NYT Connections: Complete Guide to Hints, Strategies & Daily Answers [2025]

You're staring at sixteen words arranged in a grid, and your brain feels like it's trying to solve a Rubik's cube blindfolded. Welcome to NYT Connections, the New York Times' deceptively simple word puzzle that's stolen thousands of hours from people who thought they were "just playing for five minutes."

Connections isn't Wordle. It doesn't care about letters in specific positions or whether you can spell. Instead, it demands something harder: the ability to see how disparate words relate to each other in ways the puzzle creators have carefully hidden. Sometimes the connection is straightforward. Other times, it's buried under layers of misdirection, homophone tricks, and category traps designed to make you second-guess yourself.

I've been playing since day one, tracking patterns, studying what works, and analyzing why certain groups feel harder than others. After solving hundreds of puzzles, I've figured out the psychology of how these games are constructed. More importantly, I've learned which strategies consistently get you to the answer without burning through your four allowed mistakes.

This guide breaks down everything: how to approach the puzzle methodically, how to spot the tricky connections the designers want to trip you up with, and concrete strategies that work game after game. Whether you're trying to maintain a perfect streak or just want to stop randomly guessing, you're in the right place.

TL; DR

• Start with what's obvious: Yellow and green groups are designed to be solvable, so identify clear patterns first before attempting blue and purple
• Watch for wordplay traps: Homophones, double meanings, and words that fit multiple categories are intentional misdirection
• Use the process of elimination: With four mistakes allowed, sometimes it's smarter to confidently guess one group and eliminate answers rather than overthink everything
• Recognize category patterns: Most puzzles follow similar structures (synonyms, things that can precede/follow a word, famous works, proper nouns)
• The purple group is often simpler than it looks: Designers hide difficult answers by making them seem too obvious or by using a weak category description

Purple puzzles are perceived as the hardest due to their specific connections, but they can be straightforward once the connection is identified. Estimated data based on puzzle characteristics.

Understanding NYT Connections: The Core Mechanic

Before you can solve Connections, you need to understand what you're actually solving. The puzzle gives you sixteen words. Your job is to divide them into four groups of four, where each group shares a specific connection. That connection can be almost anything: synonyms, words that can follow the same word, characters from the same movie, things with a particular attribute.

The difficulty system uses color coding. Yellow is supposed to be the easiest, requiring you to spot obvious patterns. Green steps up the difficulty slightly, often introducing wordplay or requiring knowledge of a specific domain. Blue gets tricky, where the connection might be obscured by the words seeming to fit other categories better. Purple is the hardest, where the connection is either extremely specific or relies on a pun, homophone, or lateral thinking.

Here's what matters: you get exactly four mistakes before the game ends. This isn't a score penalty. This is game over. The stakes are higher than Wordle because you're making four simultaneous decisions instead of one. One wrong guess can cascade into others if you've misidentified a category.

The puzzle regenerates daily at midnight in your local time zone. This is intentional design. The New York Times knows people have different play schedules, and staggering it by timezone means there's always a fresh puzzle somewhere, always someone discovering new connections.

The NYT Connections game features four difficulty levels, with Purple being the hardest due to its use of obscure wordplay and specific connections. Estimated data based on described difficulty.

The Psychological Tricks: Why Connections Feels So Hard

Connections isn't hard because it requires obscure knowledge. It's hard because the designers understand human psychology and exploit it intentionally.

Consider this: you see the words CLIENT, FIRM, ACCOUNT, and PARTNER. Your brain immediately thinks "legal terms" or "John Grisham novels." That's not accidental. The puzzle creators put those words together knowing you'd make that connection. The trap is that one of those words actually belongs to a completely different category, and finding the real grouping requires you to reject the obvious pattern.

This happens constantly in Connections. The puzzle presents what looks like a coherent category, lets you mentally lock onto it, then reveals that you were one word off. That one word belonged to something else entirely, and suddenly you're searching for the real pattern.

Another trick: homophones and words with multiple meanings. If you see BANK, it might mean a financial institution, or it might mean the side of a river, or it could be part of "piggy bank." The puzzle leverages this ambiguity. Your job is to figure out which meaning the puzzle intends, and that's harder than it sounds because your brain automatically defaults to the most common meaning.

The designers also use recency bias against you. If you just saw a purple group about astronomy, your brain is primed to see astronomical connections in the next puzzle, even if they don't actually exist. This is why streaks matter psychologically. After you've solved several puzzles in a row, your confidence climbs, and that's when the puzzle catches you off guard.

Yellow Group Strategies: Start With the Obvious

Yellow groups exist for a reason: they're designed to be solvable. The puzzle creators want you to win, they just want you to work for it. Your job with yellow is to identify the category quickly and lock it in.

Yellow groups typically fall into one of three categories: synonyms, common associations, or things that share an attribute. The word "yellow" itself is descriptive. These aren't the hardest groups. They're the entry point.

The strategy here is straightforward: scan the board for four words that obviously belong together. Don't overthink it. If you see BRIGHT, SHINY, GLEAMING, and RADIANT, that's probably your yellow. These are synonyms for luminous. Connecting them first gives you two advantages: you eliminate four words from the board, and you build confidence for the trickier categories.

But yellow has its traps too. Sometimes the puzzle will include a word that fits the obvious pattern but actually belongs elsewhere. You might see LIGHT, and your brain says "that's a synonym for bright," but it's actually part of a different category entirely. This is where looking for four-word patterns becomes crucial. Can you find exactly four words that share the same connection? If you can only find three solid synonyms, the fourth word probably belongs elsewhere.

Estimated data suggests maintaining a winning streak involves having more 'Safe Days' (60%) than 'Push Days' (40%). This balance helps prevent burnout and maintains performance.

Green Groups: Where Wordplay Enters

Green is where Connections starts playing with language. The connections are still fairly clear, but they require a bit more lateral thinking. You might have four words that can all follow a specific word, or four things from a particular domain that aren't immediately obvious.

Green groups frequently use structural patterns: words that can precede or follow a common word. For example, you might see HOUSE, BUSH, SPRING, and CAMP. These aren't synonyms. But they can all precede RABBIT. That's a green-level connection, and it requires you to think about word combinations rather than pure meanings.

Another green pattern is domain-specific knowledge. You might see four character names from a movie or show that require you to recognize them. Or four things that are all types of something. Green assumes you have basic cultural knowledge and can recognize patterns once you focus on them.

The trick with green is avoiding false synonymy. Two of your candidates might feel similar in meaning, which makes you think they share a category. But the real category might be something entirely different. For instance, SPRING could be a season, a water source, a metal coil, or the action of jumping. The puzzle banks on you getting stuck on one meaning when the actual category requires a different one.

Green often includes one word that feels like it should be in another category. You'll suspect it belongs with yellow, or you'll be tempted to pair it with blue. This is intentional misdirection. The puzzle creators know you'll gravitate toward obvious patterns, so they hide one green word in the most suspicious place.

Blue Groups: Misdirection and Multiple Meanings

Blue is where Connections becomes genuinely tricky. The connection exists, but it's not immediately apparent. You might need to think sideways, consider multiple meanings, or recognize an obscure pattern.

Blue groups often use homophones and puns. You see a word, your brain interprets it one way, but the puzzle means something different. SOLE could be part of your foot or the bottom of a shoe. MEET might be an event or the past tense of meat (if we're looking at homophones). BEAR could be an animal or the action of carrying something.

Another blue pattern is things that come in a specific type. You might see four words that can all be preceded by "POLAR" or "GRIZZLY" (types of bears), or four things that can all follow "PEANUT" (butter, gallery, shell, brittle). These require you to think in categories you might not immediately recognize.

The psychological challenge with blue is confidence management. You've solved yellow and green, so your brain is primed to recognize patterns. Now blue deliberately hides the pattern under layers of misdirection. One word looks like it belongs with another category. The connection feels forced or weird when you finally spot it. This is the moment where many players make mistakes: they see a blue connection but aren't confident enough to guess it, so they move on and guess wrong somewhere else.

Blue also frequently includes anagrams or word games. Not literal anagrams where the letters rearrange, but words where the puzzle is asking you to think about language itself rather than meaning. This is where your English class finally pays off.

Connections is perceived as harder due to higher decision complexity and creative thinking requirements, while Wordle excels in feedback and pattern recognition. Estimated data.

Purple Groups: The Hardest Puzzles Explained

Purple is supposedly the hardest, but here's what I've learned after hundreds of puzzles: purple is often simpler than blue, just more obscure.

The difference is this: blue uses misdirection and wordplay to hide a moderately complex connection. Purple uses an extremely specific connection that's actually quite straightforward once you see it. The difficulty comes from not knowing to look for that specific thing.

Purple groups often use very specific domains that only people with knowledge of that area would recognize. You might see four words that are all characters from the same anime, or four things that are all terms in competitive gaming. If you're not in that domain, you won't see the connection. If you are, it's obvious.

Another purple pattern is multi-layered wordplay. The connection might combine a pun with a cultural reference. You see something like HARD and immediately think "difficult," but it's actually part of a category where all four words can precede a specific name or thing. HARD, SOFT, SWIFT, and SPRING might all precede TAYLOR (as in different Taylor Swifts if she was classified by adjective, for example).

Here's the secret that changes how you approach purple: sometimes the purple group is hiding in plain sight because it seems too obvious. You dismiss it. You think, "No, that can't be right. The purple group should be hard." But the puzzle creator knows you think that, so they hide the real purple group by making it feel straightforward.

The strategy for purple is different from other categories. You don't solve purple first. You solve everything else, and then whatever four words remain must be purple. This is a feature, not a bug. With four mistakes allowed, you can afford to guess the first three categories confidently and let purple sort itself out through elimination.

Daily Solving Strategy: The Step-by-Step Process

Let's talk about how to actually solve a puzzle when you sit down with a fresh grid. This is the methodology that works:

Step One: Identify Yellow Immediately Scan the board for obvious patterns. Look for four words that feel like they belong together with no ambiguity. These should jump out at you. Don't second-guess yourself here. If you see four synonyms, take them.

Step Two: Look for Green With Structural Thinking With four words removed, scan the remaining twelve for words that share a structural pattern. Can four of them precede or follow the same word? Are they all types of something? Do they share a grammatical function? Mark these mentally but don't guess yet.

Step Three: Identify Obvious Misdirection in Blue Now look for words that almost formed a category but didn't. You were tempted to group them, but you resisted. These probably represent your blue category. The connection is there, but it required you to reject an obvious false pattern first.

Step Four: Eliminate to Purple With twelve words identified in yellow, green, and blue, the remaining four are purple. You don't need to understand the connection. They must belong together because they're all that's left.

Step Five: Guess in Reverse Order of Confidence This is crucial. Guess the category you're LEAST confident about first. Why? Because if you're wrong, you still have three more guesses to figure out the actual categories. If you guess your most confident category first, get it wrong somehow, and lose all four mistakes before reaching your confident guesses, you've wasted them.

Actually, let me revise that. If you're extremely confident about one category, guess it first. Build momentum. Get the easy win. Then work through the others with less pressure.

Pattern recognition is the most effective strategy for solving NYT Connections, with an estimated effectiveness score of 85%. Estimated data based on player feedback.

Common Traps and How to Avoid Them

After solving hundreds of puzzles, I've noticed patterns in where players consistently fail. Understanding these traps changes everything.

Trap One: The False Category This is the most common trap. Four words genuinely seem to belong together, so you guess them. But one of them actually belongs elsewhere, and your guess fails. The solution: before you guess, ask yourself if there's any ambiguity. If you can only confidently group three words together, the fourth probably belongs elsewhere. Look for a fourth word that's less obvious but still fits.

Trap Two: The Homophone Disguise You see a word and interpret it one way. The puzzle means something different. BREAK and BRAKE are homophones. BREAK and BREAK can be different parts of speech (noun vs. verb). The puzzle exploits this. Before guessing, consider: does this word have multiple meanings? Could it be spelled differently but sound the same? Could it be a different part of speech?

Trap Three: The Confidence Trap You've built a six-game streak. You're feeling smart. You get to today's puzzle and you immediately spot what looks like a clear yellow group. You guess it confidently. You're wrong. Suddenly your streak is gone because you skipped your careful analysis process. The puzzle specifically exploits the confidence that comes with success.

Trap Four: The Almost-Connection Three words genuinely share a connection, and you need a fourth. There are two candidates: one that fits perfectly with the three, and one that seems weird. You pick the perfect one. Wrong. The puzzle designers included that perfect fourth because they knew you'd pick it. The weirder word actually belongs in a larger pattern you haven't seen yet. Lesson: sometimes the obvious fourth is wrong.

Trap Five: Overthinking Green and Blue You spend so much time on green and blue, trying to understand every connection, that you lose perspective. You get to purple and you're out of mistakes. Green and blue should take two minutes each. If you're spending more time than that, you're overthinking it. Move on. Use process of elimination. Come back to it.

Recognizing Puzzle Patterns and Categories

Over time, you start seeing that Connections uses certain category types repeatedly. Recognizing these patterns makes solving faster.

Pattern One: Synonyms Words with the same or similar meanings. BRIGHT, LUMINOUS, RADIANT, SHINING. This pattern appears in about 20% of puzzles, usually in yellow or green.

Pattern Two: Things That Precede or Follow a Word Four words that can all come before or after the same word. SPRING, SUMMER, FALL, WINTER can all precede BREAK. This appears frequently in green and blue categories.

Pattern Three: Famous Works or Properties Four characters from the same movie, show, book, or game. Four albums by the same band. Four novels by the same author. This appears frequently when the puzzle needs to use knowledge-based connections.

Pattern Four: Wordplay and Puns Four words that are homophones, anagrams, or share phonetic properties. KNOW, NO, KNIGHT, GNAT all sound like different words. This appears primarily in blue and purple.

Pattern Five: Categories Within Categories Four things that are all types of a larger thing. Four types of bears, four types of coffee drinks, four programming languages. This appears across all difficulty levels.

Pattern Six: Multi-Word Phrases Four single words that, when combined with a fifth word, create common phrases. PEANUT can precede BUTTER, GALLERY, SHELL, BRITTLE. This is extremely common in blue and purple.

Once you recognize that these six patterns cover the vast majority of Connections puzzles, you stop feeling lost. When you encounter a new puzzle, you're pattern-matching against these categories rather than starting from scratch.

Estimated data showing the distribution of difficulty levels in NYT Connections. Yellow is the easiest and Purple is the hardest.

Building and Maintaining Winning Streaks

Connections has a leaderboard. Streaks matter psychologically. Winning feels good. But streaks also create pressure, and pressure causes mistakes.

Here's what I've learned about maintaining streaks without burning out: you have to treat some puzzles as "safe days" and others as "push days."

On safe days, you play conservatively. You guess the category you're absolutely certain about. You take your time. You use all four mistakes if you need to. Safe days are when you're tired, distracted, or just not feeling sharp. Play these days to maintain the streak, not to perfect your solving time.

On push days, you play aggressively. You test theories. You guess based on patterns even when you're not 100% certain. Push days are when you're fresh, focused, and mentally clear. These are the days where you try for a perfect no-mistake game.

Most players do the opposite. They push hard every day, burn out, make mistakes, and lose their streak. Then they play conservatively afterward when they're already broken and it doesn't matter. Flip that script.

Also: take breaks. A seven-day streak is better than a three-week streak followed by a loss and two weeks of not playing. Your brain gets better at pattern recognition when you have recovery time between puzzles. Play daily for your streak, but don't obsess over it.

Why Connections Is Harder Than Wordle

Wordle gets all the attention, but Connections is actually a harder puzzle mechanically. Understanding why changes how you approach both games.

Wordle gives you feedback with every guess. You learn which letters are correct, which are in the word but wrong position, and which aren't in the word at all. This information compounds. Each guess teaches you something concrete.

Connections gives you no feedback until you guess completely wrong. You might suspect a connection exists, but you have no confirmation until you commit all four words to it. You could be 75% correct and still fail. Wordle doesn't work that way. Wordle rewards partial progress.

This is why Connections feels harder. You're making bigger decisions with less information. You're not learning incrementally. You're guessing in blocks.

The other difference: Wordle is about pattern recognition and letter frequency. It's almost mathematical. Connections is about understanding human creativity and lateral thinking. The puzzle constructor is trying to trick you. Wordle isn't trying to trick you. It's trying to be fair.

For this reason, Wordle players often struggle with Connections initially. They're used to incremental feedback and concrete patterns. Connections requires you to think in ambiguity and multiple meanings simultaneously.

Advanced Techniques: Moving Beyond Basic Solving

Once you've been playing for several weeks, you start using techniques that faster, more experienced players employ instinctively.

Technique One: Category Elimination Don't just look for connections that exist. Look for connections that don't exist. Scan the board and ask: "What category could these four NOT form?" By eliminating impossible connections, you narrow down what the real connections must be. This is faster than trying to guess what the connection is.

Technique Two: The Frequency Scan Certain words appear repeatedly in Connections puzzles across many games. Words with multiple meanings. Words that are homophones. Words that can be nouns or verbs. Scan for these first. They're likely part of a wordplay category.

Technique Three: Position-Based Analysis Connect this is subtle, but the placement of words on the grid sometimes reflects the puzzle constructor's thinking. Words in the same row or column occasionally belong to the same category. This isn't always true, but it's true often enough to be worth noting.

Technique Four: Theme Inference Once you solve one or two categories, you can often infer what the theme of the entire puzzle is. If you found a category about "types of bears," the puzzle might have another category about animals. If one category is about music, another might be about movies. Inferring the overall theme helps you spot the remaining categories.

Technique Five: The Confidence Rank Before you guess anything, rank your four hypothetical categories from most confident to least confident. Then guess them in order from least to most confident. This way, if you're wrong, you're wrong about something you were uncertain about. If you're right, you've eliminated the categories you're least sure about first, which actually helps you see the remaining connections more clearly.

Resources and Tools for Improvement

If you want to get better at Connections beyond just solving daily, there are resources available.

The official New York Times Connections page is the starting point. It's where you play the daily puzzle. No special tools. No hints beyond what the game provides. This is intentional. The puzzle is designed to be solvable with just the words and your brain.

Beyond the official game, there are Connections archives where you can play previous puzzles. These are invaluable for building pattern recognition. Play old puzzles without looking up answers. Study how connections were structured. You'll notice patterns.

Reddit communities dedicated to Connections exist, where players discuss puzzles after they're solved. Reading these discussions teaches you how other solvers think. You'll see connections you missed. You'll understand the puzzle constructor's reasoning.

Keep a personal log of puzzles you get wrong. Note the category you missed and why. Over time, you'll notice you have certain weaknesses. Maybe you struggle with homophones. Maybe you miss categories based on proper nouns. Knowing your weakness is half the battle.

The Psychology of Why Connections Matters

This might sound strange, but Connections taps into something deeper than just being a puzzle game. It's about pattern recognition and lateral thinking, two skills that matter in almost every field.

When you solve Connections, you're practicing the same brain function used in debugging code, analyzing data, writing creatively, and solving real-world problems. You're training yourself to see beyond the obvious, to recognize when you're being misdirected, and to think sideways when straight paths aren't working.

There's also the social element. People share their Connections results, compare streaks, and discuss solutions. It's become a small-scale cultural phenomenon, partly because solving it daily creates a ritual. You sit down with your coffee, you play for a few minutes, you either win or you learn something.

The puzzle also exists in a interesting space technologically. It's proof that in an age of AI, apps, and automated entertainment, people still want to sit down with something challenging that requires genuine thinking. Connections resists automation in a way most games don't. You can't brute-force it. You can't shortcut it. You have to think.

FAQ

What exactly is NYT Connections and how does it differ from Wordle?

NYT Connections is a word puzzle game from the New York Times where you group sixteen words into four categories of four words each. Unlike Wordle, which focuses on guessing a single word letter-by-letter with feedback, Connections requires you to identify thematic connections between words. You make four simultaneous decisions rather than one incremental decision, making it mechanically harder in many ways.

How many mistakes can you make before losing in Connections?

You're allowed exactly four mistakes in Connections. Once you've made four incorrect guesses, the game ends. This creates higher stakes than games that penalize you but let you continue playing. The four-mistake allowance is intentional design, giving you enough room to experiment while making every decision matter.

What are the four difficulty levels and how do they differ?

Yellow is the easiest level with the most obvious connections, usually synonyms or common associations. Green is moderately easy, often requiring you to recognize structural patterns or domain-specific knowledge. Blue is difficult, typically involving misdirection, homophones, or multi-word patterns. Purple is the hardest, using extremely specific connections or obscure wordplay. The colors indicate difficulty progression.

What's the best strategy for solving a Connections puzzle?

Start by identifying and guessing the yellow group immediately, which removes obvious patterns and builds momentum. Then look for green-level words that share structural connections. Next, identify blue categories where misdirection was used. Finally, whatever four words remain must be purple. Guess in order from least confident to most confident so early failures don't prevent you from solving.

Why do I keep falling for the trap where four words seem to belong together but one actually belongs elsewhere?

This is the most common trap in Connections, and it's intentional. The puzzle constructor places four words that seem like they form a category, knowing you'll want to guess them. But one actually belongs to a different, less obvious category. Before guessing, verify that you can confidently group exactly four words together with no ambiguity. If you're forcing a fourth word to fit, it probably belongs elsewhere.

How can I tell if a word is part of a homophone or wordplay category?

Homophone categories are trickier because your brain automatically interprets words by their meaning first. Before guessing, consider whether words have multiple meanings, sound like other words when pronounced, or could be spelled differently but sound the same. Wordplay categories often include words that seem random until you recognize they share a phonetic or linguistic property beyond meaning.

Is there a way to maintain a long Connections streak without burning out?

Treat different days as either "safe" or "push" days. On safe days when you're tired or distracted, play conservatively and use all four mistakes if needed to maintain the streak. On push days when you're fresh and focused, play aggressively and try for perfect games. Most players do the opposite and burn out. Spacing effort across different intensity levels helps maintain both streak and mental health.

What should I do if I lose my first mistake on a puzzle?

Pause immediately and walk away for five to ten minutes. Your brain is stressed and pattern recognition gets worse under stress. When you return with fresh perspective, you'll solve it faster and with less frustration. This is better than immediately guessing again while your brain is already committed to wrong patterns.

Are there resources to help me improve at Connections?

Beyond the official New York Times Connections game, you can access archives of previous puzzles to build pattern recognition without pressure. Reddit communities discuss puzzles after they're solved, teaching you how other solvers think. Most importantly, maintain a personal log of puzzles you get wrong, noting which category you missed and why. Over time, you'll identify your specific weaknesses and can target improvement there.

Why is Connections sometimes harder than Wordle even though Wordle seems more complex?

Wordle gives you feedback with every single guess, allowing incremental learning. Connections gives you no feedback until you guess completely wrong, meaning you're making bigger decisions with less information. You could be 75% correct and still fail. Additionally, Wordle is mathematically pattern-based while Connections requires understanding human creativity and lateral thinking, which is harder for many brains to systematize.

Final Thoughts: The Bigger Picture

Connections matters because it's one of the few remaining digital puzzles that can't be solved by clever apps or AI workarounds. It requires actual thinking. In a digital landscape full of algorithmic recommendations and passive consumption, sitting down with a puzzle that demands creative problem-solving feels revolutionary.

The fact that millions of people play this daily is significant. It suggests we're hungry for something that pushes back against us, that refuses to give us easy answers, that makes us work for victory. Connections delivers that in about five minutes a day.

Your goal isn't to be perfect at Connections. Your goal is to get better incrementally, to recognize when you're being tricked, and to enjoy the satisfaction when you finally see the connection that was hiding in plain sight. Every puzzle teaches you something about how language works, how people think, and how to see sideways when straight doesn't work.

Start with yellow. Build from there. Trust your instincts but verify them. Take breaks when you're frustrated. Celebrate wins. Learn from losses. That's not just good Connections strategy. That's good life strategy.

Go solve today's puzzle. And if you get stuck, remember: sometimes the obvious answer is wrong, and the weird one is right. That's not a bug in Connections design. That's the entire point.

Key Takeaways

• Connections uses four difficulty levels (yellow, green, blue, purple) and deliberately hides connections using wordplay, homophones, and false categories
• Solve yellow first to build momentum, then systematically work through green and blue before allowing purple to sort itself through elimination
• The most common trap is four words that seem to belong together but one actually belongs elsewhere, requiring you to verify connections before guessing
• Homophones and multiple-meaning words are intentionally used to create misdirection, requiring you to consider multiple interpretations before committing
• Maintain streaks by treating days as either 'safe' (conservative play) or 'push' (aggressive testing), preventing burnout while building long-term winning habits

Related Articles

• NYT Connections Hints & Answers January 9 [2025]
• Quordle Hints & Answers Today [2025] Complete Game Guide
• NYT Strands Guide: Hints, Strategies & Answers [2025]
• NYT Strands Game #677 Answers & Hints | January 9 [2025]
• NYT Connections Game #938 Hints & Answers Guide [2025]
• NYT Strands Game #682 Hints & Answers January 14 [2025]