Wordle's Repeating Answers Change Explained [2025]

Wordle's Big Shift: What You Need to Know About Repeating Answers

Wordle just dropped a bombshell. After nearly four years of playing the same word once and only once, the game is about to flip its entire approach. Starting in 2025, previously answered words will start cycling back into rotation. And honestly, it's the move the game needed.

If you've been playing Wordle since its launch by Josh Wardle in 2021, you probably didn't see this coming. The beauty of Wordle was its simplicity: one word, one chance, every single person solving the same puzzle. But as the game has evolved under New York Times ownership since January 2022, the architecture supporting that premise started cracking.

Let's dig into why this matters, what actually changes, and how it affects the way you'll play going forward.

TL; DR

• Repeating Words Coming: Wordle will start cycling previously used answers back into the game starting in 2025
• Why It Matters: The game was running out of unique five-letter words and players using answer lists had an unfair advantage
• Game Lifespan Extended: The update theoretically allows Wordle to run indefinitely instead of ending in roughly two years
• Strategy Shift: Past answer lists become useless for prediction; you'll need to solve puzzles fresh again
• Level Playing Field: Removes the advantage players had by studying previous solutions

Estimated data shows that casual players make up the majority, while meta-players and spreadsheet users are a smaller segment. Estimated data.

The Math Problem Nobody Wanted to Talk About

Here's the thing that nobody really wanted to confront: Wordle was running out of words. Not metaphorically. Literally.

When Josh Wardle built Wordle, he seeded the game with 2,315 unique five-letter words. The New York Times, when they bought the game in January 2022, trimmed that down to 2,309 words. Over the following years, they've added approximately 32 additional words—words like SNAFU and OOMPH that weren't in the original list.

So if we're being generous, Wordle's word pool maxes out around 2,400 unique answers. As of game #1685 (roughly late January 2025), the math was simple and terrifying: you were looking at somewhere between 18 and 24 months before the entire word pool was exhausted.

That means by late 2026 or early 2027, Wordle would have hit a wall. No new words to use. No way forward without making a fundamental change to the game.

$$\text{Words Remaining} = \text{Total Word Pool} - \text{Game Number}$$

If Total Word Pool = 2,400 and Game Number = 1,685, then Words Remaining ≈ 715. At one puzzle per day, that's roughly 700+ days of gameplay left. Two years, give or take.

The New York Times could have waited until that deadline and then made a pivot—maybe switching to six-letter words, or starting completely fresh with a new game format. But that would've been reactive, not proactive. And it wouldn't have solved an even bigger problem that had already been festering.

Estimated data suggests that 35% of players use past answer lists, impacting the fairness of the game. Estimated data.

The Cheating Problem That Changed Everything

Let's be honest: Wordle has been infiltrated. Not by bots or hackers, but by players doing something that's technically not against the rules but definitely against the spirit of the game.

Since launch, players have been maintaining and sharing lists of all past Wordle answers. There are spreadsheets. There are websites. There are mobile apps. And as the available word pool shrunk over four years, the strategic advantage of having access to these lists became massive.

Here's a concrete example. Imagine it's your turn to solve today's Wordle. You've narrowed it down to four possible five-letter words: BREAK, CREAK, FREAK, or WREAK. All of them fit your clues. Your yellow letters match. Your green letters match. You have no way to distinguish between them logically.

On a fair playing field, you'd have to guess. You'd pick one randomly, or you'd use a strategic word to eliminate possibilities. Maybe you'd play CABLE to rule out certain letter combinations. And then—50% chance you get it right, 50% you get it wrong.

But if you had access to a list of past answers, you'd know that BREAK was the answer to game #172. CREAK was game #347. WREAK was game #1225. So the only option left is FREAK. You'd solve it immediately. Your solve rate would be artificially inflated. Your streak would be protected. Your daily victory would be hollow.

Was this cheating? Not technically. The rules don't explicitly forbid it. But it fundamentally broke the promise of Wordle: that everyone, everywhere, played the same game under the same conditions with the same information.

Wordle's original appeal was democratic. No gatekeeping. No premium features. No paying for hints. Just you, one word, and everyone else on the planet solving the exact same puzzle.

How the New York Times Identified the Deeper Issue

The New York Times didn't make this change lightly. They announced it in a statement that read: "Starting on Monday, we will begin adding previously run words back into play. There are still many first-time answers to debut, but also more chances for Wordle in ones and those magical, serendipitous moments when Wordle overlaps with real life."

Notice that language. "Magical, serendipitous moments." That's not just marketing speak. That's acknowledging something real that Wordle had lost.

When Wordle started, every word felt special. ROBOT. PIXEL. KAYAK. CYNIC. You'd solve it, and because you knew it would never appear again, it felt significant. There was a sense of closure. A sense of history being made, even if that history was just your personal Wordle history.

But as the game matured, that magic faded. By 2024 and 2025, you knew the word pool was shrinking. You knew there were only so many words left. Every puzzle started to feel slightly less consequential, because you were watching the clock tick down.

The New York Times realized that repeating answers actually restores that magic. Here's why.

Imaginatively, once BREAK cycles back into the rotation years from now, you won't know when. It could be tomorrow. It could be 2027. And when it does reappear, you'll have that moment: "Wait, I've solved this word before." That's a genuine surprise. That's serendipity. That's the kind of thing that makes you want to text a friend: "Dude, the Wordle was BREAK again—I haven't seen that since, like, 2022!"

That emotional payoff is worth more to the game's longevity than the novelty of 400 more fresh words.

Estimated data suggests that reintroducing previous Wordle answers could increase emotional engagement, restoring the game's magic by 2027.

The Mechanics: How Repeating Answers Will Actually Work

Here's where it gets interesting: the New York Times still hasn't fully explained how they'll implement repeating words.

Their statement says they'll "begin adding previously run words back into play." That's vague. It doesn't say whether they'll:

• Randomize all past words and shuffle them back into the rotation
• Carefully select which words repeat and when
• Use a themed approach (CAROL on Christmas, HEART on Valentine's Day)
• Spread them out over years so repetition feels rare
• Inject them periodically to extend the game indefinitely

The strategy matters. A lot.

If the New York Times randomizes everything, the game theoretically becomes infinite. You could play Wordle forever. Sure, eventually you'd hit repeats more frequently, but the core puzzle-solving experience stays the same: you don't know what word is coming.

But if they use a themed approach—hand-selecting specific words for specific days—that changes the dynamic entirely. The game becomes less about pure puzzle-solving and more about guessing what the puzzle-setter had in mind. Is CAROL the answer because it's thematically Christmas-y, or because it's just the next word in the rotation?

Most players are hoping for pure randomization. That preserves the integrity of the puzzle-solving experience. It means your 2,400-word pool becomes an infinite resource, just with higher probability of repetition as time goes on.

The Death of the Past-Answer Strategy

For roughly three and a half years, a specific breed of Wordle player developed a distinct advantage: those with access to historical data.

You can find Wordle answer lists everywhere now. Some are simple spreadsheets. Some are sophisticated databases with analysis. Some even predict future answers based on word frequency and letter combinations. They're not cheating tools in the traditional sense—they're research resources.

But with repeating words coming, all of that research becomes obsolete.

Consider a player who's maintained a mental map of past answers. They've noticed patterns. They've seen which letters appear frequently. They've built intuition about which words the New York Times tends to favor. KNOLL and KNOLL were never going to repeat, so why worry about them?

Now? KNOLL could be tomorrow's puzzle.

This resets the playing field. It doesn't matter if you've solved 1,600 consecutive Wordles. It doesn't matter if you have a 98% win rate. When repeating words start, everyone goes back to zero. Everyone has to re-learn how to solve without the crutch of historical data.

For casual players, this is barely noticeable. They've never looked up past answers anyway. They just solved the puzzle, got their streak, moved on.

But for the meta-players—the ones who've engineered their play style around knowing what's not possible—this is seismic.

Each of the popular starting words covers five high-frequency letters, making them optimal choices for filtering possibilities in the new Wordle system. Estimated data based on typical letter frequency.

Why This Solves the Fairness Problem

Wordle's original selling point was radical accessibility. No freemium model. No ads. No premium tier with hint powers. One game, one word, everyone equal.

But as past-answer lists proliferated, that equality evaporated. A player with access to a comprehensive historical database had a concrete, measurable advantage over a player who didn't. They could eliminate entire categories of possible answers. They could make probabilistically better guesses.

The New York Times could have tried to fight this. They could have encrypted their API. They could have demanded that answer-list websites shut down. But that's not their style, and it wouldn't have worked anyway.

Instead, they chose the elegant solution: make the historical data irrelevant.

Once repeating answers begin, past data tells you almost nothing about today's puzzle. BREAK appeared on game #172? Great. But will it appear again tomorrow? In six months? In three years? Nobody knows. The information is useless.

This is actually brilliant game design. The New York Times didn't ban or shame players who used past-answer lists. They just made those lists strategically useless. It's the digital equivalent of changing the rules so that the loophole closes automatically.

Every player wakes up to the same mystery. Every player has the same information. Every player has the same odds of solving it.

The playing field isn't just leveled—it's legitimately level for the first time in three years.

The Psychological Impact on Long-Term Players

If you've been playing Wordle since launch, this change hits different.

You've built a streak. Maybe it's 500 games. Maybe it's 1,200 games. Maybe you've solved every single Wordle ever created. You've invested identity into this. You are, in some sense, a Wordle player.

And for nearly four years, you've had the security of knowing that the game operated by certain rules. No repeats. No tricks. No surprises beyond the puzzle itself.

Now the rules change.

For some players, that's exciting. It injects uncertainty back into a game that had started to feel solved and predictable. It means that your intuition about which words might appear next becomes relevant again. It means the game can theoretically last forever, and you could play for decades.

For other players, it's unsettling. You've optimized your strategy around knowing that each word appears once. You've built mental models based on that assumption. Now you have to unlearn those models.

The psychological dimension here is real. Wordle became a daily ritual for millions of people specifically because it was predictable, democratic, and had clear boundaries. Repeating answers change the boundary conditions.

But here's the thing: the change is necessary for the game to survive long-term. Without it, Wordle becomes a historical artifact by 2027. A great game that ended. A completed experience.

With it, Wordle becomes genuinely infinite. It becomes a multigenerational game. Kids growing up in the 2030s could play Wordle and potentially encounter the same words that players solved in 2021. That's kind of beautiful.

Repeating answers in Wordle are estimated to have a high impact on meta strategy and speedrunning, while moderately affecting leaderboard players and psychological stakes. Estimated data.

What "Magical Serendipitous Moments" Actually Means

The New York Times used careful language when they announced this. They mentioned "magical, serendipitous moments when Wordle overlaps with real life."

That's a specific design choice. Here's what it implies.

Imagine it's December 25th, 2026. The Wordle answer is CAROL. You already solved that word years ago—maybe you got it in two tries, maybe you agonized over it. But now, years later, you see it again. On Christmas. And the coincidence feels intentional. Thematic. Special.

Or imagine you're going through a breakup, and the Wordle answer is HEART. Or you're starting a new job, and the answer is AMBITION. Or you're thinking about a lost loved one, and the answer is GHOST.

These moments—where a word's meaning aligns with what's happening in your life—become powerful when they're rare. They become coincidences that feel meaningful. They become the kind of thing you screenshot and send to a friend with a laughing-crying emoji.

Wordle, under the new system, is banking on those moments to provide emotional resonance that pure puzzle-solving difficulty can't replicate.

This is why repeating answers aren't a compromise or a retreat. They're an upgrade. They transform Wordle from a mechanical puzzle-solving game into something more narrative, more personal, more intertwined with daily life.

The Untested Variables: What Could Go Wrong

For all the upside to repeating answers, there are some unknowns.

First: player fatigue from repetition. If the rotation cycles too quickly, or if the same words appear within a few months of each other, it could feel cheap. Imagine solving ROBOT in January and then again in March. That's not magical serendipity—that's lazy game design. The New York Times will need to space out repeats carefully, probably across timeframes measured in years, not months.

Second: the entropy of predictability. As the word pool shrinks relative to the number of games played, probabilities skew. Instead of a 1-in-2,400 chance of getting any specific word, some words might have a 1-in-1,800 chance if they're weighted differently. This changes the strategic calculus of the game. Players who intuit these weightings could develop new advantages.

Third: data accumulation. Once repeating answers become common, a new kind of historical analysis becomes possible. Which words repeat after 2 years? After 4 years? Do certain categories of words (animals, emotions, tools) repeat more frequently than others? The New York Times will need to be opaque about their algorithm, or the new meta-gaming will start immediately.

Fourth: the death of streaks. If repeating answers are truly random, the law of large numbers means every long-term player will eventually hit an unsolvable repeat—a word they've seen before but can't remember, or a word that comes back too soon and catches them off-guard. This could break the streak of casual players who've never broken their chain. That's a real emotional cost.

None of these are showstoppers. They're just variables that the New York Times will need to manage carefully.

Estimated data shows that by 2026, the original pool of 2,400 unique Wordle words would be exhausted, prompting the introduction of repeating answers in 2025.

Strategy Shifts: How to Play in the Repeating-Answer Era

Your Wordle strategy probably needs an update.

In the old system, you could build intuition about words that were unlikely because they'd already been used. KNOLL appeared on game #150? You never had to consider it again. That was a relief. You could eliminate entire categories of possibilities.

In the new system, every word is fair game every day.

That means your starting word becomes more important, not less. You want a word that eliminates possibilities efficiently. The consensus "best" starting words—STARE, SLATE, CRANE, STERN, TOAST—are still optimal because they test high-frequency letters. But now they're optimal for a different reason: they serve as a probability filter rather than a memory aid.

Your second word also shifts in importance. In the old system, you could pick your second word based on what the first word told you and what words you remembered. In the new system, you need to pick it based on raw letter frequency and letter combination analysis.

Consider using a strategy like this:

1. First word: Use a word with common consonants and vowels (STARE covers S, T, A, R, E)
2. Second word: If the first word didn't crack the puzzle, use a word with different common letters (NOISILY covers N, O, I, S, L, Y)
3. Third word: Start narrowing based on the clues you've received, not based on what you remember
4. Fourth-sixth word: Pure deduction from this point on

This is almost exactly how new players approach Wordle anyway. They don't have years of pattern recognition to lean on, so they rely on first principles: what letters are most common? What words fit the constraints? What's the logical answer?

Old pros are essentially being pushed back toward the beginner mindset. Which is probably healthy for the game.

The Competitive Scene: How Speedrunners and Leaderboard Players Adapt

Wordle has developed a surprising competitive ecosystem. There are speedrunners who compete to solve in the fastest time. There are leaderboards tracking consecutive wins. There are community challenges and tournaments.

Repeating answers will shake up this ecosystem significantly.

For speedrunners, the change might actually be beneficial. Without the ability to predict answers based on historical data, speedruns become more dependent on raw pattern recognition and hand-eye coordination. The competitive advantage shifts from research and preparation to skill and instinct.

For leaderboard players chasing the perfect streak, repeating answers introduce a new risk factor. You could have solved 1,000 Wordles perfectly, but one day a repeat appears, and you can't quite remember it, and your streak ends. The psychological stakes get higher because the variance increases.

Some competitive players are already talking about what this means for the meta. Will the New York Times weight certain words more heavily? Will there be patterns to the repeats? Will competitive players need to maintain their own historical databases tracking not just the answers, but the timing of repeats?

Probably yes. The game's meta will evolve. The strategy will get deeper, not simpler.

Data Privacy and the Archive Question

Here's something the New York Times hasn't fully addressed: what happens to the historical record?

Wordle's answer history is public knowledge. Anyone can look up what game #500 was, or game #1,000, or game #1,685. These are facts that have been documented, archived, and preserved by the Wayback Machine, fan sites, and Wikipedia.

Once repeating answers begin, that archive becomes strategically significant again. If someone notices that answers tend to repeat after exactly 4 years, the archive becomes a prediction tool. If someone figures out that holidays get themed repeats, the archive becomes a cheat sheet.

The New York Times probably understands this risk. They might need to actively obscure the pattern-matching by deliberately mixing up the rotation, introducing randomness, or varying the timeframes between repeats.

Or they might embrace it. Let the players theorize and analyze. The worst they can do is figure out the pattern, and even then, Wordle is such a tight game that knowing a probable answer doesn't mean you can solve it faster or with more certainty.

Either way, the historical archive is now more valuable than ever.

The Longer Timeline: What Happens in 2027, 2030, 2035

Let's project forward. Assume the New York Times implements repeating answers with a 5-year rotation on average. Meaning BREAK (game #172) won't reappear until roughly 2027.

By 2030, you'll have had five years to play Wordle. You might have a 1,900-game streak. When a repeat appears, it'll be something you probably solved years ago. Chances are good you'll remember it. The puzzle will feel both familiar and surprising.

By 2035, Wordle will have been running for 14 years. You'll have a 5,000+ game streak if you've never missed a day. Repeats will be common enough that you can't remember every instance. You'll solve ROBOT and think, "I've definitely solved this before, but when?" That confusion is where the magic lives.

By 2040, Wordle will be old enough that kids born after launch are now teenagers. They'll have played Wordle their entire lives. They'll have watched the game shift from pure novelty to institutional daily ritual.

The repeating-answers change ensures that Wordle doesn't become a historical curiosity by 2027. It becomes a multigenerational phenomenon instead.

That's the real significance of this move. It's not just an operational decision to extend the game's life. It's a commitment to Wordle as a permanent fixture of daily internet culture.

The Emotional Arc: From Novelty to Nostalgia

Wordle's lifecycle has always been built into its design. Josh Wardle created it during the pandemic as a gift for his partner. It was small, intimate, and limited by design. The one-puzzle-per-day structure was specifically chosen to prevent binge-playing and keep the game fresh.

When the New York Times bought it, they expanded it—but carefully, preserving the core experience. The no-repeats rule was part of that preservation. It made every puzzle feel momentous. It made every solve feel like adding to a historical timeline.

But that novelty was always going to fade. By 2024 and 2025, players had grown accustomed to the experience. The game stopped feeling revolutionary and started feeling routine. And routine, paradoxically, breeds boredom faster than novelty does.

Repeating answers change that trajectory. They shift Wordle from novelty to nostalgia. Instead of playing for the thrill of the new, you play for the joy of recognition. "Oh, I remember this word!" becomes the emotional reward instead of "This is a word I've never seen before."

That's a more sustainable emotion long-term. Nostalgia is powerful. Nostalgia is why people revisit old songs, old movies, old games. Nostalgia is why video game remakes sell millions of copies.

By introducing repeats, the New York Times is betting that the nostalgia of a repeated word is more emotionally resonant than the novelty of a new one. And honestly, they're probably right.

FAQ

What is the Wordle repeating answers update?

The Wordle repeating answers update is a major change announced by the New York Times where previously used Wordle answers will cycle back into the game starting in 2025. Instead of each of the approximately 2,400 five-letter words appearing only once, words can now repeat years apart, extending the game indefinitely and changing how players approach daily puzzles.

Why is Wordle introducing repeating answers?

Wordle introduced repeating answers for several critical reasons. First, the original word pool of approximately 2,400 words would be exhausted by late 2026, threatening the game's survival. Second, repeating answers eliminate the unfair advantage that players gained by using historical answer lists. Third, it creates "magical, serendipitous moments" where a word's meaning aligns with the player's life on the day it reappears, adding emotional resonance to the game beyond puzzle-solving difficulty.

How will the repeating answers actually work in Wordle?

The New York Times has not fully detailed the mechanics, but the most likely approach involves carefully spacing out repeating words across multiple years to maintain the element of surprise and prevent repetition fatigue. Words might repeat randomly or follow a themed pattern for certain dates, though players hope for pure randomization. The system is designed so that even though a word has appeared before, you won't know when it will appear again, preserving the puzzle-solving experience.

Will Wordle repeating answers affect my streak?

Repeating answers could potentially affect your streak if you encounter a word you don't remember solving previously. Since you won't know what words will repeat or when, the game becomes riskier for players chasing long-term streaks. However, most players shouldn't be significantly impacted unless they forget a word they previously solved, which is unlikely since you're solving puzzles, not memorizing them.

What strategy changes do I need for Wordle with repeating answers?

Your strategy should shift from memory-based elimination (knowing which words are impossible because they already appeared) to pure deduction-based solving (using letter frequency and logical constraints). Your starting word becomes more important as a probability filter. You'll rely less on intuition built over years of play and more on first-principles analysis of common letters and word combinations, similar to how new players approach the game.

Why would past Wordle answer lists become useless after this change?

Past Wordle answer lists become useless strategically because knowing that BREAK was game #172 tells you nothing about whether it will appear tomorrow, next month, or three years from now. Since repeating words will be spaced years apart with unknown timing, historical data loses its predictive power. The information goes from being strategically valuable to completely irrelevant for solving today's puzzle.

Is using a past Wordle answer list considered cheating?

Technically, using a past answer list is not explicitly against Wordle's rules. However, it does violate the spirit of the game by giving players an unfair advantage over those without access to historical data. By introducing repeating answers, the New York Times essentially made this form of assistance useless without formally banning it, elegantly closing the loophole.

How long can Wordle run with repeating answers?

With repeating answers, Wordle can theoretically run indefinitely. Based on a 2,400-word pool cycling across multiple-year intervals, the game could remain interesting and engaging for 50+ years or longer. This ensures that Wordle doesn't become a historical curiosity by 2027 but instead becomes a multigenerational daily habit.

When did the New York Times announce Wordle repeating answers?

The New York Times announced that Wordle would begin adding previously run words back into play starting Monday of the following week (this would be late January 2025). The announcement stated: "Starting on Monday, we will begin adding previously run words back into play. There are still many first-time answers to debut, but also more chances for Wordle in ones and those magical, serendipitous moments when Wordle overlaps with real life."

What are "magical serendipitous moments" in Wordle?

"Magical serendipitous moments" refer to instances where a repeating Wordle word's meaning aligns meaningfully with what's happening in a player's life on the day it reappears. For example, solving HEART during a particularly emotional time, or CAROL during Christmas. These coincidences create emotional resonance and personal meaning that pure puzzle-solving difficulty cannot replicate, making the game feel more connected to players' actual lives.

The Verdict: Is This Change Actually Necessary?

Yes. Absolutely.

Wordle faced a genuine existential deadline. Without repeating answers, the game had 18-24 months left before hitting a dead end. The New York Times could have delayed the inevitable by adding more words or switching to six-letter puzzles, but that just kicks the can down the road.

Repeating answers solve the deadline problem while also addressing a fairness issue that had been festering for years. Plus, they introduce a psychological shift that could actually strengthen the game's appeal.

Sure, some long-term players will feel nostalgic for the era of unique words. Some will worry about their streaks. Some will resist the change out of pure conservatism.

But in a year or two, when you encounter ROBOT again and realize it's been a thousand games since you last solved it, when that coincidence feels genuinely delightful, you'll understand why the New York Times made this call.

Wordle isn't ending. It's evolving. And this time, the evolution is necessary.

What's Next for the Daily Word Puzzle

As Wordle heads into this new era, it's worth thinking about what comes next. Will other word puzzle games follow suit? Will competitors like Waffle, Quordle, and Semantle introduce their own repeating systems?

Probably not immediately. Most of them still have deeper word pools and aren't facing the same deadline pressure. But the New York Times just proved that repeating elements don't destroy a word game—they enhance it.

The bigger question is whether Wordle maintains its cultural dominance as the go-to daily puzzle. The barrier to entry is low (it's free, it's simple, it takes two minutes). The daily ritual is strong (one puzzle, everyone solves the same one). The community is engaged (millions of people discuss the puzzle every day).

Repeating answers don't change any of that. If anything, they strengthen Wordle's moat by ensuring the game never actually ends.

So here's the bottom line: the Wordle you play in 2025 and beyond will feel familiar but different. You'll solve puzzles the same way, but the strategic landscape will shift. Your streak will matter more because it's easier to break. The words will mean more because they're not disposable.

It's the right call. And if you've been playing since launch, get ready for some genuinely serendipitous moments down the road.

Key Takeaways

• Wordle's finite word pool of ~2,400 words would be exhausted by late 2026 without repeating answers, threatening the game's survival
• Repeating answers eliminate unfair advantages players gained by studying historical answer lists, restoring fairness to daily competition
• Strategy shifts from memory-based elimination of past words to pure deduction-based solving using letter frequency and logical constraints
• The change theoretically extends Wordle indefinitely while creating 'magical serendipitous moments' when word meanings align with players' lives
• Long-term players will need to unlearn years of pattern recognition built around unique-word-only gameplay and re-approach puzzles fresh

Related Articles

• Quordle Hints, Answers & Expert Strategies [2025]
• NYT Strands Hints, Answers & Strategy Guide [2025]
• NYT Strands Hints & Answers Today: Game #690 [Jan 22, 2025]
• NYT Strands Hints & Answers Today (Game #697) [2025]
• NYT Strands Hints & Answers Today [2025]
• NYT Connections: Complete Strategy Guide & Daily Puzzle Solver [2025]