Ask Runable forDesign-Driven General AI AgentTry Runable For Free
Runable
Back to Blog
Technology8 min read

'The rise of OpenAI is attributable to a web of deceit and the exploitation of users (including Floridians)”: AG seeks to hold Sam Altman and ChatGPT accountable for harm — but it doesn't make sense to hold AI accountable for every bad outcome | TechRadar

Did Altman really show a "pattern of deception and disregard for safety"? Discover insights about 'the rise of openai is attributable to a web of deceit and the

TechnologyInnovationBest PracticesGuideTutorial
'The rise of OpenAI is attributable to a web of deceit and the exploitation of users (including Floridians)”: AG seeks to hold Sam Altman and ChatGPT accountable for harm — but it doesn't make sense to hold AI accountable for every bad outcome | TechRadar
Listen to Article
0:00
0:00
0:00

'The rise of Open AI is attributable to a web of deceit and the exploitation of users (including Floridians)”: AG seeks to hold Sam Altman and Chat GPT accountable for harm — but it doesn't make sense to hold AI accountable for every bad outcome | Tech Radar

Overview

News, deals, reviews, guides and more on the newest computing gadgets

Start exploring exclusive deals, expert advice and more

Details

Unlock and manage exclusive Techradar member rewards.

Unlock instant access to exclusive member features.

Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.

'The rise of Open AI is attributable to a web of deceit and the exploitation of users (including Floridians)”: AG seeks to hold Sam Altman and Chat GPT accountable for harm — but it doesn't make sense to hold AI accountable for every bad outcome

Did Altman really show a "pattern of deception and disregard for safety"?

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.

Open AI and Sam Altman's Florida troubles are ballooning. One month after the state's attorney general launched a criminal investigation into the AI giant, Attorney General James Uthmeier launched a civil case against Open AI and CEO and Co-Founder Sam Altman, claiming Chat GPT was released and marketed to consumers while "deceiving Floridians about the true nature and dangers of the product."

The Florida AG ties this complaint to his earlier one noting how the alleged mirpresentation "and their careless introduction of Chat GPT to Florida and the world, mass shooters have been aided and abetted in deadly rampages, vulnerable people have been encouraged into suicide, professionals have suffered public humiliation, users have lost critical thinking skills, and minors have become addicted to a tool that feigns human compassion to collect their data with no parental oversight.”

The suit also targets Altman: "Plaintiff also seeks to hold Altman personally liable for the harm he has caused Floridians through his reckless and willful conduct as founder and CEO of Open AI, including his utter disregard for the risk to human life caused by his firms’ conduct."

Want the latest AI news? Here are the biggest stories from the past week

Chat GPT says it ''won’t provide instructions... to help someone commit a crime'

Elon Musk and Sam Altman face off over AI’s real danger

Throughout the suit, Uthmeier accuses Open AI and Altman of deception: "This success has not been earned; the rise of Open AI is attributable to a web of deceit and the exploitation of users (including Floridians)."

To bolster this argument, the Florida AG includes a reference to the April 2026 New Yorker profile, which quotes a source claiming Altman is "unconstrained by truth … He has two traits that are almost never seen in the same person. The first is a strong desire to please people, to be liked in any given interaction. The second is almost a sociopathic lack of concern for the consequences that may come from deceiving someone."

Open AI and Altman have made their share of mistakes in the development and release of some models, though you might argue that they've been no greater than those made by other generative AI and LLM purveyors, and while Open AI has not yet publicly responded to the new suit, it offers extensive rebuttal of a sort on its "Safety and Responsibility" page, writing, "We teach our AI good behavior so it can be both capable and aligned with human values."

The page goes on to detail how they apply these principles in model training, system-level guardrails, and long-term safety.

It also goes over how Open AI conducts Safety evaluations to identify risks and build guardrails to mitigate harm.

Granted, tools and oversight like these really didn't exist when Chat GPT exploded onto the public landscape almost four years ago.

The Florida AG may be right that Open AI and Altman did not prepare us for the potential harm surrounding generative AI, but to be fair, who could have? I know, we had countless Sci-Fi stories and films to draw from, but when it's happening in real time and being adopted by society at scale before, I think, anyone, including Open AI, was prepared, it's almost impossible to "prepare".

Sam Altman’s chaotic weekend of backlash and threats

Someone used Chat GPT to make a custom m RNA vaccine for his dog's cancer — Sam Altman

Open AI takes steps to reduce ‘teaser-style phrasing’ in Chat GPT responses

People were adopting Chat GPT as a tool long before we fully understood its early-day predilection for hallucination. Early GPT models were marked by a mix of friendly human-like conversation and a bizarre lack of empathy and situational awareness.

It was a simulacrum of humaneness stripped bare of all humanity. Early users responded to the former while mostly misreading the latter as certainty. Chat GPT could be so willfully wrong and yet sound so right. It could support your wildest fantasies, but also your worst impulses because, in either case, it was doing its job of answering your prompts and responding to inferred needs.

It's different now. Virtually all consumer AI has the kind of safety and controls described by Open AI. They have a history of you, which allows them to better understand your intentions and identify when the conversation is heading in the wrong direction. AI is done being your sycophant and co-consiprator.

Chat GPT and other platforms like it have made our lives somewhat easier over the last four years, but it has not always been an easy ride. Life is changing fast because of AI: jobs are disappearing, search engines are being pushed aside in favor of "Chat" answers, data centers are gobbling up land and the environment, and people are falling in love with chatbots.

The brief history of Chat GPT feels like a winding and uncharted path full of wonderful and terrible discoveries. It also still feels like progress, which is the hallmark of most "revolutions". These epochs always come with their share of pain, but blaming Open AI and Altman, despite their failings, seems unfair.

Over a century ago, when the automobile was introduced, it was adopted relatively quickly and often with dire consequences. Children and animals were killed by the hundreds. People took to the streets and pelted passing cars with mud and rocks. And while traffic signals predated the automobile, it wouldn't be until 1920 that the first four-way, three-color traffic light would be introduced. It included amber; the first time there was a light signaling drivers to slow down before coming to a stop.

We're still in the pre-amber light phase of AI, with many users and businesses racing to adopt it before we fully understand the implications. I don't blame Open AI (any more than I blame Google or Anthropic) for all the ills sparked by AI use, and I don't think the Florida AG has much of a case. Sometimes the price of progress is a terrible one, but looking for someone to blame is as much use as shouting at the sky when it rains.

Follow Tech Radar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds.

A 38-year industry veteran and award-winning journalist, Lance has covered technology since PCs were the size of suitcases and “on line” meant “waiting.” He’s a former Lifewire Editor-in-Chief, Mashable Editor-in-Chief, and, before that, Editor in Chief of PCMag.com and Senior Vice President of Content for Ziff Davis, Inc. He also wrote a popular, weekly tech column for Medium called The Upgrade.

Lance Ulanoff makes frequent appearances on national, international, and local news programs including Live with Kelly and Mark, the Today Show, Good Morning America, CNBC, CNN, and the BBC.

You must confirm your public display name before commenting

1 Spotify could be giving you more freedom on how your profile looks to your friends, and I think it could be the start of the platform’s much-needed social overhaul — but there are other issues I think need more attention first

2 Ninja has solved the biggest, most disgusting problem with home coffee makers, and as a barista, I can't believe nobody thought of it earlier

3 Asus used 'feedback from esports pros' to make new 24-inch OLED — and it looks like the perfect monitor for competitive gamers

4 Open AI Codex tool with over 29,000 downloads linked to malicious npm supply chain attack stealing authentication tokens

5 Texas Instruments had plans for personal computer domination - a price war nearly brought it to ruin

Tech Radar is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site.

© Future US, Inc. Full 7th Floor, 130 West 42nd Street, New York, NY 10036.

Key Takeaways

  • News, deals, reviews, guides and more on the newest computing gadgets
  • Start exploring exclusive deals, expert advice and more
  • Unlock and manage exclusive Techradar member rewards
  • Unlock instant access to exclusive member features
  • Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards

Cut Costs with Runable

Cost savings are based on average monthly price per user for each app.

Which apps do you use?

Apps to replace

ChatGPTChatGPT
$20 / month
LovableLovable
$25 / month
Gamma AIGamma AI
$25 / month
HiggsFieldHiggsField
$49 / month
Leonardo AILeonardo AI
$12 / month
TOTAL$131 / month

Runable price = $9 / month

Saves $122 / month

Runable can save upto $1464 per year compared to the non-enterprise price of your apps.