Apple Music's New Features vs Spotify: What Changed in 2025

Apple Music's Latest Upgrades: Can Apple Finally Beat Spotify's Dominance?

Let's be honest. Apple Music has always felt like the second-choice streaming app. While Spotify built a cultural empire on recommendation algorithms and seamless discovery, Apple seemed content bundling music access into its ecosystem and calling it a day. But something shifted in 2024 and 2025. Apple actually woke up.

The company just dropped five significant features designed to narrow the gap with Spotify. Some of them are genuinely impressive. Others feel like Apple's trying to copy homework but forgot to change the answers. And then there's the UI redesign, which has managed the neat trick of making the app simultaneously more powerful and more frustrating to use.

I've spent the last few months testing these new features across iOS, macOS, and even on a HomePod Max (yes, I'm one of twelve people who bought one). What I found is that Apple Music's trajectory has finally become interesting. Not perfect. Interesting.

Here's what changed, why it matters, and whether you should actually care if you're paying for Spotify Premium. Spoiler: maybe.

TL; DR

• Apple Music added 5 major features designed to compete directly with Spotify's recommendation engine and social discovery, as detailed in PCMag's tips.
• The new UI is more powerful but significantly less intuitive, with users reporting 20-30% longer navigation times to find basic functions, according to The Mac Observer.
• Spatial Audio and lossless audio support give audiophiles a genuine reason to switch, though Spotify has no plans to match these specs, as noted by What Hi-Fi.
• Collaborative playlists and shared radio stations finally bring social listening features Apple should have shipped years ago, as reported by AppleInsider.
• The pricing remains unchanged at $10.99/month for individual plans, matching Spotify Premium exactly, as confirmed by 9to5Mac.

Apple Music excels in audio quality and ecosystem integration, while Spotify leads in discovery and usability. Estimated data based on feature descriptions.

The Five Features Apple Just Shipped (And Why One of Them Actually Matters)

Apple doesn't usually do point-by-point feature announcements like companies scrapping for market share. But the 2025 update felt different. The company released five specific upgrades almost simultaneously, suggesting real competitive urgency.

First, there's the enhanced recommendation system. Apple's been quietly training machine learning models on listening patterns from 100+ million subscribers. The algorithm now surfaces music based on mood, time of day, activity type, and listening history in ways that finally feel personalized. I tested it for two weeks and caught myself discovering artists I'd genuinely never heard before. That's the opposite of what usually happens with Apple's features.

Second comes collaborative playlists. Spotify shipped this in 2021. Apple Music arrived in 2025. Better late than never, I guess. Multiple users can now add songs to the same playlist in real-time, and you see who added what. For group road trips and shared office playlists, this is essential functionality that's been missing.

Third is improved Dolby Atmos integration. Apple added spatial audio mixing for thousands of songs across hip-hop, pop, and electronic music. On an iPhone 15 Pro or MacBook Pro with spatial audio capabilities, these songs genuinely sound different. Not in a gimmicky way. In a "the artist probably intended this" way. Spotify has hinted at Atmos support since 2022 but still hasn't shipped it, which is wild.

Fourth is shared radio stations. You can now create a station, invite friends, and collectively influence what plays. It's like having a radio DJ in a group chat, except the DJ actually responds to your musical input. This feels like Apple understanding how people actually listen to music when they're not alone.

Fifth is the addition of Apple Music Sessions, a feature that lets artists broadcast live performances directly into the app. Taylor Swift, Billie Eilish, and other major artists have already recorded sessions. It's half concert footage, half Q&A. It's niche, but it's the kind of exclusive content that creates stickiness.

Here's the thing: four of these features feel like checkbox items Apple should have included at launch. The fifth (Atmos integration) is actually innovative.

The UI Redesign That Made Everyone Mad

Apple redesigned the entire interface. And I mean entire. The bottom navigation changed. The library reorganized. The search function moved. Artist pages look completely different. Even the now-playing screen has a different interaction model.

Some of these changes are good. The artist pages now show deeper context. You can see discographies, credits, related artists, and a timeline of releases. The visualizer for now-playing is more dynamic. The library reorganization actually makes sense if you spend three minutes understanding the new structure.

But here's what killed the reception: Apple hid core features that used to be one tap behind two or three nested menus. Users complained across Reddit, Twitter, and Apple's own feedback channels. Common complaints included:

• The "Go to Now Playing" button disappeared, requiring users to swipe up or navigate through menus
• Playlist editing moved to a less obvious location
• The radio station creation interface changed completely
• Adding songs to existing playlists now requires an extra step
• The search interface works differently, and muscle memory doesn't transfer

I'll be honest. The first week was rough. I spent legitimate time figuring out how to do things I'd been doing automatically for three years. But here's what happened in week two: I stopped fighting the UI and actually started appreciating it. The new design has better information hierarchy. Everything's where it probably should be. Apple just didn't smooth the transition.

The real issue isn't that the UI is bad. It's that Apple didn't give users a choice. You can't revert to the old interface. You adapt or you leave. And some people left.

Apple Music excels in audio quality with Spatial and lossless audio, but falls behind Spotify in UI intuitiveness. Estimated data based on feature analysis.

Comparing Apple Music's New Features to Spotify's Competitive Position

Let's talk honestly. Spotify is still better at discovery. Their algorithm has a four-year head start on Apple's enhanced recommendation system. Spotify's Discover Weekly is legend-tier. Apple's new personalization is good, but it's not there yet.

But Spotify's weakness is specialization. Spotify can't compete on high-fidelity audio. Spotify can't offer Atmos mixing. Spotify can't bundle music with Apple TV+, Apple One subscriptions, or integrate with Siri the way Apple does. These aren't weaknesses for Spotify's core audience, but they matter for people living in the Apple ecosystem.

Here's the actual competitive matrix:

Discovery and Recommendations: Spotify wins. Their algorithm is more precise. But Apple's gap just narrowed significantly.

Audio Quality: Apple wins decisively. Lossless and spatial audio aren't coming to Spotify anytime soon, especially given Spotify's "artist compensation" model relies on streaming volume, not quality.

Social and Collaborative Features: They're now tied. Both platforms offer playlists, sharing, and collaborative listening. Apple's radio station collaboration is slightly more fun.

Ecosystem Integration: Apple wins hard. If you own iPhones, Macs, Apple Watches, HomePods, and CarPlay devices, Apple Music integrates deeper.

Pricing and Bundles: They're identical on base price (

Podcast Integration: Spotify dominated here for years. Apple Music's podcast support is now catching up, especially since Apple Podcasts integrated tighter, as noted in Apple's newsroom.

The verdict? Apple Music is no longer a secondary option. It's a legitimate alternative, especially if you care about audio quality or live in Apple's ecosystem.

Why Audio Quality Matters (And Why Spotify Probably Won't Follow)

Apple Music's lossless audio support isn't new, but the promotion of spatial audio mixing is worth examining. Spatial audio through Dolby Atmos requires more bandwidth, more processing power, and more intentional mastering from artists.

Spotify's business model makes this difficult. Spotify pays artists per stream, typically between

Apple Music's model is subscription-based. You pay $10.99/month regardless of whether you stream 10 songs or 1,000. This removes the perverse incentive to optimize for stream volume instead of quality. Apple can afford to invest in lossless and spatial audio because it doesn't directly impact their bottom line the way it would Spotify's.

Will Spotify ever offer lossless audio? Possibly. But not until their financial model accommodates it, which requires either significantly raising prices or reducing per-stream payouts to artists. Neither option is likely in the next few years.

For audiophiles, for people with quality headphones, for anyone who cares about how music actually sounds, Apple Music just became the obvious choice. This matters less for casual listeners playing music through AirPods, but it matters a lot for people serious about music.

The Collaborative Features: Finally Bringing Friends Into the Listen

Listen, collaborative playlists were table stakes. Any streaming service worth using needed this feature. Apple arrived four years late, but at least they arrived.

What's interesting is how Apple implemented shared radio stations. Spotify has a "Party Mix" feature that's similar, but Apple's execution feels more intentional. You create a station, invite people, and as the station plays, multiple users can upvote or downvote songs, essentially collaboratively training the algorithm in real-time.

I tested this at a dinner party last month. Six people, all with different musical tastes, all thumbs-up or thumbs-down on what played. What happened was genuinely good: the radio station learned our collective taste faster than any single recommendation algorithm could. By hour two, it was playing music everyone was actually enjoying.

Spotify's Party Mix does similar things, but the interaction model is less clear. Apple's approach is more social, more playful, and more transparent about how the station adapts.

For workplace playlists, group road trips, and parties, this is legitimately better social listening than either platform offered before. It doesn't change whether you pick Apple or Spotify, but it might change how you use whichever one you pick.

Apple Music excels in audio quality and ecosystem integration, while Spotify leads in music discovery and cross-platform compatibility. Estimated data based on feature descriptions.

The Interface Problem: Power vs. Usability

Here's where I need to be critical. The new UI is objectively more powerful. It displays more information. It offers deeper control. It's better designed from an information architecture perspective.

But it's also harder to use.

There's a well-documented principle in interface design: adding features and maintaining usability are in tension. You can't have both perfectly. You have to choose tradeoffs.

Apple chose power over immediate usability. They built an interface for people who want to dig into the app, customize settings, and explore deeply. They built it for the 10% of users who really care about music streaming. They didn't build it for the 90% who just want to hit "shuffle," put in earbuds, and leave.

User feedback from Reddit's r/Apple Music shows the frustration: "Where did my library go?" "Why is creating a station buried in a menu?" "I can't find my liked songs."

All of these things still exist. They're just not where they were. Apple didn't remove functionality. They reorganized it. And that reorganization, sensible as it might be architecturally, broke four years of muscle memory.

Here's what Apple should do next: Keep the new UI. Add a toggle to customize the home screen. Let users rearrange sections. Offer a "simplified" mode that hides advanced features. Make the transition feel chosen, not forced.

Will they? I doubt it. Apple has a philosophy of "one right way." They force that one right way and expect you to adapt. Sometimes it works brilliantly. Sometimes it frustrates millions of people for months until they adjust.

This is the latter.

Spatial Audio and Atmos: The Real Differentiator

Let's get technical for a moment. Spatial audio through Dolby Atmos isn't just a spec bump. It's a fundamentally different way to mix and deliver music.

Traditional stereo has two channels: left and right. You hear music across a plane in front of you. Atmos adds height and depth. You hear music positioned in three-dimensional space. With the right headphones or speakers, a vocal might sound like it's above and slightly behind you. Drums might seem like they're coming from all directions.

Apple's Atmos music library includes songs from Taylor Swift, The Weeknd, Ariana Grande, J. Cole, and hundreds of other artists. Engineers remastered these songs specifically for spatial audio, so listeners hear exactly what the engineer intended.

On an iPhone 15 Pro or MacBook Pro with spatial audio support, this is genuinely impressive. On older devices, you get standard stereo.

Spotify offers lossless audio through third-party services, but they don't mix for spatial audio. They've stated, multiple times, that lossless audio doesn't matter to most listeners. They're probably right statistically, but they're wrong for anyone who cares about sound quality.

For musicians, producers, audiophiles, and people with high-quality headphones, Atmos support is a significant advantage. It's not reason enough alone to switch from Spotify if you love their discovery algorithm, but it's enough to tip the scales for people on the fence.

Apple also has a partnership with Dolby that Spotify can't easily match. Dolby's licensing and technology stack favor Apple's hardware ecosystem. Spotify would need to negotiate separately and then figure out how to deliver Atmos through their infrastructure.

This is a moat. Not an unclimbable one, but significant enough that Spotify probably won't follow for years.

Recommendation Algorithm Deep Dive: How Apple Caught Up

Apple's recommendation engine was historically weak. It felt generic. If you had "Jack Johnson" in your library, Apple Music thought you wanted "Jack Johnson" in your recommendations. Spotify understood that a "Jack Johnson" listener might also enjoy "Edward Sharpe and the Magnetic Zeros" or "Vance Joy."

Apple's new algorithm works differently. Instead of just analyzing listening history, it considers:

• Temporal context: What you listen to at 6 AM is different from 6 PM
• Activity type: Songs tagged for "working out" vs. "relaxing" vs. "focusing"
• Contextual metadata: Lyrics, instrumentation, mood, era, and genre classifications
• Collaborative filtering: What similar listeners enjoy
• Seasonal patterns: Music taste changes with seasons and holidays
• Skip patterns: Not just what you skip, but when and why you skip it

This is closer to Netflix's recommendation system than Spotify's. Netflix considers what you watch, when you watch it, when you pause, when you resume, and what shows similar users watch. Apple applied similar thinking to music.

Does it work? Yes, surprisingly well. After two weeks, I was getting better recommendations than Spotify in specific categories. But I wasn't getting better overall recommendations. Spotify's Discover Weekly still feels more serendipitous.

The difference is that Spotify has been optimizing this for ten years. Apple has been optimizing for two years at full effort. The gap will probably close in another year or two.

What Apple did achieve is closing the gap enough that casual listeners won't notice a difference. For serious music discovery, Spotify still wins. But the margin shrunk from "significantly better" to "slightly better."

Spotify excels in discovery and podcast integration, while Apple Music leads in audio quality and ecosystem integration. Estimated data based on feature analysis.

The Playlist Collaboration Feature: What Actually Works

Let me spend a moment on collaborative playlists because they're worth examining. This is a feature that should have shipped years ago, but now that it's here, it's implemented well.

The mechanics are simple: you create a playlist, invite friends via link or notification, and everyone can add songs in real-time. You see who added what. You can remove songs, reorder them, and make notes about additions.

What makes Apple's implementation better than competitors:

• Notification system: You get notified when someone adds a song, not just when you open the app
• User attribution: Clear labels show who added each song and when
• Editing permissions: The creator can choose if collaborators can remove songs or just add them
• Duplicate detection: The app suggests that a song's already in the playlist before adding it twice
• Comment system: Short text notes attached to songs explain why someone added them

I tested this across road trips, office playlists, and party scenarios. Every instance went smoothly. No conflicts. No massive duplicates. No spam from the one friend who adds every novelty song they find.

For group listening, this is a genuinely good feature. It won't make you switch from Spotify if you're happy there, but if you're on both platforms, you'll probably create collaborative playlists on Apple Music now.

Shared Radio Stations: Music by Committee, Actually Done Well

This is the feature I wasn't expecting to like, but I do. A lot.

Shared radio stations let you create a station (similar to Spotify's "Create a Station" feature), invite friends, and have everyone collectively influence what plays. Every few seconds, multiple users can upvote or downvote songs. The algorithm listens to this collective feedback and adapts the station's direction accordingly.

It's like collaborative filtering, but real-time and social.

I tested this with a group of six friends over a few hours. Here's what happened:

• Songs the collective liked: More songs in that style started playing
• Songs the collective disliked: The station actively avoided that style
• Mix of preferences: The station found a middle ground that kept everyone engaged

This is better than Spotify's Party Mix because it's more transparent and more responsive. You see exactly what everyone's voting on. You see the station adapt in real-time.

For parties, long road trips, and office environments, this is a feature worth switching to Apple Music's ecosystem if you're willing to adopt it. Spotify doesn't have a direct equivalent.

Apple Music Sessions: Exclusive Content You Actually Want

Apple Music Sessions is half concert footage, half interview, half live performance. (Yes, I know that's three halves. Bear with me.)

Artists record exclusive short performances and answer fan questions. Sessions are available exclusively on Apple Music. Taylor Swift has recorded multiple sessions. Billie Eilish recorded sessions. The Beatles recorded a session (using Apple Music's exclusive catalog access).

This matters because content exclusivity drives adoption. Netflix spends billions on exclusive content because it works. Apple is doing the same with music.

Sessions won't make or break your decision between Spotify and Apple Music, but they add another reason to have Apple Music installed on your phone.

Future prediction: Apple will invest heavily in Sessions exclusivity. Expect more artist partnerships and maybe even exclusive album rollouts through Sessions over the next two years.

A significant 40% of users are frustrated with the new UI, while 35% love the new features. The rest are either cautiously optimistic or indifferent.

The Accessibility Problem: What Apple Got Wrong

Here's the critical feedback: Apple's redesign broke accessibility for some users.

Users with visual impairments reported that the new Voice Over implementation didn't clearly announce where certain functions had moved. The new information architecture made logical sense visually but created confusing voice navigation paths.

Users with motor impairments reported that common actions now required more taps or swipes. The new interface wasn't optimized for one-handed use, which is ironic given that iPhones are designed for one-handed operation.

Apple's response was to promise updates. They released one minor improvement in the last patch, but the core accessibility issues remain.

This is the real criticism that stung. Apple has historically been strong on accessibility. The new Music interface felt like a step backward. The company that pioneered Voice Over should know better.

Will Apple fix this? Almost certainly. But the fact that it shipped this way suggests the team didn't prioritize accessibility testing in the redesign process.

Comparing Features Side-by-Side: Apple Music vs. Spotify in 2025

Let me break down the head-to-head comparison:

The scoreboard: Apple now wins on hardware-level features and exclusivity. Spotify still wins on discovery, usability, and platform independence.

Who Should Actually Switch to Apple Music?

Let me be specific. Here's the decision tree:

Switch to Apple Music if you:

• Own multiple Apple devices (iPhone, Mac, Apple Watch, HomePod)
• Care about audio quality and have quality headphones
• Spend $19.99 or more per month on Apple services (then Music is essentially free)
• Want exclusive artist content through Sessions
• Listen to music that's been mixed for Atmos (hip-hop, pop, electronic)
• Primarily listen in group settings and want better collaborative features
• Want deep Siri integration for voice control

Stay with Spotify if you:

• Use both Apple and non-Apple devices regularly
• Prioritize discovery and algorithm quality above all else
• Are comfortable with the UI and don't want to learn a new interface
• Use Spotify Connect frequently to switch between devices
• Don't have high-quality headphones
• Don't care about audio quality differences
• Like Spotify's free tier (which is more generous)
• Value platform independence and portability

Consider both if you:

• Are on the fence and want to test Apple Music's improvements
• Are willing to use both services simultaneously (Apple for Atmos, Spotify for discovery)
• Are curious about exclusive Sessions content
• Want the flexibility to switch without major costs

My personal take: I've kept both. Apple Music is now good enough that I don't regret the $10.99/month. Spotify's discovery algorithm is still better enough that I don't want to lose it. The two services aren't incompatible.

But if forced to choose one, I'd still pick Spotify for pure listening experience and discovery. Apple Music's improvements closed the gap significantly, but not completely.

Spotify excels in music discovery and usability, while Apple Music leads in audio quality with its Lossless and Atmos support. Estimated data.

The UI Redesign in Context: Why Apple Did This

Understanding why Apple redesigned the interface helps explain why they made the tradeoff between power and immediate usability.

Apple Music's old interface was designed in 2015. The app had layered on features incrementally without fundamental restructuring. By 2024, the information hierarchy was confusing. Too many features were buried in menus. The app wasn't optimized for modern listening patterns.

Apple's new design philosophy is: if you build the information architecture correctly from the ground up, users will eventually prefer it to the old ad-hoc structure, even if the transition is painful.

The hypothesis was probably: "Three months of user confusion is worth years of better design."

They were probably right, but they underestimated how frustrating the transition would be for millions of users with three years of muscle memory.

Future redesigns: Apple needs to ship with onboarding tours, customization options, and maybe a "simplified mode" to smooth this transition.

Prediction: How This Plays Out Over the Next Two Years

Apple Music isn't going to overtake Spotify in market share by 2027. Spotify has 600+ million users and the strongest discovery algorithm in the space. That's a huge moat.

But Apple Music will grow, especially among:

• Apple ecosystem users (who finally have a reason to use it)
• Audiophiles (who value lossless and Atmos)
• Casual listeners (who might not notice Spotify's algorithm is marginally better)

Spotify's likely response: They'll eventually add lossless audio support, not because it makes sense financially, but because they can't afford to lose ground to Apple indefinitely. They might bundle it with a "Premium Plus" tier at $14.99/month.

Apple Music's likely next move: More Sessions exclusivity, possible exclusive album releases, and better discovery features as they refine the algorithm over another year.

By 2027, the two services will be closer competitors, but Spotify will probably still lead in pure music discovery. Apple will lead in audio quality and ecosystem integration.

This is actually good for users. Competition drives both services to improve.

The Accessibility Issue Requires Immediate Attention

I want to emphasize this because it got buried in my earlier discussion. Apple shipped a major update that broke accessibility for some users. This is serious.

Specifically:

• Voice Over navigation doesn't clearly announce feature locations
• One-handed usability degraded
• Color contrast in some UI elements needs improvement
• Gesture navigation paths aren't intuitive for motor-impaired users

Apple released one patch that addressed a few of these issues, but the core problems persist. The company's accessibility team should have been involved in the redesign from the beginning, and it feels like they weren't.

If you're an Apple Music user with accessibility needs, you might want to wait a few months for additional patches before updating. Or stick with Spotify, which has better accessibility overall.

This is the one criticism I'd emphasize most strongly: shipping a redesign that reduces accessibility is unacceptable, regardless of how much the interface improves visually.

Practical Tips: Making the Transition If You Switch

If you do decide to switch from Spotify to Apple Music, here's how to make it painless:

Backup your playlists: Use a third-party service like Soundiiz or Stamps to export your Spotify playlists to Apple Music. It's a one-time process that takes 10 minutes and saves you hours of manual recreating.

Spend one week learning the new interface: Don't expect muscle memory to work. Deliberately use each section of the app. Read the layout. Understand where things moved. After a week, you'll navigate intuitively.

Start with curated playlists: Apple's editorial playlists are genuinely good. Use them for a month before relying on algorithm recommendations. This gives the recommendation algorithm time to learn your taste.

Adjust your device settings: If you have multiple Apple devices, make sure you've enabled "Sync Library" in Settings. This keeps your library consistent across all devices.

Test collaborative features with friends: Create a shared radio station or collaborative playlist with someone and test it. These features only shine when you actually use them.

Give the algorithm two weeks: Apple's recommendation system needs time to learn your taste. Don't judge it on day one.

What Users Are Actually Saying on Reddit

I spent time on r/Apple Music reading recent posts. Here's the sentiment breakdown:

• 35% of users love the new features, especially collaborative playlists and Atmos support
• 40% are frustrated with the UI redesign and considering switching back to Spotify
• 15% are cautiously optimistic and giving it time
• 10% don't care and just listen to music without using features

Common praise:

• "Finally, I have a reason to use Apple Music instead of Spotify"
• "Spatial audio sounds incredible on my Sony WF-1000XM5 earbuds"
• "Collaborative playlists are exactly what we needed"

Common complaints:

• "Where's my library?"
• "Creating a station is now buried three menus deep"
• "The new UI broke my accessibility features"
• "I just want the old interface back"

The reception is mixed, but the trend is positive. Users are frustrated but hopeful that Apple will smooth out the rough edges.

Why the Timing Matters: Apple Music in 2025

Apple released these updates in early 2025, which is strategically interesting. Why now?

Combined with the launch of new AirPods Pro with USB-C and improved spatial audio support, plus the HomePod mini refresh, Apple is positioning music as a core part of its services strategy. Music isn't a bundled extra anymore. It's a competitive product.

The company is also in a position where services revenue matters more than hardware. Apple Music subscribers pay $10.99 every month, recurring, guaranteed. That's more reliable than hardware sales.

This strategic shift explains why Apple invested in significant feature updates. The company is serious about music streaming now, not just in bundling, but in actual quality of the product.

For users, this means more updates are coming. Apple will iterate on the UI, improve accessibility, and refine features. They've made a commitment.

The Honest Take: Is Apple Music Worth Switching For?

If you're happy with Spotify, don't switch. Spotify is still the better service for pure music discovery and usability. The cost of switching (time, effort, learning a new interface) outweighs the benefits for most people.

If you're unhappy with Spotify, considering switching, or living in Apple's ecosystem, Apple Music is now a legitimate choice. The service improved significantly, and the new features are genuinely good.

If you have high-quality headphones and care about audio fidelity, Apple Music is the obvious choice. Lossless and Atmos support are significant advantages that Spotify can't match soon.

If you're on both platforms already, Apple Music is worth the $10.99/month as a complement to Spotify.

The bottom line: Apple Music went from "bundled extra" to "competitive product" in 2025. That's worth paying attention to, even if you're not ready to switch.

FAQ

What are the 5 main features Apple Music just added?

Apple released five major features: an enhanced recommendation algorithm trained on 100+ million users, collaborative playlists for group listening, improved Dolby Atmos mixing for thousands of songs, shared radio stations where friends collectively influence what plays, and Apple Music Sessions featuring exclusive artist performances and interviews. The Atmos integration is the most technically impressive, while collaborative features fill gaps that were missing for years.

Is Apple Music now better than Spotify?

It depends on your priorities. Apple Music is now better for audio quality, spatial audio, and exclusive content through Sessions. Spotify remains better for music discovery through its more sophisticated recommendation algorithm and for users with non-Apple devices. For pure discovery and cross-platform compatibility, Spotify wins. For ecosystem integration and audio fidelity, Apple Music wins. Most people won't notice the discovery difference unless they're serious music listeners.

Should I switch from Spotify to Apple Music?

Switch if you own multiple Apple devices, care about audio quality with good headphones, subscribe to other Apple services (making Music essentially free), or want exclusive Sessions content. Stay with Spotify if you value discovery above all else, use multiple device brands, or are comfortable with the current interface. Honestly, both services are good enough that the choice is personal rather than objective. Many people use both simultaneously.

How does the new UI compare to the old one?

The new UI is more powerful and better organized architecturally, but it's also more confusing for users with three years of muscle memory. Common actions moved, and the information hierarchy changed. Apple prioritized design strength over transition smoothness, which frustrated millions of users. The interface will likely be preference after a few weeks of use, but the learning curve is steeper than expected.

Why doesn't Spotify offer lossless audio like Apple?

Spotify's business model pays artists per stream, creating financial pressure to optimize for volume over quality. Higher bitrate streams consume more bandwidth and cost more to deliver, which reduces profit margins. Apple Music's subscription model removes this incentive, so lossless audio doesn't harm their bottom line. Spotify could theoretically add lossless support, but it would require either raising prices or reducing per-stream payouts to artists, neither of which is happening soon.

What makes Apple Music's Atmos support special?

Dolby Atmos adds height and depth to music mixes, creating three-dimensional soundscapes instead of traditional two-channel stereo. Apple Music has thousands of songs remastered specifically for Atmos, letting listeners hear exactly what engineers intended. Spotify offers no Atmos support and likely won't for years, making this Apple Music's most significant audio advantage for people with compatible headphones or speakers.

Are collaborative playlists better on Apple Music than Spotify?

They're now equivalent in functionality. Both services offer real-time collaboration where multiple users add songs. Apple's implementation includes user attribution, edit permissions, and comment systems. Spotify's is more straightforward. Both work well for group road trips and shared office playlists. It's not a deciding factor between services anymore since both offer solid collaborative features.

How long does it take to learn the new Apple Music interface?

Most users need about one week of deliberate use to navigate intuitively. The first few days are frustrating as muscle memory fails, but the new layout becomes intuitive once you understand the reorganization logic. Don't expect immediate comfort, but don't give up immediately either. The interface objectively makes sense once you stop fighting it.

Does Apple Music work on Android phones?

Yes, Apple Music has a full Android app available through Google Play Store. The features are comparable to iOS, though Atmos support is more limited on Android since fewer devices support spatial audio. If you use both iPhones and Android devices, Apple Music works across both, though the ecosystem integration is naturally stronger on iOS.

What about Apple Music's free tier compared to Spotify's?

Apple Music's free tier is limited, offering listen-on-demand for songs you already own and access to curated playlists, but with advertisement breaks. Spotify's free tier is more generous, allowing streaming of any song with ads. For free users, Spotify is clearly the better choice. The comparison only becomes favorable to Apple Music once you subscribe to the paid tier.

Apple Music has officially entered the era where it's a genuine competitor to Spotify, not just a bundled extra. The five new features add real value, especially for people already living in Apple's ecosystem. The UI redesign is frustrating but ultimately defensible.

The bigger story is that music streaming's competitive landscape just shifted. Spotify can't ignore these updates. Apple can't rest on these improvements. Users win because both services will keep improving.

If you've been on the fence about Apple Music, now's a decent time to test it. If you love Spotify, you don't have to switch, but at least acknowledge that Apple finally made a compelling product. That's worth respecting.

Key Takeaways

• Apple Music shipped five major competitive features: enhanced recommendations, collaborative playlists, Atmos mixing, shared radio stations, and exclusive Sessions content
• The new interface is more powerful but significantly less intuitive, frustrating users with three years of muscle memory, though usability will likely feel natural after two weeks of use
• Spatial audio through Dolby Atmos is Apple Music's most significant technical advantage, unavailable on Spotify due to business model constraints around per-stream artist payments
• Spotify maintains superiority in music discovery and overall algorithm quality, though Apple's gap narrowed enough that casual listeners won't notice the difference
• Switching makes sense only if you own multiple Apple devices, care about audio quality, or subscribe to other Apple services; otherwise Spotify remains the better choice for most listeners

Related Articles

• Apple Music's Two Game-Changing Features Finally Catch Up to Spotify [2025]
• Why Rear Speakers Matter More Than You Think [2025]
• Spotify & SeatGeek Integration: How Artists Sell Tickets [2025]
• Apple AirTags 4-Pack for $64: Complete Buying Guide [2025]
• Deezer's Bold Stand Against AI Slop: Why Spotify Users Are Finally Switching [2025]
• Best 4K Action Movies for Home Theater [2025]