Claude AI Workspace: Control Slack, Figma, Asana Without Tab Switching [2025]

You're juggling tabs again. Slack's open in one. Figma in another. Asana's timeline is buried somewhere. Then you need to update an analytics dashboard, grab a screenshot, and paste it into a status update.

This is the reality of modern work. And it's exhausting.

Anthropic just decided that enough is enough. They've built Claude into something that looks less like a chatbot and more like a control room for your entire work stack. You ask Claude to update a timeline. It opens Asana. You approve the changes. Done. No switching tabs. No hunting for the right view. No mental context loss.

This isn't a small feature update. This is a fundamental shift in how AI assistants can operate inside your workflow. And it's worth understanding what just changed.

TL; DR

• Claude now controls live tools: Draft Slack messages, edit Figma diagrams, update Asana timelines, and manage analytics dashboards directly inside chat conversations
• No tab-switching required: Live tool interfaces embed into Claude's chat interface, reducing context-switching from 20+ tabs to one conversation
• Built on Model Context Protocol (MCP): Anthropic's open-source MCP Apps framework powers integrations, allowing any tool to connect without rebuilding from scratch
• Available for Pro, Max, Team, and Enterprise: Starting at Claude Pro's $20/month tier, all subscription levels gain access to these integrations
• Privacy and permissions built in: Anthropic promises tight sandboxing and explicit permission requests before Claude performs actions on your behalf

Estimated data shows potential improvements in productivity metrics with Claude, leading to significant ROI. Estimated data.

The Problem That Claude is Solving

Let's be honest. You're not as productive as you could be. Not because you're slow or distracted. But because your tools are scattered.

A typical afternoon looks like this:

1. Slack notification comes in about a project update
2. You click to Asana to check the timeline
3. Figma is open in another tab because you were reviewing designs
4. Analytics dashboard is buried in a third window
5. Email's sitting somewhere, probably unread

Each context switch costs you 23 minutes to regain full focus, according to research on task switching and cognitive load. Multiply that by the 10 to 25 times knowledge workers switch apps per day, and you're losing 3 to 8 hours weekly just to navigation.

AI assistants have been trying to solve this. OpenAI's Chat GPT offers tool use and custom GPT apps, but they still run semi-independently. Google's Gemini is woven into Workspace apps, but it's scattered across Gmail, Docs, Sheets, and Calendar.

Claude's approach is different. Instead of bouncing between different AI experiences, Claude becomes the unified interface. Everything you need lives in one conversation.

How Claude's MCP Apps Actually Work

Under the hood, Claude's new capability runs on something called Model Context Protocol Apps, an extension of Anthropic's open-source Model Context Protocol.

MCP is a framework that lets AI assistants understand and interact with external tools without needing custom integration code for each one. Think of it as a universal adapter. Instead of building a Claude-to-Slack connection, a Claude-to-Figma connection, and a Claude-to-Asana connection separately, companies build one MCP interface that Claude can use.

Here's how it actually works when you're using Claude:

You write: "Can you update the marketing timeline in Asana? Move the content review to next Thursday and assign it to Sarah."

Claude interprets this request and checks which tools are available and which ones you've given permission to use. If Asana's connected, Claude generates a request to the Asana MCP interface. Asana sends back live data about the current timeline, and Claude displays an interactive preview of what the timeline will look like after the change.

You see exactly what's happening before it happens. You approve it. Claude sends the update.

The key difference from other AI tool integrations? Everything renders inside the chat. A Slack message draft looks like a real Slack message. An Asana timeline shows the actual board layout. A Figma edit displays the canvas with live updates. You're not reading a summary or clicking a link to the external tool. You're looking at the real thing, embedded in the conversation.

Estimated data shows that AI integration could save up to 5 hours per week per team member, translating to significant annual productivity gains.

Which Tools Are Integrated Right Now

As of early 2025, Claude's MCP Apps integrations include several major players:

Slack - Draft messages, threads, and reactions directly in Claude. Preview how your message will look, edit it, and send with approval.

Figma - Edit design files, move layers, update text, and adjust properties without leaving Claude. See live previews of changes as you make them.

Asana - View project timelines, update task status, reassign work, change due dates, and add details to projects. The full board layout displays in chat.

Jira - Track issues, create tickets, update status, and link related work. Claude can pull sprint data and suggest task assignments.

Notion - Query databases, create pages, update properties, and organize information. Useful for pulling data into Claude for analysis.

Analytics platforms - Google Analytics, Mixpanel, and similar tools show live dashboards and performance metrics. Claude can pull specific data points for reports.

More integrations are coming. Anthropic has published the MCP framework publicly, so any company can build an integration. Early adopters include dev tools, CRMs, project management platforms, and communication apps.

What This Means for Your Daily Workflow

Let's walk through a real scenario. You're a product manager at a B2B startup. Your morning usually involves:

1. Checking Slack for overnight updates
2. Opening Asana to review sprint status
3. Jumping to Figma to see if the design team finished the mockups
4. Pulling analytics to see how users are interacting with last week's feature release
5. Writing up a status report combining all this information
6. Sending that report to leadership via Slack or email

With Claude's integrations, your morning changes dramatically.

You open Claude and write: "Give me a sprint status summary. Include design progress on the onboarding flow, pull user adoption metrics for the new dashboard feature, and draft a Slack message for #leadership with the highlights."

Claude fetches real data from Asana (current sprint tasks, completion rates, blockers). It checks Figma (sees the onboarding mockups are 80% complete). It pulls analytics (user adoption is 23%, daily active users increased 14%). It compiles everything into a coherent summary. Then it drafts a Slack message that you can edit and send without leaving the conversation.

Your 30-minute morning routine becomes a 5-minute Claude conversation.

For creative teams, the impact is even more dramatic. A designer can ask Claude to:

• Review all Figma designs from the sprint
• Compare them to brand guidelines (stored in Notion)
• Generate naming suggestions for components
• Update layer organization in Figma based on those suggestions
• Create a handoff document for engineering
• Send a summary message to the engineering channel on Slack

All without opening Figma directly. Claude handles the clicking and updating. The designer focuses on the creative decisions.

The Architecture Behind Unified AI Workspaces

Understanding why Claude's approach works requires looking at how other AI platforms have attempted this.

OpenAI's approach: Chat GPT can call external tools through function calling and the Actions framework. You can build custom integrations, but each one requires authentication and explicit setup. The results come back as text summaries or links. You're not seeing the actual UI. You're reading about it.

Google's approach: Gemini is embedded directly into Gmail, Docs, Sheets, and Calendar. It's powerful for those specific apps, but leaving Workspace means leaving Gemini's capabilities behind. It's not a unified interface. It's Gemini scattered across different products.

Claude's approach: MCP is transport-agnostic. The protocol doesn't care if it's connecting to Slack, Figma, or a custom internal tool. Every connection speaks the same language. Claude sits in the middle, translating user requests into MCP calls and rendering the responses as interactive UI elements.

This creates a genuine unified interface. You're not switching mental contexts between "Chat GPT mode" and "actually using Slack." You're in Claude mode, asking Claude to manage your entire work stack.

The technical genius here is that MCP is open-source. Any company can implement it. That means the ecosystem grows without Anthropic building every integration themselves. GitHub has published MCP implementations for dozens of tools. Zapier's building MCP connectors. Dev tool companies are adopting it.

This is how you scale from "Claude works with 10 tools" to "Claude works with 1,000 tools."

Using Claude's integrations can reduce a product manager's morning routine from 30 minutes to just 5 minutes, significantly increasing efficiency. Estimated data.

Security and Permissions: How Claude Protects Your Data

Here's the question everyone should ask: if Claude can access Slack, read Figma files, and modify Asana timelines, what stops it from abusing that access?

Anthropol has built several layers of protection:

Explicit permission requests - Claude doesn't automatically perform actions. Before updating an Asana task, changing a Slack channel topic, or editing a Figma design, Claude asks for approval. You see what's about to happen and can say no.

Sandboxing - MCP connections run in isolated environments. Claude's access to your Slack workspace doesn't give it access to your file storage or email. Each integration operates independently.

API token management - Your credentials are handled by your organization's identity provider or directly through secure token storage. Anthropic itself never sees your Slack passwords or Figma tokens.

Audit trails - Every action Claude takes is logged. You can review exactly what Claude accessed and what it changed. Most enterprise customers have access to detailed audit dashboards.

Scope limitations - Integrations can be configured to limit Claude's access. You might give Claude permission to read Asana timelines but not delete projects. You might allow Slack message drafting but not channel deletion.

But here's the thing nobody wants to admit: this is new territory. The privacy implications of giving any AI assistant access to your team's entire communication history, design files, and project data is... worth thinking about.

For companies handling regulated data (healthcare, finance, legal), Anthropic's sandboxing and audit trails are necessary but not sufficient. You'll need to work with your legal and security teams to determine whether this is appropriate for your use case.

Comparing Claude's Integrations to Competing Approaches

Claude isn't alone in trying to solve the app fragmentation problem. Let's look at how the major players are approaching it:

Claude's MCP Apps vs. Chat GPT's Function Calling

OpenAI's function calling lets Chat GPT call external APIs and tools. You can build custom integrations, and OpenAI has published integrations with major platforms.

The difference: Chat GPT's results come back as data. Claude's come back as interactive UI.

With Chat GPT, if you ask it to update an Asana task, it might return: "Updated task 12345 in project Marketing. Due date set to January 15. Status changed to In Progress."

With Claude, you see the actual Asana board, with your task updated visually. You can edit it further without asking Claude to do it.

Claude's MCP Apps vs. Gemini's Native Integration

Google's Gemini integration into Workspace is deeply native. Gemini understands Gmail, Docs, Sheets, Calendar, and Meet because it's built right into those products.

The tradeoff: Gemini loses power outside Workspace. You want Gemini in Slack? It's not there natively. You want it in Figma? It doesn't integrate.

Claude goes the other direction. It's not native to any single platform, so it can integrate with many platforms equally.

Claude's MCP Apps vs. Zapier's Automation

Zapier automates workflows by connecting apps and running them on a schedule or trigger.

Claude's integrations are real-time and conversational. You're not waiting for a Zapier automation to run. You're asking Claude to do something and seeing it happen immediately.

Zapier is better for: scheduled reports, recurring tasks, multi-step workflows that don't require human judgment.

Claude is better for: interactive work, judgment calls, understanding context before acting.

Why This Matters: The Shift from Sidekick to Control Center

There's a philosophical shift happening here. For years, AI assistants have been sidekicks. You use them for help on the side. You're still the one doing the actual work in your tools.

Claude's integrations flip this script. Claude becomes the primary interface. The tools move to the background. You're no longer working in Slack, Asana, and Figma. You're working in Claude, and Claude manages Slack, Asana, and Figma on your behalf.

This matters because it changes how work gets organized. Instead of jumping between tools, you're having a conversation. Instead of clicking through interfaces, you're telling Claude what needs to happen and approving the results.

For teams, this could be transformative. A product manager, designer, and engineer can have a single Claude conversation where they:

1. Review project status from Asana
2. Look at design mockups in Figma
3. See analytics from the dashboard
4. Assign next steps
5. Send a summary to leadership via Slack

All without leaving the conversation. Everyone has access to the same data. Decisions are made collaboratively. The output is documented automatically.

Compare that to today's workflow: meetings about what happened in Asana, Slack conversations linking to Figma files, someone taking notes, someone else pulling analytics, and finally, someone writing a summary email.

One is obviously more efficient.

Claude offers extensive integrations across all plans, providing better value, especially for users needing multiple tool integrations. Estimated data for Claude Enterprise pricing.

Practical Implementation: How to Get Started

Setting up Claude's integrations is straightforward if your organization is ready, but there are prerequisites:

For individuals:

1. Upgrade to Claude Pro ($20/month) or Claude Team (organization pricing)
2. In Claude settings, navigate to Integrations or Connected Apps
3. Select the tool you want to connect (Slack, Asana, Figma, etc.)
4. Authenticate using OAuth (same process as connecting other apps)
5. Grant permissions (you'll see exactly what Claude can access)
6. Start using it immediately

For organizations:

1. Decide which tools to support (start with 2-3 most-used platforms)
2. Work with your IT/security team to review MCP sandboxing and audit capabilities
3. Configure integration scopes (what data Claude can access, what actions it can take)
4. Roll out to a pilot group first
5. Gather feedback, measure time savings, adjust scope if needed
6. Expand to broader organization

Most companies should expect a 2-4 week pilot before wider rollout. There will be edge cases where the integration doesn't handle something the way you expected. Your team needs time to understand what Claude can and can't do.

What Claude Can't Do (Yet)

It's important to be honest about limitations:

Mobile isn't supported yet. Claude's integrations work on web and desktop. Your mobile experience will be unchanged for now. This matters if your team works from phones a lot.

Complex workflows still need thinking. Claude can update a single task or draft a message, but multi-step workflows that require judgment across 10+ tools might still benefit from proper automation tools like Zapier.

Not every app is ready. Popular tools like Slack, Figma, and Asana are integrated. Niche tools you might use (internal dashboards, legacy systems, custom databases) might not be.

Claude still makes mistakes. It's better at understanding context than ever before, but it will occasionally misinterpret what you meant or take an action you didn't intend. Always review before approving.

Real-World Use Cases That Actually Work Today

Here's what teams are actually doing with these integrations right now:

Product teams: Checking sprint status, pulling analytics, drafting team updates

Design teams: Organizing Figma files, generating naming suggestions, creating handoff documents for engineering

Sales teams: Creating deals in CRM, summarizing customer conversations, sending follow-up messages

Marketing teams: Generating social copy, updating content calendars, scheduling announcements

Engineering teams: Creating tickets from bug reports, assigning tasks, leaving code review comments

HR teams: Creating onboarding documentation, sending welcome messages, setting up new employee channels

The common thread: all of these involve moving information between apps and doing it frequently. Claude saves time on every repetition.

Slack and Asana are estimated to be the most popular integrations with Claude's MCP Apps in 2025, reflecting their widespread use in communication and project management. (Estimated data)

The Broader Trend: AI as Operating System

Claude's integrations are part of a larger shift in how AI assistants will work. Over the next 1-2 years, expect to see:

More sophisticated tool understanding. Claude will learn not just how to perform actions, but which actions make sense in which contexts. It'll get better at catching your mistakes before they happen.

Predictive actions. Claude won't just wait for instructions. It'll anticipate what you need based on context. "I see three high-priority tasks assigned to you. Want me to update your status in Slack?"

Team-wide AI coordination. Multiple people asking Claude to do things simultaneously, with Claude understanding team context and preventing conflicts.

Custom integrations. Organizations will build custom MCP implementations for their internal tools, extending Claude to their entire software stack.

Cross-platform workflows. A single request will trigger actions across 5+ tools, with Claude managing the sequence and dependencies.

This is the vision Anthropic is pursuing. Not AI as a side tool. AI as your primary interface to work itself.

Potential Risks and Privacy Concerns

Let's address the elephant: giving AI systems direct access to your team's entire communication history, project data, and business files is a significant security decision.

Data exposure risk: If Claude's sandboxing is compromised, an attacker could access all connected systems. Anthropic says sandboxing is tight, but security is always an arms race.

Prompt injection attacks: Sophisticated attacks could potentially trick Claude into revealing information or taking unintended actions by embedding malicious instructions in Slack messages or Figma comments.

Behavioral changes: Teams might over-rely on Claude and lose the ability to do things manually. If Claude goes down, suddenly people can't navigate their own tools?

Job displacement concerns: Some roles (junior PMs, admin tasks, repetitive data entry) might become less necessary if Claude can handle them efficiently.

Compliance issues: Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, law) need to carefully audit whether storing AI conversation records about patient data, financial information, or legal matters meets compliance requirements.

Anthropol has thought about some of these. They haven't solved all of them. As an adopting organization, you need to think about them too.

Pricing and Accessibility

Claude's integrations are available across subscription tiers:

Claude Pro ($20/month) - All integrations included

Claude Team (Starts at $30/month per user for organizations) - All integrations included

Claude Enterprise (Custom pricing) - All integrations, plus custom MCP implementations and dedicated support

For comparison, Chat GPT Plus is also

Claude's integration ecosystem is more extensive, making it a better value if you use multiple tools.

How to Measure ROI When Implementing Claude

If you're considering rolling out Claude's integrations to your team, you'll want to track whether it's actually saving time.

Metrics to track:

1. Context switches per day - How many times are people manually navigating between apps? Measure this before and after Claude.

2. Time spent on integration tasks - How long does it take to update status across multiple systems? Track this weekly.

3. Task completion time - How long does it take to complete a typical task (sprint update, design feedback, status report)?

4. Meeting time reduction - Some teams might find they need fewer meetings to sync if Claude is handling information flow.

5. Error rates - Are mistakes happening less frequently because information is more centralized?

ROI formula:

For a team of 10 people saving 4 hours per week at $50/hour:

That's the case where Claude makes financial sense. Run the math for your organization before rolling out.

The Competitive Response: What OpenAI, Google, and Others Are Doing

Claude's move toward becoming a workspace operating system hasn't gone unnoticed.

OpenAI's response: Building more sophisticated function calling and planning capabilities into Chat GPT. Expanding GPTs and custom tool integrations. Rumors of a more Slack-like interface coming soon.

Google's response: Deepening Gemini integration into Workspace while expanding to third-party apps. Leveraging Gmail's existing centrality in knowledge work.

Microsoft: Copilot is getting tighter integration with Microsoft 365 (Outlook, Teams, Word, Excel) and Azure services. Microsoft's advantage is owning the entire enterprise stack.

Startups: Companies like Anthropic competitors are building specialized AI agents for specific workflows (sales, marketing, engineering) rather than general-purpose assistants.

The market is fragmenting. Claude is going for breadth (general assistant that works with everything). Others are going for depth (specialized agents that are great at one thing).

Both approaches have merit. Claude's bet is that you'd rather have one good tool that connects to everything than 5 specialized tools.

The Future: What's Coming Next

Based on Anthropic's public statements and industry trends, expect these developments in 2025:

Mobile integrations - Claude on iOS and Android will get access to the same tools as desktop.

Custom MCP implementations - More companies will publish MCP support, expanding beyond the current 10-15 major tools to 100+.

Agentic workflows - Claude will handle multi-step workflows without human intervention. "Generate the report, send it to the team, schedule a meeting if numbers are below target."

Offline capabilities - The ability to use Claude integrations without constant cloud connectivity.

Industry-specific versions - Claude optimized for healthcare, finance, law, and other regulated industries with built-in compliance.

Collaborative workspaces - Multiple team members in the same Claude session, seeing each other's actions in real-time.

The direction is clear: AI assistants are moving from sidekick to operating system. Claude's just ahead of the curve.

FAQ

What exactly are MCP Apps and how are they different from regular API integrations?

MCP Apps (Model Context Protocol Apps) are a standardized framework for connecting external tools to Claude. Unlike regular API integrations that require custom code for each connection, MCP uses a universal protocol. This means one integration framework can work with hundreds of tools. The key difference is that MCP results render as interactive UI inside Claude's chat, not as text summaries or links to external tools.

How does Claude's sandboxing prevent access to sensitive data I don't want shared?

Anthropic implements sandboxing at multiple levels. Each integration runs in an isolated environment, and API tokens are managed separately from Claude's processing. You can configure scopes for each integration (limiting what Claude can access and what actions it can perform). Every action is logged for audit purposes. However, you should always review which data each integration can access and configure permissions conservatively. For regulated data, coordinate with your legal and security teams.

Can Claude integrations work if my organization uses single sign-on (SSO) or has custom authentication?

Most major tools support OAuth, which works with SSO. If your organization uses custom authentication or legacy systems, the integration might not work out of the box. You may need your IT team to configure API tokens manually. For enterprise customers, Anthropic offers dedicated support for custom authentication scenarios, including building custom MCP implementations for internal tools.

What happens if Claude makes a mistake while updating something in Asana or Slack?

Claude requires explicit approval before performing any action. You'll see a preview of exactly what will happen before Claude does it. If you notice a mistake, you can reject the action. If a mistake happens anyway, you can ask Claude to undo it (most tools support this). Additionally, all actions are logged and can be audited. For critical operations, you might want to require two-person approval workflows.

Is there a way to limit Claude's access to certain apps or data within apps?

Yes. Integration scopes can be configured at the organization level. You might allow Claude to read Asana but not delete projects. You might allow Slack message drafting but not channel deletion. You can also choose not to connect certain tools at all. Anthropic's enterprise dashboard provides detailed controls for these permissions. Start with the minimum access Claude needs and expand only if necessary.

How does Claude's performance compare to manually using each tool?

For routine tasks (updating status, drafting messages, checking timelines), Claude is usually 5-10x faster because it eliminates navigation and context-switching. For complex decisions that require human judgment (strategic planning, creative work, exception handling), Claude supplements rather than replaces manual work. The time savings come from Claude handling the repetitive, low-judgment tasks, freeing your team to focus on higher-value work.

Are there any compliance or regulatory considerations I should know about?

Yes. If you work in regulated industries (healthcare, finance, law, government), you need to audit whether storing AI conversation records about sensitive data meets compliance requirements. HIPAA, FINRA, SEC rules, and similar regulations have specific requirements about data handling and storage. Anthropic has compliance certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001) but you should involve your legal team before enabling integrations with sensitive tools or data.

What tools are currently supported, and how often is this list updated?

As of early 2025, major tools include Slack, Figma, Asana, Jira, Notion, and analytics platforms. More tools are being added regularly as companies implement MCP. Since MCP is open-source, the ecosystem is growing independently of Anthropic's efforts. You can check Claude's integration marketplace for the current list and planned additions.

How does this compare to using Zapier or Make for automation?

Claude integrations are for real-time, interactive work in conversations. Zapier is better for scheduled automation and complex workflows that don't require human input. Use Zapier when you want: recurring tasks, trigger-based actions, multi-tool workflows without human judgment. Use Claude when you want: immediate results, human approval, conversational workflows, understanding context before acting. Many teams use both for different purposes.

What if I want Claude to integrate with internal tools or custom software my company built?

You can build custom MCP implementations. If your company has internal tools (custom dashboards, proprietary platforms, legacy systems), your engineering team can implement the MCP protocol for those tools. Anthropic provides documentation and example implementations. For enterprise customers, Anthropic's support team can assist with this process.

Why AI-Powered Automation Matters for Your Workflow

The landscape of work is fundamentally changing. Companies that traditionally built standalone tools are now thinking about how to integrate with AI assistants. Platforms like Runable are taking a different approach by offering AI-powered automation for creating presentations, documents, reports, and automating complex workflows directly. This shows how diverse AI automation is becoming.

Whether you choose Claude's conversational approach or explore other AI-powered automation tools like Runable, the core insight remains the same: AI working across your tools saves enormous amounts of time. The future isn't about mastering each individual application. It's about having intelligent systems that handle the coordination.

Conclusion: The Operating System Shift

We're at an inflection point. Claude's MCP integrations represent a fundamental shift in how work gets done. Instead of tools controlling your workflow, AI controls your tools.

Is this perfect? No. There are legitimate privacy concerns. Security needs ongoing attention. Mobile support is missing. Some edge cases don't work smoothly yet.

But the direction is undeniable. Work is moving from fragmented (you switching between 20 apps) to consolidated (one AI managing multiple apps on your behalf).

For teams that adopt this thoughtfully, the time savings are real. A product team that saves 4 hours weekly on context-switching and manual updates gains an extra 200+ hours per year for actual strategic work. Multiply that across a team of 10, and you're talking about 2,000+ hours annually that could go toward innovation instead of coordination.

The question isn't whether this becomes standard. It's when. And whether your team gets there first or plays catch-up.

If you're managing a team or trying to increase personal productivity, Claude's integrations are worth a serious evaluation. Even a modest time savings of 2-3 hours per week justifies the $20/month cost. And for organizations at scale, this could be transformative.

The control room model of work isn't theoretical anymore. It's here. How you adapt to it will determine whether you're more efficient or scrambling to keep up.

Key Takeaways

• Claude's MCP Apps let you manage Slack, Figma, Asana, and analytics dashboards directly in chat without tab-switching
• Knowledge workers waste 3-8 hours weekly on app context-switching, which Claude integrations can nearly eliminate
• The Model Context Protocol is open-source, meaning the ecosystem of connected tools will expand rapidly beyond current integrations
• ROI is typically 500-1000% for teams saving 4+ hours weekly, breaking even within 1-2 weeks of Claude subscription cost
• Privacy and security require careful configuration of integration scopes and audit trails before deploying across organizations

Related Articles

• Claude MCP Apps Integration: How AI Meets Slack, Figma & Canva [2025]
• Claude Cowork: Enterprise AI Infrastructure Beyond Chat [2025]
• How People Use ChatGPT: OpenAI's First User Study Analysis [2025]
• Google Calendar's Gemini Meeting Scheduler: Stop Wasting Hours Finding Available Times [2025]
• Claude Interactive Apps: Anthropic's Game-Changing Workplace Integration [2025]
• AI Coordination: The Next Frontier Beyond Chatbots [2025]