Ask Runable forDesign-Driven General AI AgentTry Runable For Free
Runable
Back to Blog
Technology6 min read

‘This is a real risk, we all could die as a result of artificial intelligence’ — the OpenAI trial took a dramatic turn as Elon Musk and Sam Altman faced off over AI’s real-world danger | TechRadar

A dramatic courtroom clash between Elon Musk and Sam Altman briefly turned into a stark warning about AI extinction risk — before the judge shut it down.

TechnologyInnovationBest PracticesGuideTutorial
‘This is a real risk, we all could die as a result of artificial intelligence’ — the OpenAI trial took a dramatic turn as Elon Musk and Sam Altman faced off over AI’s real-world danger | TechRadar
Listen to Article
0:00
0:00
0:00

‘This is a real risk, we all could die as a result of artificial intelligence’ — the Open AI trial took a dramatic turn as Elon Musk and Sam Altman faced off over AI’s real-world danger | Tech Radar

Overview

News, deals, reviews, guides and more on the newest computing gadgets

Start exploring exclusive deals, expert advice and more

Details

Unlock and manage exclusive Techradar member rewards.

Unlock instant access to exclusive member features.

Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.

‘This is a real risk, we all could die as a result of artificial intelligence’ — the Open AI trial took a dramatic turn as Elon Musk and Sam Altman faced off over AI’s real-world danger

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.

Elon Musk, executive chairman and chief technology officer of X Corp., center, arrives at federal court in San Francisco, California, US, on Wednesday, March 4, 2026.  (Image credit: Getty Images / Bloomberg)

Elon Musk and Sam Altman’s trial veered into AI extinction debate

The judge shut down claims AI could pose a real-world threat

The case could reshape Open AI and the future of Chat GPT

“This is a real risk, we all could die as a result of artificial intelligence.”

That stark warning cut through a tense courtroom this week as Elon Musk’s legal battle with Sam Altman took an unexpected turn — briefly shifting from a corporate dispute into a debate about whether AI could wipe out humanity.

Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers quickly shut it down, reminding Musk’s attorney, Steven Molo, to stay focused on the issue at trial, delivering a withering rebuttal:

'It's not okay to steal a charity': Elon Musk rails against Open AI in court

Sam Altman urges Anthropic and the Pentagon to 'find a way to work together'

“It’s ironic your client, despite these risks, is creating a company that is in the exact space,” Rogers said. “There are some people who do not want to put the future of humanity in Mr Musk’s hands. But we’re not going to get into that business.”

The Musk vs Open AI trial is the latest chapter in a feud between rival CEOs Musk and Altman that has been building for years. Much of it has played out through public comments and online jabs, but it has now escalated into a month-long federal court case in California.

At the heart of Musk’s claim is the allegation that Open AI — the company he co-founded in 2015 — drifted away from its original non-profit mission. He argues that Altman betrayed public trust by turning the organization into a profit-driven company.

Musk has also named Open AI president Greg Brockman and Microsoft as part of the case, claiming they played a role in the company’s shift toward commercialization — allegations Microsoft denies.

The judge is right, of course. This case isn’t about whether AI should exist. It’s about the future direction of Open AI. A Musk victory could trigger a major shake-up at the company and potentially even lead to Altman’s removal as CEO.

But the fact that extinction came up at all points to the real story here — whether AI could pose an existential threat to humanity.

The technology being debated in abstract terms is already here, embedded in tools like Chat GPT and rapidly spreading into everyday life. The people at the center of the case are the same figures shaping the future of AI itself, and moments like this week’s courtroom exchange point to unresolved issues beyond a corporate battle.

Sam Altman issues stark warning as $1 billion plan is revealed

Anthropic’s Super Bowl ad trolled Open AI and Sam Altman is fuming

'Companies that are not set up to quickly adopt AI workers will be at a huge disadvantage': Open AI Sam Altman warns firms not to fall behind on AI - but notes 'it’s going to take a lot of work and some risk'

Even as AI becomes more embedded in everyday products, there is still no consensus among its creators about how risky it really is. Some frame it as a transformative tool that will improve productivity, creativity, and access to information. Others continue to warn, sometimes in uncompromising terms, about long-term dangers that are harder to define, let alone regulate.

The same companies racing to roll out smarter, faster AI tools are also, at times, the ones raising concerns about where that race could lead. That tension is not new — but it is rarely expressed this directly, and almost never in a legal setting like this.

The trial is expected to run for several weeks, with billions of dollars and the future structure of Open AI on the line. But it also captures the central contradiction of the AI era right now: the people building the technology are still debating how dangerous it might be — even as they continue to build it at speed.

Follow Tech Radar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button!

And of course you can also follow Tech Radar on Tik Tok for news, reviews, unboxings in video form, and get regular updates from us on Whats App too.

➡️ Read our full guide to the best business laptops

  1. Best overall: Dell Precision 5690
  2. Best on a budget: Acer Aspire 5
  3. Best Mac Book: Apple Mac Book Pro 14-inch (M4)

Graham is the Senior Editor for AI at Tech Radar. With over 25 years of experience in both online and print journalism, Graham has worked for various market-leading tech brands including Computeractive, PC Pro, i More, Mac Format, Mac|Life, Maximum PC, and more. He specializes in reporting on everything to do with AI and has appeared on BBC TV shows like BBC One Breakfast and on Radio 4 commenting on the latest trends in tech. Graham has an honors degree in Computer Science and spends his spare time podcasting and blogging.

You must confirm your public display name before commenting

1 You heard right — Nord VPN has rolled out an AI voice checker to protect you from audio deepfakes on Chrome

2 Samsung Galaxy S27 Ultra rumored to drop 3x telephoto lens

3'The coming months are critical' — dev confirms Resonance: A Plague Tale Legacy's release is 'almost here'

5 Candidates are hitting back at employers using AI interviews

Tech Radar is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site.

© Future US, Inc. Full 7th Floor, 130 West 42nd Street, New York, NY 10036.

Key Takeaways

  • News, deals, reviews, guides and more on the newest computing gadgets
  • Start exploring exclusive deals, expert advice and more
  • Unlock and manage exclusive Techradar member rewards
  • Unlock instant access to exclusive member features
  • Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards

Cut Costs with Runable

Cost savings are based on average monthly price per user for each app.

Which apps do you use?

Apps to replace

ChatGPTChatGPT
$20 / month
LovableLovable
$25 / month
Gamma AIGamma AI
$25 / month
HiggsFieldHiggsField
$49 / month
Leonardo AILeonardo AI
$12 / month
TOTAL$131 / month

Runable price = $9 / month

Saves $122 / month

Runable can save upto $1464 per year compared to the non-enterprise price of your apps.