The Power A Advantage Wireless Controller for Nintendo Switch 2: Is It Worth Your Money?
When a new gaming console drops, the controller debate starts immediately. The official version costs serious money, aftermarket options promise better value, and you're stuck wondering if saving $15 is worth the risk.
I spent two weeks testing the Power A Advantage Wireless Controller for Nintendo Switch 2 across a range of games, from fast-paced action titles to rhythm games that demand precision. What I found was frustrating: a controller that feels like it costs half its actual price, with design choices that'll make you reach for your official Pro Controller within hours.
Let's be honest—this isn't a hidden gem. But it's also not completely terrible. There's a middle ground here, and understanding where that line is matters if you're considering dropping $70 on a third-party controller.
The core question isn't whether this controller works. It does. The real question is whether it deserves its price tag when better alternatives exist at the same price point or even cheaper. After testing it extensively, the answer is more complicated than a simple yes or no.
TL; DR
- Price-to-Quality Mismatch: At 40 controller with cheap plastic and hollow construction
- Ergonomic Failures: Tiny Start/Select buttons positioned at the bottom make them nearly impossible to reach without repositioning your hands
- Battery Life: Impressive 30-hour battery life is one of the few genuine wins here
- Design Options: More visually appealing designs than the official Pro Controller (Mario, Kirby, Pokémon themes)
- Better Alternatives Exist: Competitors like the 8 Bit Do Ultimate 2 and Game Sir Nova Lite offer superior build quality at similar or lower prices


The PowerA Advantage Wireless offers a lower cost and more design themes, but the Nintendo Switch 2 Pro Controller excels in ergonomics and material quality. Estimated data for ergonomics and material quality ratings.
Why Controller Choice Actually Matters
People underestimate how much a controller affects your gaming experience. It's not just about inputs—it's about how long you can play comfortably, whether you trust it during competitive moments, and whether you'll develop hand cramps after a three-hour session.
Think about it this way: you're holding this thing for potentially hundreds of hours. A $70 controller you use for 500+ hours breaks down to about 14 cents per hour. That's actually not bad when you frame it that way. But only if the controller is actually good.
The Nintendo Switch 2 Pro Controller situation is interesting. Nintendo's asking $85 for their official version. That's expensive, but it's also built like it's supposed to survive years of use. Third-party manufacturers see an opening and think "people want cheaper options." Fair enough. But cheaper doesn't mean the same quality for less money—it usually means cutting corners everywhere possible.
Power A has been in the third-party controller game for years. They know what they're doing. So when their wireless controller feels this cheap, it's not an accident. It's a cost-cutting decision. They're using thinner plastic, simpler internal components, and less rigorous quality control than Nintendo does.
The weird part? The wired version costs
Build Quality: Where the Problems Start
Pick up the Power A Advantage Wireless Controller and the first thing you notice is the weight. It's light—almost too light. The official Pro Controller feels substantial in your hands. This one feels like it might blow away if someone sneezed nearby.
That's because Power A went aggressive with the hollow plastic approach. The entire shell is thin plastic with minimal internal structure. When you squeeze it gently (not aggressively, just normal hand pressure), it flexes. That flexing is the sound of a controller that won't last three years of regular use.
I tested this alongside the official Pro Controller, and the difference is night and day. The Pro Controller resists all that flex. The buttons feel crisp. There's no give when you hold it. With the Power A, every button press is accompanied by a slight flex in the casing, which creates this hollow feeling that's hard to describe unless you've held it yourself.
The plastic texture is another issue. It's hard, almost cheap-feeling plastic with a slightly abrasive finish. It's not soft-touch rubber like premium controllers. It's not metal. It's just... basic plastic. After 30 minutes of holding it, you don't feel anything dramatic, but after an hour? Your hands start noticing.
The thumbsticks are particularly problematic here. The tips are hard plastic with an abrasive texture that catches your skin slightly. It's not sharp or painful, but it's definitely not smooth. Compare this to controllers that use rubber or have a smoother finish, and you immediately understand the difference a material choice makes.
Power A did include Hall effect components, which is actually smart. These sensors don't wear out like mechanical switches do, so stick drift—the infamous problem where controllers start registering phantom inputs—shouldn't happen with this controller. That's a genuine plus. But it doesn't excuse the hollow feel everywhere else.

The Button Placement Problem That Nobody Expected
Here's something that seems like a small detail but becomes infuriating after a few hours: the Start and Select buttons are tiny and positioned at the bottom of the controller face, squeezed into a row with Capture, Home, and the new C button.
Why is this a problem? Because humans have hands. Hands have limits. When you're holding a controller for gaming, your thumbs are on the sticks, your fingers are on the triggers and shoulder buttons. To hit Start or Select, you have to completely reposition your hand. You can't reach them naturally. You have to shift your grip, which breaks your focus during gameplay.
Nintendo's Pro Controller puts Start and Select in more accessible spots. They're not in the primary grip zone, but you can hit them without a full hand reposition. Power A's placement suggests nobody actually played this design for more than 10 minutes before sending it to manufacturing.
I noticed this immediately when trying to navigate menus in Zelda. Every time I needed to access the menu, I had to adjust my hand position. Every single time. After a gaming session, you don't think about this consciously, but your hands do. This is the kind of death-by-a-thousand-cuts problem that tanks a controller.
The buttons themselves are functional but cramped. They require more precision to press than they should. A larger button with better spacing would solve this instantly, but that would require a design change, which costs money.

Estimated data shows PowerA's lack of improvement in build quality and functionality from Switch 1 to Switch 2, while 8BitDo demonstrates iterative enhancements.
Trigger and Stick Performance: Rough Around the Edges
The trigger situation is weird. The triggers themselves are quite shallow, meaning you don't get much travel distance before they max out. This is fine for games where triggers are binary (all the way or nothing), but for games requiring analog trigger pressure, it's noticeable.
Try a racing game or a game with driving mechanics, and you'll feel the difference. The official Pro Controller gives you smooth, deep analog travel. The Power A gives you shallow, quick trigger activation. It works. It's just not as precise or satisfying.
Thumbstick quality is somewhere between adequate and frustrating. The mechanical movement is fine—they're responsive and quick. But the aforementioned abrasive plastic tip means your thumb gets fatigued faster. Extended gaming sessions with this controller lead to thumb irritation that doesn't happen with smoother stick designs.
The stick layout is asymmetrical, which Power A got right for Switch compatibility. But the actual stick feel is stiff. There's not much play in the dead zone. It's responsive, sure, but it feels like the sticks are on a hair trigger. Quick, jerky movements come easy. Smooth, controlled movements require more finesse than you'd expect.
For casual gaming, none of this is dealbreakers. For any game requiring precision—and there are tons of them on Switch—you'll notice the limitations.
Battery Life: Finally, Something That Works
Here's where Power A actually deserves credit. The battery claims 30 hours of playtime, and that's not marketing nonsense. Over my testing period, I got legitimate 28-30 hour sessions before the controller died.
That's genuinely impressive. Most wireless controllers get 15-20 hours. The official Pro Controller gets around 30 hours too, so this is competitive territory. Power A used decent battery components here, which makes the cheap feel everywhere else more frustrating. They clearly know how to make good hardware when they choose to.
Charging time is about 4 hours for a full charge using the included USB-C cable. That's standard. Nothing exceptional, but nothing terrible either.
Where this becomes valuable is if you're the type who forgets to charge controllers. With 30 hours of battery, you can go weeks without needing to plug in. Compare that to cheaper wireless controllers that might get 12-15 hours, and the math becomes clearer. One charge basically covers a month of casual gaming.
Battery longevity is a different question. The controller hasn't been out long enough for us to know if that battery will still deliver 30 hours after a year or two of daily use. Lithium batteries degrade over time, and Power A's track record on long-term battery reliability isn't stellar.
Motion Controls and Haptics: Surprisingly Solid
Motion controls are hit or miss on third-party controllers. They're expensive to implement well, so manufacturers often skimp. Power A, to their credit, didn't completely cheap out here.
The gyro motion tracking is responsive and accurate. I tested it in Mario Kart with motion steering, and it tracked my hand movements without lag or dead zones. For a Switch 2 controller, you need good motion controls since the console uses them heavily. Power A delivered here.
Haptics are present but minimal. You'll feel vibrations during gameplay, but they're not detailed like the premium haptics in the Pro Controller. There's no texture feedback or nuanced haptic responses. You get "vibration on" and "vibration off," essentially. It works. It's just basic.
For motion-heavy games like Ring Fit Adventure or sports titles, the motion tracking is good enough. For games emphasizing detailed haptic feedback, you'll notice the limitation.

Design and Aesthetics: The One Real Win
Let's talk about the one area where Power A legitimately wins: design variety. Nintendo offers their Pro Controller in black or white. That's it. Boring. Play Station does the same thing with different colors, but still limited.
Power A offers multiple themed designs. I tested the Mario and Friends variant, which features a colorful Super Mario-inspired pattern with bright colors and clean printing. The artwork is high quality, and the colors don't look washed out or cheap like some licensed products.
They also offer Kirby and Pokémon designs. None of these designs appear on the official Pro Controller. If you care about aesthetics and personality in your gaming setup, this is something.
The tradeoff is that all these designs sit on the same cheap plastic foundation. Putting nice artwork on a hollow controller is like putting a nice frame around a blurry photo. The design looks good, but the controller underneath still feels terrible.
That said, if you're buying this specifically because you love the Mario aesthetic and you don't care about premium feel, that's a valid use case. Just be aware of what you're getting.

The PowerA Advantage Wireless Controller offers moderate performance and design but provides good value. Estimated data.
Comparing to Alternatives: Where Power A Falls Short
At $69.99, the Power A Advantage Wireless isn't competing in a vacuum. There are other options at this price point, and they're worth considering.
The 8 Bit Do Ultimate 2 costs about
The Game Sir Nova Lite costs only $24.99 and has none of the cheap feel that plagues the Power A. Sure, it doesn't have motion controls, but for raw build quality and ergonomics at the budget tier, it's a steal. This proves that Power A's cheap feel isn't necessary at this price point—other manufacturers figured out how to build better.
The official Nintendo Switch 2 Pro Controller at
If you're shopping in the $50-70 range, the Power A doesn't have a strong case. It's not the cheapest option (cheaper alternatives exist), and it's not the best option at this price (8 Bit Do and others beat it). It's just... middle. And middle at a premium price is the worst position to be in.

The Value Proposition Doesn't Add Up
Let's do the math on what you're actually buying. Power A is charging
Meanwhile, competitors are building controllers with better ergonomics, better materials, and comparable features at the same or lower price. Power A's entire value proposition is "it's cheaper than Nintendo's official controller," but the math doesn't work when better alternatives cost the same or less.
The battery life is genuinely good, but you can get 20+ hour batteries in controllers that cost $20 less. The design options are nice, but they're purely aesthetic and don't affect how the controller plays. The Hall effect components are smart, but they're becoming standard even in budget controllers.
There's no innovation here. There's no reason to specifically choose this over competitors. It's just another third-party controller with the same compromises as a dozen others, wrapped in a price tag that doesn't justify the experience.
Should You Actually Buy This?
Here's my honest take: if you're price-conscious and you must buy right now, don't choose the Power A Advantage Wireless. Go cheaper (Game Sir Nova Lite, if you don't need motion controls) or go official (Pro Controller).
If you specifically love Mario aesthetics and you're willing to compromise on comfort for looks, then maybe this is for you. But be clear about what you're getting: a functional controller that feels cheap and suffers from ergonomic oversights, wrapped in nice artwork.
If you're planning to use this as your primary controller for 100+ hour gaming sessions, skip it entirely. Your hands will thank you. For casual use, kids' gaming, or as a backup controller, it's acceptable. Not great, but acceptable.
The worst part? Power A clearly can build good hardware (see: battery life, motion controls). They simply chose not to prioritize build quality for this model. That's a choice, and it's a wrong one at this price point.

The Bigger Picture: Third-Party Controllers in 2025
The third-party controller market is weirdly competitive right now. You've got established players like Power A competing with newer brands like 8 Bit Do and Game Sir, all fighting for the same customers who want alternatives to expensive official controllers.
What separates the winners from also-rans? Refusing to compromise on build quality while hitting a specific price point. Companies like 8 Bit Do figured this out years ago. They build premium controllers at accessible prices by optimizing manufacturing, not by cutting plastic thickness or skipping steps.
Power A's positioning suggests they think customers care primarily about price. But gaming culture has evolved. Customers care about price-to-value ratio. They want to feel like they're getting something worth the money. Power A doesn't deliver that sensation.
The Switch 2 launch is relatively new, so third-party options are still limited. But this won't last. More manufacturers will launch Switch 2 controllers. When they do, Power A needs to make a hard choice: either raise the bar on build quality or lower the price to match the perceived value. Right now, they're trying to do both, and that's failing.

PowerA's pricing at
Durability and Longevity Concerns
Third-party controllers live or die based on durability. A controller that feels cheap but lasts five years is better than one that feels premium but dies in 18 months.
The Power A Advantage Wireless has Hall effect sticks, which addresses the stick drift problem that plagued earlier Switch controllers. That's good. But the plastic build, the button placement, and the overall construction suggest this controller won't age gracefully.
Think about what happens to plastic that flexes constantly. It fatigues. After a year or two of heavy use, that hollow plastic is going to start showing signs of wear. Cracks in the seams, loose buttons, creaking sounds. You see this pattern across Power A's product line—they have a reputation for controllers that feel okay for the first few months, then deteriorate rapidly.
The official Pro Controller might feel cold and corporate, but it holds up. People report using the same Pro Controller for three, four, even five years without major issues. That durability is part of what justifies the price.
For the Power A, I'd expect genuine reliability problems around the two-year mark. Your mileage may vary depending on usage, but that's the typical trajectory for controllers built this way.

Real-World Gaming Performance Across Titles
I tested the Power A across various genres to see how well it handles different demands. Here's what I found.
Action Games (The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom): The shallow triggers and abrasive stick tips became noticeable during intense combat sequences. You don't get the precision you'd want for quick inputs. Totally playable, but frustrating if you're used to better controllers.
Racing (Mario Kart 8): Motion steering works well, which is important since Mario Kart leans heavily on gyro controls. The analog triggers make a difference here—you want smooth acceleration control, and the shallow travel made it harder to feather the gas. The stiff stick feel actually works better for the snappy inputs racing games need.
Rhythm (Nintendo Switch Sports): The motion controls are responsive enough for tennis and bowling. Not precision-instrument level, but solid enough that you won't feel like the game is fighting your inputs. This is probably where the controller performs best.
Exploration/Adventure: The Start/Select button issue becomes most apparent in games with frequent menu access. You'll hit it pretty regularly, and every single time you need a hand reposition.
Wireless Connectivity and Input Lag
One thing Power A did right is the wireless implementation. The controller uses standard 2.4 GHz wireless, which is reliable and has minimal latency. During testing, I noticed zero input lag—button presses registered immediately with no noticeable delay.
Connection stability was solid. The controller maintained a connection from 25+ feet away, even with obstacles between the controller and the console. Wireless gaming shouldn't feel different from wired, and it doesn't with the Power A. That's not an accomplishment; that's table stakes. But it's worth confirming they nailed the basics.

The Feature Set: What You Actually Get
On paper, the feature list looks respectable. You get all the buttons a Switch 2 needs—dual joysticks, four face buttons, four shoulder buttons, plus the new C button. Two rear buttons are remappable, which adds some customization. Motion controls work. Haptics are present. Battery is huge.
But in practice, several features feel half-implemented. The rear buttons are handy for advanced players, but the button mapping software is clunky. The haptics are there but barely noticeable. The motion controls work but feel less refined than the Pro Controller.
This pattern repeats across the controller. Nothing is broken, but nothing is particularly polished either. It's like the controller went through quality assurance once and then shipped.

Nintendo's Pro Controller is priced higher at $85 but is estimated to have a superior feature score compared to PowerA's options, reflecting the quality and durability differences. Estimated data.
Price Positioning Strategy Analysis
Here's what interests me about the Power A pricing: it sits in this weird middle ground between budget and premium. At
Power A could have priced this at $49.99 and dominated the budget tier. Instead, they're asking premium money for mid-tier quality. That's a positioning error. Either charge less and own the budget market, or build better and justify the premium price. Don't try to do both.
Nintendo probably sets a ceiling—nothing can cost more than the Pro Controller or customers will just buy official. Power A probably looks at manufacturing costs and sets a floor based on those costs plus profit margin. But the gap between floor and ceiling is where pricing gets strategic, and Power A made the wrong call.

Comparisons to Previous Generation Power A Controllers
One frustrating thing: Power A's wired Switch 2 controller has the exact same hollow feel, same button issues, same stick problem. The wireless version just adds those two features and raises the price $30.
This suggests Power A isn't iterating. They're not learning from feedback. They're just adding features and charging more. The original issue—the cheap hollow feel—never got addressed. That's lazy product development.
Looking back at Power A's Switch 1 controllers, the same patterns emerge. Build quality issues that never quite got resolved. Features added on top of a fundamentally cheap foundation.
Contrast this with companies like 8 Bit Do, who actively iterate and improve. Each generation feels noticeably better than the previous one. You see learning and effort.
What Works: The Hall Effect Breakthrough
Stick drift is the enemy of wireless controllers. Mechanical potentiometers—the old way of detecting stick position—wear out over time. Dust gets in, contacts degrade, and eventually the stick registers inputs even when you're not touching it.
Hall effect sensors work completely differently. They detect magnetic position without physical contact. They don't wear out. Theoretically, a stick using Hall effect components can last decades without degrading.
Power A's inclusion of Hall effect components is smart. It shows they understand what customers care about. A controller with legendary stick longevity is valuable, even if everything else is mid-tier.
The question is whether the stick durability advantage offsets the other compromises. For many customers, the answer is yes. Stick drift is annoying enough that they'd take mediocre everything else for guaranteed stick reliability.

The Ergonomic Reality: Hand Fatigue Over Time
I want to emphasize something that doesn't sound dramatic but compounds over hours of play: the ergonomic issues cause hand fatigue.
After 30 minutes, you don't notice much. After an hour, your hands start working harder. The abrasive stick tips require more grip tension. The awkward Start/Select placement means periodic hand repositioning. The slightly flexing plastic creates micro-stress as your hands unconsciously grip it tighter to feel more stable.
After a three-hour gaming session, your hands hurt slightly. Not dramatically. You're not in pain. But you definitely notice that your hands are tired. With better controllers, a three-hour session leaves your hands feeling neutral.
This matters more than you'd think. Gaming should be relaxing. When your controller makes your hands tired, it's working against the experience.
Recommendations Based on Use Case
Let me be specific about who should buy this and who shouldn't.
Skip it if you...
- Game for extended sessions (2+ hours regularly)
- Play precision-demanding games (fighting games, action RPGs)
- Want a controller that'll last 3+ years in good condition
- Have the budget for the official Pro Controller
- Prefer a premium feel in your hands
Consider it if you...
- Want Mario/Kirby/Pokémon aesthetics specifically
- Game casually for 30-60 minute sessions
- Are on a tight budget and can't stretch to the Pro Controller
- Don't mind compromising on comfort for looks
- Want reliable stick longevity as your top priority
Definitely buy it if you...
- Need a backup controller for kids or casual players
- Specifically love the design theme and have realistic expectations
- Understand the ergonomic compromises and accept them

The Future of Third-Party Switch 2 Controllers
The Switch 2 controller market is young. We're going to see significant evolution over the next year or two. New manufacturers will enter. Existing players will iterate.
The Power A Advantage Wireless is an early offering, which explains some of the limitations. But early offerings should show ambition—proof that the manufacturer is pushing what's possible. Power A's offering shows the opposite: a minimal upgrade on existing designs with minimal effort on build quality.
When better options launch at similar prices (and they will), the Power A will look increasingly dated. There's no moat here. No reason to choose this over competitors besides the design themes.
Honest Assessment: The Bottom Line
The Power A Advantage Wireless Controller for Nintendo Switch 2 is functional but mediocre. It works. You can game on it. But you'll constantly feel like you could be gaming on something better.
At
The battery life and design options are genuine positives. The Hall effect sticks address a real problem. But these advantages don't overcome the hollow plastic, the ergonomic oversights, and the overall cheap feel.
If you've already bought it, it's not a disaster. You'll be fine. But if you're considering it now, look at alternatives first. Your hands will thank you, and you'll probably save money too.

FAQ
What makes the Power A Advantage Wireless different from the official Nintendo Switch 2 Pro Controller?
The Power A costs
Is the 30-hour battery life claim accurate?
Yes, testing confirms the controller delivers genuine 30-hour battery sessions between charges. This matches the official Pro Controller's battery performance and is legitimately impressive for a third-party controller. However, battery longevity over multiple years remains unknown since the controller is relatively new to the market.
Why are the Start and Select buttons positioned so poorly?
The buttons are placed at the bottom of the controller face in a cramped row alongside Capture, Home, and the C button. This design decision forces you to reposition your grip every time you need to access them, breaking gameplay flow. Better ergonomic placement would be on the upper portion of the controller, like Nintendo's Pro Controller, allowing natural access without hand repositioning.
Does the Power A work with both Nintendo Switch and Switch 2?
Yes, the controller is compatible with both original Nintendo Switch and Switch 2 consoles. However, the dedicated C button on this model is optimized for Switch 2's new features and won't be utilized on original Switch hardware.
How does the stick durability compare to other third-party controllers?
The Hall effect stick technology used by Power A is superior to mechanical potentiometers and should theoretically prevent stick drift for years. However, the abrasive plastic tip design causes faster hand fatigue and discomfort than smoother alternatives like the 8 Bit Do Ultimate 2, which also uses Hall effect components but with better overall materials.
Are there better alternatives at the $70 price point?
Absolutely. The 8 Bit Do Ultimate 2 costs around
How noticeable is the input lag for wireless gaming?
Input lag is imperceptible during testing. The 2.4 GHz wireless connection provides reliable, immediate button response with no noticeable delay compared to wired controllers. Connection stability was excellent, maintaining signal from 25+ feet away even through obstacles.
Will this controller develop stick drift like older controllers?
Stick drift risk is significantly reduced thanks to Hall effect sensors, which detect stick position magnetically rather than through physical contacts that wear out. While the long-term reliability remains unproven, this technology theoretically prevents the mechanical degradation that causes stick drift in older controllers.
Is the hollow plastic build quality acceptable for long gaming sessions?
The hollow plastic construction causes noticeable hand fatigue during extended play. The thin casing flexes under normal grip pressure, and the abrasive stick tips require tighter hand tension to feel stable. After 2-3 hour sessions, most users notice hand tiredness that doesn't occur with premium controllers. For casual 30-60 minute sessions, it's acceptable.
What's the best use case for this controller?
The Power A Advantage Wireless is best suited as a backup controller, for casual kids' gaming, or if you specifically love the Mario/Kirby/Pokémon design themes and have realistic expectations about ergonomic compromises. It's not recommended as a primary controller for serious gamers or anyone planning extended play sessions.
Key Takeaways
- At 40 controller due to hollow plastic construction that flexes under normal grip pressure
- Ergonomic failures including cramped Start/Select buttons force constant hand repositioning during gameplay
- 30-hour battery life and Hall effect sticks are legitimate strengths that address real concerns
- Better alternatives exist at the same price point: 8BitDo Ultimate 2 ($60) offers superior build quality and features
- The official Pro Controller at 15 more expensive and dramatically outperforms the PowerA in materials, ergonomics, and polish
Related Articles
- Switch 2 Joy-Con Comfort Problem: Nyxi Hyperion 3 Solution [2025]
- Anbernic RG G01 Controller: Built-In Screen & Health Monitoring [2025]
- Hori Adventure Pack Nintendo Switch 2 Review [2025]
- Best Nintendo Switch 2 Accessories [2025]
- Joy-Con 2 Color Variants: Light Purple and Green Coming [2025]
- Razer Project Madison Gaming Chair: The Future of Immersive Gaming [2025]
![PowerA Advantage Wireless Controller Nintendo Switch 2 Review [2025]](https://tryrunable.com/blog/powera-advantage-wireless-controller-nintendo-switch-2-revie/image-1-1769279866563.jpg)


