Ask Runable forDesign-Driven General AI AgentTry Runable For Free
Runable
Back to Blog
Technology6 min read

The next evolution of the penetration test must include agentic AI | TechRadar

‘We tested it’ no longer means what you think it does Discover insights about the next evolution of the penetration test must include agentic ai | techradar.

TechnologyInnovationBest PracticesGuideTutorial
The next evolution of the penetration test must include agentic AI | TechRadar
Listen to Article
0:00
0:00
0:00

The next evolution of the penetration test must include agentic AI | Tech Radar

Overview

News, deals, reviews, guides and more on the newest computing gadgets

Start exploring exclusive deals, expert advice and more

Details

Unlock and manage exclusive Techradar member rewards.

Unlock instant access to exclusive member features.

Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.

The next evolution of the penetration test must include agentic AI

‘We tested it’ no longer means what you think it does

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.

When a CISO tells the board “we tested that system last quarter,” it sounds reassuring. But in today’s threat landscape, it’s a measurement that no longer maps to reality.

Recent industry research shows that while 95% of organizations prioritize penetration testing, only 32% of their attack surface is actually tested. The problem isn’t that penetration testing is broken. It’s that the word “tested” no longer means what organizations think it does.

Penetration testing used to involve a small team of humans spending a limited amount of time in a system - mapping what they could reach, identifying vulnerabilities within that window, and compiling results into a static report.

You can’t firewall a conversation: how AI red-teaming became mission-critical

Claude Mythos turns years of security research into 20-hour AI exploits

That model was already under pressure from the pace of change. Then AI broke it.

For more than a decade, automation was the advantage. Mass scanners and automated reconnaissance ran constantly, but they were noisy and required security teams to sift through the output. Defense was slower, but more precise where it mattered.

Humans could chain findings, understand business context, and stay one step ahead of attackers. The economics weren’t always favorable, but they were workable.

That trade has now broken down. Agentic AI is compressing reconnaissance from days to hours. These frontier models reason about endpoints that aren't visible in the UI and they can chain low-impact findings into business-logic exploits. The time between a CVE's public disclosure and the first observed threat-actor exploitation has collapsed to a matter of hours.

That isn't a faster scanner. It's a creative attacker that never sleeps, never gets bored, and runs at the cost of compute.

Now consider what an annual pentest actually buys you against that threat. It’s a snapshot of an attack surface that's changing by the hour, against an adversary that doesn't wait for the next audit. Your board doesn't know that. Your auditors don't know that. And it is increasingly the structural reason why organizations get breached between audits.

Patch window is officially dead as AI finds bugs faster than humans can squash them

Why you may want to question how your security budget is being spent

Why self-running agents are creating the biggest security crisis of 2026

The only way defenders can win is by fighting AI with AI. The next evolution of the penetration test must include agentic AI on the defense side. Here’s what that looks like.

"Tested" stops being a calendar event and becomes a posture - continuous validation against the latest exploit techniques, on the assets that actually matter, with humans focused on the findings only humans can produce.

The test needs to explain what’s exploited and confirmed. While a scanner can tell you a vulnerability might exist; agentic AI can tell you whether it actually fires in your environment.

And it stops being a humans-or-machines argument. It is both, and they’re deployed differently. AI handles the breadth, the speed, the chained reasoning attackers are already running against you.

Humans handle the creativity, the business logic, the things an algorithm has yet to model. Customers running this combined model cut average remediation time on critical vulnerabilities from 63 days to 38 in a single year, a 47% reduction across severity levels.

That doesn't happen because they bought more tooling. It happens because their definition of "tested" became continuous.

The cybersecurity skills gap is real, but the issue isn’t a shortage of practitioners. It's a lack of senior judgment, applied where it matters. Much of the work consuming our industry's most experienced researchers is reconnaissance, triage, retesting, and sifting scanner output. That is the exact work agentic AI is now good enough to take on.

Redefining "tested" frees that talent. It puts senior researchers back on the problems machines can't solve: novel attack paths and business-logic abuse - the chains that a creative human spots and a model can't reason its way to. While the UK government has set out a vision for defensive AI that operates at machine speed, the talent piece of that vision only works if we stop asking humans to do machine-speed work.

Pick the system in your environment that, if compromised, would put you on the front page. Now answer this: when was it last exploited under controlled conditions - not scanned, not reviewed -but actually attacked and confirmed?

If the answer is "in our last annual pentest," the word "tested" in your security program has stopped meaning what you need it to mean. Fix the word, and the rest of the program has a chance to follow.

We feature the best internet security suites for PCs, Macs and mobile devices.

This article was produced as part of Tech Radar Pro Perspectives, our channel to feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today.

The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Tech Radar Pro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/pro/perspectives-how-to-submit

You must confirm your public display name before commenting

1'This mode is a dream bro' — Call of Duty is bringing back Black Ops 2 in a way nobody expected

2 One of the best music streaming services is free for Prime members ahead of Prime Day — get four months of Music Unlimited on the house

3 New Trump executive order requests AI companies 'voluntarily' allow the White House to test the "advanced cyber capabilities of AI models”

4'Death was supposed to be the end' — Kratos' wife Faye returns as protagonist of new God of War game, Laufey

5'It was hard making that selection': Masters of the Universe director Travis Knight explains why some popular He-Man characters were left out of the new sci-fi fantasy movie

Tech Radar is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site.

© Future US, Inc. Full 7th Floor, 130 West 42nd Street, New York, NY 10036.

Key Takeaways

  • News, deals, reviews, guides and more on the newest computing gadgets
  • Start exploring exclusive deals, expert advice and more
  • Unlock and manage exclusive Techradar member rewards
  • Unlock instant access to exclusive member features
  • Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards

Cut Costs with Runable

Cost savings are based on average monthly price per user for each app.

Which apps do you use?

Apps to replace

ChatGPTChatGPT
$20 / month
LovableLovable
$25 / month
Gamma AIGamma AI
$25 / month
HiggsFieldHiggsField
$49 / month
Leonardo AILeonardo AI
$12 / month
TOTAL$131 / month

Runable price = $9 / month

Saves $122 / month

Runable can save upto $1464 per year compared to the non-enterprise price of your apps.