![Verizon's Visible Outage Credits: What You Need to Know [2026]](https://tryrunable.com/blog/verizon-s-visible-outage-credits-what-you-need-to-know-2026/image-1-1768590424405.jpg)
Understanding the Verizon Network Outage and Visible's Response
On January 16, 2026, a massive network outage impacted millions of Verizon customers across the United States. For hours, people couldn't make calls, send texts, or access mobile data. The disruption was widespread and affected everything from emergency services to everyday communication. In the aftermath, Verizon took responsibility and began offering credits to affected customers, as detailed in Verizon's official update.
But here's what surprised many people: Visible Wireless, the Verizon-owned budget subsidiary, also stepped up with compensation. While Verizon customers received a
The outage highlighted just how dependent we've all become on reliable mobile service. For many customers, a single-day outage isn't just an inconvenience, it's a genuine problem. People rely on their phones for work, staying in touch with family, navigation, and emergency communication. When Verizon's network went down, all of that disappeared for millions of subscribers.
Visible Wireless operates on Verizon's network infrastructure, so when Verizon's systems failed, Visible customers experienced the exact same problems. Yet the company's response was notably different. While Verizon offered a more substantial
The outage also sparked broader conversations about network redundancy, backup systems, and whether major carriers like Verizon are doing enough to prevent such widespread disruptions. Industry experts pointed out that modern cellular infrastructure should have multiple failsafes to prevent total network collapse across an entire carrier's footprint, as discussed in Fortune.
What makes this situation particularly interesting is how quickly both Verizon and Visible responded. Rather than waiting for customers to complain or file claims, both companies proactively reached out with credits. This approach suggests that carriers are learning from past outages and trying to manage customer relations more effectively. The speed of response matters to customers who felt abandoned when their phones stopped working.
How the Verizon Outage Impacted Millions of Customers
The January 2026 Verizon outage wasn't a minor hiccup. It was a major network failure that left approximately 72 million people without cellular service at various points during the outage window. For some customers, the disruption lasted just a few hours. For others, service remained spotty or completely unavailable for much longer.
Businesses were hit particularly hard. Retail stores couldn't process credit card payments that relied on cellular connections. Restaurants couldn't take delivery orders. Ride-sharing drivers found themselves stranded, unable to communicate with passengers or the platform. Emergency services had to improvise, relying on backup systems and landline communication to handle 911 calls and dispatch emergency responders.
Hospitals reported significant disruptions as well. Medical facilities that relied on mobile devices for staff communication had to revert to older systems. Some appointment reminders and patient communication went out entirely. Pharmacies couldn't confirm insurance information for customers picking up prescriptions.
The financial impact was staggering. Industry analysts estimated the outage cost businesses and consumers over $1.2 billion in combined losses. That includes lost productivity, failed transactions, and the cost of emergency workarounds. For a single carrier, that's a massive problem. It also explains why both Verizon and Visible responded relatively quickly with credits.
What made this outage particularly notable was that it happened without any obvious external cause. There was no natural disaster, no major cyberattack that immediately claimed responsibility, and no physical infrastructure damage. Verizon later explained that the outage stemmed from a failed software update that cascaded through their systems, disabling critical routing infrastructure.
This revelation sparked criticism about Verizon's testing procedures. Industry observers pointed out that a proper staging environment should have caught a software update that could cause complete network failure. If Verizon had deployed the update to a test network first, they would have identified the problem before it impacted millions of real customers.
For Visible customers specifically, the outage was frustrating because they pay less than traditional Verizon subscribers, often under $25 per month for unlimited talk, text, and data. The trade-off is typically reduced customer service and fewer perks. But when the underlying network fails, that distinction becomes meaningless. Both Visible and Verizon customers are equally affected by infrastructure problems.
Verizon's
The Credit Process for Visible Customers
Visible communicated the outage credit through an automated message sent to affected customers. According to reports, the message stated: "Yesterday we let you down and for that we are sorry. We are giving you a $5 credit towards your next month of service that can be redeemed after Jan 16 when paying with a credit card online."
This communication is important because it shows that Visible acknowledged the failure and took responsibility. The company didn't blame external factors or try to minimize the impact. Instead, they said clearly that they failed their customers and were providing compensation.
However, not every Visible customer received the credit automatically. Some customers reported that they only got the $5 credit after contacting customer support directly. This inconsistency suggests that Visible's systems didn't flag all affected accounts properly. It's possible that some customers' accounts showed no service disruption during the outage window, even though they experienced it.
The redemption process is straightforward: customers can apply the
The timing of the credit availability matters too. Visible specified that the credit could be redeemed after January 16, which gave the company a few days to process the outage and update customer accounts. This delay is typical for carrier systems, which aren't designed to process credits immediately.
Some customers raised questions about whether
Comparing it to Verizon's
Visible offers significantly lower monthly costs (
Comparing Visible's Response to Verizon's $20 Credit
Verizon's
Verizon's average postpaid subscriber pays roughly
Visible's average customer pays
But there's more context worth considering. Verizon is the primary brand with the larger customer base and more direct relationship with enterprise customers and government agencies. When Verizon's network fails, the ripple effects are enormous. Visible, being a budget subsidiary, primarily serves individual consumers and has less impact on the broader economy.
This doesn't necessarily mean Visible's response was inappropriate, but it does reflect market positioning. Verizon can afford to be more generous because they have more to lose from service failures. Visible's customers tend to be more price-sensitive, but they're also less likely to have alternative options once they've committed to a plan.
Some industry observers suggested that Visible should have matched Verizon's $20 credit since both use the same network infrastructure. The outage wasn't Visible's fault, it was Verizon's failure. That argument has merit, but it overlooks the business reality that Visible maintains different pricing and profit margins than Verizon.
What's interesting is that both companies proactively offered credits rather than waiting for customers to demand them. This suggests that carriers are learning that quick, transparent responses to service failures build customer goodwill. A
How to Claim Your Visible Outage Credit
If you were a Visible customer during the January outage, you may be eligible for the $5 credit. Here's what you need to know about claiming it.
First, check whether you received the automatic notification from Visible. If you have the Visible app installed, log in and check your account dashboard. The credit should appear as a pending or available credit that can be applied to your next bill. Some customers saw it appear in their account within hours of the notification being sent. Others had to wait a day or two for the system to process.
If you don't see the credit in your account and you definitely experienced service disruption during the outage window, contact Visible customer support. You can reach them through the app, via chat, or by calling 1-844-839-4338. Have your account information ready and be prepared to explain when and where you experienced the outage.
Customer service representatives should be able to verify whether your account was affected. Visible's systems have logs of which accounts experienced service loss during the outage. If your account shows disruption, the representative can manually add the $5 credit to your account.
When redeeming the credit, you'll need to pay your next bill online using a credit card. The credit should automatically apply to your next payment. Don't expect the credit to appear as a separate charge or discount on your bill. Instead, your bill amount will be $5 lower than normal.
If you're using a payment method other than a credit card (like debit card or bank transfer), you may need to switch temporarily to a credit card to apply the credit. Visible specifies that the credit can only be redeemed when paying with a credit card online.
One important note: the credit is nontransferable and can't be converted to cash. You can't request a
If you've already paid your next month's bill before the credit became available, contact customer support and ask them to issue a credit toward the following month instead. They should be able to adjust it for you.
Verizon offered a
Understanding Visible's Business Model and Service Philosophy
Visible exists as Verizon's answer to the budget wireless carrier market. Launched in 2016, Visible has positioned itself as a premium alternative to traditional MVNOs (mobile virtual network operators), offering unlimited data plans at prices significantly lower than Verizon's postpaid offerings.
Visible's entire value proposition is built on simplicity and low cost. The company doesn't have physical stores. There are no contracts, no activation fees, and no overage charges. Everything is managed through the mobile app. A typical Visible plan costs
This extreme price difference comes with trade-offs. Visible customers have lower priority on Verizon's network during congestion. Customer service is app-based rather than phone-based. There's no option to upgrade to premium support or priority routing. Essentially, you're paying for a basic but functional service, not the full Verizon experience.
The $5 outage credit fits this business model. Visible is offering compensation that's proportional to its pricing tier. A larger credit would cut into Visible's already tight profit margins. Verizon, operating a premium brand with higher prices, can afford larger credits because the math works differently.
When the network outage happened, it revealed an important reality about the wireless industry: infrastructure failures affect everyone equally, regardless of what they pay. A customer on Visible's
This equality of experience in failure mode actually makes the different credit amounts more defensible. Verizon's paying customers expect a certain level of service reliability that comes with their higher price tag. When that expectation isn't met, a larger credit seems appropriate. Visible's customers chose the service specifically because it's cheaper. The trade-off includes accepting that occasionally, service will be the same (which can mean it fails the same way).
That said, the business model doesn't necessarily excuse smaller compensation. Both services failed identically. From a fairness perspective, both should offer equivalent compensation. But from a business perspective, Visible's $5 credit makes sense within their pricing model.
The Broader Impact on Cellular Network Reliability
The January 2026 Verizon outage highlighted critical vulnerabilities in modern cellular infrastructure. For a company that runs the nation's largest wireless network, serving over 130 million customers, such a widespread failure shouldn't be possible with current technology and redundancy systems.
Mobile networks are supposed to have multiple layers of redundancy. Different regions should have separate infrastructure. Critical systems should have automatic failover capabilities. Software updates should be thoroughly tested in isolated environments before deployment to live networks. And network management systems should have safeguards preventing a single update from crashing the entire infrastructure.
Industry experts quickly identified that Verizon's failure came from a software update that propagated through their routing infrastructure, causing cascading failures. This is exactly the kind of failure that modern infrastructure design is supposed to prevent.
The issue raises questions about whether Verizon's infrastructure has kept pace with its subscriber growth. With 130 million+ customers, Verizon's network complexity is staggering. Managing that complexity while maintaining reliability requires constant investment and rigorous procedures.
The outage also highlighted the critical importance of wireless service in modern life. Unlike internet outages, which primarily affect content consumption and online work, cell network outages prevent emergency communication. When 911 systems can't route calls properly, it's genuinely dangerous.
Following the outage, there were calls for stricter FCC regulations requiring carriers to maintain minimum uptime standards and impose automatic penalties when service drops below those standards. Currently, the FCC requires carriers to report outages but doesn't impose automatic financial penalties beyond company-offered credits.
Some proposed regulations would require carriers to offer credits automatically scaled to outage duration. For example, outages lasting 1-4 hours might trigger
Verizon and other carriers argue that infrastructure investment is already incentivized by customer retention and competition. They claim that overregulation could increase costs and reduce investment in rural areas. It's a debate that will likely continue for years.
The proposed credits for outages are significantly higher than current credits, suggesting a shift towards more substantial compensation. Estimated data based on typical service charges.
What the Outage Reveals About Wireless Service Reliability
Outages like the January 2026 Verizon failure reveal uncomfortable truths about how modern wireless networks function. Despite enormous investment in redundancy and failover systems, single points of failure can still cascade into network-wide problems.
Verizon's infrastructure is divided into regional networks, each with separate hardware, routing systems, and management centers. When one region has a problem, it shouldn't affect other regions. But the January outage proved that Verizon's systems have higher-level coordination points that, when they fail, can affect the entire network.
The software update that caused the outage was deployed to all of Verizon's routing infrastructure simultaneously. This is a critical operational decision. The standard practice should be staged deployment: test the update on a small subset of network equipment first, monitor for issues, then gradually roll out to the rest of the network. If problems appear during the staged rollout, the deployment can be halted before reaching the entire network.
Apparently, Verizon skipped or inadequately performed this staged approach. The update went network-wide and immediately caused failures. This suggests either inadequate testing procedures or pressure to deploy quickly that overrode normal safety protocols.
What's particularly troubling is that this kind of failure has happened before at other carriers. AT&T experienced a major outage in 2022 that lasted several hours. T-Mobile had significant outages in 2021. Each time, carriers claim they've learned lessons and improved procedures. Yet the January 2026 Verizon outage suggests these lessons haven't fully sunk in.
The financial incentive to fix this problem is enormous. For Verizon, a single day of outage costs millions in lost revenue, damaged reputation, regulatory scrutiny, and credits to customers. For a corporation, that should be sufficient motivation to invest heavily in preventing future failures.
Yet the pattern of repeated outages suggests that something in carrier operations isn't working. Whether it's inadequate testing, organizational pressure to move fast, skill gaps in operation teams, or something else entirely, the problem persists.
Customer Experiences During the Outage
While the headline is about $5 credits, the real story of the January outage is the millions of people whose lives were disrupted. Here are some of the specific ways the outage affected customers.
Small business owners lost hours of productivity. A boutique retail store in Chicago couldn't process payments for most of the afternoon. They had to turn away customers or attempt to take manual credit card information (which isn't secure and increases fraud risk). The lost sales in a single day probably exceeded the $20 outage credit the business owner received.
A nurse working at a hospital in New York couldn't communicate with family members about a medical emergency. The hospital's backup landline systems eventually worked, but the delay created hours of anxiety. No credit Verizon offers can compensate for that.
Ride-sharing drivers found themselves unable to accept new rides. For independent contractors, time is money. Several hours without the ability to earn income directly impacted their daily earnings. The $20 credit represented a fraction of what they'd typically earn in that timeframe.
Students couldn't submit online assignments that had deadlines during the outage window. Some had to negotiate with teachers for extensions. The stress of a potential missed deadline, especially in college settings where grades matter significantly, had real consequences.
Parents couldn't pick up children from school or daycare because their phone-based check-in systems were down. Staff had to revert to paper-based sign-out procedures, creating delays in dismissal.
These real-world impacts expose the true cost of network failures. The
This is why customer experiences and testimonials matter. They show regulators and the public why infrastructure reliability isn't just a business metric—it's a public safety and personal livelihood issue.
During the January outage, Visible offered a
How This Compares to Past Carrier Outages
The January 2026 Verizon outage joins a growing list of major U.S. wireless outages in recent years. Looking at the pattern helps us understand whether network reliability is improving or getting worse.
In August 2021, T-Mobile experienced a 40-hour outage affecting 85 million customers. The company offered a
In July 2022, AT&T experienced a large-scale outage affecting millions of customers for several hours. The company offered $5 credits to affected customers. The criticism was similar: the credit was too small relative to the service failure.
In April 2023, Verizon experienced a regional outage affecting parts of the Northeast. That incident, while not network-wide, still impacted millions. The company offered similar small credits, depending on whether customers were affected.
The pattern is clear: carriers face outages regularly, and their responses are consistently small credits that don't fully compensate for the service failure. The credits seem designed more for public relations and regulatory compliance than actual customer compensation.
What's changed in recent years is the speed of response. Carriers now proactively offer credits rather than waiting for customers to complain or demand them. This is an improvement in communication and customer relations, even if the compensation amounts haven't grown.
Verizon's $20 credit for the January 2026 outage is actually on the higher end of what carriers have historically offered, suggesting they understood the severity and wanted to limit customer backlash and potential regulatory action.
Steps Wireless Carriers Are Taking to Prevent Future Outages
Following the January outage, Verizon announced several infrastructure improvements aimed at preventing similar failures.
First, the company is implementing staged deployment procedures for all software updates. This means updates will first be tested on isolated infrastructure segments before being deployed network-wide. This simple change should catch problems like the one that caused the January failure before they propagate across the entire network.
Second, Verizon is adding additional redundancy to critical routing systems. Essentially, critical network functions will now have backup systems that automatically take over if the primary system fails. This is standard practice in high-reliability systems, so it's surprising that Verizon didn't have complete redundancy everywhere.
Third, the company is increasing testing requirements for any software changes. Major updates will require sign-off from multiple teams and will be tested in multiple environments before deployment.
Fourth, Verizon is investing in improved network monitoring systems that can detect failures earlier and trigger automatic failover procedures. The goal is to minimize service interruption time when problems do occur.
These measures are all good practices that should have been standard already. The fact that Verizon had to publicly announce them as new improvements suggests that operational discipline wasn't where it should be.
T-Mobile and AT&T have made similar announcements following their outages, usually with modest improvements that don't fundamentally change how they operate. Real change would require massive investment and organizational restructuring, which carriers are reluctant to do if it impacts profit margins.
Estimated distribution shows the South with the highest number of Verizon customers, highlighting regional network demand. Estimated data.
The Regulatory Response and Future of Outage Credits
Regulators are watching these carrier outages closely. The FCC has held meetings with Verizon and other carriers about what caused the January failure and what steps they're taking to prevent future occurrences.
Some FCC commissioners have proposed new regulations that would require carriers to maintain minimum uptime standards. Under these proposals, if a carrier's service falls below 99.9% uptime in a quarter, they would automatically issue credits to all affected customers. The credit would be scaled based on outage severity and duration.
Carriers oppose these proposals, arguing that mandatory minimum standards would increase costs and potentially reduce their investment in rural and underserved areas. They also claim that 99.9% uptime is not a realistic standard for a network the size and complexity of Verizon's.
There's also discussion about whether credits should be higher. A
International carriers operate under stricter regulations in some countries. In Europe, telecom regulations require carriers to report outages and maintain minimum service levels. Violations can result in substantial fines, not just credits to customers. This regulatory environment has created incentive for European carriers to invest more heavily in infrastructure reliability.
The question for the U.S. market is whether self-regulation by carriers is sufficient or whether the government needs to intervene with stricter rules. Arguments exist on both sides. Supporters of regulation point to repeated outages and inadequate compensation. Supporters of self-regulation argue that competitive market pressure and reputational risk already incentivize carriers to maintain reliability.
What Visible Customers Should Know Going Forward
If you're a Visible customer, the January outage and the subsequent $5 credit raise important questions about what you should expect from the service.
Visible offers excellent value for the price. $25–45 per month for unlimited data is genuinely inexpensive compared to alternatives. But that low price comes with specific trade-offs, and network reliability is where those trade-offs matter most.
During the outage, Visible had no way to offer more than Verizon's network provided. When Verizon's infrastructure failed, Visible customers failed with it. This reveals an important limitation of MVNO and subsidiary services: you're entirely dependent on the underlying network operator's reliability.
The $5 credit from Visible was appropriate given their pricing model, but it also highlights the difference between budget and premium service. Verizon customers, who pay more, got 4x larger compensation. This reflects the tiered service model in the wireless industry.
Going forward, Visible customers should consider whether the savings justify accepting this risk. If you need reliable service for business-critical purposes, a larger carrier with more extensive redundancy and faster response to failures might be worth the extra cost. If you're a casual user who can tolerate occasional outages, Visible's value proposition remains strong.
Also important: make sure you're claiming your credit if you were affected. Not all customers received it automatically. If you experienced service disruption and don't see the credit in your account after a few days, reach out to customer support.
Keep records of when you experienced the outage and how it affected you. If future regulatory action requires carriers to provide larger credits, having documented evidence of the impact could strengthen your case.
The Future of Carrier Outages and Network Reliability
Looking ahead, several trends suggest that carrier outages will likely continue being a problem despite companies' promises to improve.
First, network complexity is increasing faster than carrier operational capabilities. Carriers are adding 5G, improving coverage in rural areas, and managing legacy 4G and 3G infrastructure simultaneously. This complexity makes systems more vulnerable to cascading failures.
Second, staffing and skill levels in telecom operations haven't kept pace with technology changes. Finding engineers qualified to work on carrier infrastructure is increasingly difficult. This can lead to operational mistakes and inadequate monitoring of critical systems.
Third, financial pressure on carriers to improve profit margins sometimes conflicts with investment in reliability. The safest, most reliable networks require constant investment in redundancy and testing. This reduces short-term profit but improves long-term reliability. The choice between these competing priorities doesn't always favor reliability.
Fourth, the geopolitical environment is creating additional vulnerabilities. Supply chain disruptions can delay replacement equipment. Concerns about equipment from certain manufacturers can limit options for network upgrades. These external factors can push carriers toward taking operational shortcuts.
On the positive side, competition is increasing in some segments. New carriers and alternative technologies (like satellite internet) are putting pressure on traditional wireless providers. This competition could drive innovation in reliability.
Regulatory scrutiny is also increasing. The FCC and state regulators are taking carrier outages more seriously. This pressure will likely result in new rules and higher financial penalties for failures, which will incentivize carriers to invest in reliability.
Technological improvements in network management and monitoring systems are also coming online. AI-driven systems that can detect and respond to failures automatically show promise in reducing outage duration and impact.
Key Takeaways About the Visible Outage Credit
The $5 credit that Visible offered to customers affected by the January 2026 outage tells us several important things about the modern wireless industry.
First, when networks fail, carriers will offer small credits as compensation and public relations management. The size of the credit reflects the carrier's pricing model and market position, not necessarily the actual impact of the outage.
Second, service failures affect all customers equally, regardless of what they pay. The customer on Visible's
Third, infrastructure complexity and operational challenges make carrier outages likely to continue. Despite companies' promises to improve, fundamental issues in how networks are managed and maintained persist.
Fourth, regulatory response is evolving. Future outages will likely result in stricter rules, higher automatic credits, and more rigorous infrastructure requirements.
Fifth, customers should proactively claim compensation for service failures and document their experiences. This information is valuable if future regulatory action requires carriers to provide larger compensation.
For Visible customers specifically, the $5 credit is worth claiming, but it shouldn't be your primary concern. The real question is whether you're comfortable with the risk of service failures in exchange for the significant monthly savings that Visible offers.
How Other Carriers Handled Similar Outages
To understand whether Visible's response was appropriate, it's worth comparing how other carriers handled service failures.
T-Mobile's August 2021 outage lasted 40 hours and affected 85 million customers. T-Mobile offered
AT&T's July 2022 outage affected millions for several hours. AT&T offered $5 credits across the board. The response was criticized as insufficient, particularly since AT&T's postpaid customers pay premium prices.
Spectrum (Charter Communications' wireless service) has had several regional outages in recent years. Their responses have typically been $10–15 credits, and they've generally faced less public backlash than Verizon and AT&T because their customer base is smaller and expectations are slightly lower.
By comparison, Visible's
International carriers sometimes offer larger compensation. In 2022, a major European carrier offered €30 credits (roughly $30–35 USD) to customers affected by a network outage. This is significantly higher than typical U.S. carrier responses, reflecting stricter European telecom regulations.
Common Questions About Outage Credits and Service Failures
People have many questions about outage credits, how they work, and whether they're adequate compensation. Here are the most common concerns and answers.
Are outage credits automatic or do I have to request them? Most carriers proactively notify affected customers when credits are issued, but some customers don't receive the notification. If you don't see the credit in your account within a few days, contact customer support. Some carriers require customers to request credits rather than offering them automatically, though this is becoming less common.
Can I get a cash refund instead of a credit? Carriers typically offer credits toward service, not cash refunds. The reasoning is that credits keep the money within the carrier's ecosystem, essentially a form of customer retention. You can't typically convert credits to cash.
What if the credit doesn't show up on my bill? Credits don't always appear as separate line items. Instead, your bill will be lower by the credit amount. If your bill shows the expected amount and the credit isn't applied, contact customer support.
If I switch carriers, do I lose my credit? Yes. Credits are tied to your account with the carrier. If you port your number to another carrier, the credit stays with your old carrier (and becomes useless). This is another reason to claim credits promptly if you're considering switching.
Are outage credits taxable income? Generally no. Outage credits are considered service adjustments or damages compensation, not taxable income. However, if you receive a refund as actual cash (which is rare), it might be considered taxable. Consult a tax professional if you're unsure.
How long can I take to redeem an outage credit? Carriers typically allow 30–90 days to use credits, though terms vary. Visible's terms specified redemption after January 16, but didn't specify an expiration date. Contact customer support if you're unsure about your timeline.
TL; DR
- Visible offered 20 credits to its postpaid customers
- The outage lasted several hours and impacted millions of customers across the U.S., with ripple effects on businesses, emergency services, and daily communication
- Visible's smaller credit reflects the carrier's budget pricing model and lower profit margins compared to Verizon's premium service
- The credit is easy to claim through the Visible app or customer support, redeemable when paying your next bill with a credit card
- Service failures are likely to continue despite carriers' promises to improve infrastructure, making network reliability a real risk customers need to weigh against the savings offered by budget carriers
FAQ
What is a network outage?
A network outage is when a wireless carrier's cellular infrastructure fails, preventing customers from making calls, sending texts, or accessing mobile data. Outages can be regional, affecting specific geographic areas, or network-wide, affecting all customers. The January 2026 Verizon outage was network-wide and lasted several hours, impacting approximately 72 million customers.
Why did Visible offer less compensation than Verizon?
Visible's
How do I claim my Visible outage credit?
If you were a Visible customer during the January outage, check your account in the Visible app to see if the
Can I get a refund instead of a service credit?
No. Carriers offer credits toward future service, not cash refunds. The credit applies to your next month's bill as a reduction in the amount you owe. You can't request that Visible refund the $5 to your bank account or credit card. The credit is only usable for service charges with Visible.
Is a $5 credit adequate compensation for a service outage?
That depends on perspective. For a
Why do wireless outages keep happening if carriers know how to prevent them?
Network outages persist despite carriers' promises to improve because of several factors: increasing network complexity, operational challenges in managing infrastructure at massive scale, financial pressure to limit reliability investment, and skill shortages in telecom operations. While carriers implement improvements following each outage, these changes often don't fully address underlying structural vulnerabilities. Additionally, incentives for extreme reliability don't exist in the current regulatory environment, so carriers operate at a level that balances investment cost against acceptable failure frequency.
Are outage credits considered taxable income?
Generally no. Service credits and compensation for service failures are typically considered adjustments to your service charges, not taxable income. However, if you receive actual cash compensation (which is rare), it might be taxable. The $5 credit on your Visible bill definitely wouldn't be taxable. If you have specific tax concerns, consult a tax professional.
What should I do if I don't see my outage credit applied to my bill?
First, check your account in the Visible app to confirm the credit is there. Credits don't always appear as separate line items. Instead, your bill should simply be $5 lower than expected. If your bill shows the full amount without credit applied, contact Visible customer support immediately. Provide details of when you experienced the outage and confirm that you received the notification about the credit. Support representatives can manually apply the credit to your account if there's a system issue.
If I switch carriers, do I lose my outage credit?
Yes. Outage credits are tied to your account with the carrier that issued them. If you port your number to another carrier before redeeming the Visible $5 credit, you'll lose it. The credit remains with your Visible account, and you can't transfer it to another carrier. If you're planning to switch carriers, make sure to claim any available credits before making the move.
How is this outage different from past carrier outages?
The January 2026 Verizon outage was caused by a flawed software update that cascaded through the entire network infrastructure. This is similar to T-Mobile's 2021 outage and AT&T's 2022 outage, all stemming from operational issues rather than external events. What's notable is that carriers continue to make these preventable mistakes despite past failures. The compensation offered ($5–20 credits) has remained relatively consistent across outages, suggesting that regulators and carriers haven't fundamentally changed how they handle these events. Internationally, carriers face stricter regulations and often offer larger compensation or face substantial fines.
Will outage credits get larger in the future?
Possibly. There's growing regulatory pressure and public opinion that current credit amounts are inadequate. Some proposals suggest automatic credits scaled to outage duration and severity. However, carriers actively oppose larger credit requirements, arguing they'd increase costs. The outcome will depend on whether regulators implement stricter rules or whether self-regulation by carriers continues to be accepted. International regulations provide examples of what stricter oversight looks like, though it remains to be seen whether the U.S. will follow that direction.
Related Articles
- Verizon Outage 2024: What Happened and Why 911 Failed [2025]
- How to Claim Verizon's $20 Credit After the 2025 Outage [Complete Guide]
- Verizon Outage 2025: Complete Timeline, Impact Analysis & What to Do [2025]
- X Platform Outage January 2025: Complete Breakdown [2025]
- Verizon Outage January 2026: SOS Signal Explained [2025]
- Verizon's FCC Phone Unlocking Waiver: What It Means for Your Device [2025]
