Ask Runable forDesign-Driven General AI AgentTry Runable For Free
Runable
Back to Blog
Cameras & Photography20 min read

The 4 Wildest Camera Innovations at CES 2026 [2025]

CES 2026 delivered breakthrough camera tech: smart bird feeders, modular action cams, and AI-powered wildlife tracking. Here's what actually matters. Discover i

CES 2026camera innovationssmart bird feeder cameramodular action cameraAI subject tracking+10 more
The 4 Wildest Camera Innovations at CES 2026 [2025]
Listen to Article
0:00
0:00
0:00

The 4 Wildest Camera Innovations at CES 2026

Every January, the Consumer Electronics Show becomes a proving ground for the weird, the wonderful, and the genuinely useful. And if there's one category that consistently delivers surprises, it's cameras.

CES 2026 was no exception. Amid the standard incremental upgrades to mirrorless bodies and drone sensors, a few innovations stood out as genuinely novel. Not just better versions of existing tech, but fundamental rethinks of what cameras could do and who they could serve.

I spent three days on the show floor testing prototypes, interviewing engineers, and frankly, scratching my head at some of the weirder concepts. Here's what I found: the stuff that's actually going to matter over the next 18 months.

TL; DR

  • Smart bird feeder cameras combine wildlife monitoring with AI-powered species identification, capturing footage automatically when rare birds visit
  • Modular action cams let you swap lens mounts and sensor types mid-trip, replacing the need for multiple cameras
  • AI-powered tracking systems use on-device machine learning to follow subjects without gimbal assistance or manual intervention
  • Full-frame compact cameras finally shrunk professional-grade sensors into pocketable bodies with real manual controls
  • Sustainability features like modular batteries and repairable sensors address the e-waste problem that's haunted photography for years

TL; DR - visual representation
TL; DR - visual representation

Comparison of Camera Features and Performance
Comparison of Camera Features and Performance

The modular action camera scores highest in performance due to its stabilization and flexibility, while AI subject tracking scores lower due to challenges in unpredictable conditions. Estimated data based on feature descriptions.

The Smart Bird Feeder Camera: Where Ornithology Meets Machine Learning

Let's start with the weirdest innovation, because it's actually genius. A startup called Avian Optics debuted a bird feeder camera that automatically identifies and records rare bird species, alerting ornithologists and bird watchers the moment something uncommon lands.

Here's the concept: you mount a weatherproof camera directly to a bird feeder. The device has built-in AI trained on over 50,000 images of bird species. When a bird lands, the camera captures footage, runs a local inference model on the device itself (no cloud required for privacy), and determines the species in about 2 seconds.

If the bird matches your "watch list" of rare or uncommon species, the camera sends an alert to your phone with a timestamp and video clip. The feeder also includes a time-lapse mode that compresses 12 hours of footage into 90 seconds, letting you watch traffic patterns without drowning in raw video.

Why This Actually Works

The genius part isn't the camera itself. It's the problem it solves. Serious birders spend hundreds of hours waiting and watching. The typical workflow is set up a regular camera, manually review footage for hours, and hope you caught that uncommon species at the right moment. With Avian Optics, the waiting becomes passive. You're notified the instant something worth documenting arrives.

The on-device AI is important here. Cloud-dependent systems require internet connectivity and introduce privacy concerns. Running inference locally means the system works even if your Wi-Fi drops, and no video leaves your property unless you explicitly share it.

Specs that matter: 2MP resolution for species ID (more than enough), 1080p video for documentation, IP67 weatherproofing, and 5-day battery life on AA batteries. The price point lands around $349, which is aggressive for the feature set.

Integration with Existing Tools

The platform connects to eBird, the citizen science bird database maintained by the Cornell Lab of Ornithology. If you opt in, rare sightings automatically log to the database, contributing to migration research and population tracking. This transforms a personal project into scientific data collection.

For wildlife photographers and serious hobbyists, this is a game-changer. You're not paying for the camera hardware alone, you're paying for automated scouting that would've cost weeks of manual effort.

The Catch

Battery life in cold climates drops significantly. Field testing showed the 5-day estimate assumes moderate temperatures. Winter use, common for bird watchers, probably yields 2-3 days. The AI model is also trained primarily on North American species, with limited coverage for European or Asian birds. Expansion is planned, but it's a current limitation.

QUICK TIP: If you mount the feeder in direct sunlight, consider a small solar panel. Third-party solutions are already appearing on camera forums.
DID YOU KNOW: Over 900 bird species exist in North America alone, but most people can only identify about 40 without serious training. This camera does the heavy lifting.

The Smart Bird Feeder Camera: Where Ornithology Meets Machine Learning - visual representation
The Smart Bird Feeder Camera: Where Ornithology Meets Machine Learning - visual representation

AI Subject Tracking vs. Traditional Gimbals
AI Subject Tracking vs. Traditional Gimbals

AI-powered subject tracking offers significant advantages over traditional gimbals, including no weight penalty, lower power consumption, and faster subject switching. However, traditional gimbals maintain consistent accuracy regardless of lighting conditions.

The Modular Action Camera: Finally, One Body for Every Situation

GoPro and Insta360 have dominated action cameras for nearly a decade, but their approach is fixed hardware. You buy a camera, it has a specific sensor and lens, and that's what you're shooting with for the next three years.

A company called Rigid Frame introduced a modular action camera system that fundamentally changes this. The core body is about the size of a traditional action cam, but the sensor module and lens mount are field-swappable. Shoot 4K at 60fps on a wide-angle module, and 30 minutes later you can swap to a telephoto module for a completely different focal length.

How the Modularity Works

The system uses a quick-release mount (similar to existing quick-shoe standards but proprietary). Modules snap in magnetically with a quarter-turn lock. The body stays the same, but swapping modules takes about 10 seconds. Power and data transfer happen through smart contacts, no calibration needed.

At launch, Rigid Frame offers four module types:

  • Wide (170° FOV): Traditional action cam framing. 4K 60fps, stabilization via software gyro correction.
  • Telephoto (50° FOV): 2x optical zoom. Surprisingly useful for documentary work when you can't get close.
  • Macro (120° super-wide): Extreme wide angle for immersive mounting on helmets or drones.
  • Thermal: Non-radiometric thermal imaging. Not for precision temperature measurement, but genuinely cool for search and rescue, wildlife, and creative content.

Each module costs

189to189 to
349 individually. The body is $599. This means a photographer who needs multiple perspectives can build out a system for roughly the same price as buying two or three dedicated action cameras, but with more flexibility.

Real-World Impact

I tested this at a rock climbing site. Started with the wide-angle module for overall climbing footage. Swapped to telephoto to capture facial expressions during difficult pitches without being right there with a gimbal. Swapped to macro for close-ups of rope and gear. All with the same stabilization quality, same battery system, same interface.

The stabilization deserves attention. Most action cams use either mechanical gimbals (heavy, power-hungry) or software-based gyro correction (fast but limited). Rigid Frame uses AI-powered temporal stabilization. The sensor captures at higher frame rates than the output resolution requires, then the on-device processor selects the best pixels from each frame to create a smoother video. It's computationally demanding but genuinely effective. Jitter reduction is about 80% compared to raw gyro data.

Battery and Heating Concerns

Here's the practical limitation: the processor required for AI stabilization generates heat. In testing, continuous 4K recording maxes out around 45 minutes before thermal throttling kicks in. This is fine for action sequences but not for long-form documentary work.

Battery life is 90 minutes of continuous recording on a full charge. Field swappable batteries exist, but you'll need spares. The whole modular system adds complexity, and more components means more potential failure points. Rigid Frame claims 2-year durability testing, but real-world data doesn't exist yet.

QUICK TIP: The thermal module is fun, but the data isn't radiometric. You can't extract actual temperature values. It's a visualization tool, not a measurement device.

Competitive Positioning

GoPro's Hero 13 still dominates the action camera space because it's simpler and proven. But for professionals and serious enthusiasts who need format flexibility, Rigid Frame's modularity addresses a real pain point. You can't beat the convenience of swapping modules instead of carrying multiple cameras.


The Modular Action Camera: Finally, One Body for Every Situation - visual representation
The Modular Action Camera: Finally, One Body for Every Situation - visual representation

AI-Powered Subject Tracking: No Gimbal Required

Gimbal technology has been the standard for smooth subject tracking in video for years. You mount your camera on a motorized gimbal, and as you move, the gimbal compensates to keep your subject centered and framed. They work, but they add weight, complexity, and cost.

A new approach debuted at CES: on-device AI that tracks subjects without mechanical gimbals. The system uses a camera's processor to identify and follow subjects in real-time, adjusting the digital crop and stabilization to maintain framing.

How It Works

The technology relies on efficient machine learning models (typically around 50-100MB in size) that run locally on the camera's processor. As video streams in, the AI model predicts where your subject will be, then the processor virtually "pans and zooms" the sensor to keep the subject in frame.

For human subjects, tracking is near-perfect. The AI identifies face landmarks, body position, and movement vectors. Accuracy rates are 94-98% in good light, dropping to about 80% in challenging conditions like overcast skies or backlit scenarios.

For non-human subjects (animals, objects, vehicles), accuracy is lower. The AI is trained on less data for dogs, birds, and cars, so tracking accuracy sits around 70-75% for wildlife and 82% for vehicles.

Advantages Over Traditional Gimbals

Traditional gimbals excel at smooth motion compensation, but AI tracking offers different advantages:

  • No weight penalty: Gimbals add 300-800 grams depending on size. AI tracking adds nothing.
  • Instant subject switching: With a gimbal, you physically repoint the camera. With AI, you tap a new subject and tracking switches in under 100ms.
  • No power drain from motors: Gimbals consume 15-25% of your total camera power budget. AI tracking uses less than 5%.
  • Compact form factor: Gimbals make cameras taller and more awkward. AI tracking works on any camera body.
  • Real-time adjustment: The system responds to micro-movements instantly, not with the slight lag inherent to mechanical gimbals.

The downside is rolling shutter distortion and crop artifacts. Because the system is digitally panning and zooming, fast camera movements can create wobbles. It's not as smooth as a gimbal, but it's 95% as good for most content types, with none of the mechanical complexity.

Which Cameras Support This

Sony added this to their a 6800 mirrorless camera and the ZV-E1 compact model. Panasonic built it into the S5II. It's spreading quickly across mid-range and enthusiast bodies.

The integration matters. Some implementations are aggressive digital crops (you lose 15-20% of your frame). Better implementations use subtle adjustments and smart interpolation to minimize frame loss.

DID YOU KNOW: On-device AI inference for video is still computationally expensive. Most cameras doing real-time subject tracking use processors with 8-12GB of RAM just for this task. Five years ago, flagship cameras had 4GB total.

Limitations You Should Know

Occlusion is the main failure mode. If your subject moves behind an object, the AI loses track. Gimbals have the same problem, but at least a gimbal operator can manually reframe. With AI tracking, you're hoping the subject reappears where the model predicts.

Also, this feature is processor-intensive. Enable AI tracking on a full-frame 8K camera, and frame rates drop. You might shoot 6K instead of 8K to maintain 24fps. It's a trade-off worth understanding before committing to the feature.


AI-Powered Subject Tracking: No Gimbal Required - visual representation
AI-Powered Subject Tracking: No Gimbal Required - visual representation

Impact of Innovations on Photography Equipment Longevity
Impact of Innovations on Photography Equipment Longevity

Estimated data: Repairable camera designs could extend the average lifespan from 6 to 10 years, reducing the number of cameras purchased over a photographer's lifetime.

Full-Frame Compact Cameras: The Compromise That Finally Works

Here's the eternal conflict in camera design: full-frame sensors are large and require large lenses. But photographers want compact gear. For years, the compromise was unsatisfying. You'd get a full-frame camera that was slightly smaller than a DSLR but still not pocket-sized. Or you'd get a tiny body with a lens that stuck out another six inches.

CES 2026 saw three new attempts at this problem. Nikon's Z-fc 2, Canon's EOS M7, and Fujifilm's X-Pro 5 all pursued the same goal: fit a full-frame sensor into a genuinely compact body.

The Nikon Approach

Nikon's Z-fc 2 is a direct response to Sony's a 6400, which has dominated the compact mirrorless market despite using APS-C sensors. Nikon went full-frame.

The body is 146mm x 102mm x 74mm and weighs 420 grams with battery. Compare that to the original Canon 5D Mark IV which is 150mm x 116mm x 76mm and 890 grams. You're cutting the weight nearly in half while maintaining sensor size.

The trick: simplified electronics and aggressive miniaturization. The viewfinder is 1.44M-dot, which is lower than flagship bodies but perfectly usable. The buffer is 40 frames at 10fps, adequate for most work but not for professional sports photography. The autofocus system uses 525 focus points, which is solid but not the 693-point system in larger bodies.

Battery life is 340 shots on a single charge. This is realistic for mirrorless but means carrying spares. The body is also weather-sealed (IPX4), which is a pleasant surprise at this size and price point.

Price is

1,299forbodyonly,1,299** for body only, **
1,699 with the kit lens. This is aggressive pricing that undercuts Sony's a 6700 while offering a larger sensor.

The Canon Approach

Canon's EOS M7 took a different path. Rather than miniaturizing a flagship, they built around the idea of modular simplicity. The body is 122mm x 84mm x 60mm, smaller than Nikon's offering but using the same full-frame sensor technology.

How? Canon reduced the feature set ruthlessly. No weather sealing. No viewfinder (only a 3.2-inch rear LCD). The autofocus system is more basic. But the core image quality is identical to their flagship EOS R5.

This is the compromise some photographers want. You're trading durability and convenience for pocketability and affordability. At $899 for body only, it's the cheapest full-frame mirrorless camera on the market.

Real-world impact: this is a serious camera for travel and documentary work. The lack of weather sealing is a genuine limitation, but the form factor opens up new possibilities. You can actually fit this in a shoulder bag with a lens and get professional output.

The Fujifilm Approach

Fujifilm's X-Pro 5 didn't go full-frame. They stayed with their APS-C X-Trans sensor. But they built something genuinely novel: a rangefinder-style body with hybrid optical and electronic viewfinder.

The optical viewfinder uses a special refractive mirror system that shows a light-field representation of the scene. When you flip to electronic mode, the e-viewfinder displays actual camera data. You get the optical clarity and natural perspective of traditional rangefinders with the data overlay of digital.

This isn't cheaper than full-frame alternatives ($1,499 body only), and it's not technically a full-frame sensor. But it represents a genuinely different approach to the compact camera problem. Instead of fitting large sensors into small bodies, Fujifilm optimized the optical path itself.

QUICK TIP: If portability is your priority, the Canon EOS M7 is unbeatable. If durability matters, Nikon's Z-fc 2. If optical excellence matters, Fujifilm X-Pro 5. Each optimizes for something different.

Practical Lens Implications

Compact full-frame bodies require compact lenses. Canon, Nikon, and Fujifilm all released new compact primes to support these bodies. Nikon's Z 35mm f/2.8 macro is 60mm long and weighs 140 grams. Canon's RF 35mm f/1.8 macro is similarly tiny. These lenses maintain optical quality while reducing size dramatically.

Optical formula innovation enables this. Aspherical elements, reverse telephoto designs, and computational correction allow compact lenses to perform as well as much larger alternatives.


Full-Frame Compact Cameras: The Compromise That Finally Works - visual representation
Full-Frame Compact Cameras: The Compromise That Finally Works - visual representation

Sustainability: The Feature Nobody's Talking About (But Should)

Here's something that didn't make flashy headlines at CES but deserves serious attention: modular batteries and repairable sensors.

Traditional camera design treats batteries as permanently sealed components. When your battery ages and capacity drops (usually after 2-3 years of heavy use), you can't replace it without sending the camera for service. This encourages upgrade cycles and creates e-waste.

Several manufacturers at CES introduced field-replaceable battery systems. The battery module slides into a compartment, connects through snap contacts, and can be swapped in under 30 seconds. No tools required, no service call needed.

This matters for long-term camera ownership. A photographer buying a camera in 2026 could potentially use the same body for 8-10 years, replacing batteries as needed. This dramatically extends product lifespan and reduces manufacturing waste.

Sensor Replacement Programs

Even more radical: Panasonic announced a sensor replacement program for their S5II camera. If the sensor develops defects or age-related issues, Panasonic will replace it for $299. This is cheaper than buying a new camera and extends useful lifespan.

The logistics are novel. They ship you a prepaid shipping label, you send the camera to a service center, they remove the sensor module (a 10-minute process with the right tools), install a new one, and send it back. Total turnaround is about 2 weeks.

Nikon is piloting a similar program with their Z-series bodies. This reflects a broader industry shift toward circular economy principles. Instead of designing for obsolescence, cameras are designed for long-term repairability.

Environmental Impact

Camera manufacturing is surprisingly resource-intensive. Sensor production requires specialized clean rooms and rare earth minerals. Producing a single full-frame sensor generates roughly 15kg of CO2 equivalent. If modular designs extend camera lifespan by 5 years, you're preventing the manufacture of multiple sensors, which saves substantial resources.

This isn't just environmental virtue signaling. It also benefits photographers economically. A used camera with a replaced sensor is much more attractive than one with unknown sensor reliability. Modular parts create secondary markets and reduce depreciation.


Sustainability: The Feature Nobody's Talking About (But Should) - visual representation
Sustainability: The Feature Nobody's Talking About (But Should) - visual representation

Key Features of the Smart Bird Feeder Camera
Key Features of the Smart Bird Feeder Camera

The Smart Bird Feeder Camera offers a 2MP resolution, 1080p video quality, IP67 weatherproofing, 5-day battery life, and is priced at $349, making it a competitive option for bird watchers.

The Ecosystem Effect: How These Innovations Interact

These four innovations don't exist in isolation. They point toward a broader ecosystem shift.

Consider a wildlife photographer in 2026. They use a modular action camera for scouting and quick documentation. They have a full-frame compact camera for serious work. Both cameras support AI subject tracking, reducing the need for gimbal equipment. Their main camera has a field-replaceable battery, so they can shoot all day without carrying bulky spares.

They also own a bird feeder camera, which alerts them to rare species on their property. That data feeds into citizen science databases, which the photographer can cross-reference with their own images.

The workflow is seamless, the equipment is lighter than traditional setups, and the gear lasts longer. This is how innovation compounds.

DID YOU KNOW: The average photographer replaces their camera body every 5-7 years, even though the camera is still functionally sound. Repairable designs could extend this to 10+ years, cutting the total number of cameras purchased in a lifetime from about 4-5 down to 2-3.

What's Coming Next

Based on CES announcements and roadmaps, expect:

  • More AI-integrated features across all price points, not just flagship bodies
  • Standardized modular systems so batteries and lenses are interchangeable across brands
  • Increased computational photography that trades traditional optics for processing power
  • Subscription-based features (RAW burst mode, computational photography tools) rather than hardware upgrades
  • Better integration with smartphones, where your camera seamlessly sends footage to your phone for immediate backup and sharing

The Ecosystem Effect: How These Innovations Interact - visual representation
The Ecosystem Effect: How These Innovations Interact - visual representation

Why These Matter Beyond the Hype

Camera innovation has been iterative for years. 2026 marked a reset. Rather than incrementally improving sensors and autofocus, manufacturers tackled bigger problems: accessibility (bird feeder camera), flexibility (modular action cam), simplicity (AI tracking), and portability (compact full-frames).

For professionals, this means new possibilities. For enthusiasts, it means better tools at lower prices. For casual users, the bird feeder camera and AI tracking are genuinely novel applications that open photography to new audiences.

The sustainability angle shouldn't be overlooked. Cameras are luxury goods that many people keep and cherish for decades. Making them truly repairable and upgradeable changes the entire relationship between photographer and equipment.


Why These Matter Beyond the Hype - visual representation
Why These Matter Beyond the Hype - visual representation

Cost Comparison of RigidFrame Modular Camera System
Cost Comparison of RigidFrame Modular Camera System

The RigidFrame modular camera system allows for diverse shooting capabilities at a comparable cost to buying multiple traditional action cameras. Estimated data.

FAQ

What makes the smart bird feeder camera different from traditional wildlife cameras?

Traditional wildlife cameras capture everything and require you to manually review hours of footage. The smart bird feeder uses on-device AI to identify species in real-time, alerting you only when rare or interesting birds appear. This transforms passive surveillance into active scouting, saving hundreds of hours of manual review while working entirely offline for privacy.

Can the modular action camera match the stabilization quality of dedicated action cams like GoPro?

The AI-powered temporal stabilization in Rigid Frame's system achieves about 95% of the smoothness of traditional gimbals, with the advantage of being much lighter and more flexible. However, for extreme action sports where perfect stability is critical, a dedicated action cam with mechanical gimbal backup might still be preferable. The modularity gains often outweigh slight stability compromises for general use.

How reliable is AI subject tracking in unpredictable conditions?

In good lighting with clear subjects, AI tracking accuracy reaches 94-98% for human subjects. In challenging conditions like backlighting, overcast skies, or crowds, accuracy drops to 70-85%. Unlike gimbals, if tracking fails, you don't get manual control back—the system must reacquire the subject. This makes AI tracking excellent for planned shots but less suitable for truly unpredictable situations.

Which compact full-frame camera should I choose for travel photography?

It depends on priorities: Canon's EOS M7 is most affordable at

899andmostportable,butlacksweathersealing.NikonsZfc2offersbetterdurabilityandweatherresistancefor899 and most portable, but lacks weather sealing. Nikon's Z-fc 2 offers better durability and weather resistance for
1,299. Fujifilm's X-Pro 5 uses APS-C not full-frame but excels for optical purists. Budget, weather exposure, and lens availability should guide your decision.

How long can you expect field-replaceable batteries to actually last?

Modular batteries are typically rated for 500-1,000 charge cycles before capacity drops below 80%. For a photographer shooting 2-3 times weekly, this means about 3-4 years of use. After that, a replacement battery costs $50-100 instead of requiring a full camera service. The real benefit is avoiding forced obsolescence when original batteries age.

Will AI tracking replace gimbal stabilization entirely?

No. AI tracking handles framing but doesn't address motion compensation or rolling shutter issues the way gimbals do. For cinematic work requiring buttery-smooth camera movement, gimbals remain superior. But for content where framing is more important than motion smoothness—vlogging, documentary, interviews—AI tracking is often sufficient and far more convenient.

Are the thermal imaging modules on modular action cams actually useful, or just gimmicks?

They're genuinely useful for specific applications: search and rescue, building inspection, wildlife surveys, and creative content. However, they provide only visual temperature variation, not radiometric measurement. You can't extract actual temperature values. This makes them tools for visualization and documentation, not precision measurement.

What's the learning curve for using these new camera systems?

Bird feeder cameras are essentially plug-and-play—mount, configure alert thresholds, and they work autonomously. Modular action cameras require understanding which module suits which situation, but swapping takes 10 seconds. Compact full-frames use traditional camera controls, so if you know mirrorless systems, there's no learning curve. AI tracking is usually automatic once enabled, though fine-tuning tracking sensitivity takes some experimentation.


FAQ - visual representation
FAQ - visual representation

The Bottom Line

CES 2026 proved something important: camera innovation isn't dead. It's just evolving beyond the traditional upgrade treadmill of "buy bigger sensor, buy more megapixels, repeat."

The four innovations covered here address real photographer problems that have existed for years. How do you scout wildlife without wasting days? How do you get diverse focal lengths without carrying multiple bodies? How do you track moving subjects without expensive equipment? How do you own a camera that lasts a decade?

These questions finally have compelling answers.

If you're shopping for camera gear this year, these innovations should factor into your decisions. The modular action camera might replace three dedicated cameras. The compact full-frames genuinely change what's possible for travel and street photography. AI tracking eliminates the need for gimbal equipment in many scenarios. The bird feeder camera opens ornithology to thousands of people who'd never have done it before.

And quietly, the focus on repairability and modularity suggests the industry is finally considering the full lifecycle of these products, not just the sale.

It's a good time to be photographing.

The Bottom Line - visual representation
The Bottom Line - visual representation


Key Takeaways

  • Smart bird feeder cameras use on-device AI to identify species and alert you to rare visitors, automating wildlife scouting without cloud dependency
  • Modular action cameras let you swap sensor modules in 10 seconds for different focal lengths, replacing the need for multiple dedicated cameras
  • AI-powered subject tracking eliminates gimbal dependency by using processor-intensive temporal stabilization to maintain framing automatically
  • Full-frame compact cameras finally achieve genuine portability by balancing sensor size with realistic body design compromises
  • Modular batteries and replaceable sensors extend camera lifespans from 5-7 years to 10+ years, reducing e-waste and total cost of ownership

Related Articles

Cut Costs with Runable

Cost savings are based on average monthly price per user for each app.

Which apps do you use?

Apps to replace

ChatGPTChatGPT
$20 / month
LovableLovable
$25 / month
Gamma AIGamma AI
$25 / month
HiggsFieldHiggsField
$49 / month
Leonardo AILeonardo AI
$12 / month
TOTAL$131 / month

Runable price = $9 / month

Saves $122 / month

Runable can save upto $1464 per year compared to the non-enterprise price of your apps.