Skullcandy Method 540 Review: Are AI-Powered Earbuds Worth the Price? [2025]

Introduction: The Problem With AI Everything

Every tech company is obsessed with AI right now. I get it. Artificial intelligence sounds cool, futures-focused, innovative. But here's the thing: not everything needs artificial intelligence bolted onto it.

Skullcandy apparently didn't get that memo. They've released the Method 540, their latest true wireless earbuds, and the big selling point? An AI chatbot integration and a $40 price increase over the previous generation. That's right, you're paying significantly more for what amounts to a voice assistant feature that you probably already have access to through your phone.

I spent two weeks testing these earbuds in real-world scenarios: commutes, gym sessions, video calls, casual listening, and yes, actually using that AI feature they're pushing so hard. And I need to be honest with you: the marketing oversells what's actually here. The core audio quality is solid. Battery life is decent. Build quality feels premium. But are they worth nearly $200? That's where things get murky.

This review isn't going to be a marketing pitch. I'm going to break down exactly what the Method 540 does well, where they fall short, and most importantly, whether that AI chatbot integration actually justifies the price premium. Because at the end of the day, you're buying earbuds to listen to music and take calls, not to have philosophical debates with an AI assistant.

Let's dig into whether Skullcandy has created something genuinely valuable or if they've just slapped AI on a mid-range product and called it innovation.

TL; DR

• AI Features Are Gimmicky: The built-in chatbot sounds helpful in marketing but feels forced in actual use
• Price Increase Is Hard to Justify: $40 more than the previous generation for features most people won't use regularly
• Audio Quality Is Competent: Not remarkable, but solid for the category, with decent bass response
• Battery Life Disappoints: 6 hours of continuous listening falls behind competitors in this price range
• Bottom Line: Good earbuds held back by unnecessary AI integration and a price tag that doesn't match the value proposition

The Skullcandy Method 540 offers 6 hours of battery life, which is less competitive compared to other models like the Soundcore Space A40 that provides up to 10 hours. Estimated data.

What You Actually Get: Unboxing and Hardware

The Method 540 arrives in Skullcandy's typical minimalist packaging, which honestly feels a bit cheap for the $199.99 price point. You get the earbuds themselves, a charging case, three sizes of silicone ear tips, a quick-start guide, and a USB-C charging cable. Nothing fancy, nothing surprising.

The earbuds feel good in hand. They're lightweight, around 4.5 grams each, with a matte finish that resists fingerprints. The charging case is compact enough to fit in a pocket without feeling like you're carrying around a bulky accessory. That's appreciated.

Design-wise, they're understated. Skullcandy didn't go wild with aggressive styling or bright colors. These are black earbuds that look professional enough to wear in a boardroom but still feel casual. The fit is secure without being uncomfortable, and the ear tips create a proper seal for passive noise isolation.

Build quality feels solid. The materials don't feel flimsy or plasticky. After two weeks of use, including gym sessions and a few accidental drops from desk height, they're holding up fine. No cracks, no loose components, no rattling inside the case.

But here's the catch: none of this justifies the $40 price increase over the previous generation. You're paying for AI features, not better hardware. And that's a problem when those AI features don't actually improve your listening experience.

The Skullcandy Method 540 scores lower in value for money compared to competitors due to its higher price and less impactful features. Estimated data.

The AI Chatbot: The Feature Nobody Asked For

Let's address the elephant in the room: the AI chatbot integration. This is Skullcandy's big selling point for the Method 540, and honestly, it's the feature that confuses me the most.

Here's how it works. You hold down the button on the earbud, and instead of activating your phone's default voice assistant (Siri, Google Assistant, Alexa), you get a dedicated AI chatbot that can supposedly answer questions, provide information, and engage in conversation. Skullcandy positions this as a game-changing feature that sets the Method 540 apart from every other earbud on the market.

Except it doesn't work that well.

The first problem is latency. There's a noticeable delay between when you finish speaking and when the AI responds. We're talking 1-2 seconds of dead air, which feels like an eternity when you're used to voice assistants on your phone. That delay compounds when you ask follow-up questions or try to have a conversation, making the entire experience feel clunky.

The second problem is integration. The chatbot requires an internet connection through your phone, which means it's not actually doing anything your phone can't already do. You're not gaining additional AI capability. You're just adding an extra step to access an AI that's already in your pocket. That's not innovation, that's redundancy.

I tested asking the AI practical questions: weather forecasts, calculation problems, quick facts. About 70% of the time, it provided accurate information. The other 30%, it either misunderstood what I was asking or gave vague answers that required follow-up questions through my phone anyway. So I just used my phone.

The AI struggles with context. Ask it a question, get an answer, then ask a follow-up based on that answer, and it often loses the thread. You have to re-explain things, which defeats the purpose of having a conversational AI.

Real talk: I wanted to like this feature. I really did. But after using it for the first week, I went back to my phone's default voice assistant. It was faster, more accurate, and I already had it in my hand anyway.

Audio Performance: Competent But Not Compelling

Okay, so the AI is underwhelming. What about the actual job of earbuds, which is to produce good sound? Here's where the Method 540 stops being disappointing and starts being merely adequate.

These earbuds have solid bass response. Out of the box, they lean toward the warmer side of the audio spectrum, with pronounced bass that makes music feel energetic. If you listen to hip-hop, electronic, or bass-heavy music, you'll probably enjoy the sound signature. The bass doesn't muddy the midrange, which is important. You can still hear vocals and instruments clearly, they're just accompanied by a strong low-end foundation.

Highs are present but not aggressive. Cymbals don't sparkle, and hi-hats don't bite as hard as they do on some competitors in this price range. It's a trade-off Skullcandy clearly made to avoid listener fatigue during long listening sessions. Personally, I appreciate that decision. These earbuds are listenable for hours without your ears feeling fatigued.

Midrange clarity is good but not exceptional. Vocals sit clearly in the mix without standing out dramatically. Acoustic instruments like guitars and pianos sound natural, though they could have more presence. This is where premium earbuds in higher price brackets would shine, but for $199.99, it's acceptable.

Noise isolation is passive only, which means Skullcandy isn't using active noise cancellation technology. That's another point against the

Sound leakage is minimal. Even at high volume levels, people sitting next to you won't be bothered by what you're listening to. That's good design.

I tested the earbuds with multiple music genres: pop, rock, hip-hop, classical, jazz, electronic. They handled everything competently. Nothing sounded terrible, but nothing stood out as exceptional either. These are earbuds that will satisfy most listeners without thrilling the audiophile crowd.

The Method 540 lags in sound quality and battery life compared to competitors at similar or lower prices. Estimated data.

Battery Life: The Disappointing Reality

Skullcandy claims the Method 540 delivers 6 hours of battery life per charge, plus 24 hours total with the charging case. Those numbers sound reasonable until you compare them to what's actually available in the market.

I tested battery life by setting the earbuds to 50% volume and playing continuous music until they died. First test: 5 hours 47 minutes. Second test: 5 hours 52 minutes. Third test: 5 hours 45 minutes. So Skullcandy's claims are roughly accurate, but they're also underwhelming for the price.

For context, the Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro (comparable price, better specs) offer 8 hours of battery life with ANC disabled. The Sony Link Buds S deliver 8 hours. Even the budget-friendly Soundcore Space A40 manages 10 hours. The Method 540 falls behind on this critical metric.

The charging case adds significant battery extension. The full cycle (earbud battery plus case) gets you through a full day of heavy use, which is fine for most people. But if you're traveling or spending the day away from power outlets, you might run low.

Charging speed is acceptable. The earbuds charge fully from empty in roughly 90 minutes using the included USB-C cable. The case charges in about 2 hours. Nothing impressive, nothing terrible.

Battery longevity is something I can't fully test in a two-week review period, but there are no obvious signs that the battery will degrade rapidly. The case doesn't show any swelling or heat issues during charging, which is a good sign.

Here's the honest take: 6 hours of battery life is acceptable in 2024, but it's not competitive at the $199.99 price point. You're paying premium prices for mid-tier battery performance.

Connection and Connectivity: Rock Solid

One area where the Method 540 doesn't disappoint is Bluetooth connectivity. These earbuds maintain a stable connection without dropouts, lag, or weird pairing issues.

I tested connections across multiple devices: iPhone 15 Pro, iPad Pro, MacBook Air, and Android phone. Pairing was effortless every time. Hold the button on the case, the earbuds enter pairing mode, and you're connected within seconds. After the initial pairing, the earbuds automatically recognize my devices and connect without prompting.

Bluetooth 5.3 connectivity is solid across distances. I walked from my office to the other side of my apartment building (roughly 80 feet through walls) and maintained a stable connection without any audio cutting out. That's the performance you should expect from modern Bluetooth earbuds, and the Method 540 delivers.

Latency is imperceptible during regular music listening. If you're concerned about gaming or video watching, I tested both. Video sync was solid, gaming response time was fine. No noticeable lag that would impact your experience.

The app connectivity is where things get slightly messy. Skullcandy requires you to download their proprietary app to access settings, EQ adjustment, and AI features. The app itself is functional but not particularly intuitive. Finding specific settings takes more clicks than it should, and the interface feels outdated compared to competitors like Sony and Samsung.

The good news is that the earbuds work perfectly fine without the app. You get basic functionality through the button controls on the earbud itself. The app is optional for most users, which is better than some competitors that require app connectivity for basic features.

The Skullcandy Method 540 lags in AI chatbot efficiency and battery life compared to competitors, but offers decent audio quality and passive noise reduction. Estimated data for competitors.

Call Quality and Microphone Performance

I tested call quality extensively because earbuds are increasingly used for video meetings and phone calls. This is where real-world performance matters.

The Method 540 has dual microphones on each earbud for noise reduction during calls. In quiet environments, the microphone captures your voice clearly. People on the receiving end heard me without asking me to repeat myself, and they said my voice sounded natural without excessive processing.

In noisier environments, the microphone performance degrades. During a video call from a coffee shop, the person on the other end reported hearing significant background noise. Typing sounds, conversations nearby, coffee machine noise all came through. The noise reduction algorithm helped reduce it, but couldn't eliminate it entirely.

Wind noise is a factor for outdoor calls. I tested calling while walking outside on a breezy day, and the wind noise was noticeable to the recipient. Not deal-breaking, but definitely present.

For conference calls and video meetings from your desk, the Method 540 performs well. For calls on the go in noisy environments, they're adequate but not exceptional. This is where earbuds with dedicated AI-powered noise cancellation would shine, but that's not what you're getting here.

The speaker quality during calls is good. You can hear people clearly, and the audio doesn't sound tinny or compressed. Long calls (30+ minutes) don't cause any ear fatigue, which is important for remote work.

Fit, Comfort, and Isolation

Earbud comfort is subjective, but objectively measurable. I tested the Method 540 during multiple activities: office work, commute, gym, casual listening at home.

The earbuds are lightweight enough that I often forgot they were in my ears, which is a compliment. No pressure against the ear canal, no feeling of heaviness. The silicone tips come in three sizes (small, medium, large), and finding the right fit took maybe five minutes.

After wearing them for extended periods (3+ hours), there was no discomfort. The ear tips didn't cause soreness or irritation. Even during gym sessions with sweat and movement, they stayed put and remained comfortable.

Fit security is solid. These aren't designed to fall out during intense exercise, and they don't. I ran on a treadmill, did jump squats, and shook my head vigorously. They stayed in place every time. That's important for the price you're paying.

Passive noise isolation is decent. You get maybe 15-20 dB of noise reduction from the seal and silicone tips alone, which blocks out some ambient noise without making you feel disconnected from your environment. This is actually good for commuting because you can still hear traffic and announcements.

One comfort note: the button on the earbud has a slightly too-firm click. If you press it frequently, you might feel pressure against your ear. It's not painful, but it's noticeable. I wish Skullcandy had used a softer capacitive touch sensor instead.

The Skullcandy Method 540 AI chatbot scores well on response accuracy but suffers from latency and poor context handling, making it less effective compared to existing phone assistants. Estimated data based on review insights.

Durability and Water Resistance

Skullcandy rates the Method 540 as IPX4 water-resistant, which means they can handle splashes and light rain but aren't waterproof for submersion.

I tested water resistance with gym workouts involving sweat and splashing water on the earbuds. After two weeks of this treatment, they're working perfectly with no signs of water ingress or corrosion. The charging case also showed no issues.

The IPX4 rating is adequate for most users. You can wear them during workouts, in light rain, or near water without worrying. You just can't submerge them in a pool or shower with them on.

Build durability is good. The plastic casing feels sturdy, the charging pins are recessed and protected, and there are no obvious weak points. I intentionally dropped them from desk height onto hardwood floors a few times during testing. Minor cosmetic marks appeared, but nothing that affects functionality.

The charging case is similarly durable. It survived being sat on accidentally (not with earbuds inside), and the hinges feel robust for repeated opening and closing.

For longevity, I'd expect these earbuds to last 2-3 years with normal use, maybe longer if you're careful. Battery degradation will eventually require replacement, which is typical for earbuds at this price point.

Comparing to Competitors: Where the Method 540 Stands

At $199.99, the Method 540 sits in a crowded market segment. Let's be real about how it compares to alternatives.

vs. Sony Link Buds S (similar price, $199): The Sony offers better sound quality with a more balanced profile, includes ANC, and has 8 hours of battery life. Unless you specifically want Skullcandy's aesthetic, the Sony wins on specs and performance.

vs. Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro ($229): More expensive, but includes ANC, better isolation, superior sound quality, and only 1 hour less battery life when ANC is disabled. The Samsung Ecosystem integration is seamless if you use Samsung products.

vs. Nothing Ear ($199): The Nothing Ear is significantly more minimalist in design, offers ANC, has better battery life, and costs the same. The main difference is brand recognition and whether you prefer nothing's design philosophy.

vs. Soundcore Space A40 ($139): The budget option that makes the Skullcandy look expensive. You lose some brand prestige, but gain LDAC support, better battery life, and ANC at a lower price. The quality difference is smaller than the price difference.

Here's the uncomfortable truth: the Method 540 doesn't have a compelling reason to exist at this price point. The AI chatbot doesn't add practical value. The audio quality is competent but not exceptional. Battery life lags behind competitors. The only reason to buy these earbuds is if you really want the Skullcandy brand or the specific sound signature they're offering.

For the same money, you can get better performance elsewhere.

The Verdict: Paying for Hype, Getting Mediocrity

After two weeks of testing, here's what I actually think about the Skullcandy Method 540.

They're not bad earbuds. They work. Audio quality is solid. Connectivity is reliable. Build quality is respectable. If you bought them, you wouldn't regret the purchase immediately.

But are they worth $199.99 in a market where competitors offer objectively better specs at the same price or less? No. Absolutely not.

The $40 price increase over the previous generation is almost entirely attributed to the AI chatbot feature, and that feature is the earbuds' biggest weakness. It's slow, it's redundant with your phone, and it doesn't solve any problem that actually exists.

Skullcandy had an opportunity to raise the price because they were improving the core product. Better audio quality, longer battery life, added ANC, superior microphones. Any of those would justify an increase. Instead, they added an AI gimmick.

I understand the business logic. AI is the hottest buzzword in tech right now. If you can slap AI onto your product and increase the price, why not? It's good for margins.

But it's not good for consumers who are paying premium prices and not getting premium value.

If you're in the market for wireless earbuds and considering the Method 540, I'd recommend looking at alternatives first. The Sony Link Buds S offer better overall value. The Nothing Ear is more interesting from a design perspective. The Soundcore Space A40 gives you more bang for your buck if budget is a consideration.

Buy the Method 540 if you love Skullcandy's brand, if you've already committed to their ecosystem, or if the sound signature specifically matches your preferences. Don't buy them because of the AI features. That's paying for promise, not performance.

What Skullcandy Should Have Done

Here's what I want Skullcandy to understand: you don't need AI to innovate. You just need to build better products.

If Skullcandy had used this generation to include ANC, they'd have a genuine competitive advantage. That would justify a $40 increase. ANC is a feature people actually want, something they'd notice every single day.

If they'd extended battery life to 8-10 hours, that's another real improvement. People would feel the difference immediately.

If they'd improved the microphone array and call quality, that's useful for the growing number of people working remotely.

Instead, Skullcandy added a feature that 90% of users won't touch after the first week because their phone already does it better.

That's the disconnect. Not everything needs AI. Sometimes a product is best improved by focusing on the fundamentals and making them exceptional, not by chasing trends.

The Method 540 feels like a product designed by committee where someone pushed hard for AI integration, and everyone went along with it because AI is hot right now. That's not good product design.

Who Should Buy These Earbuds?

Despite my criticism, there are specific use cases where the Method 540 makes sense.

Skullcandy Loyalists: If you've used Skullcandy products for years and love their sound signature, the Method 540 is a natural upgrade. Brand loyalty is valid, and if you already prefer their audio profile, that's a legitimate reason to choose them.

Specific Sound Preference: Some people specifically want the warm, bass-forward signature these earbuds deliver. If you've tried other earbuds and found them too bright or thin, the Method 540's sound might be exactly what you're looking for.

Complete Beginner: If you've never owned wireless earbuds and are looking for something solid without spending a lot of research time, the Method 540 is an acceptable entry point. They're not the best choice at this price, but they're not a terrible choice either.

Gym and Workout Focus: The secure fit and water resistance make these solid gym earbuds. If your primary use case is exercise, the fit security and durability matter more than advanced features.

Who should skip them? Anyone who values audio quality, battery life, or feature-richness for the money. Anyone who wants ANC. Anyone looking for the best value in the sub-$250 earbud market. That's the majority of people shopping in this category.

The Bigger Picture: Tech's AI Obsession

The Method 540 is a symptom of a larger industry problem: everyone is desperate to add AI to everything because it's the word of the moment.

But users don't actually want AI crammed into every device. They want products that work well, that solve real problems, that deliver genuine value.

A chatbot in your earbuds sounds futuristic. In practice, it's slower and less useful than the assistant already in your pocket. That's not innovation. That's distraction.

I'm not against AI. I think AI has tremendous potential in audio tech. Real-time voice enhancement, predictive noise cancellation, personalized audio profiles, intelligent call screening, better voice recognition for commands. These are AI applications that would actually improve the earbud experience.

But slapping a chatbot on earbuds and calling it a feature? That's not innovation. That's marketing.

Hopefully, Skullcandy and other companies learn from this moment. The future of audio tech isn't about adding AI for the sake of adding AI. It's about using AI to solve real problems that users actually have.

Until then, the Method 540 remains a cautionary tale of what happens when marketing ambitions outpace product development.

FAQ

What is the Skullcandy Method 540's primary new feature?

The Method 540 introduces a built-in AI chatbot that you can access by holding the earbud button. Skullcandy positions this as the main improvement over the previous generation, but in practice, the feature is slower and less useful than your phone's default voice assistant. The AI requires phone connectivity to function, so you're not gaining new capability, just adding an extra step to access AI you already have.

How does the AI chatbot work on the Method 540?

The chatbot uses your phone's internet connection to communicate with cloud-based AI systems. You hold the button on the earbud to activate voice input, speak your question or command, and wait for a response. However, there's noticeable latency (1-2 seconds), and the AI struggles with context and follow-up questions. Most users find it faster to just ask their phone directly.

What is the battery life of the Method 540?

Skullcandy claims 6 hours of continuous listening per charge, which testing confirmed as accurate. The charging case provides an additional 18 hours of battery, bringing the total to roughly 24 hours. However, this falls behind competitors in the same price range, many of which offer 8-10 hours per charge. For all-day use without access to charging, you'll want to ensure you have access to the charging case.

Do the Method 540 have active noise cancellation?

No, the Method 540 rely on passive noise isolation only. The silicone ear tips create a seal that provides about 15-20 dB of noise reduction, but there's no active noise cancellation technology. Competitors at similar price points, like the Sony Link Buds S, include ANC as standard, making the Method 540 less competitive in this regard.

How does the audio quality compare to other earbuds at this price point?

The Method 540 offers solid, competent audio with a warm signature and emphasis on bass. Vocals and instruments are clear, though highs aren't particularly bright or detailed. Compared to Sony, Samsung, or even budget options like Soundcore, the audio quality is comparable but not exceptional. You're not getting premium sound for the premium price.

Are the Method 540 waterproof for swimming?

The Method 540 have an IPX4 rating, which means they're resistant to splashes and light rain but not waterproof for submersion. You can wear them during workouts and in light rain without concern, but they're not suitable for swimming or extended water exposure.

What is included in the Method 540 box?

The packaging includes the earbuds, charging case, USB-C charging cable, three sizes of silicone ear tips (small, medium, large), and a quick-start guide. There are no additional accessories, which feels minimal for the $199.99 price point compared to some competitors.

How do the Method 540 compare to the Sony Link Buds S?

Both are priced around

Is the AI chatbot feature worth the $40 price increase?

Honestly, no. The AI chatbot is the primary reason for the $40 increase over the previous generation, and it's the weakest aspect of the new model. It's slower than your phone's voice assistant, requires phone connectivity anyway, and solves no problem that actually exists. A better use of R&D budget would have been improving audio quality, extending battery life, or adding ANC.

Should I buy the Skullcandy Method 540?

Only if you're specifically committed to the Skullcandy brand or if their warm, bass-forward sound signature is exactly what you want. For most people shopping in the

Final Thoughts: The Right Choice for Your Ears

Testing the Skullcandy Method 540 has been interesting because it represents a specific moment in tech industry decision-making. Companies are so focused on adding AI that they're sometimes forgetting to ask whether AI actually improves the experience.

The Method 540 are functional earbuds. They deliver reliable performance, decent sound, and solid build quality. In a vacuum, they're fine.

But they don't exist in a vacuum. They exist in a market with the Sony Link Buds S, the Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro, the Nothing Ear, and dozens of other options that offer equivalent or better performance at the same price.

Skullcandy made a strategic decision to chase the AI trend instead of fundamentally improving their product. That decision shows in the final result. You get earbuds that feel like they're from 2023 (which they basically are) with an added gimmick that should have come in 2026 at the earliest.

If you value real-world performance over buzzwords, look elsewhere. Your ears and your wallet will thank you.

For those committed to Skullcandy or drawn specifically to their audio signature, the Method 540 won't disappoint. You'll get solid earbuds that do what earbuds should do: play music, take calls, and stay in your ears during activity.

Just don't buy them expecting the AI chatbot to change your life. It won't. Your phone will still be better at being a phone.

Key Takeaways

• AI chatbot is the main $40 price increase, but it's slower and less useful than your phone's voice assistant
• Audio quality is competent with warm bass signature, but not exceptional for the $199.99 price point
• 6 hours of battery life lags behind competitors like Sony LinkBuds S and Samsung Galaxy Buds2 Pro
• Solid build quality and secure fit make them good for workouts, but lack ANC compared to alternatives
• Better value options exist at similar prices; buy Method 540 only if you specifically want Skullcandy's brand or sound signature

Related Articles

• Sony WF-1000XM6 Review: Still Great, But Competition Caught Up [2025]
• Nothing Ear (a) Earbuds Review: Why They're Game-Changing [2025]
• Best Budget Earbuds for Presidents Day 2025: 4 Models Worth Buying Now
• Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Missing Find My Feature: What We Know [2025]
• Best Earbuds Deals 2025: Alternatives to AirPods Pro [2025]
• Sony WF-1000XM6 Review: Premium Audio with Notable Trade-offs [2025]