and good software integration. If Motorola delivers on both fronts, the Razr Fold will find its audience.

FAQ

What is the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold is the company's first side-foldable smartphone announced at CES 2025. It features a 6.6-inch external cover display and an 8.1-inch flexible main display when unfolded, making it roughly the size and shape of a small tablet. The device includes support for the Moto Pen Ultra stylus, a premium camera system with multiple 50MP sensors, and Dolby Vision video recording capabilities. Motorola positions it as a direct competitor to Samsung's Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Google's Pixel 10 Pro Fold, combining premium hardware with the company's design heritage.

How does the Motorola Razr Fold compare to the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?

The Razr Fold and Galaxy Z Fold 7 are similar in concept but different in execution. The Razr Fold has a slightly larger external display (6.6-inch vs. 6.3-inch) and main display (8.1-inch vs. 7.6-inch), giving it more usable screen real estate. Critically, the Razr Fold includes stylus support via the Moto Pen Ultra, while Samsung removed stylus support from the Z Fold 7 entirely. Both have premium camera systems and likely similar performance. The key differences will emerge through software optimization, build quality, and real-world user experience once the device launches. Samsung has proven foldable design through six generations, while Motorola is entering the market with fresh perspective.

What are the benefits of the stylus support on the Razr Fold?

Stylus support transforms the Razr Fold from a media consumption device into a productivity tool. Samsung proved stylus value for years with the Z Fold series, enabling handwritten note-taking, precise document annotation, sketching, and drawing. For professionals, designers, and content creators, stylus support makes foldables genuinely useful beyond casual browsing. The large unfolded display (8.1 inches) combined with pressure-sensitive stylus input creates a tablet-like experience in a phone form factor. By including stylus support when Samsung removed it from the Z Fold 7, Motorola captures users who value this productivity feature and want an alternative to Samsung's ecosystem.

When will the Motorola Razr Fold be available?

Motorola hasn't announced specific availability dates, pricing, or regional launch information yet. The company stated that "more specifications will be shared in the coming months," indicating a staged reveal schedule. Based on typical smartphone launch cycles, expect the Razr Fold to launch in mid-to-late 2025 (likely Q2 or Q3), with broader availability following later that year. Regional availability is uncertain—some foldables launch globally, while others start in specific markets. Motorola's distribution network will influence how quickly the device reaches consumers worldwide.

What is the expected pricing for the Razr Fold?

Motorola hasn't announced official pricing. However, market analysis suggests the Razr Fold will price between

Motorola hasn't detailed software specifications. The device will run Android, but the degree of Motorola-specific optimization is unknown. Samsung's One UI and Google's Pixel experience have years of foldable-specific optimization. If Motorola uses near-stock Android without deep foldable customization, the software experience will feel less polished than competitors. If Motorola invests in custom multitasking, gesture controls, and stylus integration, it could differentiate. Software will be crucial to the Razr Fold's success or failure.

Is the Moto Pen Ultra compatible with other devices?

Motorola hasn't specified stylus compatibility with other devices. Typically, styluses designed for specific foldables don't work with other phones due to different digitizer implementations. The Moto Pen Ultra is likely optimized specifically for the Razr Fold's digitizer layer. This is similar to how Samsung's S Pen is tied to Galaxy devices. If you're buying the Razr Fold primarily for stylus support, expect that the stylus is dedicated to this device only. Compatibility details will be clarified closer to launch.

How will the Razr Fold affect Motorola's premium phone strategy?

The Razr Fold represents Motorola's commitment to the premium smartphone segment after years of focusing on midrange and budget devices. Success with the Razr Fold would justify continued investment in premium hardware and software development, potentially leading to a premium product line. Failure would signal that Motorola can't compete against established players like Samsung and Google. The strategic importance of this device to Motorola's brand repositioning is enormous. The company needs the Razr Fold to be reviewed as credible and competitive, not just "okay for a first attempt." Everything depends on execution and market reception.

Motorola's announcement of the Razr Fold marks a significant moment in smartphone history. A legendary brand is reentering the premium segment after years in the wilderness. The device looks competitive on paper, but specs don't tell the whole story. Software, durability, and pricing will determine whether the Razr Fold succeeds or becomes forgotten.

The foldable market needs more competition. Samsung and Google have had the field largely to themselves for too long. Motorola's entry—with stylus support, premium hardware, and design heritage—creates genuine choice for consumers. Whether that choice becomes meaningful depends on what reviewers discover when the device launches. For now, we wait.

What's Next for Foldable Technology

Beyond the Razr Fold, the foldable market is accelerating. Expect new form factors to emerge. Rolling displays. Transparent screens. Devices that fold in multiple ways. The basic side-fold design that Samsung pioneered will eventually feel dated, just like today's phones look dated compared to five years ago.

Motorola isn't pushing boundaries here—the Razr Fold is a competent execution of established technology. But that's okay. The market needs solid competitive devices before radical innovation happens. Once foldables are mainstream enough, companies will get weird with form factors.

In the meantime, the battle between Motorola, Samsung, and Google will be about refinement, pricing, and software. That's healthy competition. It keeps everyone sharp and benefits consumers with better products and lower prices.

The Razr Fold's role in this story is still being written. Check back in six months for reviews. That's when you'll know if Motorola's bet pays off.

Key Takeaways

• Motorola's Razr Fold is the company's first side-foldable smartphone, joining Samsung and Google in the premium foldable market with competitive hardware specifications
• The device includes stylus support via Moto Pen Ultra, a significant advantage over Samsung's Galaxy Z Fold 7 which removed this productivity feature
• Display specs include a 6.6-inch cover screen and 8.1-inch main display, offering more screen real estate than direct competitors for productivity and media consumption
• Premium camera system features quad 50MP sensors plus Dolby Vision recording, positioning the Razr Fold as a device for photography enthusiasts alongside casual users
• Motorola's strategic entry signals that foldables are established premium category, likely driving price competition and market expansion across the industry

Related Articles

• Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold Hands-On Review: The Ultimate Foldable [2025]
• Motorola Razr Fold and Signature Specs Leak: Book-Style Foldable Arrives [2025]
• TP-Link's Aireal AI Assistant Transforms Smart Home Control [2025]
• Samsung's Creaseless Foldable Screen: What It Means for iPhone Fold [2025]
• AMD Ryzen AI 400: Can These Chips Maintain AMD's Lead? [2025]
• ASUS ROG Flow Z13-KJP: Kojima's Dream Gaming Tablet [2025]