Ask Runable forDesign-Driven General AI AgentTry Runable For Free
Runable
Back to Blog
Technology6 min read

Taylor Swift is taking legal action against the rising threat of AI misuse — here’s why the singer has filed trademark applications to protect her identity | TechRadar

When it comes to AI, you can't just shake it off Discover insights about taylor swift is taking legal action against the rising threat of ai misuse — here’s why

TechnologyInnovationBest PracticesGuideTutorial
Taylor Swift is taking legal action against the rising threat of AI misuse — here’s why the singer has filed trademark applications to protect her identity | TechRadar
Listen to Article
0:00
0:00
0:00

Taylor Swift is taking legal action against the rising threat of AI misuse — here’s why the singer has filed trademark applications to protect her identity | Tech Radar

Overview

News, deals, reviews, guides and more on the newest computing gadgets

Start exploring exclusive deals, expert advice and more

Details

Unlock and manage exclusive Techradar member rewards.

Unlock instant access to exclusive member features.

Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.

Taylor Swift is taking legal action against the rising threat of AI misuse — here’s why the singer has filed trademark applications to protect her identity

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.

Taylor Swift has filed three trademark applications to protect her sound and image from AI deepfakes

It follows Matthew Mc Conaughey's filings from January

Her trademarks reflect the industry's increasing concerns, but smaller artists are still feeling the burn

AI interpretations are on the rise, and Taylor Swift is the latest artist to take a legal stance against the increasing threats.

Acting on behalf of the singer, Swift’s company TAS Management filed three trademark applications with the US Patent and Trademark Office on April 24, two of which relate to sound trademarks protecting Swift’s voice represented by the phrases ‘Hey, it's Taylor Swift’ and ‘Hey, it’s Taylor’ — which she’s known for saying several times during her live performances.

The third trademark relates to visual protections, where a photo of her ‘holding a pink guitar, with a black strap and wearing a multi-colored iridescent bodysuit with silver boots’ (as described in the application) has been used to represent her image. The filings were first spotted by intellectual property attorney Josh Gerben, but Swift’s team has yet to provide a comment on the status of the applications.

Sony Music removes 135,000 deepfake songs from streaming platforms

Here are 3 ways to spot AI-generated music in Spotify, and where you can report it

At the moment, it’s quite an uncertain time to be a musician, or any public figure in entertainment for that matter, and Swift’s latest legal action shows how increasingly concerned artists are becoming for the safeguarding of their identities against AI. But Swift isn’t the first one to take action in this way.

Just like musicians, actors have also expressed concerns about losing control over their identities — the most recent example being Matthew Mc Conaughey. Earlier this year, Mc Conaughey trademarked himself saying ‘alright, alright, alright’ (his famous catchphrase from the 1993 movie Dazed and Confused) to implement tighter legal safeguards to make it easier to challenge potential AI misinterpretations.

If they were to be approved, Swift’s trademarks will provide similar protections according to Gerben’s blog post. “Theoretically, if a lawsuit were to be filed over an AI using Swift’s voice, she could claim that any use of her voice that sounds like the registered trademark violates her trademark rights,” he details.

Given her international status, there's no doubt that Swift’s trademark requests will be granted to warrant her safety, but not all artists have this privilege, and it’s the lesser-known musicians that are falling victim to fraudulent AI impersonations.

Back in January, folk singer Murphy Campbell faced every artist’s worst nightmare when she found a number of songs listed on her Spotify page that she had recorded, but never released, The Verge reported. She recalled noticing something ‘off’ about the vocals, and after running songs through multiple AI detectors, she concluded that they were AI-generated using live performance videos of the unreleased songs she uploaded to You Tube.

Although the fraudulent songs no longer appear to be available on platforms such as Apple Music, Campbell’s concerns are far from relaxed as there’s still a number of impersonation profiles with the same name — highlighting the responsibility that the best music streaming services have to protect their artists. As a result, Spotify has since rolled out a new approval system for artists that gives them control over what music appears on their profile. This will allow artists to approve and decline music when it’s submitted to Spotify in their name, helping to filter out any AI impersonations and deepfakes.

Despite the rise of these kinds of safety measures, the uncertainty of AI misuse will remain a worry for those in entertainment until firmer regulations are clamped down. Now that the biggest pop star in the world has kick-started her stance against AI imitation, it could serve as a catalyst for an influx of similar filings from other big artists with big reputations to protect.

Follow Tech Radar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds.

Rowan is an Editorial Associate and Apprentice Writer for Tech Radar. A recent addition to the news team, he is involved in generating stories for topics that spread across Tech Radar's categories. His interests in audio tech and knowledge in entertainment culture help bring the latest updates in tech news to our readers.

You must confirm your public display name before commenting

1I tested the DJI Mic Mini 2 and the thing that excited me the most is the new low pricing — there’s no better value small wireless mic

2'Please be fake' — Play Station fans panic as Sony seemingly introduces ridiculous new '30-day license check' on digital games

3‘The future has arrived’: China’s power grid will soon be run by an army of humanoid robots and robot dogs as state announces $1 billion investment in 8,500 robo-helpers

4 Taylor Swift is taking legal action against the rising threat of AI misuse — here’s why the singer has filed trademark applications to protect her identity

5‘This will not end well’: Apple App Store gets new ‘more affordable’ monthly subscriptions, but not all i Phone owners are convinced

Tech Radar is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site.

© Future US, Inc. Full 7th Floor, 130 West 42nd Street, New York, NY 10036.

Key Takeaways

  • News, deals, reviews, guides and more on the newest computing gadgets
  • Start exploring exclusive deals, expert advice and more
  • Unlock and manage exclusive Techradar member rewards
  • Unlock instant access to exclusive member features
  • Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards

Cut Costs with Runable

Cost savings are based on average monthly price per user for each app.

Which apps do you use?

Apps to replace

ChatGPTChatGPT
$20 / month
LovableLovable
$25 / month
Gamma AIGamma AI
$25 / month
HiggsFieldHiggsField
$49 / month
Leonardo AILeonardo AI
$12 / month
TOTAL$131 / month

Runable price = $9 / month

Saves $122 / month

Runable can save upto $1464 per year compared to the non-enterprise price of your apps.