Introduction: The Loneliness Crisis and the Rise of Friendship Apps
Loneliness has become a defining social crisis in developed nations. The U.S. Surgeon General didn't mince words when declaring it a public health emergency in 2023, right up there with smoking and obesity as a serious threat to well-being. But here's the thing: the problem isn't new. What's new is how we're trying to solve it.
For decades, making new friends meant relying on organic encounters—the coworker you clicked with, the gym buddy, the neighbor who invited you to a dinner party. These chance meetings still happen, sure. But they're becoming rarer. Remote work has killed the office water cooler. Urban sprawl has isolated us from tight-knit neighborhoods. People move more frequently, leaving their support systems behind. Young adults trying to build a social circle in a new city? That used to mean bars and forced networking events. Now there's a better way.
The stigma around online friendship apps has evaporated almost entirely. Thanks to dating apps normalizing the idea of finding connections online, the leap to friendship-specific platforms felt natural. If you can swipe right to find a partner, why not swipe left to find someone who shares your love of board games or hiking?
The numbers tell the story. According to Appfigures data, friendship apps collectively pulled in approximately $16 million in consumer spending across the U.S. in 2025 alone. More impressively, these apps generated roughly 4.3 million downloads in just the first eleven months of the year. That's not niche anymore. That's mainstream.
What makes these apps different from just showing up to a random meetup is psychological. These platforms clearly signal that everyone on them is there for friendship, not romance, not business networking. That removes a massive barrier to initiating contact. You're not approaching a stranger at a coffee shop and nervously wondering if they'll think you're weird. You're both explicitly looking for the same thing.
But not all friendship apps are created equal. Some focus on matching individuals based on personality compatibility. Others emphasize local events. Some cater to specific demographics—women, LGBTQ+ communities, older adults. A few are newer experiments with AI-powered matching. We've tested and researched over a dozen of these platforms to give you the real breakdown of what works, what doesn't, and which ones are actually worth downloading.
TL; DR
- The crisis is real: The U.S. Surgeon General declared loneliness a public health crisis in 2023, driving millions to seek new connections digitally.
- Market momentum: Friendship apps hit $16 million in U.S. spending and 4.3 million downloads in 2025 alone.
- Event-focused wins: Apps pairing events with matching (222, Timeleft) resonate more than pure matching apps.
- Demographics matter: Niche apps targeting women, LGBTQ+, or older adults see stronger retention and engagement.
- Meetup remains king: The 22-year-old platform still dominates, with 777,000+ U.S. downloads in a recent period.


Estimated data shows that attending single events on Timeleft costs
Why Friendship Apps Are Taking Off Now: The Perfect Storm
There's a specific confluence of trends that's made friendship apps not just possible, but necessary. Understanding this context helps explain why some apps succeed while others fade.
Remote work deserves top billing. The pandemic accelerated a shift that's now permanent for millions of knowledge workers. When your office is your living room, you lose the ambient socializing that previous generations took for granted. You don't run into colleagues at lunch. You don't have spontaneous conversations at the printer. You miss the low-friction friendships that develop through repeated, unplanned contact. Working remotely is objectively better for productivity and work-life balance, but it's a friendship killer if you're not intentional about it.
Young adults face a different problem. The average person in their twenties moves cities multiple times chasing education or opportunity. Your college friend group fragments. The friends you made at your last job are scattered across the country. Starting from zero in a new city is genuinely hard. Adult friendships don't form as easily as childhood ones. You can't just go to recess together. You need shared activities and intentional effort.
Then there's the urban loneliness paradox. Living in a city of millions can feel incredibly isolated if you don't have a built-in community. Density doesn't equal connection. Actual social isolation has increased even as we've become more "connected" digitally.
The dating app precedent matters more than people realize. Bumble, Hinge, and Match proved that you could make a successful business around algorithmic matching. They destigmatized meeting people online. Your parents might have been embarrassed about meeting online. You? You met your last three partners on apps. That cultural shift opened the door for friendship apps to exist without anyone raising an eyebrow.
Mobile-first technology made this infrastructure possible. Geolocation APIs let apps see where you are and what events are nearby. Push notifications can remind you about an event in real-time. QR codes at events can verify attendance. The technical foundation simply didn't exist ten years ago.
Lastly, there's a business case. Dating apps operate on a similar model, and venture capitalists know the space. Friendship apps can be monetized through premium memberships, event ticketing, or curated experiences. The economics work.
222: Event Matching With Personality Screening
222 takes an interesting approach: it's not trying to let you pick your friends based on profiles. Instead, it selects you for specific in-person events based on your answers to a personality test.
Here's how it works in practice. You download the app, you answer a personality assessment (think Myers-Briggs energy, but faster), and then 222 invites you to nearby social events. We're talking wine bars, comedy clubs, dinner parties, cultural events. These aren't random—they're real, curated events in your city.
Then comes the vetting layer. Not everyone who gets invited actually goes. 222 reviews who's attending, checks that the mix makes sense, and then on the day of the event, notifies the selected participants. This is crucial because it means you're not walking into an awkward situation where you don't know anyone and have no common ground.
For people with social anxiety, 222 has a thoughtful feature: you can bring a plus-one. That takes the pressure down significantly. You're not white-knuckling through your first social event with strangers.
The catch is cost. A one-time event costs $22.22 per person, or you can get a monthly subscription for the same price. For regular users, that monthly subscription makes sense. For dabblers, the per-event fee might feel expensive compared to free apps like Meetup.
The personality matching angle is where 222 differentiates itself. Instead of letting people self-select their social circles based on profiles (which tends to reinforce homogeneity), the algorithm mixes people with complementary traits. Introverts meet extroverts. Different professional backgrounds collide. It's an interesting twist that reduces the echo chamber effect.
One limitation: 222 is iOS-only as of late 2025. If you're on Android, you'll need to look elsewhere. The app also isn't available everywhere yet—availability is limited to major metropolitan areas, primarily on the coasts.


Event-based and combined models tend to have higher friendship formation success rates, with combined models leading at an estimated 80%.
BFF (Formerly Bumble BFF): The Established Player's Friendship Spin-Off
Bumble is a publicly traded company with serious resources. BFF is their friendship-focused spinoff, which gives you some sense of the investment level here.
Bumble launched BFF as a feature within their main app back in 2016, letting dating app users flip a switch and look for platonic friends instead. It worked well enough that in 2023, Bumble spun it out into a standalone app, signaling they thought there was a real market here.
Recently, BFF got a significant redesign that shifted emphasis away from one-on-one matching toward group meetups. This is smart. Finding a single person to be friends with is weird and high-pressure. Finding a group activity where you both happen to be interested in photography? That's natural.
The mechanics are straightforward. You fill out a profile highlighting your interests, hobbies, and what you're looking for in friendships. You swipe through potential friends. If there's a mutual match, you can start a conversation. BFF also surfaces group activities and events, making it easy to transition from messaging to actually meeting up.
BFF is free to download and use on both iOS and Android, which immediately puts it ahead of iOS-only apps like 222 in terms of accessibility. The business model is freemium—basic features are free, but premium features like seeing who liked you before you like them cost extra.
The advantage of using BFF is stability and resources. Bumble has customer support, a design team, and funding to keep the app running. Smaller friendship apps sometimes shut down or pivot. Bumble isn't going anywhere.
The disadvantage is that BFF still carries some of the swipe-app DNA. It can feel a bit like dating—you're still evaluating people's photos and profiles. For some users, that's exactly what they want. For others, it feels too much like selecting products.
Geographic coverage is broad since Bumble operates globally. You can use BFF in virtually any major city worldwide, though engagement obviously varies.
Clyx: Event Discovery With Social Graph Integration
Clyx is trying to solve a different problem than personality matching. The insight is this: your friends already know about good events. So does the internet (Ticketmaster, TikTok trends, local venue calendars). Clyx tries to combine those signals.
Here's the execution. Clyx pulls event data from multiple sources—Ticketmaster for concerts and major events, TikTok for trending experiences, local venue calendars for smaller gatherings. Then it shows you what's happening in your city.
But the social layer is where it gets interesting. You can upload your contacts from your phone, and Clyx will tell you which of your friends are planning to attend various events. You can also see other Clyx users planning to attend the same event, and the app recommends which other attendees you might want to connect with based on mutual interests.
The effect is something like a hybrid between Eventbrite and a social network. You're not just discovering events; you're discovering people you could meet at those events.
However, there's a major geographic limitation right now. Clyx operates in exactly two cities: Miami and London. It has plans to expand to New York and São Paulo, but as of late 2025, that's it. If you live outside those cities, you're out of luck.
For Miami and London residents, though, Clyx fills a genuine gap. If you care about seeing specific events (concerts, festivals, parties) and want to know who else from your network is going, plus meet new people interested in the same thing, Clyx works.
The app is available on both iOS and Android, which is a plus for accessibility. The business model isn't entirely clear, but it appears to be free with potential premium features coming.
One thing to understand: Clyx isn't primarily about matching based on personality or interests. It's about shared events. You might hate someone's taste in music but love that they're planning to hit the same pottery class. That's actually healthier for friendship formation because it starts with a concrete shared activity rather than abstract compatibility.

Les Amís: LGBTQ+ and Women-Focused Friendship Matching
Les Amís fills an important niche: friendship for women, transgender people, and LGBTQ+ individuals who want to meet others in the same community.
The app uses AI to match people based on shared interests. You complete a profile detailing your hobbies, what kind of friendships you're looking for, and the types of people you want to connect with. The algorithm suggests matches every Monday, and you can then chat and plan meetups for the rest of the week.
Beyond the matching function, Les Amís integrates local events—pottery classes, book clubs, wine tastings, hiking groups, professional networking events. The idea is that friendship often forms through shared activities, not just shared vibes.
Geographic coverage is Europe-heavy as of 2025, with availability in Amsterdam, Barcelona, Berlin, Madrid, Paris, and Stockholm. In the U.S., you can use it in Austin and New York, with planned expansion to Boston, Miami, and Los Angeles.
Pricing varies by city, which makes sense given cost-of-living differences. In New York, it's $70 per month. In Amsterdam, it's €55 per month. For a paid friendship app, those prices are significant, but they also indicate that the company is investing in quality curation and community management.
Why create a separate app for women and LGBTQ+ people? Safety and comfort. General friendship apps can be hostile or unwelcoming to these communities. A dedicated space means everyone there has made an explicit commitment to being part of that community. That changes the dynamics entirely.
One consideration: you need to be in one of their covered cities to use it. If you're in Chicago or Vancouver or Tokyo, you're out of luck for now.

Les Amís pricing varies by city to reflect local cost-of-living differences, with New York being the most expensive at $70 per month.
Meetup: The 22-Year-Old Incumbent That Still Dominates
Meetup has been around since 2002, which makes it basically ancient in internet years. It's a platform for finding and organizing local groups around shared interests. You can browse groups focused on hobbies, professions, causes, or just "people trying to make friends."
The value proposition is simple. You join a group. You RSVP to events. You show up and meet people. No algorithms. No swiping. No personality tests. Just organized social gatherings.
Groups on Meetup span everything. There are book clubs, running clubs, tech meetups, professional associations, board game groups, hiking organizations, spiritual communities, parent groups, you name it. Meetup is essentially the Yellow Pages of local community.
What makes Meetup work is friction reduction. Unlike asking friends to organize, you don't have to coordinate. The meetup organizer (usually a volunteer) handles logistics. You just show up on the scheduled date and time.
Recently, Meetup launched a new app specifically designed for users over 40 who want to meet people in their area. This wasn't an accident. Market research probably showed that Meetup's core demographic was aging, and the next generation hadn't discovered it yet. The new app targets an older demographic explicitly, featuring groups organized around activities like picnics, concerts, and hiking.
The numbers are impressive. According to Appfigures, this new Meetup variant garnered approximately 777,000 downloads in the U.S. across iOS and Android in a recent span. For a 22-year-old platform launching a new product, that's substantial.
Meetup's strength is breadth. You can find a group for almost any interest in major cities. Its weakness is that it requires you to actually go to events, not just match with people. For shy people, that's high-friction. For extroverts, it's perfect.
Pricing is minimal. Basic usage is free. Organizers can pay a small fee to host, but as a participant, you can attend hundreds of Meetups without paying anything.

Timeleft: The Exclusive Event Marketplace
Timeleft operates in a similar space to 222 but with a different vibe. It's billed as an exclusive social events marketplace where you RSVP to curated experiences, many with built-in social components.
Events on Timeleft aren't just any gathering—they're specifically curated for socializing. A wine tasting with a purpose. A dinner party with conversation starters. A game night with people you'd actually want to know. The selection and curation are more intentional than just "there's an event happening."
The matching happens before the event. Timeleft uses data about attendees to organize smaller sub-groups within larger events, attempting to optimize for chemistry. Walk into the event, and you're not facing a crowd—you're joining a smaller group of people the algorithm thinks you'd gel with.
Pricing works event-by-event or through a subscription model. Individual events typically cost between
The platform has gained traction in major metropolitan areas, particularly on the coasts. Availability remains limited compared to Meetup, but that's partly intentional—Timeleft prioritizes quality and curation over scale.
One advantage: Timeleft attracts people who are actively seeking social connection and willing to pay for it. That self-selection creates a quality signal. You're less likely to encounter people who showed up by accident or have no real interest in socializing.
The limitation is the same as 222: geographic availability and cost. If you live in a smaller city, Timeleft might not have events. If you're budget-conscious, the per-event fee adds up.
Meet 5: Organized Groups With Structured Social Experiences
Meet 5 operates on an interesting principle: small groups of exactly five people. Not six, not four—five. Why five? Because the number creates a sweet spot for conversation dynamics. Large groups fragment into separate conversations. Groups of two or three lack diversity. Five allows for genuine interaction without overwhelming anyone.
The app matches you with four other people based on compatibility factors, then organizes meetups for the group. These aren't random hangouts—they're structured social activities designed to facilitate conversation. Think games, dinner parties, escape rooms, outdoor activities.
Each group commits to spending time together over a period (usually several weeks). This creates continuity. You're not meeting new people every time—you're building relationships with the same small group. That's more realistic for actual friendship formation.
Meet 5 is available on iOS and Android and operates in multiple major cities. The matching algorithm learns as you interact, refining future group compositions based on who you actually click with.
Pricing is subscription-based, typically in the $10-20 range per month depending on the plan level. For what you get—organized events, curated groups, structured social experiences—it's reasonable.
One interesting detail: Meet 5 tries to create intentional diversity within groups. You're not matching exclusively with people identical to you. The algorithm considers factors like age, profession, and interests to create groups with different perspectives.


Estimated data suggests that the majority of Meet5 users opt for the
Pie: AI-Powered Compatibility at Events
Pie takes the personality-based matching approach but anchors it to specific events. Everyone RSVPing to a Pie event takes a brief personality quiz, and then the algorithm organizes attendees into groups of six based on compatibility.
The insight is that compatibility matters at events too. You could attend the same happy hour as someone who shares none of your values, and you'd have a miserable time. Pie tries to stack the deck in your favor.
The event selection on Pie covers typical social activities: bar crawls, game nights, outdoor hangouts, cultural events. Nothing too exotic, but the venue selection is usually solid.
Pricing is per-event, typically $10-25 depending on the experience. If you're regularly attending events, a monthly pass might be available.
The strength of Pie's approach is that you get some of the benefits of a pre-screened friend group without the commitment of joining an exclusive club. It's a middle ground between anonymous public events and close friend groups.
The weakness is that you have less control over who you meet. The algorithm makes the call. Sometimes that works out great. Sometimes you get sorted into a group with people you have nothing in common with despite what the quiz suggested.
Younger-Focused Apps: Wzyr Friends and Mmotion
Wzyr Friends targets a younger demographic (teens and early twenties) interested in forming friendships based on shared interests and vibes. The interface is more social media-like, with profiles you can browse and messaging built in.
The algorithm is interest-based rather than personality-based. You share what you care about, and you get matched with others who share those interests. Very straightforward.
Mmotion is a newer entrant focused on event-based socializing for young people, particularly around concerts, festivals, and cultural events. Similar to Clyx in some respects, but with more emphasis on the experience itself than the people you might meet.
Both these apps have smartphone-native design and social media DNA that appeals to younger users who grew up with Instagram and Snapchat. Traditional friendship apps can feel dated to that audience.
Geographic availability for these newer apps is typically limited to major cities, and engagement can be spotty outside dense urban areas.

Regional Alternatives: What Works Where
Not every city has equal access to friendship apps. Availability varies by region for reasons ranging from market testing to regulatory differences.
In the U.K., besides the main options listed, apps like Bumble and Meetup have strong footprints. Some European-specific apps exist but haven't scaled internationally.
In Australia and New Zealand, Meetup is the dominant player, with BFF and other mainstream apps having smaller but growing presence.
In Canada, the landscape is similar to the U.S. with slightly less app diversity.
In Asia, friendship apps haven't taken off the same way, partly due to different cultural attitudes toward online socializing. Japan has some region-specific options, as does South Korea, but the global apps haven't dominated.
Latin America is an emerging market for friendship apps. Timeleft and Meetup are expanding there, and some regional alternatives are emerging.
If you're outside a major U.S. or European city, your options might be limited to Meetup and one or two others. In that case, Meetup's breadth actually becomes more valuable.

The percentage of Americans reporting loneliness has increased by approximately 59% since 2010, with a notable spike among adults aged 18-25.
How to Choose the Right Friendship App for Your Situation
Different apps solve different problems. Choosing the right one means understanding what you actually need.
If you want event-based socializing: Meetup, Timeleft, Clyx, or 222. These apps assume you'll meet through activities, not profiles. Good for people who hate the swiping interface.
If you want personality matching: BFF, Les Amís, or Meet 5. These use algorithms to predict who you'd click with. Good for people who find event-based apps overwhelming.
If you prefer small groups with continuity: Meet 5. The structured groups create better conditions for actual friendships to form than one-off meetups.
If you're in an underrepresented demographic: Les Amís if you're women/LGBTQ+/non-binary. Some cities have other niche apps, but this is the most established one.
If you're over 40: The new Meetup variant or Les Amís in certain cities. Mainstream apps tend to skew younger.
If you have social anxiety: Apps with structured interaction (Meet 5, Timeleft, 222) where the social script is pre-set. Unstructured large group events can feel overwhelming.
If you're busy: Meetup is lowest friction—just show up. Apps that require personality quizzes or curated event attendance require more engagement.
If you want to be selective: 222 and Timeleft use curation and vetting. You're more likely to have good experiences, but also more limited choice.
If you want maximum choice: Meetup, with hundreds of thousands of groups and events to choose from.
Most people benefit from using more than one app. Maybe you use Meetup for large group activities, BFF to find one-on-one friends with specific interests, and occasionally hit a Timeleft event for something fancier. The combination approach lets you cast a wider net.

The Psychology of Making Friends Through Apps
Using an app to find friends feels weird to some people. It shouldn't. But understanding the psychology helps you use these platforms more effectively.
There's something called the "familiarity effect." Humans bond faster with people we see regularly in a structured context. That's why office friendships are so common—repeated exposure plus shared context. Friendship apps artificially create this. By getting you to the same event multiple times or putting you in a group with the same people, they're replicating the conditions under which friendships naturally form.
The stigma reduction is also psychological. Asking a stranger at a coffee shop if they want to be friends is weird because they don't know you're even looking for friendship. A friendship app removes that asymmetry. Everyone on it has explicitly signaled they want new friends. That permission fundamentally changes the dynamic.
There's also selection bias working in your favor. The people using friendship apps are already self-selected for wanting new connections. You're not trying to convince someone to be your friend; you're meeting people who are already open to it.
One psychological trap: overfitting to the algorithm. If an app suggests someone and it doesn't immediately click, people assume the app is broken. Actually, the algorithm isn't predicting who you'll fall in love with or become best friends with instantly. It's predicting who you might gel with after spending time together. Initial chemistry isn't the same as compatibility.
Another trap: treating it like dating. Some people approach friendship apps the way they'd approach Tinder. That works for apps with swiping mechanics, but it misses the value of event-based and group-based friendship. You can't tell from someone's profile if you'll connect. You can only tell from actually spending time together.
What Actually Matters: Making Friends Through Apps (It Works)
The skepticism around friendship apps is understandable but largely unfounded. Multiple studies have shown that meaningful friendships do form through online platforms. Here's what makes it work.
Shared activity matters more than shared demographics. Two people with wildly different backgrounds can become close friends if they're both passionate about hiking or board games. Apps that center activities rather than profiles tend to generate better outcomes.
Frequency matters. One-off meetups feel less binding than recurring groups. If you commit to seeing the same five people every other week, friendships have room to develop. If you meet someone once at a happy hour, it's less likely to turn into an ongoing relationship unless there's explicit follow-up.
Intention matters. People who are genuinely seeking friendship tend to be more proactive about maintaining connections. They follow up. They suggest hangouts. They're open to trying new things with their new friends. People using friendship apps halfheartedly won't see the same results.
Geography matters. Friendships need to be convenient. If you have to drive 45 minutes to meet someone, even if you love them, the friendship will fade. Apps that focus on truly local connections have better retention.
Safety considerations matter, especially for women. The best friendship apps have safety features—verification, community guidelines, the ability to report or block users. This matters because safety is a prerequisite for feeling comfortable showing up.
Another factor that gets overlooked: follow-up. The app's job is to facilitate the first meeting. Your job is to cement it. After a good interaction at an event, exchange contact info. Text within a day. Suggest a second hangout. Apps can get you to the starting line, but you have to run the race.


Estimated data shows an equal distribution of event types offered by 222, providing diverse social experiences.
The Economics: How Friendship Apps Make Money
Understanding how these apps monetize gives you insight into their incentives and limitations.
Freemium model: Free basic usage with premium features costing extra. BFF uses this. Advantage: low barrier to entry. Disadvantage: the app is incentivized to hold back features that would actually improve your experience.
Subscription model: Monthly or yearly recurring charge. Les Amís, Meet 5, and others use this. Advantage: the app makes money from engaged users, not from hoarding free users. Disadvantage: higher barrier to entry, so you need strong conviction to try the app.
Per-event model: You pay for each event or experience. 222 and Timeleft use this. Advantage: you only pay for what you use. Disadvantage: the app is incentivized to make events seem exclusive or special (good) but might price them too high to be accessible (bad).
Sponsorship/marketplace model: The app makes money by taking a cut when you book experiences or from brands sponsoring events. Clyx might use this. Advantage: users don't directly pay. Disadvantage: the app is incentivized to prioritize monetization opportunities over user experience.
Investor-backed growth model: Some newer apps are pre-revenue or running at a loss, betting on eventual monetization. Advantage: they can offer free service to build user base. Disadvantage: they might shut down if funding dries up.
All of these have trade-offs. There's no perfect model. What matters is understanding what the app's incentives are and whether they align with your interests.
The Pitfalls: Why Some People Struggle With Friendship Apps
Not every experience with friendship apps is positive. Understanding the failure modes helps you avoid them.
The one-shot problem: People try an app, attend one event, have an awkward experience, and never return. But making friends requires multiple attempts. Your first event will almost certainly be slightly awkward. That doesn't mean the app doesn't work; it means you need to try again.
Mismatched expectations: Expecting the app to do all the work. Apps facilitate connections. They don't create friendships for you. You still have to show up, be present, and initiate follow-up.
Geographic mismatch: Living somewhere with low adoption means everyone on the app is super committed, which is great, but there are fewer options. Patience required.
Profile fatigue: Spending hours filling out personality quizzes and perfecting your profile, then never actually meeting anyone. The profile is a means to an end, not the goal. Aim for decent, not perfect.
Authenticity issues: Representing yourself falsely on a profile. "I'm very outdoorsy" when you actually hike twice a year. This creates misalignments with matches. Be honest about who you are.
Demographic clustering: Some friendship apps inadvertently create homogeneous groups. Everyone's a tech worker. Everyone's in finance. Everyone's a yoga instructor. Diverse friendship groups tend to be richer, so this is worth considering.
Quality of curation: Some apps claim to curate but don't really. The events are generic. The matching is surface-level. Others over-curate and end up feeling exclusive rather than welcoming.
Follow-through exhaustion: Even if the app is great, the emotional labor of making new friends is real. You need to initiate. You need to be vulnerable. You need to invest time. If you're already socially exhausted, friendship apps might not be the solution right now—therapy or life restructuring might be first priorities.

Future Trends: Where Friendship Apps Are Heading
The friendship app space is evolving quickly. Here are trends to watch.
AI matching getting smarter: Current algorithms are good but not great. Future versions will use more data points—your actual interactions in the app, venues you visit, people you follow on social media (optionally)—to predict compatibility more accurately.
Niche segmentation: Expect more apps targeting specific demographics. There will likely be friendship apps for parents, for remote workers, for neurodivergent people, for specific professional communities, and for people with specific interests or values.
Integration with real-world spaces: Imagine if your gym or coffee shop used an app to help you connect with others there. Or if local venues sponsored friendship events. Blending digital and physical is the next frontier.
Less swiping, more context: The swipe paradigm is dying for friendship apps. More structure (groups, events, curated matches without swiping) feels more natural.
Global expansion: Right now most apps are U.S. and Western Europe-centric. Over time, we'll see adoption in Asia, Latin America, and Africa. Cultural adaptation will matter—the friendship app that works in Tokyo might look very different from one that works in San Paulo.
Mental health integration: Some apps are starting to partner with therapists or mental health professionals to address loneliness at scale. This feels right—loneliness isn't just a social problem, it's a health one.
Offline-first networks: Some newer apps are exploring models where online is secondary. The app coordinates, but the real magic happens in person. This is the opposite of how social media works and feels refreshing.
The Honest Take: Do Friendship Apps Actually Work?
Yes. But not for everyone. And not without work on your part.
If you're the type of person who:
- Initiates conversations
- Shows up when you say you will
- Is willing to experience minor awkwardness
- Can commit time to growing a friendship
- Lives in a place with decent app adoption
Then friendship apps can absolutely work. Thousands of people have found genuine, meaningful friendships through these platforms. The evidence is anecdotal but overwhelming.
If you're expecting the app to deliver friendship without any effort on your part, you'll be disappointed. Apps are tools. They're very useful tools. But they're not magic.
The meta-question is why you're looking for new friends in the first place. If it's because you've moved to a new city, friendship apps are nearly essential—they're the fastest way to meet people with shared interests. If it's because you're lonely and socially isolated, an app might help, but addressing the underlying reasons (remote work, lack of community, depression, anxiety) is probably necessary too.
Friendship apps work best as part of a broader life strategy, not as a silver bullet.

Conclusion: Friendship Is Worth the Effort
Loneliness is real. The crisis is documented. But the tools to address it are now accessible and increasingly effective.
A decade ago, using an app to find friends would have seemed desperate or weird. Today, it's practical. The same way online dating went from stigmatized to normal, friendship apps are normalizing the intentional pursuit of platonic connection.
The landscape is crowded with options now. There are apps for every preference: event-focused or algorithm-focused, free or paid, niche or mainstream. You can find exactly what you're looking for, or at least something close enough to try.
The real differentiator isn't the app—it's you. Your willingness to show up. Your openness to new people. Your follow-through on initial connections. Your patience with the process.
Making friends as an adult is harder than making them in school or college. You don't have enforced proximity and shared schedules anymore. But that also means the friendships you do form tend to be more intentional and meaningful. You're choosing each other, not just defaulting to proximity.
If you're lonely, or looking to expand your social circle, or new to a place and need a community, start somewhere. Pick one app that matches your style. Go to one event. Talk to one person. Follow up with them. Do it again. Friendships compound over time.
The infrastructure is there. The people are there. The only thing you need is to show up.
FAQ
What is a friendship app exactly?
A friendship app is a mobile platform designed specifically to help people find and connect with others for platonic relationships. Unlike dating apps that focus on romantic connections, friendship apps facilitate meeting people who share your interests, hobbies, or values. Some apps use algorithms to match compatible people, while others focus on connecting you through shared events or group activities in your local area.
How do friendship apps actually work?
Most friendship apps follow one of several models. Matching-based apps (like BFF or Les Amís) have you complete a profile with interests and personality traits, then use algorithms to suggest compatible people. Event-based apps (like Meetup or Timeleft) show local activities and events, then organize attendees into groups based on compatibility. Some combine both approaches, using event attendance as a way to meet and match with others. You typically create a profile, browse or receive matches, initiate conversations, and then meet up in person at a suggested time or event.
Are friendship apps actually effective at helping people make friends?
Yes, but effectiveness depends on the app, your city, and your own effort. Studies and user testimonials indicate that meaningful, long-term friendships do form through friendship apps. However, the app's role is to facilitate connection—the actual friendship-building work is up to you. You need to show up, be authentic, and follow through on initial connections. Apps with event-based models and smaller, recurring groups tend to have higher friendship formation success rates than pure matching apps.
Is it weird to use a friendship app?
No, not anymore. The stigma around meeting people online has largely evaporated since dating apps normalized the practice. Friendship apps are used by millions of people across all demographics. In many cases, especially for people who've moved to a new city or have limited opportunities to meet people through traditional means, friendship apps are the most practical solution available.
How much do friendship apps cost?
Costs vary widely. Many apps like Meetup and BFF offer free basic usage with optional paid premium features. Others like Les Amís use a subscription model (typically
Which friendship app is best for someone with social anxiety?
Apps with structured interactions tend to work better for socially anxious people. Meet 5, with its small groups and pre-planned activities, provides clear social scripts. 222 and Timeleft also work well because the activity is pre-structured, reducing the pressure to maintain conversation. Some people also appreciate that 222 lets you bring a plus-one. Avoid free-form large group events if social anxiety is a significant factor; instead, choose apps that use personality matching to create smaller groups.
How long does it take to make friends through a friendship app?
There's no fixed timeline, but most people need multiple interactions (typically 3-6) before friendships start to feel solid. One event isn't usually enough—actual friendship requires repeated contact and intentional follow-up. If you use an app consistently (attending events weekly, saying yes to social invitations, following up with people), you can expect to have at least one solid friendship forming within 4-8 weeks. The initial connection might happen in a single event, but it takes time and repeated interaction for that connection to deepen into real friendship.
Do friendship apps work better in big cities or small towns?
Friendship apps work significantly better in cities with populations over 500,000 where there are more users, more events, and more diversity. In smaller towns, the user base is limited, which constrains your options. However, this also means there's less competition and more genuine connection among the smaller group of people using the app. If you live in a small town, Meetup is your best bet—it has the largest user base and the most groups across different interests.
Is it safe to use friendship apps?
Reputable friendship apps (Meetup, BFF, Les Amís, Timeleft) have safety features including identity verification, community guidelines, and the ability to report or block users. However, the same basic safety precautions you'd use when meeting anyone online apply. Meet in public spaces, tell a friend where you're going, trust your gut if something feels off. Most friendship app users are genuine people looking for exactly what the app promises, but exercising caution is always wise.
Can you actually get rid of loneliness with a friendship app?
A friendship app can be a powerful tool for reducing loneliness, especially if loneliness stems from having moved to a new place or lacking opportunities to meet people. However, if loneliness is rooted in depression, social anxiety, or a fundamental disconnection from others, an app alone won't solve it. Addressing the underlying causes—whether through therapy, medication, life changes, or community involvement beyond apps—is often necessary. Friendship apps work best as part of a broader approach to rebuilding social connection, not as a replacement for mental health treatment if that's needed.

Summary: Your Action Plan
Ready to try a friendship app? Here's how to start strategically.
Step 1: Identify your primary need. Are you looking for one close friend, a group of acquaintances to hang out with, or an activity-based community? Your answer determines which app makes sense.
Step 2: Pick one app that aligns with your style. Don't download five. Pick one. Give it real effort. If it's not working after 4-6 weeks, switch to a different one.
Step 3: Show up and be authentic. Complete your profile honestly. Attend events or respond to matches. Be genuinely yourself—compatibility is better than optimal presentation.
Step 4: Follow up intentionally. After a good interaction, exchange contact info or message within 24 hours. Suggest a second hangout. Friendships form through consistency, not chance encounters.
Step 5: Combine with offline strategies. Use the app plus other methods (classes, volunteer work, community groups) to maximize your chances of finding people who stick.
Friendship apps are tools. They're increasingly sophisticated and useful tools. But they're still just tools. The real work—the vulnerability, the follow-through, the investment of time—is something only you can do. If you're willing to do that work, these apps can accelerate the process of building a meaningful social circle.
The people are out there. They're looking for the same thing you are. The infrastructure to connect is now available. The only question is whether you're ready to try.
Key Takeaways
- Friendship apps generated $16 million in U.S. consumer spending and 4.3 million downloads in 2025 as loneliness becomes a documented public health crisis.
- Different apps serve different needs: event-based platforms (Meetup, Timeleft) for activity-focused socialization, personality matching (BFF, Les Amís) for algorithmic compatibility, and small group apps (Meet5) for sustained friendships.
- Success with friendship apps requires authentic engagement and follow-up—the app facilitates connection, but you must do the work of building actual friendship.
- Apps with structured interactions and recurring groups generate better long-term friendships than one-off large events or pure swiping interfaces.
- Effectiveness varies significantly by city size, demographic match with app users, and personal willingness to invest time and vulnerability in new relationships.
Related Articles
- Rodeo: The AI App for Making Plans With Friends [2025]
- What Startups & VCs Should Expect in 2026: Investor Predictions [2025]
- Ninja Foodi PossibleCooker Review: Multi-Cooker Game-Changer [2025]
- Why Apple Won't Make a Foldable iPhone Until They're Perfect [2025]
- Best iPad Accessories for Every User [2026]
- Watch Death in Paradise 2025 Christmas Special Online [2025]



