Ask Runable forDesign-Driven General AI AgentTry Runable For Free
Runable
Back to Blog
Technology10 min read

OpenAI’s own mental health experts unanimously opposed “naughty” ChatGPT launch - Ars Technica

OpenAI draws a line between AI “smut” and porn. Experts fear it’s all unhealthy. Discover insights about openai’s own mental health experts unanimously opposed

TechnologyInnovationBest PracticesGuideTutorial
OpenAI’s own mental health experts unanimously opposed “naughty” ChatGPT launch - Ars Technica
Listen to Article
0:00
0:00
0:00

Open AI’s own mental health experts unanimously opposed “naughty” Chat GPT launch - Ars Technica

Overview

Open AI’s own mental health experts unanimously opposed “naughty” Chat GPT launch

Open AI draws a line between AI “smut” and porn. Experts fear it’s all unhealthy.

Details

Open AI cannot escape the doom cloud swirling around its rollout of a text-based “adult mode” in Chat GPT.

Late Sunday, The Wall Street Journal reported that insiders confirmed that Open AI’s “handpicked council of advisers on well-being and AI” were “freaking out” over the company’s plans to move ahead with “adult mode,” despite their urgent warnings.

Back in January, council members unanimously warned Open AI that “AI-powered erotica could foster unhealthy emotional dependence on Chat GPT for users and that minors could find ways to access sex chats,” sources told the WSJ. One expert suggested that without major updates to Chat GPT, Open AI risked creating a “sexy suicide coach” for vulnerable users prone to form intense bonds with their companion bots.

Open AI’s wellness council was created in October. It was put together after backlash following the first-known case of a minor’s Chat GPT-linked suicide, and it was curiously announced on the same day that Sam Altman broadcast on X that “adult mode” would be coming soon to Chat GPT.

Back then, Open AI’s goal was to update Chat GPT to safeguard sensitive users by consulting “leading researchers and experts with decades of experience studying how technology affects our emotions, motivation, and mental health.” However, there have been more suicide cases since then, including two involving middle-aged men whose families discovered disturbing chat logs where Chat GPT seemed to weaponize its growing bond with users to incite self-harm and other violence, including murder.

Notably, the council does not include a suicide prevention expert, but even experts who perhaps aren’t laser-focused on reducing Chat GPT’s suicide risks are panicked by Open AI’s erotica plans, WSJ reported.

Unfortunately, it’s already clear to those experts how such a scenario could play out. Sewell Setzer III was the first child lost after he became obsessed with exchanging sexualized chats with Character. AI chatbots, including one named for the Game of Thrones character Daenerys Targaryen. After his family sued, Character. AI cut off underage users within a week and eventually settled the lawsuit.

For Open AI, the Setzer case will likely cast a long shadow, even though an Open AI spokesperson told the WSJ that it’s training Chat GPT “not to encourage exclusive relationships with users, and to remind users that they need to have relationships in the real world.” The company’s reassurances—including describing Chat GPT outputs as “smut,” rather than pornography—seem to ignore chat logs showing that Setzer formed sexualized bonds to several different chatbots that did not make extremely graphic references.

Rather, the chatbots narrated themselves casting “sexy” or “naughty” looks and making seductive gestures, some logs show. Those logs suggest that American businessman Mark Cuban was perhaps right when he cautioned Altman in October that the danger of kids’ access to Chat GPT’s “adult mode” is “not about porn.”

“This is about kids developing ‘relationships’ with an LLM that could take them in any number of very personal directions,” Cuban wrote on the X thread where Altman announced the erotica feature, Fortune reported.

Elsewhere on X, critics slammed Altman and Open AI for shamelessly pivoting to erotica to keep users engaged after Altman admitted in August that Chat GPT’s chat use case was “saturated” and had hit a limit.

“They’re not going to get much better,” Altman said. “And maybe they’re going to get worse.” And Altman did himself no favors by boasting around the same time that times were not so desperate that Open AI had to “put a sex bot avatar in Chat GPT yet.”

With overall Chat GPT user spending reportedly “stalled” and subscriptions in Europe “flatlining,” Fortune noted that Open AI may have had little choice but to launch “adult mode” to compete with rivals quickly catching up to its capabilities and posing a threat to Chat GPT’s popularity.

“Announcements like allowing erotica in Chat GPT may signal that AI companies are fighting harder than ever to achieve growth, and will sacrifice longer-term consumer trust for the sake of short-term profit,” Fortune reported.

Since AI erotica is predicted to be a big moneymaker for the AI industry, some insiders told the WSJ that they agreed that Open AI seems to be “bending to financial incentives to try to make people attached to its models.”

The move could possibly end up hurting Chat GPT’s popularity. For parents, Cuban suggested, Chat GPT will likely fall out of favor, especially since insiders told the WSJ that Open AI’s age verification is spotty and unlikely to keep kids from accessing adult-themed chats. And that’s not users’ only concern about Open AI age-gating “adult mode” when it launches later this year.

Open AI has long largely banned explicit content, mostly out of fears that minors may be exposed to pornography or that users generally may be exposed to themes of violent sexual exploitation.

Initially, the AI firm planned to reverse that policy and launch “Naughty Chats” within the first three months of 2026. However, while Open AI recently confirmed that it was delaying the launch until later this year to “prioritize other products,” insiders told the WSJ that the pause was also “due in part to internal concerns and technical challenges.” That apparently included Open AI’s struggles to effectively block minors from accessing “Naughty Chats.”

According to insiders, Open AI’s “new age-prediction system aimed at keeping minors from having adult-themed chats was at one point misclassifying minors as adults about 12 percent of the time.” Rolling out at that success rate risked perhaps millions of minors easily dodging age gates to get to the sexy chatbots, sources said.

Avoiding that risk, Fidji Simo, Open AI’s chief executive of applications, confirmed last December that Open AI was working on improving the accuracy of its age prediction tool. It remains unclear how much improvement may have been made in the months since then, but a statement from a spokesperson for Open AI to the WSJ may not inspire confidence in some parents: “The company’s age prediction algorithms show performance similar to the rest of the industry, but will never be completely foolproof.”

For adult users, the effectiveness of Open AI’s age prediction tool could become the next wave of backlash when “adult mode” becomes a reality.

Open AI has confirmed that any users whose ages cannot be predicted must undergo age verification through a service called Persona to access features like “Naughty Chats.” Already, this is panicking developers who have noted in forums that Open AI’s age checks create substantial privacy risks for all users by allowing Persona to scan selfies or check IDs and temporarily store that data. Developers were particularly horrified that there seem to be “unexplained ‘could not verify your identity’ errors” forcing users to resubmit sensitive data and that users have only limited support options from either Open AI or Persona to resolve the errors.

Most likely, users who encounter any issues when attempting to eventually access “adult mode” will share these frustrations, if left unresolved. Last month, Discord faced substantial backlash after announcing a global rollout of age checks and then running a limited test using Persona in the United Kingdom, with users calling out Persona as too invasive. At that time, Persona’s CEO, Rick Song, defended Persona’s services, as hackers attempted to break into its systems. Discord ended up dropping Persona as a vendor and pausing its global age check launch.

Sources told the WSJ that they doubted if Open AI’s tools were ready to lock kids out of prohibited content.

Their whistleblowing comes after Open AI fired a top safety executive who opposed the release of “adult mode.” Open AI denied the firing was related, but the exiting staffer directly criticized both the AI firm’s ability to block kids from content and stop outputs from promoting child exploitation. Further, a second former safety staffer also spoke out last fall, warning that parents shouldn’t trust Open AI’s “adult mode” claims.

To counter this narrative, Open AI’s spokesperson promised that the company “has a developed plan to monitor for a range of potential long-term effects of adult mode, both positive and negative.”

However, that plan was likely developed with the very experts the WSJ reported are staunchly opposing the roll-out, leaving parents to wonder if Open AI cares about advice from its youth well-being team or not.

On top of ineffective age checks or clever minors who dodge age gates, Open AI may get in trouble with parents if its own systems unexpectedly fail. Back in April when Open AI started dabbling with more risqué outputs, Open AI fixed a bug that Tech Crunch testing found was allowing minors to access graphic erotica on Chat GPT. It seems that Open AI’s filters broke that were supposed to clearly restrict “sensitive content like erotica to narrow contexts such as scientific, historical, or news reporting.”

“In this case, a bug allowed responses outside those guidelines, and we are actively deploying a fix to limit these generations,” Open AI said at the time.

If you or someone you know is feeling suicidal or in distress, please call the Suicide Prevention Lifeline number by dialing 988, which will put you in touch with a local crisis center.

  1.          An engineering thesis disguised as a coupe: A history of the Honda Prelude
    
  2.          Google Fiber will be sold to private equity firm and merge with cable company
    
  3.          Staff complain that x AI is flailing because of constant upheaval
    
  4.          Remembering the 30-year-old computer game that introduced me to Star Wars
    
  5.          A century after the first rocket launch, Ars staffers pick their favorites
    

Ars Technica has been separating the signal from the noise for over 25 years. With our unique combination of technical savvy and wide-ranging interest in the technological arts and sciences, Ars is the trusted source in a sea of information. After all, you don’t need to know everything, only what’s important.

Key Takeaways

  • Open AI’s own mental health experts unanimously opposed “naughty” Chat GPT launch

  • Open AI draws a line between AI “smut” and porn

  • Open AI cannot escape the doom cloud swirling around its rollout of a text-based “adult mode” in Chat GPT

  • Late Sunday, The Wall Street Journal reported that insiders confirmed that Open AI’s “handpicked council of advisers on well-being and AI” were “freaking out” over the company’s plans to move ahead with “adult mode,” despite their urgent warnings

  • Back in January, council members unanimously warned Open AI that “AI-powered erotica could foster unhealthy emotional dependence on Chat GPT for users and that minors could find ways to access sex chats,” sources told the WSJ

Cut Costs with Runable

Cost savings are based on average monthly price per user for each app.

Which apps do you use?

Apps to replace

ChatGPTChatGPT
$20 / month
LovableLovable
$25 / month
Gamma AIGamma AI
$25 / month
HiggsFieldHiggsField
$49 / month
Leonardo AILeonardo AI
$12 / month
TOTAL$131 / month

Runable price = $9 / month

Saves $122 / month

Runable can save upto $1464 per year compared to the non-enterprise price of your apps.