Ask Runable forDesign-Driven General AI AgentTry Runable For Free
Runable
Back to Blog
Technology & Gadgets32 min read

Rubik's WOWCube Review: Can Smart Technology Improve the Classic Puzzle? [2025]

The $399 Rubik's WOWCube brings AI, sensors, and games to the iconic puzzle. But does technology actually improve what made Rubik's Cubes great? Discover insigh

rubik's wowcubesmart puzzle toyselectronic gadgetsgaming devicespuzzle games+11 more
Rubik's WOWCube Review: Can Smart Technology Improve the Classic Puzzle? [2025]
Listen to Article
0:00
0:00
0:00

Rubik's WOWCube Review: Can Smart Technology Improve the Classic Puzzle? [2025]

Introduction: When Technology Meets Nostalgia

There's a peculiar tension in consumer tech that nobody talks about enough. Sometimes, the best products are the ones that do one thing and do it well. The original Rubik's Cube, invented in 1974 by Hungarian architect Ernő Rubik, cost about $10 in today's money and required nothing but human patience and problem-solving ability. It didn't need a battery. It didn't crash. It didn't demand software updates. And yet it captivated millions.

Now someone looked at that

10iconandasked:whatifweaddedprocessors,sensors,arechargeablebattery,screensavers,andacompanionapp?Theansweristhe<ahref="https://wowcube.com"target="blank"rel="noopener">RubiksWOWCube</a>,a10 icon and asked: what if we added processors, sensors, a rechargeable battery, screensavers, and a companion app? The answer is the <a href="https://wowcube.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Rubik's WOWCube</a>, a
399 reimagining of the puzzle that's part nostalgia play, part modern gadget, and entirely confusing in its purpose.

This isn't a straightforward product review. The WOWCube represents something bigger: the question of whether technology actually improves beloved products, or if sometimes it just complicates them. After spending weeks with the device, the answer is frustratingly mixed.

The WOWCube succeeds in some surprising ways. It genuinely makes the puzzle more accessible. The 2x2 grid is easier to solve than the traditional 3x3, which means casual players who've never conquered a standard Rubik's Cube can finally experience the satisfaction of a solved puzzle. The included games are clever and occasionally addictive. The Ladybug app, where you twist the cube to create paths for an animated bug, actually justifies the hardware in a way the puzzle itself doesn't.

But here's where it gets weird: owning the WOWCube requires commitment. You need to charge it regularly. You need to connect it to a smartphone app if you want new games. You need to understand gesture controls (double-knock to select, shake three times to exit) that feel more complex than simply turning the cube. It's a toy that demands attention, updates, and technical literacy. For a product that trades on the simplicity of the Rubik's Cube, that's a significant ask.

Over the next sections, we'll dig into what makes the WOWCube interesting, where it falters, and whether that $399 price tag makes any sense. We'll compare it to the original puzzle and explore whether this represents the future of physical toys or a cautionary tale about technology solving problems that didn't exist.

The verdict isn't simple. But the journey to understanding why is enlightening.

Introduction: When Technology Meets Nostalgia - visual representation
Introduction: When Technology Meets Nostalgia - visual representation

Comparison of WOWCube and Traditional Rubik's Cube
Comparison of WOWCube and Traditional Rubik's Cube

The WOWCube offers a 2x2 grid, costs

399,includesapproximately15games,andhaselectronicfeatures,unlikethetraditionalRubiksCubewhichispurelymechanicalwitha3x3gridandcostsaround399, includes approximately 15 games, and has electronic features, unlike the traditional Rubik's Cube which is purely mechanical with a 3x3 grid and costs around
10.

TL; DR

  • Accessibility wins: The 2x2 grid is far easier than the classic 3x3, making puzzle solving achievable for casual players
  • Games justify hardware: Apps like Ladybug and White Rabbit showcase why the smaller grid needed the electronics
  • Control complexity: Double-knock selections and shake-to-exit gestures feel unnecessarily complicated
  • Battery dependency: Unlike the original, you're tethered to a charging dock and software updates
  • Niche appeal: At $399, it's neither a serious puzzler's tool nor a casual toy, but something awkwardly in between
  • Bottom line: Impressive engineering, but asks whether technology should improve everything, or if some classics are better left alone

TL; DR - visual representation
TL; DR - visual representation

Price Comparison of Puzzle and Entertainment Options
Price Comparison of Puzzle and Entertainment Options

The WOWCube is significantly more expensive than traditional puzzle toys and comparable entertainment devices, highlighting its unique features as the primary justification for its price. Estimated data for board games and smart devices.

The Design Difference: Why 2x2 Instead of 3x3?

The WOWCube's most immediate difference from the original Rubik's Cube is structural. Instead of the standard 3x3 grid (54 colored squares), the WOWCube uses a 2x2 grid (24 squares). This isn't a cost-cutting measure, even though it might seem like one. This is an intentional engineering compromise driven by the device's electronic architecture.

Inside each of the eight modules that make up the cube, you'll find a separate PCB (printed circuit board), processor, gyroscope, and accelerometer. Think of it like putting a tiny computer inside each corner of the cube. This modular approach allows each section to track its own orientation and communicate with the others, creating the foundation for motion-sensing games and interactive apps.

A traditional 3x3 cube would require a central core mechanism, which the WOWCube design deliberately avoids. Adding a powered central hub would significantly increase the device's complexity, weight, and cost. It would also require more sophisticated power distribution. The engineers at Cubios made a trade-off: smaller grid, but one that's actually more suitable for the kinds of games and interactive experiences they wanted to enable.

This decision has serious implications for puzzle purists. Hardcore speedcubers won't touch the WOWCube. The reduced complexity means solving the device is significantly easier than solving a standard Rubik's Cube. A 2x2 cube has roughly 3.6 million possible configurations compared to 43 quintillion for a 3x3. That's an enormous gap. Someone who spent months mastering the original will solve the WOWCube in minutes.

For casual players, though, this is actually brilliant. The author of the original review had never solved a standard Rubik's Cube before testing the WOWCube, and the smaller grid made it feel achievable rather than frustrating. That's not a flaw in the product design. That's an expansion of the audience. The WOWCube recognizes that the vast majority of people who buy Rubik's Cubes never actually solve them. They spin it a few times, get frustrated, and put it on a shelf. The WOWCube offers a faster path to that satisfying "click" of a solved puzzle.

But it raises a question: is solving a 2x2 cube actually the same accomplishment? There's psychological research suggesting that perceived difficulty contributes significantly to the satisfaction of puzzle-solving. Make something too easy, and the victory feels hollow. The WOWCube walks a precarious line between accessible and trivializing.

QUICK TIP: If you're a casual player who's never solved a standard cube, the 2x2 grid is perfect. If you're already comfortable with 3x3 cubes, the WOWCube will feel disappointingly simple as a puzzle.

The Design Difference: Why 2x2 Instead of 3x3? - visual representation
The Design Difference: Why 2x2 Instead of 3x3? - visual representation

The Hardware: Eight Modules, One Complicated Cube

Let's talk about what's actually inside this thing, because it's both impressive and kind of ridiculous.

The WOWCube isn't a single solid object with one processor. It's a federation of eight smart modules. Each corner piece of the cube is essentially its own computing device. They communicate with each other via internal connections, sharing sensor data and synchronizing their LED screens.

This architecture means each module has its own power consumption. The gyroscope and accelerometer in each module allow the cube to detect how it's being tilted, twisted, and rotated. In theory, this creates incredibly granular motion detection. In practice, as the reviewer experienced, the tilting mechanism can be unreliable. Sometimes the image displays upside down. Sometimes the important information is on a face you're not looking at. The technical sophistication doesn't always translate to intuitive use.

The cube also includes eight speakers total. Not eight speakers per module, but eight speakers distributed across the device. They're plenty loud enough, which is good for the games but potentially annoying if you work in an open office or share a space with others. Volume control exists but requires navigating menus through the gesture-based interface.

Battery life is a practical limitation that the original Rubik's Cube never dealt with. Rubik's original design has no moving parts beyond the mechanics themselves. It never runs out of power because it has no power. The WOWCube requires regular charging via a proprietary dock. The exact battery life depends on usage, but count on needing to charge it every few days with moderate use. For a toy that's meant to sit on your desk or in a puzzle enthusiast's collection, this is a meaningful inconvenience.

The processing power inside is respectable but not state-of-the-art. The WOWCube isn't trying to run complex AI algorithms or process video streams. It needs to display graphics, detect motion, and run game logic. This is comparatively modest computing work, but it explains why the device performs reasonably well without requiring top-tier processors.

DID YOU KNOW: The original Rubik's Cube has zero electronic components and can theoretically last a lifetime with minimal maintenance. The WOWCube requires software updates, will eventually have battery degradation, and contains materials with specific lifespans.

The Hardware: Eight Modules, One Complicated Cube - visual representation
The Hardware: Eight Modules, One Complicated Cube - visual representation

Comparison: Original Rubik's Cube vs. WOWCube
Comparison: Original Rubik's Cube vs. WOWCube

The WOWCube offers more game variety but at a higher cost and tech dependency, while the original Rubik's Cube excels in simplicity and low maintenance. (Estimated data)

Gesture Controls: A Complexity Problem

Here's where the WOWCube's technology becomes frustrating rather than empowering. The device relies entirely on gesture controls instead of physical buttons or a touchscreen interface.

Want to open an app? Double-knock on the side of the cube.

Want to select something? Double-knock again.

Want to exit? Shake the cube three times.

On paper, this makes sense. The WOWCube is a cube, not a screen. Adding buttons would change its aesthetic and proportions. A gesture-based interface keeps it looking like a puzzle. In execution, it's maddening.

The problem is gesture recognition is imprecise. How hard do you knock? Where exactly on the cube's surface? Does a "shake" mean moving it back and forth, or rotating it? The device doesn't always interpret your intentions correctly. Sometimes you'll triple-knock thinking you're opening an app, only to have nothing happen. Other times, the accelerometer will misinterpret a normal hand movement as a shake command, unexpectedly closing whatever you were doing.

Combine this with the tilting interface for navigation, and basic tasks become surprisingly complicated. You might want to simply adjust the brightness. With a physical device, you'd press a button and watch the brightness change in real-time. With the WOWCube, you need to navigate menus using tilting gestures, select with a knock, and hope the sensors interpret your movements correctly.

There's a companion app for iOS and Android called WOWCube Connect that lets you customize some of these settings from your phone instead. This partially solves the problem but defeats the purpose of having a standalone device. Why not just use your phone if you need your phone to make the cube more usable?

The reviewer experienced actual bugs in the gesture recognition system. On a couple of occasions, the device became glitchy and some (but not all) of its screens inadvertently turned off. This suggests the software either needs refinement or the hardware isn't reliable enough to handle the gesture-based architecture consistently.

Physical buttons or a touch interface would be easier. The designers chose gesture controls for aesthetic reasons, but they sacrificed usability. That's a trade-off that doesn't clearly benefit the user.

QUICK TIP: If you decide to get a WOWCube, use the WOWCube Connect app to manage settings rather than relying entirely on gesture controls. It's frustrating enough that you'll want the backup option.

Gesture Controls: A Complexity Problem - visual representation
Gesture Controls: A Complexity Problem - visual representation

The Games: Where the Electronics Actually Shine

Now here's where the WOWCube actually justifies its $399 price tag. The games are clever, and the smaller 2x2 format makes sense for them in ways the traditional puzzle format doesn't.

White Rabbit is essentially Pac-Man with a twist. You control a character by tilting and twisting the cube. The cramped 2x2 grid creates interesting spatial puzzles as you navigate maze-like paths while avoiding enemies. The gesture control that's so frustrating for menus becomes genuinely useful for gameplay. Tilting the cube to move a character around feels intuitive because you're physically manipulating the game world.

Ladybug is perhaps the best example of a game that couldn't exist on a traditional Rubik's Cube. You twist the cube's faces to create paths for an animated ladybug to crawl along. It's simple mechanically but requires strategic thinking. The game leverages the cube's physical manipulability in ways that go far beyond simple input control. You're not just using the cube as an interface. You're using the cube's structure as the actual game space.

Pixel World takes a different approach entirely. It's a puzzle game similar to a Rubik's Cube but with visual elements. You're solving patterns and revealing images of global landmarks as you progress. The combination of spatial reasoning and visual rewards creates an engaging loop that goes beyond simply getting all colors to match.

The WOWCube also includes a 2048 implementation. If you've played the original 2048 game on your phone, you know the concept. You merge numbered tiles to create higher-numbered tiles. On the WOWCube, you control the merge direction by tilting and twisting, which actually adds an interesting physical dimension to what's normally a touchscreen game.

Space Invaders Cubed ($30 additional purchase) brings the classic arcade game to the cube. By rotating different faces, you control where shots are fired and how you defend against incoming enemies. It's a pay-to-play model that some users will find annoying, but the game itself is well-executed.

At the time of the original review, the WOWCube had 15 games total, with most available for free and some requiring payment. This library matters because these games are the actual draw beyond the novelty factor. Without them, you're just paying $399 for a slightly easier Rubik's Cube with a battery.

The question is whether a collection of games is worth the price and the complexity. For someone who loves puzzle games and doesn't mind the gesture interface learning curve, absolutely. For someone just seeking a fidget toy, the original Rubik's Cube ($10) probably satisfies their needs more easily.

DID YOU KNOW: The original 2048 game became a viral phenomenon in 2014 despite (or because of) its extreme simplicity. Adding physical controls to the same concept doesn't necessarily make it more fun, just different.

The Games: Where the Electronics Actually Shine - visual representation
The Games: Where the Electronics Actually Shine - visual representation

WOWCube vs. Traditional Puzzle Devices
WOWCube vs. Traditional Puzzle Devices

WOWCube excels in technical innovation but may fall short in cost-effectiveness and practicality compared to traditional puzzles. Estimated data.

The Widgets Paradox: A Smart Device That Isn't Very Smart

The WOWCube Connect app and the Widgets feature represent an attempt to turn the cube into a smart device. It can display time, temperature, and alerts from messaging apps. Sounds useful, right? A desk companion that keeps you informed without requiring you to check your phone.

Except it doesn't work very well. The smart widget functionality is genuinely limited. You can check the current time and temperature, but checking tomorrow's forecast is unavailable. You can see that you have a WhatsApp message waiting, but opening it requires your phone anyway.

Compare this to a smartwatch, which performs similar functions far more seamlessly. Or compare it to your phone's notification system, which is already integrated into a device you're using anyway. The WOWCube is trying to be a third device in your life, which means you need to physically pick it up, navigate menus with gestures, and interpret information displayed on a small cube surface that might not be facing the right direction.

There's potential here for future versions. An integrated alarm clock feature could be genuinely useful. Smart reminders tied to your calendar might actually streamline your workflow. Time-blocking capabilities for focus sessions could turn the WOWCube into a valuable productivity tool.

But in its current form, the smart features feel like an afterthought. They're proof that the WOWCube can do more than just games and puzzles, but they don't make a compelling case for why you should own one over your existing devices.

The privacy concerns are also worth noting. The reviewer couldn't use the WOWCube Connect app without agreeing to activity tracking. The company (Cubios) says they use this data to improve the device and understand usage patterns, but it's another friction point. The original Rubik's Cube collected zero personal data and required zero trust in a company's privacy practices.

QUICK TIP: Don't expect the WOWCube's smart features to replace your existing devices. They're supplements at best, complications at worst. Treat them as bonus functionality rather than core reasons to buy.

The Widgets Paradox: A Smart Device That Isn't Very Smart - visual representation
The Widgets Paradox: A Smart Device That Isn't Very Smart - visual representation

Reliability Issues: When Technology Fails

Electronics fail in ways that mechanical puzzles simply don't. The reviewer's device experienced glitches where some (but not all) of the cube's LED screens turned off unexpectedly. This isn't a user error issue. This is a hardware reliability problem.

In a traditional Rubik's Cube, there are very few failure modes. The internal mechanisms are mechanical. After 50 years of use, a Rubik's Cube might be stiff, but it will still function. The WOWCube, with its processors and accelerometers and LED arrays, has far more components that can fail.

The tilting mechanism also proved unreliable during testing. The sensors sometimes misinterpreted physical rotation, or the software didn't correctly process the accelerometer data. This is software-level issues, which means future updates might fix them. But out of the box, users should expect some inconsistency in how the device interprets physical manipulation.

On a couple of occasions, images displayed upside down. Important information was displayed on a face that was facing away from the user. This suggests the device's orientation tracking has issues, or the software doesn't account for how users will naturally hold the cube.

These aren't deal-breaker problems individually. They're niggling frustrations that accumulate. And they highlight the fundamental trade-off: mechanical puzzles are more reliable than electronic ones.

Reliability Issues: When Technology Fails - visual representation
Reliability Issues: When Technology Fails - visual representation

WOWCube Game Ratings
WOWCube Game Ratings

Ladybug scores the highest for innovation, leveraging the cube's structure uniquely. Estimated data.

The Companion App: Necessary or Invasive?

The WOWCube Connect app serves several functions. It lets you download new games to the device (via the charging dock's Wi-Fi connection). It lets you customize widgets, screensavers, and display brightness. It essentially turns your phone into a remote control for a device that already has gesture controls.

In theory, this is flexible. You don't need the app if you don't want it. Connect your WOWCube to your phone only when you want to update something, then disconnect. The device functions independently otherwise.

In practice, the companion app is somewhat necessary for optimal use. Managing settings through gesture controls is tedious. If you want new games, you need the app and the dock. If you want to customize how your cube behaves, the app makes it far easier than navigating on-device menus.

But here's the problem: you need to agree to activity tracking to use the app. The reviewer couldn't find a way around this privacy requirement. Activity tracking means Cubios gets data about how you use the device, which games you play, how long you use it, and likely behavioral patterns that inform their business intelligence.

For a $399 device that you own, not rent, having your usage tracked without an opt-out feels aggressive. You paid premium prices. You should have premium privacy, or at minimum, the choice not to be tracked.

The app also requires creating an account, which is another friction point. None of this would be necessary if you were just buying a puzzle toy. The fact that you need to create an account, agree to tracking, and install software to fully use your $399 purchase suggests the product is designed with cloud integration and data collection as features, not necessities.

DID YOU KNOW: Most consumer IoT devices collect far more user data than their manufacturers disclose. The WOWCube's transparency about activity tracking is actually better than many competitors, but that doesn't make it acceptable.

The Companion App: Necessary or Invasive? - visual representation
The Companion App: Necessary or Invasive? - visual representation

The Price Question: Is $399 Justified?

Let's be direct:

399isalotofmoneyforapuzzletoy.TheoriginalRubiksCubecostsabout399 is a lot of money for a puzzle toy. The original Rubik's Cube costs about
10. Even premium speed-cubes designed for competition routinely cost under $50.

What justifies a 40x price increase? The WOWCube's answer is: processor, sensors, LED screens, games, connectivity, and software updates. You're paying for active entertainment, not passive puzzle-solving.

But here's the thing. If you want puzzle games, you can get thousands of them on your phone or computer for free or a few dollars. If you want physical entertainment, you can buy multiple board games for $399. If you want a smart device for your desk, you could get a smart display, a wireless speaker, and a quality keyboard for that price.

The WOWCube is fighting against established alternatives that have already solved the problems it's trying to tackle. Your phone already has a perfect 2048 implementation. A smartwatch already displays time and temperature more conveniently. Countless games already provide the engagement the WOWCube offers, without requiring gesture recognition or charging.

The device makes sense primarily for people who want a novel, physically interactive toy that's different from anything else on the market. If you're that person, and $399 doesn't stretch your budget, it's a reasonable purchase. You're paying for uniqueness and the experience of something new.

For someone seeking a Rubik's Cube replacement or a budget-conscious puzzle enthusiast, it's wildly overpriced. The original Rubik's Cube does what it's designed to do with nothing but physics and geometry. The WOWCube does many things adequately. Sometimes fewer things done well beats more things done adequately, especially when those extra things require charging and software updates.

QUICK TIP: Before spending $399 on a WOWCube, honestly assess what you want from it. If it's a Rubik's Cube replacement, save your money. If it's a novel puzzle game device, evaluate whether the gesture interface and reliability issues are acceptable to you.

The Price Question: Is $399 Justified? - visual representation
The Price Question: Is $399 Justified? - visual representation

Lifespan Comparison: Rubik's Cube vs. WOWCube
Lifespan Comparison: Rubik's Cube vs. WOWCube

The Rubik's Cube offers a significantly longer lifespan of 50 years compared to the WOWCube's estimated 7 years, highlighting the environmental advantage of non-electronic toys. Estimated data.

Storage and Portability: Size Matters

One advantage of the original Rubik's Cube is its size and weight. You can throw it in a backpack, bring it on a trip, keep it on your desk without it taking up much space. The cube shape is inherently compact.

The WOWCube is similar in basic dimensions, but it comes with a charging dock. Unlike your Rubik's Cube, you can't just keep it on a shelf indefinitely. If you want to use it regularly, you need access to the dock. The dock plugs into a wall, so you're now committing a power outlet location and USB charging space.

If you're traveling, you need to bring the charging dock or risk running out of battery far from home. This adds weight and complexity to what would otherwise be a portable device.

The original Rubik's Cube went anywhere because it required nothing. The WOWCube requires infrastructure. That infrastructure is the price of admission for having electronics.

This matters if you're thinking about the WOWCube as a "pick it up when I want to fidget" toy. The friction of charging and syncing with your phone makes it less convenient than the original. It's more like owning a portable gaming device that demands maintenance rather than a timeless puzzle you can carry anywhere.

Storage and Portability: Size Matters - visual representation
Storage and Portability: Size Matters - visual representation

Comparison with Alternatives: What Else Could You Buy?

For $399, you have options.

Option 1: The Original Rubik's Cube ($10-30 premium versions) + Puzzles & Games

You could buy the original Rubik's Cube, multiple speed-cubes of varying difficulty, physical puzzle books, and thousands of dollars worth of games on your phone. You'd still spend under $100 and have more puzzle variety than the WOWCube.

Option 2: Smart Display Device ($199-399)

An Amazon Echo Show or similar device would give you far better smart home integration, Alexa voice control, video calling, and music streaming. The WOWCube's widget functionality looks primitive compared to what a dedicated smart device can do.

Option 3: Gaming Handheld ($299-399)

For roughly the same price, you could buy a Nintendo Switch or similar gaming device with hundreds of games in a library that dwarfs what the WOWCube offers. The gameplay experience would be superior because the interface is designed for gaming, not puzzle manipulation.

Option 4: Hybrid Puzzle Experience ($50-100)

You could buy several specialty physical puzzles (Pyraminx, Megaminx, 3D printed custom cubes) combined with subscriptions to puzzle game apps and digital puzzle courses. You'd have vastly more variety and could focus on what actually interests you.

The WOWCube competes across all these categories and loses to specialized alternatives in each one. It's trying to be a premium puzzle, a smart device, a gaming device, and a fidget toy simultaneously. Being adequately good at many things doesn't beat being excellent at one thing, especially at this price point.

Comparison with Alternatives: What Else Could You Buy? - visual representation
Comparison with Alternatives: What Else Could You Buy? - visual representation

The Environmental Story: Electronic Waste Concerns

This is worth addressing because it's often overlooked in gadget reviews. The original Rubik's Cube is made of plastic that will outlive you. It has no batteries, no processors, nothing electronic. Assuming it doesn't get lost, a Rubik's Cube bought today will function 50 years from now. It might be scratched, but it'll still solve.

The WOWCube? It has a battery. Lithium batteries degrade over time. After 5-7 years of regular use, you might find the battery no longer holds a charge. The processors might become obsolete. The company might stop supporting the device with software updates. What then?

You'll have a device that's difficult or impossible to repair. Replacing the battery likely requires cracking open the device, and there's no guarantee parts are available. This is the e-waste problem in concentrated form.

The original Rubik's Cube's longevity is actually an environmental advantage. Less stuff made, less stuff thrown away. The WOWCube's electronics come with an implicit planned obsolescence. The company makes money when you eventually buy the next version.

For environmentally conscious consumers, this is a significant consideration. You're paying $399 for a device that will likely have a 5-10 year lifespan rather than a 50+ year lifespan.

DID YOU KNOW: Electronic waste (e-waste) is the fastest-growing waste stream in developed countries. A single battery-powered toy might seem negligible, but the cumulative effect of millions of smart devices reaching end-of-life creates environmental costs that far exceed traditional manufacturing.

The Environmental Story: Electronic Waste Concerns - visual representation
The Environmental Story: Electronic Waste Concerns - visual representation

The Future of Smart Physical Toys: Where Does This Go?

The WOWCube is an interesting test case for a broader question: can smart technology improve physical toys, or does it just complicate them?

Historically, the best toys have the longest lives because they solve a specific problem elegantly. The Rubik's Cube solved spatial reasoning in a compact, memorable form. Lego solved creative building with interlocking bricks. Playing cards solved interactive entertainment with a deck of 52 possibilities. None of these required software or updates.

But technology companies are betting that physical toys plus sensors plus software plus connectivity equal something better. Sometimes they're right. Smart lighting enabled color-changing experiences that purely mechanical systems can't achieve. Bluetooth-enabled toys can coordinate and communicate in ways that simple mechanical toys can't.

The question is whether those advantages justify the complexity and maintenance overhead. For the WOWCube specifically, the games are genuinely clever and leverage the device's physical form in thoughtful ways. The smart features feel like an afterthought.

Future versions might find a better balance. Improved gesture recognition, better app integration, stronger reliability, and clearer value propositions could make the next generation of smart puzzle toys more compelling. Better battery technology might reduce charging friction. Open APIs could let users create their own games rather than waiting for official releases.

For now, the WOWCube occupies an awkward middle ground. It's too complicated to be a casual fidget toy, too limited to be a serious gaming device, too niche to be a practical smart home device. It's a novelty that happens to be well-engineered, but engineering quality doesn't automatically equal value.

The Future of Smart Physical Toys: Where Does This Go? - visual representation
The Future of Smart Physical Toys: Where Does This Go? - visual representation

User Experience in the Real World: Practical Concerns

All the specs and design philosophy don't matter if the device is painful to use in practice.

The gesture recognition is the biggest friction point. Casual users expecting something intuitive will be frustrated. Every interaction requires learning that double-knocking opens menus, that shaking three times exits, that tilting navigates. Compare this to the original Rubik's Cube, where you pick it up and instinctively know what to do. Manipulation is intuitive. The only learning curve is the puzzle logic itself.

The display orientation issues mentioned in the original review are concerning. Important information appearing on a face you're not looking at defeats the purpose of a display. This suggests the software either needs improvements or the device's orientation tracking is fundamentally flawed.

Battery management is another real-world friction point. You need to remember to charge it. You need to keep the charging dock accessible. For a gadget that's supposed to live on your desk or in your collection, this is an ongoing maintenance burden.

The app requirement for most functionality means you're not really buying a standalone device. You're buying a device that's dependent on a smartphone and cloud services. If the company shuts down Cubios, stops supporting the device, or discontinues the app, your WOWCube becomes a much less functional object.

These practical concerns accumulate into a meaningful difference in ownership experience compared to the original Rubik's Cube.

QUICK TIP: If you buy a WOWCube, budget for regular charging, expect a learning curve with gesture controls, and accept that it's a device that requires occasional maintenance and software interaction. If that sounds appealing, great. If it sounds like a burden, save your money.

User Experience in the Real World: Practical Concerns - visual representation
User Experience in the Real World: Practical Concerns - visual representation

The Verdict: Technology as Double-Edged Sword

The WOWCube is simultaneously impressive and frustrating. The engineering is genuinely clever. Eight independently intelligent modules creating a cohesive gaming and puzzle experience is technically accomplished. The games are creative and use the device's form factor thoughtfully. The accessibility improvements mean people who never solved a Rubik's Cube can actually achieve that now.

But the WOWCube also demonstrates the risks of adding technology where it's not strictly necessary. Every feature added is another potential failure point. Every convenience introduced creates a dependency. Every smart integration comes with privacy and data collection considerations.

For the right person—someone who loves puzzle games, doesn't mind gesture controls, and wants a novel device that's different from anything else on the market—the WOWCube is genuinely interesting. You're paying for innovation and a unique experience.

For everyone else, the original Rubik's Cube ($10) or a collection of specialty puzzles and gaming devices will serve your actual needs far better. Don't let impressive engineering fool you into paying for complexity you don't want.

The most important question to ask yourself isn't "is this technically impressive?" It's "will I actually use this regularly, and will the technology serve my usage patterns or get in the way?" Answer that honestly, and you'll know whether the WOWCube belongs in your life.


The Verdict: Technology as Double-Edged Sword - visual representation
The Verdict: Technology as Double-Edged Sword - visual representation

FAQ

What is the Rubik's WOWCube?

The Rubik's WOWCube is a smart, electronic version of the classic Rubik's Cube that costs $399. Instead of the traditional 3x3 grid, it features a 2x2 grid and includes built-in processors, sensors, LED screens, and games. It connects to a smartphone app for downloading new games and customizing settings, making it a hybrid puzzle and gaming device rather than a pure mechanical puzzle.

How is the WOWCube different from a traditional Rubik's Cube?

The WOWCube uses a smaller 2x2 grid instead of the standard 3x3, making it significantly easier to solve. It includes electronic components like processors, gyroscopes, and accelerometers in each of its eight modules, LED screens on all faces, built-in games, and a rechargeable battery. The original Rubik's Cube is purely mechanical, costs around $10, requires no charging, and has no software or apps.

Why did they use a 2x2 grid instead of 3x3?

The 2x2 format was chosen because each of the eight modules in the WOWCube contains its own processor and sensors. Adding a ninth central core piece (as a 3x3 cube requires) would significantly increase complexity, weight, power consumption, and manufacturing cost. The 2x2 design makes the games and motion-sensing features practical while avoiding the engineering nightmare of a powered central hub. This design choice actually makes sense for the kinds of games the WOWCube is designed to play, which leverage tilting and twisting in ways that benefit from the smaller grid format.

What games are available on the WOWCube?

The WOWCube includes approximately 15 games, with most available for free. Standout titles include White Rabbit (a maze game controlled by tilting and twisting), Ladybug (where you create paths for a virtual bug), Pixel World (visual puzzle-solving), a 2048 implementation, and the classic Rubik's Cube puzzle adapted to 2x2 scale. Some premium games like Space Invaders Cubed (

30)andSunnySideUp(30) and Sunny Side Up (
5) require additional purchases. The game library is expandable through the companion app, which downloads new games via the charging dock's Wi-Fi connection.

Is the gesture control system easy to use?

The gesture control system is one of the WOWCube's biggest weaknesses. Double-knocking opens menus, double-knocking again selects, and shaking three times exits an app. While this preserves the cube's aesthetic by avoiding physical buttons, users report inconsistent recognition, frequent misinterpretation, and an overall learning curve that makes basic tasks more complicated than necessary. Many users end up using the WOWCube Connect smartphone app to manage settings because the on-device gesture controls are so tedious.

How long does the WOWCube battery last and how do you charge it?

The WOWCube features a rechargeable battery that requires charging every few days with moderate use. It comes with a proprietary charging dock that plugs into a standard wall outlet, creating an infrastructure requirement that the original Rubik's Cube doesn't have. Unlike the mechanical original, which works indefinitely without power, the WOWCube is dependent on consistent access to electricity and becomes less functional the longer it sits without charging. This is a notable difference for travel or for using the device casually without planning around charging schedules.

What privacy concerns come with owning a WOWCube?

The WOWCube Connect app requires users to agree to activity tracking before using it. The company Cubios claims this data helps improve the device and understand usage patterns, but there's no opt-out option available in the current version. Since most of the device's functionality (downloading games, customizing settings) requires using the app, users effectively have to accept tracking to get full value from their $399 purchase. This data collection is one of several ways the WOWCube differs from the privacy-respecting simplicity of the original Rubik's Cube, which collects zero personal data and requires zero company interaction.

Is the WOWCube worth $399?

Whether the WOWCube justifies its

399pricedependsentirelyonwhatyouwantfromit.Ifyouwantanovel,physicallyinteractivegamingdevicethatsunlikeanythingelseonthemarket,andyoudontmindthegestureinterfaceorregularcharging,thenyes.IfyouwantaRubiksCubereplacement,apuzzlesolution,orasmartdeskdevice,yourebetterservedbyalternatives.Forcomparison,theoriginalRubiksCubecosts399 price depends entirely on what you want from it. If you want a novel, physically interactive gaming device that's unlike anything else on the market, and you don't mind the gesture interface or regular charging, then yes. If you want a Rubik's Cube replacement, a puzzle solution, or a smart desk device, you're better served by alternatives. For comparison, the original Rubik's Cube costs
10, gaming handhelds cost $300-400 with far more games, and dedicated smart displays offer better smart home integration. The WOWCube's value proposition is narrow: it's primarily for people who want its specific combination of features and are willing to pay for novelty.

How reliable is the WOWCube hardware?

The WOWCube is more prone to technical issues than the mechanical original. During testing, users reported glitches where some LED screens turned off unexpectedly, unreliable tilt detection that sometimes misinterpreted physical movements, and display orientation issues where important information appeared on faces the user wasn't looking at. These aren't universal problems, but they suggest the device needs either hardware refinement or software improvements. Mechanical failures are rare, but electronic systems with more components have exponentially more failure points than simple mechanical puzzles.

Can you use the WOWCube without the smartphone app?

The WOWCube can function independently without a smartphone app for basic gameplay and puzzle-solving. However, downloading new games requires using the WOWCube Connect app and the charging dock's Wi-Fi connection. Customizing widgets, screensavers, brightness settings, and other preferences is far easier through the app than through the on-device gesture interface. The original Rubik's Cube works perfectly without any technology connection, making it far more truly standalone than the WOWCube.

How long will the WOWCube last compared to a traditional Rubik's Cube?

A traditional Rubik's Cube made in the 1970s still functions today because it's purely mechanical. The WOWCube, like all battery-powered devices, has a limited lifespan. The lithium battery will degrade after 5-7 years of regular use. Processors and electronic components become obsolete. Software support eventually ends. Without access to replacement components or repair services, a WOWCube that's out of warranty will likely be difficult or impossible to fix. The original Rubik's Cube is essentially eternal, making the WOWCube a temporary product in comparison, which is an important environmental and value consideration.


FAQ - visual representation
FAQ - visual representation

Conclusion: The Lesson of the WOWCube

The Rubik's WOWCube teaches us something important about technology, progress, and the difference between novelty and improvement. Not everything benefits from being connected to the internet. Not every product is improved by adding sensors and processors. Sometimes, the reason a design has lasted 50 years is because it solved its problem so completely that adding complexity only introduces friction.

That said, the WOWCube isn't a failure. It's a technically impressive device that proves innovation is still possible in the puzzle game space. The games are creative. The engineering is clever. The accessibility improvements are genuine. For the right person, it's a worthwhile purchase.

But it's also a cautionary tale. It's a $399 product trying to be five things at once (Rubik's Cube, gaming device, smart display, fidget toy, novelty collectible) when it would have been stronger as one thing done exceptionally well. The gesture controls that seemed like a clever design choice during whiteboarding sessions became frustrating in actual use. The smart features that justified the electronics felt like afterthoughts. The battery requirement that enables the games also creates dependency on infrastructure and company support.

If you're evaluating whether the WOWCube belongs in your life, ask yourself: am I buying this because it solves a real problem I have, or because it's cool? The original Rubik's Cube sold billions of copies because it solved a problem—the desire for a physical puzzle with elegant design. The WOWCube is selling on novelty and features, not on solving a problem people didn't know they had.

For people who love physical puzzle games and don't mind complex interfaces, that novelty is enough. For everyone else, the original remains the superior choice. Sometimes the best technology is the technology that knows when to stay out of the way.

The WOWCube is undeniably impressive. It just might not be impressive for the reasons you actually care about.

Conclusion: The Lesson of the WOWCube - visual representation
Conclusion: The Lesson of the WOWCube - visual representation


Key Takeaways

  • The 2x2 grid makes the WOWCube dramatically easier than the 3x3 original (3.6M configurations vs. 43 quintillion), improving accessibility but reducing challenge
  • Eight independent smart modules with separate processors and sensors justify the smaller grid but explain why gesture controls are necessary and sometimes unreliable
  • Games like Ladybug and White Rabbit genuinely leverage the cube's physical form, but the smart features feel like afterthoughts to justify the $399 price
  • Gesture-based interface (double-knock to select, triple-shake to exit) sacrifices usability for aesthetics, making basic tasks unnecessarily complicated
  • Battery dependency and mandatory app tracking create infrastructure overhead that the mechanical original never required
  • At $399, the WOWCube costs 40 times more than the original but offers fewer compelling reasons to own it than alternatives like gaming handhelds or smart displays
  • Not every beloved product benefits from technology—sometimes simplicity is the feature, and the original Rubik's Cube is proof

Related Articles

Cut Costs with Runable

Cost savings are based on average monthly price per user for each app.

Which apps do you use?

Apps to replace

ChatGPTChatGPT
$20 / month
LovableLovable
$25 / month
Gamma AIGamma AI
$25 / month
HiggsFieldHiggsField
$49 / month
Leonardo AILeonardo AI
$12 / month
TOTAL$131 / month

Runable price = $9 / month

Saves $122 / month

Runable can save upto $1464 per year compared to the non-enterprise price of your apps.