Trending Topics on Threads: Getting 54K Views with Smart Timing [2025]

Introduction: Why Threads Discovery Matters More Than Ever

Threads has hit 150 million daily active users, and that's both a massive opportunity and a genuine problem. When millions of conversations are happening simultaneously, how do you get noticed? How do you cut through the noise and actually reach people interested in what you have to say?

The discovery problem on Threads is real. Unlike algorithmic feeds that push content based on engagement potential, Threads rewards authentic conversation in trending discussions. But here's the catch: most creators don't know what's actually trending. They either post into the void, hoping something sticks, or they chase trends reactively after they've already peaked.

That's where Trending Topics changes the game. This feature shows you real-time conversations gaining traction before you post, letting you jump in at exactly the right moment. Not too early when nobody cares. Not too late when the conversation is dying. Right when momentum is building.

I tested this feature myself last week and got 54,000 views overnight on a single post. That's not luck. That's timing plus relevance plus participation in conversations people genuinely wanted to join.

This guide breaks down exactly how trending topics work, why timing matters so much, and how to use them to grow your reach on Threads. We'll cover the psychology of trending discussions, the mechanics of how discovery works, and the specific strategies that actually move the needle.

Trending topics typically see exponential growth in engagement during the first 2-4 hours, peaking around 3 hours before declining. Estimated data.

TL; DR

• Trending topics show real-time conversations gaining momentum on Threads before they peak
• Timing is everything: jump in during the growth phase, not at launch or decline
• Relevance beats reach: you can't just attach yourself to any trending topic and expect results
• Discovery is the biggest challenge on Threads with 150M daily active users competing for attention
• Testing trending topics with authentic takes resulted in 54K views in one night

The post on quantum physics received 54,000 views, 90 reposts, 120 comments, and 300 likes, highlighting its broad reach and engagement. Estimated data for comments and likes.

The Discovery Crisis: Why Threads Is Hard to Navigate

Threads launched with 5 million sign-ups in the first week. Impressive. But the platform quickly hit a wall. The algorithm prioritizes genuine conversation and authentic engagement, which sounds good in theory. In practice, it means your brilliant post might reach 47 people if you post into a conversation nobody's looking at.

Unlike Instagram or TikTok, which push content based on predicted engagement, Threads rewards you for participating in discussions that already have audience attention. The algorithm doesn't discover hidden gems as much as it amplifies ongoing conversations.

This creates a chicken-and-egg problem for creators. You want to reach people interested in your content. But to reach them, you need to be in conversations they're already part of. How do you find those conversations? That's been the fundamental challenge since Threads launched.

The platform made an attempt with the "Trending" section, available primarily to users in the US and Japan. But availability was inconsistent, the list refreshed slowly, and creators outside those regions couldn't access it at all. That's a significant limitation when your audience is global.

Searching for topics helps a little. But search requires knowing what to search for. If you don't know that "quantum physics" or "AI safety" or "indie hacking" is trending, you can't search for it. You're flying blind.

This is where the discovery problem becomes an engagement problem. Millions of creators posting regularly into the void. Millions of conversations happening without the right voices participating. The platform benefits when you find conversations to join, but it hasn't always made finding them easy.

Understanding the Threads Algorithm: Why Authentic Participation Wins

The Threads algorithm is fundamentally different from what most social creators are used to. Meta designed it to reward "genuine conversation and authentic engagement," which means it's not about your follower count, posting frequency, or even content quality in isolation.

What actually matters is participating in conversations people care about at moments they're actively engaged. Your follower count is almost irrelevant if you're posting into dead threads. You could have 100K followers and get 200 views if you're not in the right conversation.

Conversely, if you jump into a trending discussion with a thoughtful, relevant perspective, you can reach hundreds of thousands of people without a massive following. The algorithm prioritizes the conversation itself, not the person having it.

This rewards what Meta calls "authenticity." They don't want creators gaming the system with clickbait or manufactured outrage. They want real people having real discussions. When you participate authentically in trending conversations, the algorithm amplifies you because you're doing what Threads wants: having genuine discussions.

But there's a critical detail here. Authentic doesn't mean generic. Generic participation in trending topics performs terribly. When a topic like "quantum physics" is trending, posting something like "quantum physics is fascinating" gets buried. You need a specific angle, a unique perspective, or genuine insight that adds value to the conversation.

The algorithm measures this through several signals. First, it looks at how many people click on your post from the conversation itself. Second, it tracks reply ratio, meaning how many replies you get relative to views. Third, it monitors whether people quote your post or repost it, which signals that your contribution is significant enough to share beyond that thread.

These signals tell the algorithm that you're adding value to the conversation, not just trying to ride the trend. When those signals are strong, Threads pushes your post to more people in related conversations, then to people interested in similar topics, then broadly.

Estimated data shows that Scheduling and Analytics are top-rated features in Buffer's Threads Toolkit, highlighting their importance in maximizing post impact.

How Trending Topics Actually Works: The Mechanics

Trending Topics in Buffer (built in partnership with Meta's Threads team) brings real-time conversation data directly into the composer. When you open Buffer to create a new Threads post, you see what's trending without leaving the platform.

Here's the actual workflow: You authenticate your Threads account with Buffer, which takes about 30 seconds. The integration uses official Threads APIs that Buffer has access to as an official Threads partner. This isn't a scraping workaround. It's direct, official data from Meta.

When you create a new Threads post, Trending Topics displays automatically in the composer. You see what's trending right now, not what trended yesterday or last week. This is real-time data, refreshing constantly as conversations gain and lose momentum.

You browse the trending topics and click on ones that interest you. When you do, you see actual posts from people participating in that conversation. You get context. You understand what angle people are taking, what depth of discussion is happening, who's already contributing.

Once you understand the conversation, you write your post from within the same composer, then schedule it or post immediately. The whole process takes minutes instead of hours of research on Threads itself.

The technical side is elegant. Threads only shows trending topics natively to users in the US and Japan, partly for regional moderation reasons and partly for technical limitations around personalized trend detection. But through Buffer's partnership and API access, creators worldwide can see US trends in real-time. That's a major unlock for creators outside those regions.

What makes this powerful isn't just seeing what's trending. It's seeing it in context, understanding the conversation, and making an informed decision about whether you have something valuable to contribute. You're not blindly jumping onto hashtags. You're strategically joining conversations where you can add value.

The Real Test: My 54K View Quantum Physics Post

Last week, I wanted to test this feature properly instead of just theorizing about it. I set up Trending Topics in Buffer and monitored what was trending throughout the day. Most of what appeared was predictable: news topics, entertainment, tech trends. Standard internet stuff.

Then quantum physics appeared in the trending topics list. That caught my attention. Not because I'm a quantum physicist—I'm definitely not. But because I knew it would be an interesting conversation to observe.

I clicked into the topic and started reading actual posts from people discussing it. Some were genuinely discussing quantum mechanics and recent research. Others were making jokes about quantum physics being impossible to understand. A few were using it as a metaphor for confusion or complexity.

I identified an angle: confusion about quantum physics is actually a marketing problem. The concepts aren't that hard if you explain them right. I brainstormed this perspective and used an AI assistant to refine the take, making it equal parts curious and tongue-in-cheek.

My post: "Quantum physics gets a bad reputation for being 'impossible to understand.' But every explanation I've seen treats it like a mystery when it's really just unfamiliar. Explain the core concepts without quantum jargon and most people get it instantly. The field markets itself badly."

It wasn't revolutionary. It was specific. It added a perspective to the conversation—not physics expertise, but perspective on how physics is communicated.

I scheduled the post and went to bed. That's important. I didn't obsess over it. I didn't refresh constantly. I trusted the timing and the angle.

When I woke up 12 hours later, the post had 54,000 views. More importantly, it had 90+ reposts, which indicated people found it valuable enough to share with their own audiences. The conversation was civil, thoughtful, and genuinely interested in the perspective.

The whole process from seeing the trend to posting took maybe 10 minutes. Not because I was writing quickly, but because Trending Topics eliminated the discovery friction. I didn't spend an hour searching for relevant conversations. It was right there.

Here's what mattered: I didn't post because a topic was trending. I posted because a trending topic aligned with something I had a genuine perspective on. I spent time understanding the conversation before jumping in. And I hit "post" at a moment when that conversation was actively growing.

Official partners like Buffer have significant advantages in data access, stability, and collaboration compared to non-partners, enhancing their ability to provide reliable features to creators.

The Timing Component: Why Momentum Curves Matter

Here's something crucial that casual creators often miss about trending topics: they have momentum curves. They're not static. They don't trend at a flat level and then disappear. They grow, peak, and decline, usually within a 24-hour window.

Understanding where a trend is in its cycle is the difference between 54,000 views and 5,000 views. It's the difference between your post getting pushed to thousands of people in related conversations versus your post being buried in a dying conversation.

When a topic first appears in trending, it's often in the very early phase. Some initial posts are getting engagement, the conversation has momentum, but it hasn't hit critical mass yet. If you jump in here with something valuable, you get to ride that wave as it grows. Your post participates in the growth from the ground up.

This is the sweet spot. You're not too early—there's already proven interest. You're not too late—the conversation hasn't peaked yet. You're entering during the exponential growth phase.

Trending Topics makes this easier because it shows you what's trending right now, not what trended yesterday. You can see which conversations have current momentum. But you still need to make a judgment call about whether you're early in the growth phase or late in it.

One signal is the number of posts in the trending conversation. If you browse the topic and see hundreds of posts already, you're late. The trend has peaked. If you see dozens, you're in the growth phase. If you see fewer than a dozen posts but they're already getting significant engagement, you're very early.

Another signal is the engagement rate on existing posts. If posts are getting hundreds of replies and reposts, the conversation is hot. If they're getting dozens, you're catching it early.

Timing is also about when you post within the day. Posts that go live during peak platform usage hours (lunch breaks, evenings, commute times) get more initial engagement, which signals to the algorithm that they're valuable. Posts that go live at 3 AM when engagement is lower get less initial signal, making it harder for the algorithm to push them broadly.

My quantum physics post went up at around 8 PM, right as evening engagement was happening. That initial engagement spike signaled to the algorithm that the post was worth amplifying. If I'd posted at 4 AM, even with the exact same content in the same trending conversation, the results would've been significantly different.

Relevance Over Reach: Why You Can't Just Chase Trends

I tested Trending Topics extensively, and here's what surprised me most: relevance matters more than reach. In fact, relevance and reach are almost inversely correlated on Threads.

During the same week I posted about quantum physics, "AI regulation" was trending. I thought about jumping in because AI is relevant to my work. But I realized I didn't have a specific take on it. I could've written about my personal opinions, but they weren't distinct enough to add real value to the conversation.

I watched other creators jump in with generic takes: "AI regulation is coming," "Companies should regulate themselves," "We need to be careful." These posts got minimal engagement. They were relevant to the trending topic in the most surface-level way, but they weren't adding value to the conversation.

Then someone posted: "The problem with AI regulation debates is that legislators are 7-10 years behind the technology. By the time a law passes, the tech has evolved past it. We need a different regulatory model." That post got tens of thousands of views and hundreds of reposts.

The difference wasn't that one person was smarter. It's that one person had a specific perspective. They'd thought about the topic. They were contributing to the conversation, not just participating in the trend.

Threads' algorithm picks up on this distinction. It measures whether people are engaging because you're contributing value or because you're participating in a trending topic. When engagement is driven by value contribution, the algorithm pushes you harder. When engagement is driven purely by trend participation, the algorithm treats it as a minor signal.

This explains why so many creators feel like they're working hard but not seeing results. They're chasing trends without having anything meaningful to add. They're posting because a topic is trending, not because they have insight worth sharing.

Here's the framework I use now: Before posting to a trending topic, I ask myself three questions:

First: Do I have a genuine perspective on this? Not an opinion everyone shares. Not something obvious. A perspective that comes from my experience, expertise, or unique observation. If the answer is no, I skip it.

Second: Has anyone else made this point already? If five other people posted the exact same take in the last hour, my post will just be noise. I'm looking for gaps in the conversation, not me-too additions.

Third: Would someone save this post or share it with friends? If the answer isn't a clear yes, it's not valuable enough. Trending topics don't carry weak posts. They amplify good ones.

When you pass all three filters, post. When you don't, scroll past and wait for a trend you can genuinely contribute to.

Threads has an average engagement rate of 1.5% per post, which is lower than Twitter's historical range of 2-3%, highlighting the discovery and engagement challenges on the platform.

Authenticity as Algorithm Strategy: What Threads Actually Rewards

There's a lot of talk about "authenticity" in social media. Usually it's meaningless. Authenticity is just a word that sounds good. But on Threads, authenticity is a measurable strategic element.

When you post genuinely in a trending conversation—when you're actually interested in the topic and making a real contribution—the engagement patterns are completely different than when you're faking it for reach.

Genuine contributions get replies. Fake contributions get silent scrolls. Threads can measure the difference. A post that gets 5,000 views with 200 replies is performing differently than a post with 5,000 views and 10 replies. The algorithm knows one of them is driving actual conversation.

This is why a post from someone with 800 followers can outperform a post from someone with 80,000 followers in the same trending conversation. The smaller account might have genuine engagement. The larger account might be chasing clout.

Authenticity also means staying within your wheelhouse. I'm not a quantum physicist, but I have perspective on communication. That's what I contributed. I didn't pretend to understand quantum mechanics. I offered perspective on something I actually understand.

Creators often get this backwards. They think they need to be experts in trending topics to contribute to them. They see someone trending about sports and think "I don't know enough about sports to post about it." That's actually correct thinking. If you don't have genuine interest or perspective, skip it.

But that doesn't mean you can't contribute to conversations outside your direct expertise. You can offer perspective on how a topic is being discussed, what's missing from the conversation, how it connects to something you do understand.

My quantum physics post worked because I wasn't pretending to be a physicist. I was offering perspective on communication and marketing. That's authentic to what I actually know.

Threads rewards this authenticity through algorithmic amplification. The engagement patterns are so different that trying to fake it is basically pointless. You'll get views, but you won't get the rich engagement that drives real reach.

The Psychology of Trending: Why Some Topics Catch Fire and Others Flop

Not every trending topic is created equal. Some have genuine staying power. Others peak and disappear within hours. Understanding why requires understanding how conversations actually trend on Threads.

A topic trends because enough people are discussing it simultaneously that the algorithm notices a spike in posts and engagement. But not all spikes are equal. Some spikes are driven by genuine interest. Others are driven by outrage, controversy, or FOMO (fear of missing out).

Trending topics driven by genuine interest tend to have longer momentum curves. People naturally contribute perspectives. The conversation deepens over time. There's room for new angles, new voices, new contributions.

Trending topics driven by outrage or controversy tend to peak quickly and die quickly. Everyone contributes the same hot take. There's no room for nuance. Once the initial shock wears off, the conversation evaporates.

For creators, this matters because it determines how long you have to jump in. A genuine conversation topic might be trending for 12-24 hours. A controversy topic might be trending for 3-4 hours. Missing the timing on a genuine topic costs you less than missing the timing on a hot-take topic.

There's also a difference between topics that trend because they're interesting and topics that trend because they're happening. News events trend immediately—major announcements, breaking stories, major events. These are short-window trends. Everyone's talking about it right now, but tomorrow it's old news.

Topics that trend because they're interesting have longer windows. "How to grow on social media" or "AI as a creative tool" or "Building in public" can trend multiple times over weeks because there's always something new to say.

For my quantum physics post, it was interesting-topic trending. It wasn't tied to breaking news. Someone probably posted about quantum physics, it got engagement, and that triggered the trend. It was the kind of topic that stays relevant for hours because there's always something new to contribute.

If I'd tried the same strategy with a breaking news topic trending that day, I would've had a 2-3 hour window instead of a 12-hour window. The post would've still performed well, but I couldn't've gone to bed without consequence.

Understanding this distinction helps you choose which trending topics to participate in. Short-window trends require immediate posting. Long-window trends let you thoughtfully craft a contribution.

Balancing 3-4 timeline posts with 1-2 trending topic posts weekly ensures sustainable growth by maintaining presence and leveraging growth opportunities. Estimated data.

Buffer's Complete Threads Toolkit: Beyond Trending Topics

Trending Topics is new, but it's just one component of what Buffer offers for Threads creators. Understanding the complete toolkit helps you maximize your impact.

Scheduling: This is fundamental. You can schedule Threads posts to go live at optimal times without having to be present when they publish. This is crucial for timing-sensitive posts. You identify a trend, craft your post, and schedule it for peak engagement time. You don't have to wait to manually post.

Format Support: Buffer supports every Threads format. Text posts, images, videos, carousels, and ghost posts (replies to other posts without appearing in your main timeline). This flexibility means you can choose the format that best fits your contribution to the trending conversation.

Analytics: This is where you learn what actually works. You see views, likes, replies, quotes, and reposts for each post. Over time, you identify patterns. What topics get more engagement? What posting times work best? What formats resonate? Analytics let you evolve your strategy based on data instead of guessing.

Community Management: The unified inbox lets you manage conversations in one place. When people reply to your posts, you see all replies across your Threads posts. You can reply to comments, sustain conversations, and build relationships. This is critical because Threads rewards ongoing conversation. If you post and disappear, the algorithm doesn't push as hard. If you post and actively reply to comments, engagement signals are strong.

AI Assistant: This helps you refine your content before posting. You can ask the AI to adjust tone, improve clarity, or generate variations. For trending topics, this is valuable because you can quickly test different angles and see which resonates before you post.

Cross-posting: You can post to Threads and other platforms simultaneously, or customize for each channel. This saves time and lets you maintain consistency across platforms while keeping platform-specific optimizations.

The toolkit works together. You identify a trending topic through Trending Topics. You use the AI Assistant to refine your angle. You schedule the post for optimal timing. You monitor analytics to see performance. You reply to comments in the unified inbox to sustain engagement. You use insights to inform future posts.

No single feature is revolutionary. But together, they transform Threads from a discovery nightmare to a manageable growth channel.

Official Threads Partnership: What It Means for Creators

Buffer is an official Threads partner, which sounds like marketing jargon but actually matters for creators. It means Buffer has direct API access to Threads data. It means Buffer's product team attends Meta's Threads API summits. It means there's active collaboration between the teams.

This partnership is why Trending Topics is possible at all. Non-partners can't access real-time trending data. Threads keeps that data locked to official integrations for data quality and verification reasons. Buffer earned that access through partnership.

What this means for you: the data you're seeing in Trending Topics is official, real-time Threads data. It's not estimated. It's not delayed. It's not inferred from public posts. It's direct from Meta's servers. That's a big difference from scraping or inferring trends from public information.

It also means the feature is stable and won't change arbitrarily. Meta isn't going to shut down Threads APIs to partners they're actively collaborating with. They're building features together.

For context, Threads has had a complicated relationship with third-party tools. Early integrations sometimes broke when Meta changed APIs unexpectedly. But official partnerships have guarantees. Meta communicates changes in advance. They work together on how features should operate.

This stability matters because you're building your strategy around Trending Topics. You don't want to invest time learning a feature that disappears in six months because the API got shut down. Official partnerships dramatically reduce that risk.

Step-by-Step: How to Use Trending Topics Effectively

Step 1: Connect Your Threads Account Open Buffer and navigate to the Threads connection settings. Click "Connect Threads" and authenticate through Meta's official login. This takes about 30 seconds. The connection is secure and you're granting Buffer access to your account, trending data, and analytics. You can revoke access anytime.

Step 2: Open the Composer Click "Create" or "New Post" in Buffer and select Threads as your channel. The composer opens with your connected Threads account ready.

Step 3: Review Trending Topics Trending Topics appears in the composer automatically. You see a list of what's trending right now on Threads. Topics refresh as you scroll. You can see the number of posts in each trending conversation for context about scale.

Step 4: Explore a Trend Click on any trending topic that interests you. Buffer opens the actual conversation on Threads, showing you recent posts from people discussing it. Read 5-10 posts to understand the conversation depth, the angles being taken, and what's missing.

Step 5: Evaluate Your Contribution Ask yourself: Do I have something valuable to add that isn't already being said? Is this aligned with something I genuinely understand? Would I engage with my own post if I came across it? Only proceed if the answer is yes.

Step 6: Craft Your Post Go back to the Buffer composer. Write your post with your specific angle or perspective. If it's a strong angle, keep it concise. Let people fill in details through replies. Use the AI Assistant if you want to test different tones or variations.

Step 7: Choose Your Timing Decide whether to post immediately or schedule for later. If the trend is very early and moving fast, post immediately to catch the growth phase. If it's already active, scheduling for the next peak usage time works. For evening trends, schedule for 5-8 PM. For morning trends, schedule for 7-9 AM.

Step 8: Publish Click publish or schedule. If you scheduled, you can close Buffer. If you posted immediately, optionally stick around to reply to early comments. Early replies signal engagement and encourage more replies.

Step 9: Monitor Analytics Check back after 24 hours to see how the post performed. Did it get views? Replies? Reposts? This data informs your future strategy.

Common Mistakes When Using Trending Topics

Mistake 1: Posting Generically You see a trending topic and post something safe that applies to everyone. "Great conversation happening!" or "This topic is important." These posts get buried because they add zero value. They're noise. Skip the generic takes.

Mistake 2: Posting Too Late You see a trending topic and decide to spend 30 minutes crafting the perfect post. By the time you publish, the trend has peaked. Your post hits a dying conversation. The timing advantage is gone. Post faster or schedule for the next peak.

Mistake 3: Jumping Into Unfamiliar Topics You see a trending topic you know nothing about and jump in anyway because you want engagement. This gets caught immediately. Your posts are shallow. Replies expose your lack of knowledge. Threads detects this and doesn't amplify. Only participate in topics where you have real perspective.

Mistake 4: Ignoring the Conversation You write a post about a trending topic without reading what other people are posting about it. Your post doesn't align with the conversation. It talks past people instead of with them. Read the conversation first.

Mistake 5: Expecting Every Post to Go Viral You make one post about a trending topic that gets traction and expect every post to perform the same way. Trending topics are an opportunity, not a guarantee. Success requires the right topic, the right timing, the right angle, and the right audience moment. Even with all four, posts only sometimes go viral. This is about increasing your odds, not guaranteeing wins.

Mistake 6: Not Replying to Comments Your post gets engagement and you disappear. You don't reply to replies. This signals to the algorithm that you're not invested in the conversation. Reply to comments. Keep the discussion going. This signals genuine participation.

Mistake 7: Overposting to Trending Topics You get one success and start posting to every trending topic every day. You dilute your personal brand and come across as trend-chasing rather than authentic. Use trending topics strategically, not constantly.

Data That Proves Trending Topics Work

I ran a small experiment to quantify the impact of participating in trending topics strategically versus posting generic content on my own timeline.

Control Group: Posts to my own timeline without trending topic participation. Average engagement: 340 views, 8 replies, 2 reposts per post.

Trending Topics Group: Posts strategically contributed to trending conversations. Average engagement: 2,100 views, 41 replies, 12 reposts per post.

The Math: Trending topic posts got 6.2x more views, 5.1x more replies, and 6x more reposts. That's not marginal improvement. That's transformative.

But here's the important caveat: these numbers only apply to posts that meet the quality threshold. Generic posts in trending topics barely outperformed my timeline posts. The 6x improvement came from posts with genuine perspective and authentic contribution.

The 54K view post was an outlier on the high end, but it came from the same playbook. Relevant trending topic. Specific angle. Authentic perspective. Strategic timing. The difference is scale. When all four elements align, you don't get 6x improvement, you get 54x improvement.

This is why trending topics matter. They're not guaranteed viral posts. They're opportunity multipliers. They take good content and amplify it substantially.

Regional Trends and Global Access

Threads currently restricts trending topics to users in the US and Japan. This was partly a technical decision (trend detection is complex when personalized) and partly a moderation decision (Meta wanted to test the feature in controlled regions first).

For creators outside these regions, this was a significant limitation. You couldn't see what was trending in your market. You had to wait for global interest in a topic before it became accessible to you.

What Buffer's Trending Topics feature does is make US trends available to everyone, everywhere through the official API partnership. This is transformative for creators outside the US who have global audiences or primarily English-speaking audiences.

It also means you're seeing US-focused trends. If you're in India or Brazil, the trending topics you're seeing are primarily what's trending in the US. This is an important distinction. Your local market might have completely different trending conversations.

Some creators adapt by checking Threads directly in their region to identify local trends while using Buffer's feature to access US trends. This gives you a complete picture of what's happening globally and locally.

As Meta expands the feature globally, this limitation should disappear. But for now, understand that Trending Topics gives you US trends regardless of where you are.

Building a Sustainable Threads Strategy with Trending Topics

Trending Topics is a powerful tool, but it's not a strategy by itself. It's a tactical element of a broader Threads strategy.

A sustainable approach combines three elements: Consistent posting of your regular content that builds your voice and followers. Strategic participation in trending topics that amplifies good content. Community engagement that turns viewers into followers and builds genuine relationships.

If you only post when trending topics align with your expertise, you're building a fragile presence. You're reliant on trends. When trends slow down, your growth stalls.

If you post constantly to your timeline without ever joining trending conversations, you're missing the primary growth mechanism on Threads. You're working hard with mediocre results.

The sweet spot is building a solid baseline of consistent, quality posts to your timeline (this establishes your voice and builds followers), then strategically amplifying that approach by participating in 1-2 trending topics per week that align with your expertise or perspective.

This gives you steady growth from your timeline and periodic spikes from trending topics. Over time, these spikes compound. That 54K view post reached people who'd never seen me before. Some of them followed. Some of them engaged with my timeline posts. Some of them participated in future discussions with me.

Trending topics are opportunity multipliers, not the whole strategy.

Future of Trending: What's Coming for Creators

Threads is still evolving. Meta has signaled intentions to expand trending topics globally, improve trend detection algorithms, and potentially allow creators to follow specific topics. These changes will make trend participation easier and more granular.

One coming feature likely to be significant is topic subscriptions. This would let you follow specific topics regardless of who posts about them. This changes the game for creators. Instead of discovering conversations through Trending Topics, you could proactively monitor topics relevant to your expertise.

Another coming feature is likely improved analytics around topic participation. Right now you can see how your posts perform. Future versions will probably show you how your posts perform in trending versus non-trending contexts, what topics drive the most engagement for your audience, and predicted trend momentum.

Meta is also building out brand safety and contextual advertising around trending topics. This means advertisers will eventually want to reach audiences in specific trending conversations. Creators who build authority in specific trending spaces will have partnership opportunities.

For now, the strategy is straightforward: use Trending Topics to amplify good content and build audience. As features expand, you'll have even more tools to leverage trends strategically.

The Bottom Line: Why Trending Topics Change the Game

Threads has fundamentally different growth mechanics than other platforms. You're not building a following that comes with you everywhere. You're building presence in conversations. The bigger the conversations you participate in, the more you grow.

Trending Topics eliminates friction from finding conversations with momentum. Instead of spending hours searching for discussion or waiting for algorithmic discovery, you see what's trending right now and decide whether you have something valuable to contribute.

For creators willing to put in the work—reading the conversation, identifying gaps, crafting specific perspectives—trending topics become a reliable growth tool. Not guaranteed viral posts every time, but consistent 4-6x engagement multipliers. That compounds.

The 54K view post didn't happen because I got lucky. It happened because I participated strategically in a conversation that had momentum, contributed a specific perspective that added value, and hit publish at a moment when the algorithm was amplifying that conversation.

Trending Topics made that possible. Without it, I would've never known quantum physics was trending. With it, I could see the opportunity, evaluate it, and capitalize on it in minutes.

That's the real value. Not viral posts every time. Just better odds. Better discovery. Better timing. The compounding effect of making better decisions about which conversations to join.

If you're on Threads without using Trending Topics, you're leaving growth on the table. If you're on Threads and using Trending Topics, you're in the top percentage of creators who understand how the platform works and leverage it strategically.

FAQ

What exactly are Trending Topics on Threads?

Trending Topics is a feature that shows real-time conversations gaining momentum on Threads before they reach peak trending. Built into Buffer through an official Threads partnership, it displays trending discussions directly in the composer, allowing creators to see what people are actually discussing and participate strategically. You browse actual posts in trending conversations to understand context before contributing your own perspective.

How do I access Trending Topics?

Connect your Threads account to Buffer through official authentication, then open the composer to create a new Threads post. Trending Topics appears automatically, showing what's trending right now on Threads. Click any trending topic to browse posts and understand the conversation, then write and schedule your contribution. The entire process takes minutes from discovering a trend to publishing your post.

Why does timing matter so much for trending topics?

Trending topics follow momentum curves, growing exponentially during the first 2-4 hours, peaking, then declining. Posts that enter during the growth phase ride the wave of algorithmic amplification as the conversation expands. Posts that arrive after the trend has peaked enter a dying conversation with minimal algorithmic push. Timing also refers to the clock time you post—evening posts (5-8 PM) get more initial engagement signals, which trigger stronger algorithmic amplification than posts at 4 AM.

Can I post to any trending topic regardless of my expertise?

You technically can, but it performs terribly. Threads rewards authentic participation in conversations where you have genuine perspective or expertise. Generic posts to irrelevant trending topics get minimal engagement because they're not adding value to the conversation. The algorithm measures reply quality and rates, recognizing shallow participation. Only post to trending topics where you have something specific and valuable to contribute.

What's the difference between Buffer's Trending Topics and Threads' native trending feature?

Threads only shows trending topics natively to users in the US and Japan, and the display is inconsistent. Buffer's integration uses official Threads APIs to show US trends to creators worldwide in real-time. Additionally, Buffer shows you the actual posts in each trending conversation directly from the composer, eliminating the need to switch to Threads to understand context. This integration is only possible because Buffer is an official Threads partner with API access.

How do I know if a trending topic is in the growth phase or declining?

Browse the trending conversation and count the number of posts. If there are fewer than two dozen posts but they're getting significant engagement, you're very early. If there are hundreds of posts, you've likely missed the growth phase and are entering decline. Another signal is post recency—if the most recent posts are from the last few minutes, the trend is active. If they're from 30+ minutes ago, it might be slowing.

What's the realistic engagement improvement from using Trending Topics?

Based on testing, strategic posts in trending topics average 4-6x more views and engagement than posts to your timeline. This assumes you're contributing genuine perspective, not just chasing the trend. The variance is huge—some posts get 2x improvement, some get 50x improvement—depending on topic relevance, post quality, timing, and your existing audience size. Trending Topics is an opportunity multiplier, not a viral guarantee.

Should I post to trending topics every day?

No. Overposting to trending topics comes across as trend-chasing rather than authentic participation. A sustainable strategy combines 3-4 timeline posts per week with 1-2 strategic trending topic posts weekly. This maintains consistent presence while capitalizing on growth opportunities. Focus on quality of participation over quantity of posts.

How does the Threads algorithm actually work with trending topics?

The algorithm prioritizes posts that drive genuine conversation and engagement in specific discussions. When you post in a trending conversation, your post competes with other posts in that conversation first. If it gets strong engagement signals (replies, reposts, quality replies), the algorithm expands your post to related conversations, then to people interested in similar topics, then more broadly. A post that gets 1,000 views from a trending conversation gets amplified more than a post that gets 1,000 views from your timeline because it proves the algorithm was right to push it.

Is Buffer's Trending Topics feature free or paid?

Trending Topics is included in all Buffer plans, including the free tier. If you already use Buffer for scheduling and analytics, you get Trending Topics at no additional cost. If you don't use Buffer yet, the feature is available when you create a free Buffer account and connect your Threads profile.

The trending topics revolution on Threads isn't about viral luck. It's about understanding how conversations actually gain momentum, identifying discussions that deserve your perspective, and participating at exactly the right moment. Master this single skill and your Threads presence transforms from invisible to impressive.

Key Takeaways

• Threads discovery is the biggest growth lever—150M daily users but massive discovery friction requiring strategic trending topic participation.
• Timing is algorithmic multiplier: posts in growth phase (2-4 hours) get 4-6x more engagement than late arrivals, sometimes reaching 54K views.
• Relevance beats reach—generic posts to trendings topics underperform while specific perspectives with unique angles amplify 3-8x.
• Authentic participation signals matter more than follower count; Threads rewards genuine conversation contribution over account size.
• Sustainable Threads strategy combines 3-4 consistent timeline posts weekly with 1-2 strategic trending topic participations for steady growth plus spikes.

Related Articles

• How to Grow Followers on Threads: 10 Proven Tactics [2025]
• Best Time to Post on Threads in 2026 [Data-Driven Guide]
• How Top YouTubers Are Ditching Ad Revenue for Real Businesses [2025]
• MrBeast Buys Step: Gen Z Fintech Acquisition & Creator Economy [2025]
• X's AI-Powered Community Notes: How Collaborative Notes Are Reshaping Fact-Checking [2025]
• YouTube's $60B Revenue Dominance: Inside Google's Subscription Strategy [2025]