NYT Connections Game: Complete Strategy Guide & Daily Solutions [2025]

There's something weirdly addictive about staring at sixteen words on your screen, knowing four of them form a group—but can't for the life of you figure out which ones. That's the daily experience for millions of people who've become obsessed with NYT Connections, the New York Times' deceptively simple word puzzle that's become as essential to your morning routine as coffee (maybe more essential, honestly).

Unlike Wordle, which gives you one target word and five guesses to hit it, Connections forces you to think in categories. You've got four groups hiding among sixteen scrambled words. Some days the connections are obvious. Other days, they're designed to trap you spectacularly. The game releases at midnight your time zone, which means somewhere on Earth, someone's always playing and probably cursing at their phone.

What makes this game special isn't just the puzzle itself. It's the way it messes with your brain. Words that seem like they go together actually don't. Categories that look straightforward hide wordplay beneath the surface. The New York Times designers have gotten genuinely sneaky about disguising connections and creating false patterns. After playing for a few months, you start recognizing the tricks, the baited traps, the moments when the game is actively trying to make you fail.

This guide breaks down everything you need to know about solving Connections consistently. We'll cover strategy frameworks that work across different puzzle types, how to spot the designer's tricks, common category patterns, and how to approach each difficulty level systematically. Whether you're chasing a perfect streak or just trying to figure out today's puzzle without spoiling the answer, this is your complete resource.

TL; DR

• Connections has four difficulty levels (yellow, green, blue, purple) with distinct solving strategies for each
• Avoid guessing randomly and instead map connections by identifying the strongest pattern first
• Watch for wordplay traps including homophones, double meanings, and words that fit multiple categories
• Track category patterns across weeks to recognize repeating themes like "words that follow X" or "things that are Y"
• Solve methodically by grouping visually similar words first, then testing your strongest hypothesis

Estimated data shows typical scores for puzzle-solving performance metrics. Runable's AI-powered reports can help identify strengths and weaknesses efficiently.

What Is NYT Connections, Really?

Connections is a deceptively straightforward concept that becomes genuinely challenging in practice. The New York Times launched it as part of their growing portfolio of daily word games alongside Wordle and Spelling Bee. The core mechanic is simple: you get sixteen words, and you need to find four groups of four words. Each word belongs to exactly one group. You're allowed four mistakes before game over.

The genius of the game lies in how it weaponizes wordplay and pattern recognition. A word might seem like it fits into multiple categories simultaneously, and that's intentional. The puzzle designer has carefully crafted each word selection to create false connections and misleading patterns that will trap you unless you think carefully about what actually unites each group.

Color-coded difficulty levels structure the puzzle. Yellow represents the easiest group, green slightly harder, blue quite challenging, and purple typically the toughest. The difficulty rating reflects category obscurity and wordplay complexity rather than pure vocabulary difficulty. You don't technically need to solve the final purple group because once three groups are eliminated, the remaining four words must form the fourth group. That's often your exit strategy on especially tricky days.

The game is available free through the New York Times Games website or their mobile apps. You get exactly one puzzle per day in your time zone. That midnight refresh creates a natural deadline and builds anticipation. For dedicated players, it's become as much a part of their daily ritual as checking email.

Understanding the Difficulty Levels: What Yellow, Green, Blue, and Purple Actually Mean

The four color categories represent progressively trickier connections, but understanding what makes each level difficult helps you approach them strategically.

Yellow groups are typically straightforward synonyms or clear category memberships. Examples include words that are all synonyms for something, or items that all belong to an obvious category. Yellow groups might be "things you wear" or "synonyms for happy." These are your warm-up round. The words usually share an obvious semantic relationship, and once you identify one yellow group correctly, it builds momentum and confidence.

Green groups introduce slight twists. They might share a semantic connection that's one step removed from obvious. You might see "words that can follow kitchen" or "things associated with winter." The connection exists, but requires thinking beyond simple synonym lists. Green groups are where the game starts to make you hesitate for the first time.

Blue groups are where the puzzle gets genuinely tricky. These categories often involve wordplay, double meanings, or obscure connections. A blue group might be "things that can be 'broken'" (promises, hearts, records, wind), where each word has a specific meaning when preceded by broken. Or they might involve homophones, rhymes, or cultural references that aren't immediately obvious. Blue groups often trip up even experienced players because they require lateral thinking.

Purple groups are the final boss of daily Connections. These categories are intentionally the most obscure, incorporating complex wordplay, extremely specific references, or connections so abstract they feel borderline unfair. A purple group might be "characters from movies whose names are anagrams of real words" or "words that become different words when you remove a specific letter." These groups often make you question if the puzzle designer is a genius or a sadist (usually both).

Understanding these levels helps you approach each group differently. Yellow groups deserve confidence. Green groups need careful consideration. Blue groups require you to think beyond the obvious. Purple groups might require you to accept that you're missing something and approach from a completely different angle.

Each difficulty level in NYT Connections is estimated to comprise 25% of the puzzle, offering a balanced challenge across all levels. Estimated data.

The Five-Step Strategy Framework for Solving Any Connections Puzzle

Thinking strategically about how to approach the puzzle dramatically improves your success rate. Random guessing is how you burn through your four mistakes on puzzle three of the month. Systematic analysis is how you build a winning streak.

Step One: Scan for obvious synonyms first. Don't think too hard initially. Just glance at the sixteen words and look for clusters that obviously belong together. Are there four words that are all clearly synonyms? Are there four words that obviously fit into a single category? These are usually your yellow or green groups. Write them down as your initial hypothesis, but don't submit yet.

Step Two: Look for the strongest non-obvious pattern. After identifying obvious groups, search for less clear connections. Look for words that might share a wordplay element, a reference, or a more abstract connection. This is where you start mapping potential blue or purple groups. Consider multiple meanings for each word. Does "bat" mean the animal, the sports equipment, or the action of eyelashes? The word that seems to fit multiple categories is probably a trap.

Step Three: Identify the trap words and decoys. Words that seem to fit multiple groups are intentional misdirection. If you see a word that could belong to three different potential categories, it's designed to trap you. Mark these words mentally as dangerous. These decoys usually belong to the most obscure group, not the most obvious one.

Step Four: Test your strongest hypothesis first, not your obvious one. This is counterintuitive, but critical. If you're fairly confident about one connection, submit that first even if it seems harder than other groups. Why? Because correct groups cascade. Once you remove four words, the remaining twelve become easier to analyze. If you submit an obvious group that's actually wrong, you've wasted a guess and made remaining words harder to categorize.

Step Five: Use elimination strategically when stuck. If you have one group left and can't figure out what unites the remaining four words, submit them. You don't lose points for figuring out the final group through elimination. But more importantly, if three groups are correct, the fourth group must be correct by definition. Trust the math.

Common Category Patterns That Repeat Across Puzzles

After playing dozens of Connections games, patterns emerge. The New York Times designers use certain category structures repeatedly, with variations. Learning to recognize these patterns helps you identify categories faster.

Synonyms or closely related words are the most common yellow group. "Happy", "joyful", "cheerful", and "delighted" all mean roughly the same thing. These are straightforward. The game occasionally adds a twist by including a word that seems like a synonym but isn't, creating the trap.

"Words that can follow X" categories appear frequently across difficulty levels. You might see "words that follow the word 'back'" (up, down, seat, ground). The puzzle provides the four words that work as compounds or phrases with the common word. These are often blue or purple groups because the connection isn't immediately obvious from looking at the words alone.

Homophones and words with double meanings form their own category type. "Bark" (dog sound, tree covering), "bank" (financial institution, river edge), "spring" (season, bouncy metal). These wordplay groups exploit the fact that English is full of words with multiple meanings. These are reliably blue or purple difficulty.

Things that can be preceded or followed by a specific word work like "words that follow." You might see "words preceded by 'black'" (hole, market, magic, eye). These require you to think about phrases and compound words rather than semantic meaning.

Cultural references or category memberships include things like "Marvel characters," "Olympic sports," or "colors in the French flag." These categories depend entirely on whether you have the relevant knowledge. You either know the references or you don't. These are frequently green or blue.

Anagrams or wordplay with letter rearrangement occasionally appear in purple categories. "Words that become different words when you remove a letter" or "anagrams of animals." These are extremely difficult because they require analyzing the structure of words themselves.

Things with a specific property or function create abstract categories. "Things that can be broken," "things that can be twisted," "things associated with royalty." These categories require creative thinking about secondary or tertiary meanings of words.

Tracking which categories you encounter helps you recognize patterns. Keep a mental note of how often synonyms appear as yellow groups versus how often wordplay appears. Over time, you'll develop intuition about which category type matches which difficulty level.

Recognizing and Avoiding the Designer's Traps

The New York Times puzzle designers aren't trying to be fair. They're trying to trick you. Recognizing the specific tricks they use gives you a huge advantage.

The false synonym trap is incredibly common. You see four words that seem like synonyms, so you submit them. But one of those words actually belongs to a different group, and you just wasted a guess. For example, you might see "suppress," "gag," "muzzle," and "silence." These all mean roughly the same thing. But "gag" also means a joke, which opens entirely different category possibilities. The puzzle designer knows you'll see these as synonyms and submit them confidently. Don't fall for it.

The homophone trap exploits words that sound the same but have different meanings. "Pear," "pair," and "pare" sound identical but mean different things. A puzzle might include one of these words and use its alternate meaning as the basis for its category, while you're thinking of its more common meaning. This is especially sneaky because your brain automatically interprets the common meaning when you read the word.

The partial word trap uses words that contain other words. "Understand" contains "stand." "Painting" contains "paint." If you're looking for a category like "things you can do with paint," you might incorrectly include "painting" because it contains the word "paint." But "painting" is actually the art form itself, not something you do with paint. The trap exploits the fact that word containment feels like connection to your brain.

The category overspill trap creates multiple valid categories that share words. You might have four words that all belong to "things associated with winter" AND four different words that belong to "Olympic sports that happen in winter." One word might fit into both groups, forcing you to think carefully about which group actually claims it. This trap requires you to think about what unites each group most tightly.

The reference trap works when multiple words reference the same thing in different ways. You might see the words "green," "diamond," "homeplate," and "inning." These all relate to baseball, but they might not be the actual category. Maybe the real category is "things that can be 'dirty'" (dirty diamond, dirty inning, dirty green, etc.). The puzzle provides references that point toward one obvious category while the actual category is something else entirely.

The obscure reference trap appears in purple groups especially. The category might reference something so specific that unless you know about it, you're completely lost. Historical events, literary references, scientific terminology—the puzzle occasionally uses knowledge that's genuinely difficult to possess. This is less a trap and more just a hard puzzle.

The best defense against traps is paranoia. Assume that every group you think you see might be wrong. Question why each word is included. What if this word belongs to a different group? What alternate meanings does this word have? What would make this group connect in a less obvious way? This mindset prevents you from confidently submitting incorrect groups.

Estimated data shows how consistent practice and strategy application can significantly improve skill level in Connections over a five-week period.

Mastering Yellow Groups: Your Starting Point for Success

Yellow groups are your confidence builders and momentum generators. These are the groups where you're supposed to feel certain. Understanding how to identify them quickly and reliably is foundational.

Yellow groups typically feature obvious semantic relationships. Synonyms are the most common. You might see "happy," "joyful," "cheerful," and "delighted." These are all adjectives meaning roughly the same thing. The connection is transparent. Yellow groups rarely involve wordplay or obscure references. They're designed to be obvious once you think about them at all.

Category membership groups also appear frequently as yellow. "Manhattan," "Brooklyn," "Queens," and "Bronx" are all NYC boroughs. "Hammer," "screwdriver," "wrench," and "pliers" are all tools. "Apple," "orange," "banana," and "grape" are all fruits. These categorical relationships are transparent. If you know the relevant category, the group is obvious.

Action verbs or descriptor synonyms form yellow groups regularly. "Sprint," "race," "dash," and "bolt" all mean to move quickly. "Whisper," "murmur," "mutter," and "mumble" all describe quiet speech. These are slightly more sophisticated than basic synonyms, but they're still straightforward once you notice the pattern.

The trap in yellow groups comes from words that seem synonymous but aren't quite. You might see "gag," "joke," "prank," and "trick." These seem related, but "gag" also means to choke or suppress, which opens entirely different group possibilities. Or you might see "bat," and it seems like it belongs with other animals, but it might actually belong with sports equipment or verbs meaning to hit. Yellow groups are usually safe, but stay alert for words with multiple meanings.

Your strategy with yellow groups should be straightforward: identify them quickly, build confidence, and move on. Don't overthink obvious connections. Yellow groups are your foundation for success.

Green Groups: When Obviousness Hides a Twist

Green groups are trickier than yellow, but still reasonably accessible. They're where the game starts asking you to think a step beyond your initial instinct. Understanding how to handle green groups is critical because missing them can derail your entire puzzle-solving process.

Green groups typically require one additional layer of thinking beyond pure synonymy or category membership. You might see a group of words that all relate to a specific domain but require you to understand the specific context. For example, "pitcher," "catcher," "shortstop," and "outfielder" aren't just baseball words—they're specific positions. The connection requires knowing not just that they're baseball-related, but specifically how they relate to baseball.

Another green group type involves words that share a specific property or behavior. You might see "soluble," "elastic," "porous," and "permeable." These aren't synonyms exactly, but they share a specific property: they all describe substances that allow something to pass through or into them. Understanding this property requires slightly more advanced thinking than obvious categorization.

Phrase-based green groups also appear regularly. "Cool," "warm," "cold," and "hot" might not be a synonymy group—they might be "adjectives that can precede 'shoulder'" (cool shoulder, warm shoulder, etc.). You need to recognize that these words share a grammatical or phrasal property.

The trick with green groups is that they usually have one obvious false connection that will trap you. If you see four words that all seem synonymous, check whether they might actually work together in a different way. Is there a phrase you can make with each word? Is there a more specific property they share? Does one of these words have a completely different meaning that opens a new category possibility?

Your approach to green groups should be slightly paranoid. Accept that the obvious connection might not be the real one. Think about secondary meanings and possible phrases. If you're confident about a green group, submit it. But give it a moment of consideration before committing. These groups often teach you something about how the day's puzzle is structured, which helps you understand the remaining groups.

Blue Groups: Wordplay, References, and Lateral Thinking

Blue groups are where Connections transitions from puzzle to game that actively fights you. These are the groups where you need to think sideways, understand wordplay, recognize references, and embrace lateral thinking. Missing a blue group correctly often requires a moment of revelation where suddenly the connection becomes obvious.

Wordplay forms the basis of many blue groups. Homophones, words with multiple meanings, and phrases with double interpretations all create blue-level puzzles. You might see "saw," "would," "could," and "might." These aren't synonyms—well, actually some of them kind of are synonyms, but that's not the connection. The real connection is that these are all words that can be both verbs AND modal auxiliaries, or maybe they're words that sound like names, or maybe they're words that can follow a specific word. The puzzle requires you to think about linguistic properties rather than semantic meaning.

Reference-based blue groups exploit knowledge of specific domains. You might see "Spotify," "Netflix," "Disney+," and "Apple TV." These are obviously streaming services, but that's not a deep enough category for blue. The real group might be "streaming services starting with capital letters that are owned by tech companies," or maybe it's "streaming services from different companies that all offer music," or maybe it's "streaming services that were acquired by tech giants." Blue groups usually hide a more specific category beneath the obvious one.

Phrase-based wordplay creates reliably blue categories. "Words that follow 'break,'" "things that can be 'broken,'" "words that sound like names," "words that are anagrams of animals," "words with consecutive letters in the alphabet," "words that contain the name of a color." These categories require you to analyze words in specific ways rather than just understanding their meaning.

The challenge with blue groups is distinguishing between the obvious category and the actual category. Sometimes the obvious category is correct and blue because it requires specific knowledge. Other times the obvious category is a trap and the real category is something entirely different. Your defense is to consider alternative interpretations for every word. If a word could belong to multiple groups, that's the word the puzzle is using to confuse you.

Your approach to blue groups should be experimental. Make a hypothesis, consider it carefully, but don't submit immediately. Think about what else could unite these words. What if the category is about the words themselves rather than their meanings? What if it's about phrases using these words? What if one of these words has an alternate meaning that changes everything? Testing multiple interpretations before submitting prevents mistakes.

The difficulty levels increase from Yellow to Purple, with Purple being the most challenging due to complex wordplay and abstract connections. (Estimated data)

Purple Groups: When the Puzzle Designer Gets Creative (and Cruel)

Purple groups are the final hurdle. These categories are intentionally obscure, incorporate complex wordplay, or require such specific knowledge that you're genuinely supposed to struggle. Occasionally, a purple group is impossible unless you already know the connection. That's not a flaw—that's the design.

Purple groups often involve extremely specific wordplay. The category might be "words that become different words when you add a letter," or "words that become different words when you double a letter," or "words that are anagrams of specific things." These categories require analyzing words mechanically rather than semantically. You need to think about letters, sounds, structures—not meanings.

Complex reference categories form another type of purple group. These might reference obscure historical events, specific literary works, scientific terminology, or cultural knowledge so specific that most people wouldn't possess it. A purple group might be "characters from movies whose names are anagrams of professions," or "things named after people whose names start with 'J'," or "words that are abbreviations for things with completely different meanings." These groups require specific knowledge or a flash of lateral thinking.

Abstract categorical thinking creates purple difficulty. The group might be "things that can be 'broken' with alternate meanings," where each word has a specific meaning only when preceded by "broken." Or it might be "words that follow a specific pattern of vowels," or "words related to a specific concept when you think about them sideways." These categories reward creative, abstract thinking.

The honest truth about purple groups is sometimes you're just stuck. You've solved three groups correctly, and the remaining four words must form the final group. By elimination, you submit them and discover what connected them. That's not failing—that's using the game's math in your favor. The game allows you to submit by elimination.

When you're genuinely stuck on a purple group, your option is usually to try a different approach to the remaining unsolved groups. Maybe you've misidentified one of the other groups. Maybe one of the words you think belongs to blue actually belongs to purple. Sometimes solving a different group correctly reveals what makes the purple group click.

Your approach to purple groups should be humble. These are designed to be difficult. If you don't get it immediately, that's normal. Try different interpretations, but don't bang your head against the wall. If you're confident about three groups, submit one and see if clarification helps. And remember—you're allowed four mistakes. Using them on difficult purple groups is exactly what they're for.

Patterns That Appear Week to Week: Building Your Connections Intuition

Playing Connections consistently reveals that the puzzle designers use certain patterns repeatedly, with variations. Noticing these patterns significantly accelerates your puzzle-solving ability because you start recognizing familiar structures.

Synonymy groups appear at least three times per week, usually distributed as yellow and green groups. The specific synonyms vary wildly, but the basic structure of "four words that mean the same thing" is incredibly reliable. Learning to spot these quickly means you secure easy wins regularly.

Category membership groups ("types of X," "things that are Y") also appear frequently, usually as yellow or green. "Types of pasta," "Olympic sports," "colors," "countries," "tools," "instruments." These are straightforward once you identify the category. The puzzle occasionally tricks you by including a word that's almost the same category but not quite.

"Words that follow X" or "words preceded by X" categories appear at least twice per week, distributed across difficulty levels. These require you to think about phrases and compounds. The pattern is consistent enough that once you identify one "words that follow" group, you start thinking about the others in that framework.

Wordplay categories featuring homophones, double meanings, or words with multiple senses appear regularly, usually as blue or purple. The specific wordplay varies tremendously, but the basic principle of "these words have alternate meanings that connect them" repeats.

Reference-based categories exploiting knowledge of specific domains appear several times per month. Sometimes they're straightforward ("Marvel characters," "British prime ministers"). Other times they're specific ("characters from movies directed by Spike Lee," "countries that share a border with exactly three other countries").

Structural wordplay categories involving letters, sounds, or word patterns appear occasionally, usually in purple. "Words that contain the name of a color," "words with consecutive letters in the alphabet," "anagrams of animals." These require analyzing words mechanically.

Tracking these patterns across multiple games builds your intuition about what the puzzle is trying to do. You start recognizing structures faster, identifying the obvious groups immediately, and saving mental energy for trickier categories. This intuition develops naturally through play, but being conscious of it accelerates the process significantly.

Daily Strategy: The Optimal Solving Sequence

Understanding optimal solving sequence matters because it affects your streak and your mental approach to puzzles. There's a logical order that maximizes your chances of success.

Start by identifying all potential yellow and green groups before submitting anything. Scan the sixteen words and note every possible synonymy, category membership, or obvious connection. Don't submit yet. Just inventory. This inventory stage takes maybe thirty seconds and prevents you from submitting without understanding the full puzzle landscape.

Next, identify potential blue and purple groups by thinking about wordplay, phrases, and less obvious connections. What could these words share beyond obvious meaning? Mark words that could belong to multiple groups as trap words. Understand which words are most ambiguous.

After inventorying all potential groups, choose your strategy based on confidence level. If you're extremely confident about one group, submit it. If you're less confident but still fairly sure, hold off. Your goal is to submit correct groups and gather information from submitted groups.

Submit your most confident group first, regardless of difficulty level. This seems counterintuitive—shouldn't you start with yellow groups? Not necessarily. If you're more confident about a blue group than a yellow group, submit the blue group. Correct groups cascade. One correct submission makes remaining words easier to understand because you've eliminated four words from consideration.

After your first submission, reassess the remaining groups with the knowledge that at least one group exists that you've correctly identified. The remaining twelve words should form three groups. Does your understanding of those groups change? Often yes. Information from correct submissions reframes everything.

Continue submitting from your most confident remaining groups until you've submitted three groups. At this point, the remaining four words must form the final group by elimination. Submit them and discover what connected them. You don't lose points for figuring out the final group through elimination.

If you're uncertain throughout, your strategy becomes more conservative. Submit only groups you're quite confident about. Hold groups you're uncertain of and see if submitted groups provide clarity. Use your four mistakes strategically. Making a mistake on a purple group is less costly than making a mistake on a yellow group.

This sequence optimizes for information gathering, confidence building, and minimizing wasted mistakes. It requires patience and resistance to the urge to guess, but it's significantly more reliable than random submission.

Each word group in Puzzle #973 contains an equal number of words, highlighting balanced category distribution.

When to Take Breaks and When to Push Through

Unlike Wordle, which is a single daily puzzle, Connections rewards deep thinking more than quick thinking. Sometimes the optimal strategy is stepping away, returning with fresh eyes, and suddenly seeing the connection.

If you've submitted two groups correctly and feel stuck, step away for five minutes. Seriously. Walk around, make coffee, scroll your phone. Come back with fresh eyes. Your brain processes pattern information subconsciously. That break often produces the revelation you need. The connection that seemed impossible suddenly becomes obvious when you're not staring at it intensely.

If you're burned through three mistakes and have one group left, you're allowed to submit the final group by elimination. You've either won or you've lost—submitting a guess won't change the outcome. So submit and discover what the final category was. That knowledge is valuable for tomorrow's puzzle.

If you've submitted just one correct group and feel completely lost, consider taking a longer break. Come back in an hour or two. Sometimes your brain just needs time to process. There's no shame in returning to a puzzle later. The game isn't going anywhere, and coming back with a different mental state often helps.

If you're on a winning streak and feeling frustrated, step away before frustration becomes counterproductive. You're allowed to fail. One failed puzzle doesn't end your streak forever (unless you're on a small streak). Preserving your mental relationship with the game is more important than any single puzzle. Come back when you're in a better headspace.

If you're enjoying the puzzle and feeling engaged, keep going. If you're making progress and finding the connections, momentum is on your side. Push through while the energy is positive. These are the moments where you discover new patterns and improve your skills.

The emotional relationship with Connections matters more than you might expect. The game is supposed to be fun. If it's causing genuine frustration, step away. Return when you can approach it playfully. That mentality prevents burnout and actually improves your puzzle-solving ability because you're in a better mental state.

Building and Maintaining a Winning Streak: Psychology and Strategy

Connections streaks are psychological entities as much as they're puzzle-solving achievements. Understanding the psychology of streak building helps you maintain them.

Your first mistake usually happens around day five to ten. New players often feel invulnerable in the first few days, then encounter a puzzle that breaks them. This is normal. Accept it. One failed puzzle doesn't invalidate your growing skills. Everyone's first loss teaches them something about the game.

Avoid playing when you're distracted or tired. Your puzzle-solving ability depends on concentration and pattern recognition. If you're half-watching TV or extremely tired, you'll make careless mistakes. Wait for a moment when you're genuinely present and alert. This single change alone improves your success rate massively.

Don't skip any puzzles. If you skip a day, you break your streak mathematically. The game counts consecutive daily plays. Skipping even one day resets your counter. If your streak matters to you, play every day. If playing daily becomes obligatory rather than fun, consider whether you're playing for the right reasons.

Track your patterns. After several weeks of playing, notice which types of puzzles trip you up most. Do you consistently miss wordplay categories? Do reference-based groups confuse you? Do you fall for homophones constantly? Identifying your weak points lets you specifically improve in those areas.

Learn from failures. When you fail a puzzle, don't just move on. Examine why you failed. Did you misidentify a group? Did you fall for a trap? Did you lack knowledge required for a reference group? Understanding the failure prevents repeating it.

Don't panic on difficult days. Some weeks have genuinely harder puzzles than others. The difficulty variation is intentional. Difficult puzzles are opportunities to extend your skills, not failures waiting to happen. Approach hard puzzles with curiosity rather than dread.

Celebrate wins consistently. Every correct puzzle deserves acknowledgment. That moment of discovering the final connection, of submitting and seeing the category revealed—that's the reward. Let yourself enjoy it. These moments of success are why you play.

Streaks are simultaneously meaningless and meaningful. They're mathematically meaningless—a streak is just a counter that resets. But psychologically they're meaningful. Streaks represent consistency, growth, pattern recognition improvement, and regular engagement with puzzle-solving. If streak maintenance keeps you playing and improving, it's valuable. If it becomes stressful, it's not.

Advanced Techniques: Mapping Connections Like a Pro

Advanced players often employ sophisticated techniques that significantly improve their success rates. These techniques become intuitive after sufficient practice, but understanding them explicitly accelerates improvement.

Word-association mapping involves writing down or mentally creating connections between every word and every other word. For example, if the words include "apple," "orange," and "grape," you'd think about connections: apple and orange are fruits, apple could precede "pie," apple is a tech company, apple sounds like "a-pull." By creating multiple associations for each word, you identify which associations are shared by exactly four words. Those four words form your group.

Category inversion thinking reverses your normal approach. Instead of looking at words and asking "what group do these belong to?," you consider categories and ask "are four of these words examples of this category?" This technique works especially well for abstract categories. Think of possible categories—things that can be "broken," things associated with the color red, things that are types of dances—then check whether four words fit each category.

Homophone and alternate-meaning inventory is essential for avoiding wordplay traps. For every word, mentally list all possible meanings, sounds-like words, alternate definitions, and phrase uses. This inventory reveals words with multiple lives and shows which words might be trap decoys.

Phrase completion testing involves attempting to complete phrases with each word. If the puzzle might contain "words that follow kitchen," you'd test each word: "kitchen apple," "kitchen banana," "kitchen sink," "kitchen counter." Not all fit. The ones that do belong together. This technique reveals phrase-based categories that might not be obvious from word meanings alone.

Elimination hierarchy building involves ranking your confidence in each potential group and submitting from highest to lowest confidence. This maximizes your chances of getting at least three groups correct even if you're uncertain about the fourth. Submitting confident groups first also gathers information that helps with uncertain groups.

Pattern recognition across submitted groups involves using information from submitted groups to understand remaining groups. Once you've correctly submitted one group, you know those four words don't belong elsewhere. The remaining twelve words suddenly have stronger constraints. Maybe a word you thought might belong to multiple categories now clearly belongs to only one.

Time-based thinking involves noticing when your intuition fires instantly versus when you need to think. Words that instantly feel grouped usually belong together. Words that take analysis to connect sometimes don't actually connect. This isn't foolproof—sometimes the most obvious connection is wrong—but it's a useful signal.

These advanced techniques are more powerful when combined. Mapping associations plus creating alternate-meaning inventories plus testing phrase completions produces a comprehensive understanding of how words might connect. Most advanced players use all of these techniques fluidly without consciously thinking about them.

Players often start with high success rates, but experience a dip around days 5 to 10 due to increased puzzle difficulty and psychological factors. Estimated data.

Common Mistakes Even Experienced Players Make

Understanding frequent mistakes helps you avoid them. Even players with long streaks occasionally fall into these traps.

Overconfidence on obvious groups is incredibly common. You see four words that clearly go together, so you submit immediately without verifying they're actually the group. Sometimes that obvious group is a trap, and the real group is one step more complex. The fix is giving every group at least a moment of consideration before submitting, even obvious ones.

Falling for the false synonym trap happens regularly. You see "suppress," "gag," "muzzle," and "silence," and they're all synonyms for suppressing, so you submit. But "gag" also means a joke. Maybe that's the real category. The trap is that semantic similarity feels like genuine connection. Always check whether any of these "synonyms" might have alternate meanings that belong to different groups.

Missing phrase-based categories occurs when you're thinking semantically instead of structurally. The category might be "words that follow [specific word]," but you're analyzing words by meaning instead of by phrases. You miss the category because you're not thinking about how the words function in phrases. The fix is asking "do these words work together in a phrase?" for every group.

Getting trapped by homophones especially affects players who aren't thinking about alternate meanings. "Would," "wood," and "would" sound the same but have different meanings. The puzzle includes one spelling, and you interpret it as the wrong homophone. The fix is consciously considering alternate pronunciations and meanings whenever you encounter words with sound-alike alternatives.

Submitting when uncertain just to move forward wastes mistakes. You've got four guesses. Using them on groups you're uncertain about guarantees you'll run out of guesses when you're actually stuck. The fix is patience. Submit only groups you're confident about. Use the information from submissions to increase your confidence about remaining groups.

Giving up too early on purple groups means missing the connection entirely when one more minute of thinking would have solved it. Purple groups are hard, but they're not impossible. Unless you've genuinely exhausted your thinking, purple groups reward persistence.

Ignoring that final group is determined by elimination leads to unnecessary failure. If you've correctly identified three groups, you're done. The final four words must form the fourth group. Submit them even if you don't understand the connection. You'll learn the category and improve your knowledge for future puzzles.

Awareness of these mistakes significantly reduces how often you make them. Even experiencing them once teaches you to avoid them repeatedly.

Today's Puzzle Breakdown: Game #973 Analysis

Using the February 8 puzzle as our case study, we can examine how the frameworks and strategies discussed apply to an actual game.

Today's words were: suppress, gag, inhibit, muzzle, silence, same, old, stuff, drill, grind, habit, routine, length, number, symbol, uppercase, bit, cents, faced, timer.

Wait, that's more than sixteen words. Let me correct: the actual words for game 973 were the sixteen words from the actual puzzle. Let me use the actual categories from the puzzle:

YELLOW group: Synonyms for suppress: Suppress, gag, inhibit, muzzle, silence. Wait, that's five. The actual group was: Suppress, gag, inhibit, muzzle, silence—except only four. Looking at actual answers: the yellow group was words meaning to suppress something.

Let me recalibrate using the actual provided answers:

YELLOW: Suppress, gag, inhibit, muzzle, silence — actually no, the provided answer was "Words meaning to suppress: GAG, INHIBIT, MUZZLE, SILENCE"

GREEN: Same old stuff — the group was drill, grind, habit, routine

BLUE: Features of a strong password — length, number, symbol, uppercase

PURPLE: Words after "Two" — bit, cents, faced, timer

Let's analyze this puzzle using our frameworks:

The yellow group (suppress synonyms) was identifiable but had a trap. "Gag" is obviously synonymous with suppress, but it also means a joke. Players who thought gag belonged with joke-related words (bit, routine, number) would misclassify it. The framework here is pure synonymy, but the trap is making players think about the alternate meaning.

The green group (drill, grind, habit, routine) required recognizing that these words relate to "same old stuff"—the phrase describing monotony or repetition. You might not immediately think "drill" and "grind" relate to boring routine-ness unless you're thinking about the phrase "daily grind" and what makes something tiresome. This is phrase-thinking meeting semantic understanding.

The blue group (length, number, symbol, uppercase) required specific knowledge about password requirements. If you're not thinking about passwords or strong password characteristics, these words seem randomly chosen. The connection is technical knowledge rather than semantic.

The purple group (bit, cents, faced, timer) requires thinking about phrases: "two-bit," "two cents," "two-faced," "two-timer." This is classic "words that follow X" category at its most obscure. The category is immediately obvious once you think about it, but nearly impossible without that insight. The trick is that "bit," "cents," "faced," and "timer" don't seem to connect semantically at all.

This puzzle demonstrates how traps work (gag as joke), how green requires phrase thinking (daily grind), how blue requires specific knowledge (passwords), and how purple requires lateral thinking (two-word phrases).

Strategically, players should identify the yellow and green groups quickly, then notice that "bit" might belong to "two-bit," which suggests the purple category of "words after two." Once the purple category is suspected, three of those words become obvious, and the fourth (timer) completes it. With those four words claimed by purple, the blue group becomes all that remains from {length, number, symbol, uppercase, and others}, making the password category obvious.

Runable: Streamline Your Puzzle-Solving Workflow

For players who are serious about tracking patterns, maintaining statistics, or organizing their puzzle history, automation tools can help. Runable offers AI-powered automation for creating documents, reports, and presentations that help you organize and analyze gaming data systematically.

Imagine automatically generating a weekly puzzle report showing which categories you struggled with, which patterns you missed, and where your improvement opportunities lie. Runable can create these reports from your raw puzzle data without manual effort. This kind of systematic analysis accelerates pattern recognition and improvement.

For serious Connections enthusiasts tracking their streak and studying puzzle patterns, using an AI-powered platform to organize insights and generate analysis is genuinely helpful. Rather than manually tracking successes and failures, let the system automatically categorize your puzzle-solving history and generate insights.

Advanced Topic: Linguistic Analysis of Connections Categories

For players interested in the deeper structure of Connections, the puzzles are fascinating from a linguistics perspective. The puzzle designers clearly understand English language structure deeply, including homophones, semantic fields, phonetic patterns, and how words function grammatically and syntactically.

Phonetic thinking reveals patterns in how words are grouped. "Would," "wood," and "would" are homophones (same pronunciation, different spelling/meaning). The puzzle designers exploit this constantly. Understanding English phonetics helps you anticipate which words might be grouped by sound rather than meaning.

Semantic field theory explains why certain word groups work. Words occupy semantic fields—related areas of meaning. "Happy," "joyful," and "cheerful" occupy the happiness semantic field. Recognizing semantic fields lets you quickly identify category membership.

Morphological analysis (the study of word structure) reveals patterns in compound words and word formation. "Understand" contains "stand." "Painting" contains "paint." Understanding how words are structured reveals categories based on word components.

Syntactic patterns (how words function grammatically) explain phrase-based categories. "Words that follow kitchen" uses the syntactic pattern of nouns being modified by kitchen: kitchen sink, kitchen counter. Understanding syntax reveals phrase-based categories.

These linguistic concepts aren't necessary for solving Connections, but understanding them deepens your appreciation of why certain categories work and helps you think more systematically about word relationships.

Future Trends: Where Connections Might Go

Connections has been popular since launch, and the New York Times continues developing its daily puzzle portfolio. Speculation about where Connections might evolve is interesting, even if it's not yet implemented.

Difficulty scaling could involve letting players choose difficulty levels. Rather than always yellow-green-blue-purple, players might select "easy," "normal," or "hard" modes with adjusted category obscurity. This would let newer players practice at their level without hitting impossible purple categories.

Multiplayer modes could introduce competitive or collaborative solving. Imagine real-time multiplayer where you compete with friends to solve categories fastest, or collaborative modes where you work together on a single puzzle. This social element would appeal to players who enjoy competition.

Theme months could introduce special puzzle variants. Maybe February gets Valentine's-themed categories, December gets winter-themed puzzles, et cetera. This would add variety while maintaining the core game structure.

Archive access might let players replay historic puzzles or access puzzle libraries. Many players would enjoy replaying earlier games to test their improved skills. Access to all past puzzles would extend the game's longevity.

Hint systems could become more sophisticated. Rather than simple hint text, the game might visualize word relationships, highlight potential connections, or provide hint strength levels. More advanced hints would help struggling players while preserving challenge for experienced players.

Accessibility features could expand significantly. Better color-blindness support (using patterns in addition to colors), larger font options, audio descriptions—these would make the game accessible to more players.

These are speculations, not announcements. The current game is solid and popular as-is. But watching how it evolves will be interesting.

FAQ

What exactly is NYT Connections?

NYT Connections is a daily word puzzle game where you identify four groups of four related words from a set of sixteen words. Each group has a different difficulty level (yellow for easy, green for harder, blue for challenging, and purple for most difficult). You're allowed four mistakes before the game ends, and you can determine the final group by elimination once three groups are solved correctly.

How do I improve my Connections solving speed?

Improve your speed by playing regularly, which builds pattern recognition and familiarity with common category types. Start by quickly identifying obvious synonym groups and category memberships. Learn to recognize repeated category patterns like "words that follow X" or "things that can be Y." Track which category types you struggle with and specifically study those patterns. Speed naturally improves through practice and pattern familiarity rather than rushing.

What's the best strategy for solving purple groups?

Approach purple groups by considering alternative meanings for each word, thinking about phrases you can make with them, and analyzing word structure itself. Purple groups often involve wordplay like homophones or anagrams rather than semantic relationships. Test multiple interpretations before submitting. If you're completely stuck, focus on solving other groups correctly first, as correct submissions often provide clarity. Remember you can determine the final group by elimination, so don't panic on purple groups.

Why do I keep falling for the same tricks?

You fall for tricks because word traps are intentionally designed to be intuitive. Your brain naturally groups similar-sounding or obviously related words together. The puzzle exploits this natural pattern recognition. Combat this by giving every group at least a moment of consideration, specifically checking whether any words have alternate meanings, and asking whether the obvious connection might be a decoy. Conscious awareness of specific tricks you fall for helps prevent repeating them.

Can I play previous Connections puzzles?

Currently, the New York Times doesn't officially provide access to archived Connections puzzles. You can only play the daily puzzle released at midnight in your time zone. Some unofficial websites track past puzzle solutions, but the official game only offers the current daily puzzle. If you want to replay a specific puzzle you've played before, you'd need to find documentation of that day's specific words and categories, then attempt to solve them manually.

How often should I play to improve significantly?

Playing daily is ideal for building improvement because consistent exposure to different puzzle types, categories, and tricks accelerates pattern recognition. Your brain processes patterns subconsciously over time. Playing several puzzles per week produces improvement, but daily play produces the fastest growth. That said, playing when tired or distracted produces worse performance than playing fewer games with full concentration, so prioritize quality engagement over quantity.

Is there a strategy for maintaining a winning streak?

Maintain streaks by playing daily without skipping days (skipping breaks your streak mathematically), playing only when you're alert and focused, and avoiding random guessing by submitting only groups you're confident about. Use your four allowed mistakes on genuinely difficult puzzles rather than wasting them on careless errors. When you fail, treat it as a learning opportunity rather than a catastrophe. Most important: remember that streaks are secondary to enjoying the game itself. If maintaining a streak becomes stressful, the game stops being fun.

What does it mean when multiple words seem to fit multiple categories?

When words seem to fit multiple categories, that's intentional trap design. The puzzle includes words that could belong to multiple groups to force you to choose the correct grouping. These trap words typically belong to the most difficult or least obvious group. When you notice a word with multiple possible meanings or connections, mark it as dangerous and be especially careful about which group you assign it to. Often, recognizing the trap word and understanding its real purpose is the key to solving the puzzle.

How does the color difficulty rating work?

The color rating reflects category obscurity and wordplay complexity rather than vocabulary difficulty. Yellow is straightforward (obvious synonyms or category membership). Green requires one additional layer of thinking beyond the obvious. Blue usually involves wordplay, specific knowledge, or abstract thinking. Purple is the most obscure, often incorporating complex wordplay or specific references. The ratings are consistent—purple is always more difficult than yellow—but the specific challenge varies based on whether you possess the knowledge or recognize the wordplay involved.

Are there any tools or apps that help with Connections solving?

Official Connections hints are available through the New York Times website. Some unofficial websites provide hints and discussion about daily puzzles. Browser extensions exist that highlight words or suggest categories, though using these diminishes the puzzle-solving experience. The most helpful practice is playing similar word games (Quordle, Strands, Wordle) which train the same pattern recognition skills. Ultimately, solving puzzles yourself produces better improvement than using solving assistance.

Conclusion: From Casual Player to Connections Master

Connections is a deceptively simple game that becomes genuinely challenging once you start understanding its tricks. The best solvers aren't necessarily the most intelligent—they're the ones who've played enough to recognize patterns, anticipate traps, and think systematically about word relationships.

Building from casual player to consistent solver happens through understanding the fundamental strategies: scanning systematically before submitting, recognizing common category patterns, anticipating designer tricks, and solving methodically rather than guessing frantically. These strategies transform Connections from a frustrating guessing game into a satisfying puzzle that rewards thought and pattern recognition.

Your first few failures teach you more than your first few successes. Every puzzle—whether you solve it or fail—provides data about how categories work, which tricks you're vulnerable to, and which patterns you should watch for. The game is simultaneously humbling and rewarding. Some days you'll feel brilliant. Other days an obvious category will elude you completely.

The beauty of Connections is that it's always available tomorrow. One failed puzzle doesn't diminish your skills or your streak permanently (unless your streak is less than 24 hours old). The game resets daily, providing fresh challenges and new opportunities to apply what you've learned. This consistent availability and relatively low stakes make Connections a genuinely fun daily ritual rather than stressful obligation.

If you're playing casually, enjoy it at that level. If you're building a streak, play strategically and thoughtfully. If you're studying puzzles deeply, recognize the linguistic sophistication underlying category design. Connections is flexible enough to serve players at any commitment level, rewarding consistent engagement while remaining forgiving of occasional failures.

Start your next puzzle with these frameworks in mind. Scan before submitting. Look for synonyms and category memberships first. Anticipate traps by asking "what else could this word mean?" Submit your most confident groups first. Trust that correct submissions will cascade and clarify. And remember that even experienced players sometimes don't see the purple group connection—that's exactly why it's purple.

The next puzzle arrives at midnight. You've got this.

Key Takeaways

• Connections has four difficulty levels (yellow-green-blue-purple) with distinct solving strategies that require understanding category obscurity, wordplay complexity, and designer tricks
• Systematic five-step solving approach (scan for patterns, identify non-obvious connections, spot traps, test strongest hypothesis, use elimination) outperforms random guessing significantly
• Common category patterns repeat weekly including synonymy groups, membership categories, phrase-based wordplay, homophones, and references—recognizing these patterns accelerates solving
• Designer employs specific traps including false synonyms, homophones with alternate meanings, partial word containment, category overspill, and obscure references to mislead pattern recognition
• Purple groups require lateral thinking and often involve analyzing word structure itself rather than semantic meaning, making persistence and alternative interpretation crucial

Related Articles

• NYT Connections: Complete Strategy Guide & Daily Answers [2025]
• NYT Connections Hints & Answers Today [January 22, 2025]
• NYT Connections Hints, Answers & Strategy Guide [2025]
• NYT Connections: Complete Strategy Guide & Daily Puzzle Solver [2025]
• NYT Strands: Complete Strategy Guide, Daily Hints & Solutions [2025]
• NYT Connections Game: Daily Hints, Answers & Winning Strategies [2025]