Ask Runable forDesign-Driven General AI AgentTry Runable For Free
Runable
Back to Blog
Technology24 min read

Apple's Gemini-Powered Siri Coming February 2026 [Update]

Apple plans to unveil a Gemini-powered Siri assistant in February 2026, marking the first major step in its AI partnership with Google. The new Siri will acc...

apple intelligencesiri assistantgoogle geminiai partnershipsiri update 2026+10 more
Apple's Gemini-Powered Siri Coming February 2026 [Update]
Listen to Article
0:00
0:00
0:00

Apple's Gemini-Powered Siri Coming February 2026: What You Need to Know

Siri's about to get a serious upgrade, and yeah, it's coming from Google.

According to reporting from Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, Apple plans to announce a completely revamped Siri powered by Google's Gemini AI models sometime in February 2026. This isn't just a polish on top of the existing assistant. We're talking about a fundamentally different Siri that can actually understand context, access your personal information, and complete tasks across apps and services.

For anyone who's been frustrated with Siri over the past five years, this is actually big news. The current Siri feels stuck in 2015. It can tell you the weather and set timers, sure. But ask it to do anything requiring actual reasoning or understanding of your digital life, and it falls flat on its face.

What's wild is that Apple building this AI partnership with Google wasn't supposed to happen. Back in June 2024, Apple announced what they called "Apple Intelligence." The pitch was that all this AI would run directly on your device, in your pocket, on your phone. No cloud servers. No data leaving your iPhone. Pure, on-device AI that respects privacy.

That vision hit some serious snags. Building sophisticated AI that runs entirely locally is genuinely hard. Apple's own AI infrastructure wasn't ready. So the company made a pragmatic choice: partner with Google, use their proven Gemini models running in the cloud, and integrate those capabilities directly into Apple's ecosystem.

Here's the thing that makes this interesting: it's the first real test of whether Apple-Google collaboration on AI actually works. These companies compete fiercely on search, advertising, and mobile. But on AI, they're willing to work together. That says something about how important they both think this partnership is.

TL; DR

  • February 2026 Reveal: Apple will announce a Gemini-powered Siri that can access personal data and complete complex tasks.
  • Google Partnership: This is the first major product from Apple's AI partnership with Google announced in June 2024.
  • Cloud-Based Processing: Unlike Apple's original on-device AI plans, this Siri version will run on Google's cloud infrastructure.
  • Bigger Update Coming: An even more advanced version is planned for June 2026 at Apple's Worldwide Developers Conference.
  • Conversational AI: The new Siri will be more Chat GPT-like, offering natural dialogue instead of command-and-control interactions.

The Context: Why Apple Needed Google's Help

Apple's been trying to own AI for years. They've built neural engines into their chips. They've published papers. They've hired talented researchers. But when it comes to large language models that can have actual conversations and reason through problems, they've struggled to keep up with OpenAI's Chat GPT and other advanced models.

The original Apple Intelligence announcement in June 2024 was supposed to be Apple's answer. The company showed off features like email summarization, photo cleanup, and writing tools. But critically, Apple positioned all of this as happening on-device, with your data staying on your phone.

That's a compelling pitch from a privacy angle. Your data never touches Apple's servers, much less Google's or anyone else's. But here's the problem: truly sophisticated AI requires serious compute power. You can't run a state-of-the-art language model on an iPhone's local neural engine for every possible task.

So Apple hit a wall. They could deliver basic on-device AI features. But they couldn't deliver the kind of conversational, context-aware assistant that users now expect after playing with Chat GPT for a year or two.

Enter Google. The search giant has been building Gemini, their own large language model family. Google's been aggressive about integrating Gemini everywhere, from their Pixel phones to Chrome to their workspace tools. They've got infrastructure, scale, and proven models.

So Apple did something that would've been unthinkable five years ago: they called Google and made a deal. Apple would integrate Google's Gemini into Apple's devices. Google gets deeper integration with hundreds of millions of iPhones, iPads, and Macs. Apple gets access to proven AI capabilities without having to build everything from scratch.

It's pragmatic. It's not what either company ideally wanted. But it's real.

What February's Siri Update Actually Does

Let's get into the specifics, because this is where the rubber meets the road.

The Siri coming in February won't be your grandmother's Siri. For the first time since the assistant launched in 2011, Apple's actually building an AI that understands context across your entire digital life.

Picture this: You're looking at a text message from your dentist mentioning your appointment next Tuesday. You ask Siri, "Can you remind me about this?" Current Siri would stare blankly. New Siri will understand what "this" refers to. It'll look at the text message on your screen, extract the appointment time, and create a reminder for you.

That's not magic. But it's the kind of basic intelligence that humans have always expected from a digital assistant. The fact that current Siri can't do it is honestly embarrassing.

The new Siri will be able to:

  • Read your screen content: Understand what's displayed on your device and reason about it.
  • Access personal data: Connect to your calendar, contacts, email, notes, and other apps to complete tasks.
  • Execute multi-step workflows: Chain together actions across different apps without you intervening.
  • Maintain context: Remember what you've said previously in the conversation and reference it.
  • Speak naturally: Use conversational language instead of requiring command-line syntax.

Let's say you want to create a meeting invite. Right now, you'd open Calendar, manually fill in details, and send it. With the new Siri, you could say something like, "Schedule a meeting with Sarah from marketing next Thursday at 2 PM to discuss the Q2 campaign. Send her a calendar invite and add it to my calendar too."

Siri would parse that entire request, understand all the context, and actually execute it.

That requires understanding natural language, reasoning about intent, accessing your personal data structures, and integrating with multiple apps. It's legitimately sophisticated AI work. Gemini can do it. Apple's on-device AI engine couldn't—at least not reliably.

The Google Cloud Infrastructure Question

Here's where privacy advocates get nervous, and rightfully so.

Apple's positioning Siri as "on-device first" for many features. Basic functions will still run locally. But for the sophisticated reasoning required to understand context and complete complex tasks, the new Siri will actually send data to Google's cloud servers for processing.

Let's be clear about what that means: when you ask the new Siri to do something complicated, some version of that request—along with potentially relevant context from your device—will leave your iPhone and hit Google's infrastructure.

Apple's saying they'll encrypt this data end-to-end. They'll use anonymous tokens instead of your Apple ID. Google technically won't know it's you making the request. But Google will absolutely know the nature of what you're asking.

If you ask Siri about your doctor's appointment, Google's servers will process that query. If you ask Siri to help draft a sensitive email, Google's infrastructure will see that too. Apple's trying to make this palatable by promising encryption and anonymization, but fundamentally, you're routing certain tasks through Google's systems.

This is Apple making a compromise between their stated privacy principles and the reality of what sophisticated AI requires. Some users will accept that tradeoff. Privacy absolutists will hate it.

But here's the pragmatic take: every major AI system requires cloud compute. Chat GPT, Gemini, Claude, Copilot—they all run on servers. The question isn't whether data travels to the cloud. It's whether the company processing it will abuse it or keep it safe.

Apple's betting that encryption and anonymization are good enough safeguards. Whether that's actually true remains to be seen.

Why February Matters: The Incremental Upgrade Path

Apple's clearly doing this in stages. February's Siri announcement is step one. June 2026 brings something even more advanced.

That staggered approach makes sense strategically. Apple needs to:

  1. Test integration at scale: Get the Gemini-Siri partnership working reliably across millions of devices.
  2. Iron out privacy issues: Work through encryption, anonymization, and data handling in the real world.
  3. Develop more advanced features: Use the February release as a foundation for deeper integrations coming in June.
  4. Build developer support: Give app makers time to integrate with the new Siri capabilities.
  5. Handle regulatory scrutiny: Work with privacy regulators who'll want to examine this Apple-Google partnership closely.

The February announcement will be watched carefully. If Siri finally works well, people will be impressed. If it's half-baked or continues to misunderstand basic requests, Apple looks foolish for partnering with Google and still failing.

There's real pressure here. Apple's been promising better AI for eighteen months. The company's credibility on AI is on the line.

The Bigger June 2026 Update: What to Expect

But February's really just the appetizer.

Gurman reports that Apple's planning an even more significant Siri overhaul for June 2026, which they'll announce at WWDC (Worldwide Developers Conference). This version will supposedly be even more capable, more conversational, and more deeply integrated with iOS, iPadOS, and macOS.

At WWDC, Apple could announce things like:

  • Deeper device integration: Siri that understands more complex multi-app workflows.
  • Proactive assistance: Siri anticipating what you want to do based on patterns and context.
  • Developer APIs: Allowing third-party apps to integrate deeply with the new Siri.
  • On-device model improvements: Better local processing for things that don't need cloud compute.
  • Multi-language and localization: Regional versions that understand local context better.

WWDC is Apple's developer conference, which means it's also when they announce the next iOS version and detailed technical capabilities. So June's update will likely come with a full iOS refresh that bakes Siri deeper into the operating system.

That's the play. February gets headlines and starts the upgrade cycle. June gives developers and power users everything they wanted.

The Competitive Landscape: Where Siri Stands Now

Let's put this in perspective. Siri's been falling behind for years.

Google Assistant on Android phones has been more capable for at least five years. Google's integration with search, maps, Gmail, and other services gives it a huge advantage. Plus, Google's been deploying their language models to the assistant for longer than Apple.

Amazon's Alexa is a different category (voice-first smart home), but even there, Alexa understands context better than Siri in many scenarios.

And then there's Chat GPT, which everyone's comparing everything to now. Chat GPT can have complex conversations, reason through problems, and help with creative work. Siri can't.

So Apple's been losing ground. Not on hardware—iPhones are still fantastic. But on the software intelligence layer, Siri's become the weak point. Apple Intelligence features like email summarization and writing assistance are helpful, but they don't make Siri a great conversational assistant.

The Gemini partnership is Apple trying to catch up. It's not Apple inventing something new. It's Apple admitting they need Google's help to compete with where AI assistants have evolved.

There's nothing wrong with that, honestly. It's honest about the challenge. But it also means Apple's not leading AI innovation anymore. They're integrating someone else's innovation.

Apple's AI Chief Departure: What Changed

There's an interesting subtext here that's worth examining.

John Giannandrea was Apple's head of AI and machine learning. He'd been there since 2018, coming from Google where he'd overseen a massive AI research operation. His job was to make Apple a world-class AI company.

By late 2024, reports emerged that Giannandrea was departing. His title had been quietly reduced earlier. And suddenly, Apple's moving away from the "all on-device, all the time" AI vision that Giannandrea had been championing toward a hybrid model that involves Google's cloud infrastructure.

That's not a coincidence. When leadership changes, strategy often changes with it.

Giannandrea was betting that Apple could be the only major tech company delivering sophisticated AI entirely on-device. That's ambitious. It's also genuinely hard. Maybe impossible with current technology and battery constraints on mobile devices.

His departure signals that Apple's accepting a different vision. A vision where some AI happens on-device, some happens in Apple's cloud, and some happens on Google's cloud. It's less pure, but more practical.

Mike Rockwell, Apple's VP of Software Engineering for user experience, is increasingly involved in AI strategy. Rockwell comes from a software integration background, not pure AI research. That suggests Apple's shifting focus from inventing new AI capabilities to integrating existing capabilities better.

It's a real strategic shift, not just personnel changes.

Privacy Trade-offs: The Honest Conversation

Apple built their brand on privacy. "Your data is yours." "We don't track you." "Your iPhone is a vault for your secrets."

But here's the reality: sophisticated AI requires data processing. There's an inherent tension between Apple's privacy positioning and the AI capabilities users expect.

Apple's trying to square this circle with:

  1. Anonymization: Using tokens and pseudonyms instead of your Apple ID.
  2. End-to-end encryption: Encrypting data before it leaves your device.
  3. Minimal data transmission: Only sending what's necessary for the task.
  4. Transparency: Telling users when data leaves their device.

But let's be real: encryption can be cracked. Anonymization can be deanonymized. And regulators globally are increasingly skeptical about any data leaving users' devices, even if encrypted.

The European Union's Digital Services Act, for instance, has specific concerns about AI transparency. If Apple's routes certain requests to Google's servers without explicit user consent (or just buries it in settings), they could face regulatory pushback.

This isn't a technical problem Apple can solve with engineering. It's a policy and transparency problem.

Users need to understand what's happening, when it's happening, and have real control over it. Not "control" in the sense of digging through Settings for twenty minutes. Actual, obvious, granular control.

Apple's probably going to take hits on this from privacy advocates, no matter how good the technical safeguards are.

Ecosystem Integration: How Siri Becomes Useful

Here's the thing that actually matters: none of this works unless app developers adopt it.

Siri can understand context and complete tasks only if the apps on your iPhone expose those capabilities to Siri. Apple's built Siri Shortcuts for years, which allow automation. But that's always been clunky. Developers have never embraced it the way they've embraced widgets or other iOS features.

For the new Siri to be genuinely useful, app makers need to build intentional Siri integration into their apps. That means:

  • Creating intents that Siri can understand.
  • Exposing key actions through Siri's API.
  • Testing interactions to make sure Siri doesn't misunderstand.
  • Updating these integrations as Siri evolves.

That's work. It costs engineering time and attention. And if Apple doesn't provide strong incentives or if the ROI isn't clear, developers will deprioritize it.

Apple's probably learned this lesson from Siri's historical failures. So you'd expect them to announce strong developer incentives at WWDC 2026. Maybe tighter integration APIs. Maybe app store visibility rewards for apps with great Siri support.

The new Siri could be technically great but practically useless if app integration is weak.

Timeline: What We Know for Sure

Let's pin down what's actually confirmed versus what's speculation.

Confirmed (from Gurman's reporting):

  • Apple will announce a new Siri in February 2026.
  • This Siri uses Google's Gemini AI models.
  • It can access personal data and on-screen content.
  • It's more conversational than current Siri.
  • A bigger update is coming in June 2026 at WWDC.

Likely but not confirmed:

  • The February version will run on Google's cloud infrastructure.
  • Privacy features like encryption and anonymization will be included.
  • John Giannandrea's departure reflects strategic shifts in Apple's AI approach.

Speculation:

  • What specific features will be included beyond basic capabilities.
  • How users will control data transmission to Google.
  • How extensively third-party apps will integrate.
  • Pricing or subscription models (probably free, but not guaranteed).

The confirmed pieces are enough to understand the broad strokes. The details will emerge over the next few months as we get closer to February.

Developer Implications: What's Changing for App Makers

Developers need to be thinking about this now, even though February's still months away.

The new Siri will likely come with updated APIs for app integration. Apple usually telegraphs these changes at WWDC, sometimes even earlier through developer documentation leaks.

Smart app makers should be:

  1. Auditing their current Siri integration: How good is it? What could be better?
  2. Thinking about new workflows: What could users accomplish through Siri that they currently can't?
  3. Designing for conversational interactions: The new Siri will be more natural language-based. Designs need to account for that.
  4. Planning data exposure carefully: Apps will need to decide what data they expose to Siri and how they protect it.
  5. Testing edge cases: Natural language understanding is probabilistic. Apps need to handle misunderstandings gracefully.

Developers who get this right early will have a competitive advantage. Users will be trying the new Siri as soon as it's available. If your app works great with it, you win attention. If it doesn't, your app gets deprioritized.

Apple's probably building this into their App Store review guidelines and potentially their app store discovery algorithms. "Works well with new Siri" could become a category that gets featured.

The Competitive Response: What Google, Microsoft, and Others Will Do

Apple's move is going to trigger responses from competitors.

Google will accelerate their own assistant development. They're already deep in Gemini, but now they'll want to highlight what Google Assistant can do that Siri can't. Expect Google to announce deeper Assistant integration across Android and their services.

Microsoft will lean harder into Copilot across Windows and Office. They've been pushing Copilot everywhere, and this gives them more reason to differentiate by highlighting how Copilot integrates with Microsoft's entire ecosystem.

Amazon will probably refocus on Alexa as a smart home hub rather than trying to compete with Chat GPT-like conversational AI. That's honestly their strength anyway.

OpenAI and Anthropic won't directly respond product-wise (they're not building phone operating systems), but they'll probably explore partnerships similar to Apple's. OpenAI's already working with various platforms. Anthropic could be next.

The bigger story is that AI assistants are becoming a battleground, and big tech companies are lining up partners and integrations. No single company wants to be left out.

Consumer Expectations: The Bar Siri Has to Clear

Here's the pressure Siri faces: people have used Chat GPT, Gemini, and Claude. They know what good AI conversation feels like.

It feels like talking to a knowledgeable person. It maintains context. It catches nuance. It admits when it doesn't know something. It reasons through problems step by step.

Current Siri feels like talking to a very literal database query tool. You have to phrase things exactly right. It misunderstands context. It doesn't admit uncertainty—it just gives wrong answers confidently.

The new Siri has to clear a much higher bar than Siri ever has. Users won't compare it to Android Assistant anymore. They'll compare it to Chat GPT. That's the benchmark now.

Gemini is competitive with Chat GPT in most dimensions. So the new Siri has potential. But Apple will need to optimize the hell out of the integration to make sure that potential translates into an experience that feels natural on an iPhone.

Speed matters. Latency matters. If every Siri request involves a round trip to Google's servers, and that takes two seconds, users will get frustrated. Siri needs to feel snappy, even when doing cloud processing.

That's an engineering challenge Apple definitely has the resources to solve. But it's not guaranteed.

Regulatory Considerations: The Oversight Question

Apple's shipping a system that routes some user requests to Google's infrastructure. Regulators are watching.

The EU's Digital Services Act has specific provisions about AI systems and transparency. If Apple's not crystal clear about when data leaves the device and where it goes, they could face pushback from EU authorities.

Similarly, privacy regulators in various countries are increasingly concerned about AI systems accessing personal data. Apple will need to justify why the Siri system is appropriately designed to protect privacy.

The FTC in the United States is also watching. Apple's historically positioned themselves as the privacy company. If that positioning turns out to be marketing rather than reality, the FTC might investigate.

There's legal and regulatory risk here. It's manageable, but it's real. Apple's probably already working with their legal and regulatory teams to prepare for scrutiny.

The Bigger Picture: AI Is Becoming Ubiquitous

Apple's move is one piece of a much larger story.

AI is ceasing to be a novelty feature. It's becoming the expected layer in every software product. Companies that don't have credible AI capabilities are increasingly at a disadvantage.

Apple's been slow to this. Siri should have evolved into a world-class assistant years ago. The company got distracted by privacy concerns and on-device execution constraints.

Now they're playing catch-up, which is honestly fine. Catch-up mode sometimes leads to better decisions because you can learn from what others have done.

Apple's learning that you can't ignore cloud infrastructure and partnerships. You can't pretend AI works fine entirely on-device when it doesn't. And you can't move slower than the market expects.

The Gemini partnership is Apple adapting to market realities. That's good.

FAQ

What is Apple Intelligence and how does it relate to the new Siri?

Apple Intelligence is the collective term Apple uses for AI features built into their devices. It includes things like email summarization, writing tools, and photo cleanup. The new Gemini-powered Siri is the next evolution of Apple Intelligence, bringing more sophisticated conversational AI and task automation capabilities. Essentially, Apple Intelligence is the umbrella, and the new Siri is the flagship feature.

When exactly will the new Gemini-powered Siri be available?

Apple is planning to announce the new Siri sometime in February 2026, according to reporting from Bloomberg. An even more advanced version is expected to be announced at WWDC in June 2026. However, availability dates typically come after the announcement, so users likely won't get the feature immediately in February. Historical Apple releases suggest a gradual rollout starting with the latest devices and iOS versions.

How does Apple ensure privacy when Siri is using Google's servers?

Apple says they're using end-to-end encryption to protect data before it leaves your device, and they're using anonymization techniques (tokens instead of your Apple ID) so Google theoretically won't know it's you. However, this is a meaningful compromise from the original "all on-device" Apple Intelligence vision. Some privacy advocates remain concerned that encrypted data traveling to Google's servers still reveals metadata about your requests and activities.

Will the new Siri work better than current Siri?

Yes, based on available information. The new Siri will reportedly be able to understand context, access your personal data and on-screen content, and complete multi-step tasks across apps. It will be more conversational and use natural language understanding, similar to Chat GPT. However, real-world performance will depend on implementation details and how well third-party app developers integrate with the new system.

Do I need to buy a new iPhone to use the new Siri?

That hasn't been officially announced yet, but historically Apple rolls out major software features to multiple generations of devices. It's likely the new Siri will work on recent iPhone models (probably the last 3-4 generations), but older devices might not support it. The announcement in February should clarify compatibility details.

What happens to my data when I ask Siri a question using Google's infrastructure?

According to Apple, the data is encrypted before it leaves your device and remains encrypted during transmission to Google's servers. Apple claims Google won't be able to identify you personally because of anonymization techniques. However, Google will see the nature of your requests (encrypted though they may be) and any metadata about when and how frequently you use the service. Your personal data on your device doesn't leave it without your explicit command.

Why did Apple partner with Google instead of developing their own AI?

Apple's own AI development wasn't keeping up with what users expect from modern AI assistants. Building a large language model that's competitive with Gemini or Chat GPT requires massive scale, computational resources, and years of research. Apple chose the pragmatic route of partnering with Google (who has proven Gemini models) rather than spending years trying to catch up. This lets Apple ship better capabilities faster while focusing on integration and user experience.

Will third-party apps work with the new Siri?

Yes, app integration is central to making the new Siri useful. However, developers will need to build Siri integration into their apps using Apple's new APIs. Not every app will support it immediately. Apps that do will likely be featured in the App Store and gain an advantage. Over time, most popular apps will probably add deep Siri integration.

Can I choose not to use the cloud-based features?

That should be an option (Apple's always emphasized user choice), but the specifics haven't been announced yet. It's possible Apple will allow you to disable cloud processing and stick with on-device features only, which would mean losing some functionality. Or cloud processing might be required for the conversational features. Details will emerge closer to the launch.

How does the new Siri compare to Chat GPT, Google Assistant, and other AI assistants?

Based on capabilities, the new Siri will be powered by the same Gemini models that Google uses, so it should be roughly comparable to Google Assistant and Google's direct Gemini product. Whether it's better or worse than Chat GPT will depend on real-world performance and how well Apple integrates it with iOS. The new Siri has one advantage: it can access your personal data and understand what's on your screen, which neither Chat GPT nor Google Assistant can do by default.

What This Means for You

If you're an iPhone user, you should be excited and a little cautious.

Excited because Siri finally becoming a competent assistant is genuinely good news. Your phone will be smarter and more useful. Tasks that should take thirty seconds will take five. That matters.

Cautious because you're making a trade: some of your data and requests are now flowing through Google's infrastructure. You should understand what that means and decide if you're okay with it. Apple's privacy positioning becomes more nuanced—still better than most companies, but not the absolute privacy utopia they've sometimes claimed.

If you're a developer, pay attention. The new Siri is a platform. Apps that integrate well will get visibility and user adoption. Apps that ignore it will gradually seem dated and less capable. Start thinking about Siri integration now, before the February announcement. You'll be ahead of the curve.

If you're Apple—well, you already know. This is a critical moment. Siri's been embarrassing for years. It's time to ship something world-class. February's announcement needs to impress. The competitive pressure is real. Siri's future, and arguably Apple's position in AI, depends on nailing this.

The February announcement is a turning point. Siri's been the weak link in Apple's ecosystem. For the first time in years, there's a credible path to fixing that weakness. Whether Apple actually executes is the open question.

Bet on them executing well. They usually do, eventually.

Key Takeaways

  • Apple is unveiling a Gemini-powered Siri in February 2026 that will understand context and access personal data for the first time.
  • The partnership with Google represents Apple's pragmatic response to AI capabilities they couldn't build fast enough on their own.
  • Siri will process some requests through Google's cloud infrastructure with encryption and anonymization for privacy protection.
  • A more advanced Siri version is planned for WWDC June 2026, suggesting a two-phase rollout strategy.
  • Developers will need to integrate with the new Siri APIs to make their apps fully compatible with the new assistant capabilities.

Related Articles

Cut Costs with Runable

Cost savings are based on average monthly price per user for each app.

Which apps do you use?

Apps to replace

ChatGPTChatGPT
$20 / month
LovableLovable
$25 / month
Gamma AIGamma AI
$25 / month
HiggsFieldHiggsField
$49 / month
Leonardo AILeonardo AI
$12 / month
TOTAL$131 / month

Runable price = $9 / month

Saves $122 / month

Runable can save upto $1464 per year compared to the non-enterprise price of your apps.