Ask Runable forDesign-Driven General AI AgentTry Runable For Free
Runable
Back to Blog
Technology7 min read

"Protecting children online is a parental responsibility, not a regulatory one" — the VPN industry reacts to Government VPN spending amid discussions on restricting child VPN use | TechRadar

Following our exclusive research, how does the VPN industry see the UK Government's actions? Discover insights about "protecting children online is a parental r

TechnologyInnovationBest PracticesGuideTutorial
"Protecting children online is a parental responsibility, not a regulatory one" — the VPN industry reacts to Government VPN spending amid discussions on restricting child VPN use | TechRadar
Listen to Article
0:00
0:00
0:00

"Protecting children online is a parental responsibility, not a regulatory one" — the VPN industry reacts to Government VPN spending amid discussions on restricting child VPN use | Tech Radar

Overview

News, deals, reviews, guides and more on the newest smartphones

News, deals, reviews, guides and more on the newest computing gadgets

Details

Start exploring exclusive deals, expert advice and more

Unlock and manage exclusive Techradar member rewards.

"Protecting children online is a parental responsibility, not a regulatory one" — the VPN industry reacts to Government VPN spending amid discussions on restricting child VPN use

Following our exclusive research, how does the VPN industry see the UK Government's actions?

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.

Unlock instant access to exclusive member features.

Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.

We recently uncovered that the UK Government is spending millions on VPNs despite ongoing discussions around VPN bans for children.

While much of that spending relates to corporate VPNs – used mostly to allow access to internal intranets and secure resources while working from home – many instances relate to consumer VPNs too.

VPNs focus mainly on privacy. They hide internet traffic data from internet service providers and snoopers alike. But their use has now been associated with getting around geo-restricted content blocks, including material that has now been age-restricted within the UK.

UK government may 'age restrict or limit children’s VPN use' following three-month consultation

Investigation: UK spends millions on VPNs as government weighs ban for children

VPN companies 'open to meaningful dialogue' with UK government during children's online safety consultation

This week, I contacted some of companies behind the best VPNs to see just how big an impact the UK Government's attitude could have on the industry, and what needs to be rectified.

As Yegor Sak, Co-founder and CEO of Windscribe, put it:

“The core contradiction your research highlights is hard to ignore. The UK government spends millions on VPN technology to protect its own data while exploring policies that would restrict the same technology for everyone else."

"It’s encouraging to see the Government and regulators like Ofsted and Ofcom endorsing the use of VPNs," began David Peterson, General Manager of Proton VPN.

"Their investment highlights the role of VPNs as essential cybersecurity and privacy tools."

But, as was highlighted by Pete Membrey, Chief Research Officer at Express VPN, "Consumer VPNs use the same underlying technology [as corporate VPNs] for the same purpose."

"If VPNs are trusted to protect government systems and sensitive data, it is difficult to justify denying individuals access to the same protection."

“Not equipped to handle that responsibility”: the VPN industry reacts to Tech Radar's latest research

'No approach is a silver bullet' — UK launches online safety consultation that could see VPNs age-restricted

'The UK war on VPNs is an embarrassment' – backlash grows over proposed VPN age-checks

So why limit the availability of these tools for consumers if they're trusted at the highest levels?

As Membrey notes, "secure network access is not a special entitlement reserved for institutions."

The Government's primary concern remains circumventing age verification. But, as Windscribe's Sak put it, "kids are resourceful" and "will find workarounds for any technical restriction".

VPN adoption rose in the wake of the arrival of UK age verification measures. Proton VPN recorded spikes of over 1400%, while several untrustworthy free VPNs also shot to the top of app stores.

These untrustworthy providers are notoriously capable of slipping through nets intended to catch them. They’re often circulated via social media links on forums, without any formal verification of their safety.

Restricting reputable VPN providers could backfire..."David Peterson, General Manager of Proton VPN

Restricting reputable VPN providers could backfire..."

As Sak suggests, if VPN restrictions do come into place, it’s more than likely that children would remain exposed to them. However, instead of being directed towards trustworthy solutions, they’d directed to more harmful products, with safer VPNs of better repute adhere to the new regulations.

This problem would also expand beyond children. As Proton's David Peterson explains:

“Restricting reputable VPN providers could backfire, pushing privacy-conscious users toward less transparent alternatives, some linked to authoritarian regimes which are known to exploit user and corporate data through intrusive surveillance."

In our research, it became clear that despite the corporate solutions available, many top individuals, including Labour MPs, were using consumer VPNs instead.

These same solutions are those that would be restricted for children should the discussions be successful.

VPNs would be required to break their no-logs policies to identify and separate user activity and ID, a move no provider would support. This would also compromise the security capabilities these tools are built to achieve.

Fixing the problem may require different means outside of restrictions because, as Sak notes, “children face real threats online that VPNs actively protect against.”

Removing VPN protection leaves huge potential for children to be exposed to tracking, data harvesting, and malicious content — all of which could have huge ramifications on their wellbeing.

“The government's energy would be better spent helping parents understand and use the tools already available to them” Sak continued.

"Protecting children is a parental responsibility, not a regulatory one."

According to Sak, solutions being considered, such as locking VPNs behind age checks, would have an inverse effect — “asking privacy tools to become surveillance tools”.

For the moment, there’s little more that VPNs themselves can do to tackle these issues. Providers such as Nord VPN and Express VPN have introduced parental control functionalities to offer secure limitations for families.

The technology is also yet to exist to allow for safe age verification within VPNs themselves, and, even if it were, Membrey notes, “Limiting access does not remove risk - it shifts it onto users, leaving them more exposed online without addressing the underlying harms.”

Rob is Tech Radar's VPN Editor. Coming from a background in phones and technology, he's no stranger to the risks that come with putting yourself online. Over years of using different platforms, testing the limits of his online persona, and feeling the brunt of several data breaches, Rob has gained a keen understanding of cybersecurity and the benefits of services such as VPNs in providing a secure online experience. He uses this to not only advise on the best ways to stay secure online but also share his own experiences and especially how to avoid trouble. Outside of work, you'll find Rob on the tennis courts, in the gym, or diving into the biggest and best games of the year. To share a story or tip, email robert.dunne@futurenet.com

You must confirm your public display name before commenting

1'I'm not missing the four hours of daily prosthetics': For All Mankind season 5 star on 'challenges' in new Apple TV show Imperfect Women

2'We know exactly where we are going and exactly what we want to do' — The Division 3 senior producer suggests fans shouldn't worry about the departure of the game's executive producer, confirming its roadmap has been 'planned and secured for some time'

3 Hasbro hit by major cyberattack — toymaker confirms 'unfortunate incident' takes down some parts of its websites

4 Kitchen Aid's new premium stand mixer has one brilliant feature I didn't realize I needed in my baking

5'Time to unsubscribe' — Netflix made a big change to its Apple TV app, removing a ton of useful functions

Tech Radar is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site.

© Future US, Inc. Full 7th Floor, 130 West 42nd Street, New York, NY 10036.

Key Takeaways

  • News, deals, reviews, guides and more on the newest smartphones
  • News, deals, reviews, guides and more on the newest computing gadgets
  • Start exploring exclusive deals, expert advice and more
  • Unlock and manage exclusive Techradar member rewards
  • "Protecting children online is a parental responsibility, not a regulatory one" — the VPN industry reacts to Government VPN spending amid discussions on restricting child VPN use

Cut Costs with Runable

Cost savings are based on average monthly price per user for each app.

Which apps do you use?

Apps to replace

ChatGPTChatGPT
$20 / month
LovableLovable
$25 / month
Gamma AIGamma AI
$25 / month
HiggsFieldHiggsField
$49 / month
Leonardo AILeonardo AI
$12 / month
TOTAL$131 / month

Runable price = $9 / month

Saves $122 / month

Runable can save upto $1464 per year compared to the non-enterprise price of your apps.